If the last twelve years have told us anything, it is that the football authorities are far less interested in the actual sport, the processes of playing the game and maintaining fair competition, and totally devoted to the acquisition of the spare cash lying around in fans’ pockets.
The lies and contortions which went into attempting to save the dying Rangers Football Club, and the subsequent ridiculous proposition that the dead club had come to life again as the One True Rangers (despite two of them having actually participated in the same vote at the same time), and in fact had never died at all; we were only kidding etc etc. These were all targeted at the fantasist notion that the blue pound was a prerequisite for the success of the game.
But it was never about the turnover of Scottish Football as whole, rather the ringfencing of cash by those in charge of our top half-dozen clubs, whose boardrooms could easily serve secondary purposes as Tory Party committee rooms, populated by those who insist on conflating aspiration with acquisition.
Of course, it is not just Scotland that the malaise has visited. The inequitable distribution of wealth in society, grotesquely in favour of those at the top and in charge of the means of distributing information is mirrored in football all over Europe, where cash-rich clubs routinely pick up titles giving them access to even greater riches in European competition. Apart from England, where there may realistically be four or five challengers for their championship, there is hardly a top league in Europe where you can’t predict who will be on top of the pile come the end of the season. In short, European football is the land of the one, or two-horse race
It is curious therefore that national leagues remain the most important competitions to fans and TV companies, despite UEFA competitions being far and away more competitive.
One odd anomaly is that despite Scotland’s football leagues being the best attended in the world in terms of percentage of population, the TV and streaming cash available to our game is multiples less than the cash available in similar sized countries, for example in Scandinavian, Dutch and Belgian football. One would think that this stat alone would result in P45s being issued at Hampden, but ho-hum …
Leaving the last paragraph aside, the point I am arriving at (slowly, but hopefully steadily) is that the logical progression to the inequitable distribution of the game’s riches is a move away from national leagues to elite European and world competition. This is a move which takes participants in the game away from the roots of the sport itself, and distances the owners, the managements and the players even further from the fans. The relationship between fans and clubs, players in particular, is based on the belief that there is a common cause, a shared goal between them. Further evolution into the kind of sport I see in ten years time will I believe finally break that bond, and the beautiful game we grew up with, the wonderful shared joy (and pain) will be no more.
If they all buggered off and started new clubs with different names, like Glasgow Gorrillas, Edinburgh Hadyertees, Dundee Donkeys, that would be fine, but what they have all taken from us is our clubs’ histories and identities.
They knew that when Rangers died. Having that brand was not enough. They needed the history because they thought that was the effective way to monetise it. My own feeling is that it wasn’t necessary to pretend. The old club was gone anyway. Rangers fans would not have deserted the new Rangers playing in blue at Ibrox.
However the rest of our clubs are still here after a century and a half of serving their communities. Taking those histories, those traditions, and using them just to enrich the few is to mind appalling.
A sizeable section (though absolutely not all) of Rangers fans believe in the continuity myth, but like our government knows, having a compliant media allows the lie to peddled ad nauseam. Football has that compliant media to help grow it into something it was never intended to be.
My own view is that a more equitable formula for sharing gate, sponsorship and media monies is the only way forward if we are to get the game back to what it was intended to be. Not a view popular amongst fans of clubs based in Glasgow, Edinburgh and Aberdeen – and yet ironically, the real glory days of those clubs all took place when there was a more equitable distribution of cash in the game and where real competition was allowed to grow.
Like our country, now in the grip of neo-fascists who want to stifle freedoms and rights at their whim, football is in the grip of like-minded greed. In both cases, it’s probably too late to do anything positive.
Think there is movement behind the scenes to get rid of Bennets regime .
Was the GASL not pushing for American involvement not too long ago .
IIRC he blocked certain shareholders from voting funnily I thought some of them were guys he was recently looking to get into bed with to force Bennets hand
A plugin has broken the site for logged in users – unfortunately whilst I was on holiday. Now fixed and ready to resume the banter 🙂
Interesting season ahead. Looks like Celtic slipping back a bit, Hearts & Rangers about the same, Hibs in freefall, Aberdeen looking solid.
St Mirren and Killie also with a great start.
As I say, interesting …
I’m afraid the “edit comments” plugin was one of the rogue plugins causing the site to fall over, so that facility is gone for the time being.
I will be updating the site before Christmas. Give it a leaner, but more colourful look. At that time I will try to add some user-friendly functions.
Also considering a trial of allowing comments by non-registered members. Worn that t-shirt before of course but who knows 🙂
Had a reply from AIM Regulation, but haven’t been able to post it.
very quiet place these days. Is everything ok?
goodmorning
Good morning
My apologies folks. Over my extended break I thought I had fixed one problem but neglected another.
My focus over the next few weeks will be to change the look and functionality of the site. Meanwhile, be kind about the new blog 🙂
New travel stuff appears to have united everyone – so far 🙂
What is one to make of this ambivalently/ cowardly piece of ‘journalism’ in The Herald online today?
” Will Super Caley, like Queens Park, Morton, Dundee, Motherwell, Livingston, Dunfermline and Hearts in the past, survive and go ballistic once more?
Or are they doomed to suffer the same sorry fate as Clydebank, Airdrie, Gretna and Rangers or be forced to start over again?”
It’s clear that whoever wrote that is ignorant of the fact that Rangers of 1872 is within a few days of being struck off the Register of Companies having been Liquidated in 2012.
Rangers of 1872 did not ‘start over again!
The Rangers Football Cub Ltd was admitted as a new club for the first time when it was granted a place in a league recognised by the SFA in 2012 and was in virtue of that membership was granted membership of the SFA.
By no stretch of truth can TRFC be the selfsame RFC of 1872, whatever warped journalism might wish to be the case.
I said in my post of 21 August at 00.28 that I would post any reply that I received to my email to AIM Regulation ‘complaining’ about what I believe was the Nominated Adviser’s failure to notice that the ‘Prospectus’ issued by RIFC plc in 2012 was in my opinion misleading and ought to have corrected to show the truth.
This is the first opportunity I have had to post that reply. (I had said that I would post both the reply and the full text of my letter. On second thoughts, though, my email to AIM Regulation is a bit on the long side, and the general run of readers of the SFM know already know my view point so I won’t post it here.)
“AIM Regulation aimregulation@lseg.com
To:
(me)@yahoo.co.uk
Cc:
AIM Regulation
Fri, 25 Aug at 14:58
CORPORATE
Thank you for your further email…regarding Rangers International Football Club plc (the “Company”) outlining your concerns regarding: (i) information in the Company’s Prospectus dated 7 December 2012, prior to admission of the Company’s securities to AIM; and (ii) information in the Investor Information pages on the Company’s website.
AIM Regulation considers all enquiries relating to matters within our remit, which is compliance with the AIM Rules for Companies and AIM Rules for Nominated Advisers and takes action where appropriate. In this regard, please note that our remit does not extend to any current information on the Company’s website, noting that admission of the Company’s securities to AIM was cancelled in 2015.
As indicated, we can assure you that we consider all enquiries and investigate alleged breaches of our rules. However, you will appreciate that confidentiality is essential in maintaining the integrity of our work and, accordingly, please note we are unable to comment on individual enquiries.
Kind regards
AIM REGULATION ”
I can accept that “AIM Regulation” has no brief to look at an application by a Company to have its securities admitted to “AIM” because, of course, until it is admitted it is not a member company of “AIM”.
And I understand that a member company kicked out of “AIM” ceases to be a member.
But this leads to the absurd situation in which a Company could issue a misleading Prospectus, capitalising on the good name and market history of an entirely different company for a couple of years, and when it ceases (for reasons unconnected with its Prospectus) to be a member company of “AIM”, “AIM Regulation” can do nothing in respect of investigating whether their Prospectus was misleading!
I will make that point in my reply to “AIM Regulation” indicating that I will copy my original email and their reply to it, to the FCA, asking how it can be right that the in-house regulatory body can be so limited in its powers of regulation that it cannot investigate a complaint about a Prospectus!
After listening to pundits’ comments on football at the weekend (and before) , it seems that a foul is only committed if the players “claim” for one . When did that become a rule ?
Paddy malarkey
If that is the case I would point any of those uttering such to the penalty sevco 2012 got in the cup game v morton .
Picking up on your post BP. Couldn’t agree more especially the points about the value of competitive domestic leagues translating into European success and the weakening of the link between clubs and fans.
There was a fairly wide ranging article with Arsene Wenger in The Independent in his role as (from what I could figure out) global head of football development at FIFA. He talked a lot about transfer fees, rich v poor countries, developing players and tactical developments. But unless I missed it he didn’t once mention the fans.
Personally I would have a more equitable sharing of revenues (especially European incomes) on basis that European spots are awarded to the country. We could go out on a limb and do this as Scotland on basis that we believe it will strengthen the domestic league, improve all teams and lead to improved European results – this would be my preference.
wokingcelt
7th September 2023 at 21:56
‘…Personally I would have a more equitable sharing of revenues…’
+++++++++++++
Worth a wee read
https://scottishfootballmatters.org/2021/03/25/why-did-the-other-scottish-football-clubs-take-the-daft-decision-in-1980-that-the-old-firm-could-keep-all-their-home-gate-receipts/
We’re not to be demonised after all
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-66753478
paddy malarkey
8th September 2023 at 18:27
‘…We’re not to be demonised after all’
+++++++++
Well, I am no fan of Douglas Ross as being a politician whose politics are very, very different from mine [ note: I do not accept the creeping American bastardisation of our language, where even BBC England now uses ‘different to’, as do some asreholes on BBC Radio Scotland.} Things ‘differ from’ or are ‘similar to’ other things, ffs!]
But I agree with him on this issue!
I speak lightheartedly tonight, cheered by our victory in Cyprus.
Woking Celt
Auldheid is also a champion of equitable distribution of Euro cash. I think we need to be far more radical. The “culture” Scottish football favours the two big Glasgow clubs to such an extent that genuine competition was already difficult to achieve before gate-sharing was abandoned.
The retention of gate money makes that imbalance even more entrenched imo.
Of course it’s never gonna happen, but my view (which perhaps betrays my politics) is that money men have taken over our top clubs. They have zero interest in competition, and there is very little in terms of motivation that would incentivise them to look at improving the sport vs their bottom line.
Ultimately they will destroy the sport: nothing last forever after all, but I really feel that our gaze should be inward, and not jealously eye-ing the riches in European football.
Rather than touring the Ranger’s museum ( should that be Ranger’s 1 and Sevco Ranger’s 2 versions), would Mr. Beale not be better off taking a peek at the England training session on their training ground. According to most reports he may need some asisstance in gaining knowledge in tatics, etc. Showing the past glories of Rangers 1 and Rangers 2 is highly unlikley to spark an uptick in their fortunes on the field.
Well, all I can say is that we were absolutely utter rubbish tonight!
Well and truly gubbed.
Gubbed from kick-off.
Big punts up the field instead of clever close-work passing , always on the back foot in the first half: a small improvement after the substitutions not sustained ..
Honest to God, Scottish Football must have done something very bad, to be thus punished .
I wonder what that bad thing might have been?
Naw, we all know that Scottish Football is living a lie at its very heart
And hell mend it!
Not sure whether I’m blocked.The machine tells me I’m logged in to reply to one of my own posts so we’ll see.
vernallen 09/09 22.49
Further to your comment regarding Englands use of the facilities at the RTC, i’m sure you will agree that it was a great gesture by Gareth Southgate to put on another session at Hampden and invite 49,000 Scottish fans to attend.
Bravo Gareth, Bravo.
vernallen
11th September 2023 at 22:49
Rather than touring the Ranger’s museum………
////////////////////////////////////////////////////
For some reason, I keep reading that as Rangers’ mausoleum. Can’t think why.
Far removed from football matters and by way of light relief can I say that I have just been viewing the live transmission of the impeachment trial v the Attorney General of Texas, Paxton.
Interesting to see the less deferential attitude of the proceedings and note that the judge consulted his own legal team, sitting behind him, switching off his microphone as he did so!
Give me the Court of Session anytime.
Except, perhaps, when it comes to its body-swerving on the death of a football club!
And its careful brotherly readiness not to question the ridiculous notion that TRFC of 2012 foundation is RFC of 1872!
Honest to God.
Sometimes JC you have to tip your hat to the better team – the talent England have in their attack minded midfielders and forwards is several levels above us. And in Bellingham they have a World Player. Not comparing us to them, but we do not appear to be producing those types of players in Scotland at this time. Personally I would like to see Shankland given a chance and if Harvey Barnes can be convinced to join us that would be a boost. And I note that Spain had their youngest ever international player capped this last week – if Ben Doak is good enough then age shouldn’t be a barrier…
wokingcelt
15th September 2023 at 22:19
‘….Sometimes JC you have to tip your hat to the better team .’
+++++++
You’re right of course, wokingcelt. And I readily acknowledge the brilliant skills of Bellingham and one or two of the other England players.
But why where we so out of it in the first half? There seemed to be no self-belief, and a definite dysfunctionality as a team.
I’m not knowledgeable enough to even think of criticising Clarke, but there has to be a connection between the substitutions he made and the better functioning of the team thereafter. Why did he not see that a substitution might (ought to have?) been made earlier?
But being beaten by England in a meaningless sporting event (as opposed to a money-making opportunity for the Associations!) is neither here nor there, except in so far as it serves as a lesson in avoiding ‘hubris’!
But here’s to us, and wha’s like us!
Incidentally and by the way (and I imagine that not every reader of SFM is particularly interested) can I say that I have tonight sent an email to the Financial Conduct Authority forwarding the e-mail chain of my correspondence with AIM Regulation.
‘AIM Regulation’ (the in-house disciplinary body) told me that since the would-be plc (RIFC) was not a member company of AIM at the time, their remit gives them no power of investigation.
And that since RIFC ceased to be a member company of AIM a few years ago (because they had no replacement for the ‘nominated adviser’ who had resigned) they were unable to act!
My email to the FCA asks, basically, who the **** looks at the Prospectus issued by would-be PLCs to check the truth of what is said or implied?
Of course, me being me, my email is written in the most polite and civilised manner.
But it is a mucky, mucky world out there, the world of business. The FCA is not a government department. It is funded by the world of business!
It ultimately has to watch its step vis-a-vis the ‘world of business’.
And, as we know, the world of business doesn’t give a tuppenny damn about truth and morality!
As exampled by our own SFA and SPFL, in my opinion.
Honest to God!
What were they, what are they, like!
From Friday’s Rolls of Court :
LORD BRAID – R Hamilton, Clerk
Court 6 – Parliament House
Tuesday 19th September
Debate (2 days)
COS/CA6-23 Livingston Football Club Ltd v Neil Hogarth Blackwater Law Limited Shoosmiths LLP Traditional
COS/CA40-23 Neil Rankine v Livingston Football Club Ltd
Drummond Miller LLP Blackwater Law Limited
I don’t think I’ve even heard or read of this matter!
Can anyone carefully shed some light?
There will be jubilation in the stands at Ibrox , methinks .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scotland
Apologies if I’ve caused offence .
paddy malarkey above
One of the attractions of this site (unlike many other ‘partisan’ ones), is that folk like yourself are prepared to come on and admit when they feel they may have caused (even unintentionally) offence, and I think you’ve gracefully done that.
However, I have no doubt that there will be some glee amongst the more ‘rabid’ supporters (you get them everywhere to be fair) down Govan way – so don’t be too hard on yourself.
As a Celtic supporter I think the club has (belatedly) taken the right step with regard to the historic abuse cases. One can argue about strict legal liability but my take is one of perception and association. I have no idea how one begins to calculate compensation for such abuse and then allocate on the basis of what I believe the lawyers call “proportional liability”, but on completion of that process I would like my club to make a donation to a reputable charity that helps young people who have suffered abuse regardless of where the abuse took place. No doubt such abuse was more widespread and the damage caused less understood in the past – let’s support those who work to improve lives.
wokingcelt
21st September 2023 at 22:28
‘.One can argue about strict legal liability but my take is one of perception and association..’
++++++
I think I agree with you.
Any chancer claiming to set up a Celtic boys’ club would have been given short shrift (in my opinion) if the Celtic board had not been happy to allow him to do so,
It was a good idea at the time.
been supported and allowed to use that title by Celtic unless they were supportive of
my post 22.28 refers
made a pig’s ear of it accidentally pressing ‘send’ before I had finished and edited!
It seems to me that Celtic were happy enough to have someone run ‘boys’ club, using their name as if it was an actual part of Celtic plc (or the previous Celtic Football and Athletic Club).
They have, as seems to me, at least a vicarious liability, perhaps, in that while they may have benefited from having the ‘product’ of that boys’ club they appeared not to have checked it out in any way.
( Voice from the ether: you! shut your mouth about Res 12 and integrity)
John Clark
18th September 2023 at 22:36
From Friday’s Rolls of Court :
COS/CA6-23 Livingston Football Club Ltd v Neil Hogarth Blackwater Law Limited Shoosmiths LLP Traditional
COS/CA40-23 Neil Rankine v Livingston Football Club Ltd
Drummond Miller LLP Blackwater Law Limited
I don’t think I’ve even heard or read of this matter!
Can anyone carefully shed some light?
Possibly tied into : https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/former-livingston-fc-director-neil-26452277
Best regards
fitbawfan
22nd September 2023 at 19:14
‘….Possibly tied into : https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/former-livingston-fc-director-neil-26452277‘
+++++++
That’s extremely helpful, fitbawfan, and thank you.
I wish I had followed my first impulse which was to attend the hearing in person, but I was sure that I read that the business would be live-streamed. But when I read the info page on the website there was no ‘case code'(you need to quote the case code when you phone to get linked in)
That was for the Tuesday, and if there was a case-code for the Wednesday I wouldn’t in the event have been able to attend.
I’ll now try to find other earlier articles satisfy my curiosity!
Thanks again.
Hadn’t seen this posted but sorry if it’s a duplicate .
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/rangers-tycoon-david-grier-5m-31008144
paddy malarkey
23rd September 2023 at 12:27
‘..Hadn’t seen this posted but sorry if it’s a duplicate..’
+++++++++
I hadn’t seen that report, pm, not being a reader of such a Pinocchio of a ‘newspaper’ as the DR which can write garbage such as
“Detectives and prosecutors believed the law had been broken during the time the club was sold to now-disgraced wheeler dealer Craig Whyte”!
Honest to God! What are they liek, who cannot admit the plain, objective truth:
that it was Rangers Football Club of 1872 (and not some ‘holding company’) that was required to surrender its share in the SPL and ceased thereby to be a football club entitled to membership of the SFA
and that Charles Green did not buy Rangers Football Club of 1872: his band of footballers did not become a shareholder in the SPL but had to beg for a place in the SFL before it could even apply for membership of the SFA.
The good thing about Grier’s knock-back by the UK Supreme Court is that it saves us taxpayers having to shell out some more millions on account of the feckin balls-up made by our polis and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service!
We will never hear the full story of course-and I imagine that the SMSM has no interest in anything other than perpetuating the fiction that RFC of 1872 is simultaneously both alive and kicking in the SPFL and lying in Liquidation awaiting dissolution as soon as the Liquidators have signed off.
Not for the SMSM to seek truth that might be inconvenient and cost them loss of revenue!
I don’t think there is a journalist working in the SMSM who is a member of the ICIJ?
Re my post at 22.31 tonight, it’s my turn to apologise!
Of course Craig Whyte bought Rangers of 1872.
I am so determined on getting the SMSM to recognise that CG did NOT buy RFC 1872 that I got carried away!
[Mrs C and I were in Pitlochry yesterday to celebrate our 53rd wedding anniversary and take in a play at the Festival Theatre featuring Taggart actor John Michie. I bought ‘The Scotsman’ but never had time to read it, so I don’t know if they reported the Grier result. Came back down the road this evening, without the paper]
On the Boys’ Club thing, I think that Celtic are being a little disingenuous with regard to liability.
There is no question that the CBC was not officially part of the club, but neither is it reasonably in doubt that CBC was sanctioned and encouraged by the club.
If there are mitigating circumstances they would be the same for all institutions and individuals in the context of the times.
These were not matters that were discussed freely as they are now. It is understandable that folk swept it under the carpet in the hope that it would “go away”. I know of people who simply stopped their kids going back to play football at the CBC rather than make an issue out of it.
I was never involved in any of that kind of stuff back in the day, although there was always chat, which the 15 year-old me chose to classify as just gossip, and that leads me back to how the culture at that time made it difficult to speak out.
Having never been abused as a child, I can’t imagine what my reaction would have been, but I often think to myself how on earth I could have gone to either of my parents to tell them that a priest, or some other trusted pillar of society had made sexual advances. I think it would have been out of the question for me to do so.
We don’t live in those times any more, and instead of getting out from under the whole thing by admitting shortcomings, organisations (like the Catholic Church in particular) have compounded the felony by continuing to bury the truth, and in Celtic’s case to offer a flimsy “nothing to do wiv us guv!” proffer.
The difficulties faced by individuals which resulted in failing to acknowledge what went on in the 60s/70s are one thing, but they no longer apply. As a Celtic fan, I would much rather the club took responsibility for its part in the mess. They do have an historical sins of omission case to answer, but they most definitely have failed to properly face that fact.
The real problem for Celtic as an institution is not the financial liabilities they face as a consequence of court action, but the reputational damage that will surely follow if they fail to step up.
The FCA asked me to give them the name of the ‘nominated adviser’ who acted for RIFC plc in relation to the Prospectus issued by that company in 2012.
I replied giving the name of the firm [Cenkos Securities].
This is their reply:
“FCA – Individuals Inbox consumer.queries@fca.org.uk
To:
(me) @yahoo.co.uk Fri, 22 Sept at 12:16
Our ref: As before
Dear Mr ….,
Thanks for your further email and for providing the information requested. This additional information has been shared with my colleagues in the team that supervises the conduct of the NOMAD for their consideration.
Please be aware that as much of our work is covered by legal and policy restrictions, I won’t be able to provide feedback about how the information is used.
I hope this is helpful and thanks again for taking the time to send me this information.
Yours sincerely.
Nicci Grady
Supervisor / Supervision Hub
Supervision – Retail and Authorisations / Tel: 0207 066 1000
Financial Conduct Authority
12 Endeavour Square
London
E20 1JN
Tel: +44 (0)20 7066 1000
http://www.fca.org.uk.
+++++
I shall be writing again to the FCA to insist that I be told that there will at least be an investigation, even if ‘confidentiality’ rules out the possibility of me being told the outcome of such. [Interestingly enough, the FCA’s Annual Report 2022/23 itself does name a small number of the companies which they hit with penalties for breaches of one rule or another]
In my in-box today is an email from the ICIJ [ International Consortium of Investigative Journalists]
from which I give you this:
” Dozens of charges against Pinto — who is also the source behind ICIJ’s Luanda Leaks — were dropped due to a recent amnesty. He faces 377 charges in a separate case tied to the exposé that revealed the dark underbelly of the global football industry.
By Matei Rosca
September 11, 2023
Rui Pinto, the Portuguese whistleblower behind an unprecedented leak that rocked European football, was given a four-year suspended sentence by a Lisbon court after being convicted of nine crimes, including attempted extortion and unauthorized entry into computer systems.
The 34-year-old, who rose to global prominence after being revealed as the creator of the Football Leaks website, faced 90 charges but benefited from Portugal’s recent amnesty for some young offenders.
In addition to operating the Football Leaks website, Pinto also shared millions of confidential documents with journalists from Der Spiegel, European Investigative Collaborations and other outlets between 2015 and 2018. The files revealed how the world’s top football clubs, players and executives used extensive offshore networks to dodge taxes and avoid scrutiny of their business dealings.
The court decided Rui Pinto will be handed a single four-year sentence … but there is no need to serve the sentence in prison,” Judge Margarida Alves of the Lisbon Central Criminal Court said.
“The court hopes that the regret [Pinto has shown in court] is serious and that from now on he refrains from performing acts as described here.”
I love that phrase ‘the dark underbelly of the global football industry.’
‘global’ makes one think of FIFA, and of UEFA.
But of course, any constituent part of UEFA or FIFA might have a ‘dark underbelly’!
I suppose the ICIJ would not be interested in the smaller ‘dark underbelly’ of a small country’s national football association.
But maybe I’ll write to them on the point. Just to make a point!
I enjoyed reading this morning about the case mentioned at this link: [the case has nothing at all to do with football or IPO Prospectuses, but it is heartening to see that the FCA does take disciplinary action and can make the details public]
fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-takes-action-against-darren-reynolds-and-andrew-deeney-active-wealth-dishonest-pension-transfer
Hope this helps JC.
https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-takes-action-against-darren-reynolds-and-andrew-deeney-active-wealth-dishonest-pension-transfer
In my post on 27th September 2023 at 14.32 I said that I shall be writing again to the FCA to insist that I be told that there will at least be an investigation.’
I wrote today, and this is the text of my email
me@yahoo.co.uk>
To:
consumer.queries@fca.org.uk Fri, 29 Sept at 12:20
FAO: Nicci Grady
Dear Nicci Grady,
My apologies for breaking the email chain!
Many thanks for your letting me know that you have ‘shared the information’ with relevant colleagues.
While I perfectly understand the ‘confidentiality’ requirement as to the outcome of FCA investigations I expect that I may be told that there will be an investigation into my assertion that the Prospectus issued by RIFC plc in 2012 contained misleading information and that your colleagues do not simply bin the information provided without serious consideration.
Best regards,
JC’
I received an automatic acknowledgement of that email.
Will I get a human being’s response?
Will I write to my MP if I don’t?
Would he/she bother his/her ar.e if I did? At a time of political party conferences?
Me? Cynical?
Our print SMSM chaps and the cowardly folk at Pacific Quay have made me so.
I haven’t posted on TSFM for ages.
This article pretty much sums up my attempts to explain Scottish football to folk in Norwich.
I hope to be able to resume posting regularly soon and I’ve just added my latest contribution to ensure that the site can continue.
The Cat NR1
The Cat NR1
Good to her from you again my friend. Contribution also gratefully accepted 🙂
Been keeping the appeal low-key since we sent out the email, but it’s live on the site now👍
J
The Cat NR1
30th September 2023 at 00:0
‘..I haven’t posted on TSFM for ages…’
+++++++
Welcome back at an interesting time, with Beale of Rangers just havin been sacked ten minutes ago or so!
From wiki :
“Following the club’s liquidation in 2012, Davis exercised his rights under TUPE regulations to rescind his contract and become a free agent, returning to the Premier League with Southampton. During his later years with Southampton, he captained the side before returning to Rangers under manager Steven Gerrard in 2019.”
Aye, he deserted the sunken vessel and was legally free to do so because liquidation ended the very life and existence of RFC of 1872 as a football club belonging to a recognised football league and was therefore not entitled to continue in membership of the SFA.
So much so was that the case that the SFA insisted that SevcoScotland had to find some recognised league to give it a place, before it could even apply as a new club for membership of the SFA
Longmuir saw to it that the SFL provided a berth.
And then the SFA and the SPL/SFL decided to lie and pretend that Charie’s new club was RFC of 1872.
And the SMSM and BBC bought into that absurd piece of sporting nonsense..
Davis’ welcome back Ibrox is but another manifestation of the Board’s desperate need to keep propagating the lie that RFC of 1872 did not cease to exist.
From Jane Lewis BBC Scotland at 21.43 tonight:
“The new management team will take charge for the first time in their Europa League match against Aris Limassol on Thursday and with that in mind, we understand the club are happy that between the interim coaching staff they have the correct Uefa licence for managing/coaching in Europe”
Will the BBC check independently with UEFA any more than they checked anything else that RIFC plc/TRFC told them about the Res 12 matter?
The SMSM and BBC Scotland simply do not do any independent checking, but merely act as PR people broadcasting what they are told.
I suspect that there is not journalist among them that would not be spat upon by those journalists furth of Scotland who have been killed for seeking truth rather than parroting nonsense.
In the present instance RIFC plc my well be telling the truth. But surely the BBC should make a wee quiet enquiry of its own, given the buggering about that Hearts had to suffer!
From Jane Lewis BBC Scotland at 21.43 tonight:
“The new management team will take charge for the first time in their Europa League match against Aris Limassol on Thursday and with that in mind, we understand the club are happy that between the interim coaching staff they have the correct Uefa licence for managing/coaching in Europe”
Will the BBC check independently with UEFA any more than they checked anything else that RIFC plc/TRFC told them about the Res 12 matter?
The SMSM and BBC Scotland simply do not do any independent checking, but merely act as PR people broadcasting what they are told.
I suspect that there is not journalist among them that would not be spat upon by those journalists furth of Scotland who have been killed for seeking truth rather than parroting nonsense.
In the present instance RIFC plc my well be telling the truth. But surely the BBC should make a wee quiet enquiry of its own, given the buggering about that Hearts had to suffer!
Apologies if my post of 22.16 appeared twice! Usually the system tells one that one is repeating oneself, and stops one from doing so.
““The search process for the new manager is already underway”, says the RIFC plc/TRFC utterly amateurish ‘statement’ {who writes that rubbishy sh.te for them?].”
Will whoever had the final decision in making Beale the successful candidate for the job be soundly kicked in the ar.e for making an a.se of it?
And removed from any involvement in selecting the new manager?
Oh, for a recording of the Board’s discussions as they try to do what they so failed to do in their appointment of Beale!
Beale has my ordinary human sympathies, of course, and no harm to him from my point of view.
[ except maybe that he was no Walter Smith or Jock Stein in post-match press interviews but rabbited on in Southgate PR talk that made me focus on the mole on his cheek]
John C:
I’m not so sure that there’s a great deal of blame to be attached to the whoever recruited Beale. Contemporary – if anecdotal – evidence throughout the Gerrard regime and beyond suggested that Beale was the tactical and coaching muscle of that team. Probably wasn’t a huge leap to get him onside – especially after his successful start to the job at Loftus Road.
Of course there was a complete absence of dignity and decency in the way he undermined GVB, but I suppose football is a ruthless sport. I know of one former Celtic player who became a successful manager and was ‘tapped up’ by the Celtic board. He sent them away with a flea in their ear because he wouldn’t talk to them unless the man in post knew about it – and he knew the man in post didn’t know a thing.
Of course it’s a jungle out there and the wheels would grind to a halt if continuity planning was disallowed, but the public manner in which Beale did for GVB was poor.
Who knows though, why the successful coach has failed as a manager?
My own feeling is that it is a lottery. Trouble is, reducing the odds is expensive. With a Rogers type, you know exactly what you are getting – but that costs. In the world that most Scottish clubs inhabit, those types are unaffordable.
Our old friend David Low has been banging a drum for years on his strategy at any football club. “Get the best manager you can afford and budget on the playing staff”, he has told me so many times I can finish the sentence for him; “a good manager can make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear, but a poor manager will make a sow’s ear out a silk purse”.
Maybe he’s is correct, but that’s not what football fans want to see or hear from their clubs. Time will tell whether The New Rangers have given themselves enough financial headroom to go with the Low formula. Given the fact that their playing staff salary bill is greater than that of Celtic, I suspect not. But we seldom really know the full financial picture. Too many people have been predicting financial meltdown for the Ibrox club for far too long. But they always seem to be able to find cash when it is needed.
Not quite agreeing with you here BP. As a manager Beale was pretty much untested (his record at QPR was fast start then downhill). Demanding clubs tend not to be a good place to serve your apprenticeship.
I would agree go for the best manager you can afford as this will give a better return than splurging on a superstar player.
What lessons will be learned by the board of TRFC I have no idea and I agree, where they are financially who knows. The big question as always for me is whether we are are realistic with Scottish football’s place in the world (typed as I watch a terrific match between Napoli and Real Madrid)
Looks like David Grier is a persistent fellow:
From today’s Rolls of Court of Session:
” INNER HOUSE ROLLS
FIRST DIVISION
Friday 13th October
Single Bill
CA86/19 Reclaiming Motion (Lord Tyre) David Grier v The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland.
+++
As far as I understand these things, this is Grier’s appeal against Lord Tyre’s decision of 11th January 2022 that he was not ‘maliciously prosecuted’ by Police Scotland.
I wonder whether, if he loses this appeal, he will appeal to the UK Supreme Court [as he did when he lost his appeal to the Court of Session against Lord Tyre’s decision in relation to his claim that the Lord Advocate’s prosecution was ‘malicious’]
As a matter of idle curiosity, does anyone know whether the police officers who were criticised by Lord Tyre are still in the police service? Or for that matter, was anyone in the COPFS called to account for what seemed to me to have been an absolutely farcical balls-up of a ‘prosecution’ even if it was not ‘malicious’?
I sympathised with Lord Bannatyne in his frequent frustrated expostulations :”Mr Deputy-Advocate… I was promised a copy of…’ and ‘which copy of the indictment is the current one?’
[The ‘indictment’ of the ‘accused’ went through several amendments and I sat there wondering at the sheer incompetence of the COPFS, back in the day!]
I daresay someone one day will write a best-seller follow-up to PmcG’s ” Downfall”.
A follow-up in which the saga subsequent to the death of RFC of 1872, including the law-enforcement action and the legal stuff and the actions of the football authorities and the propaganda of untruth by the BBC and the print SMSM is fully exposed.
May I live to see the day!
And would to God I myself was able to write such a best-seller!
(Where is Denise Mina when you want her?)
My latest correspondence with the FCA:
FCA – Individuals Inbox consumer.queries@fca.org.uk
To:
(me)
Mon, 2 Oct at 15:59
Our ref: As before
Dear Mr Clark,
Thanks for your further email. You’ve stated you expect you will be advised whether or not an investigation will take place on the basis of the information you provided.
In my previous emails, I explained we would not be able to provide feedback about how information is used . This includes confirming whether or not we will be carrying out any investigation. As such, we will be unable to provide the information you’re looking for.
I hope this is helpful and has clarified our position.
Yours sincerely,
Nicci Grady
Supervisor / Supervision Hub
Supervision – Retail and Authorisations / Tel: 0207 066 1000
Financial Conduct Authority
12 Endeavour Square
London
E20 1JN
Tel: +44 (0)20 7066 1000
http://www.fca.org.uk
To:
FCA – Individuals Inbox
Mon, 2 Oct at 22:38
Dear Nicci Grady,
Thank you for your clarification.
I appreciate that the FCA is a creature of the London Stock Exchange and perhaps operates much more flexibly than statutory regulatory bodies can in applying its own rules.
Nevertheless, I would have thought a complainant might reasonably expect to be told in terms whether his complaint has even been read!
When the current political party ‘conference season’ is over I think I may have a discussion with my Member of Parliament.
Thank you for your courtesy, and I do apologise to you personally for not knowing whether ‘Nicci’ is ‘Nicola’ or ‘Nicholas’- my next-door neighbour’s wife is ‘Nikki’, and I have a pal called Nicky!
Best regards,
JC
I haven’t been here for a long, long time, but it is welcomely reassuring to see all the familiar names that are still posting.
I hope to resume commenting if or when I think of something mildly interesting to say or comment on.
ThomTheThim
6th October 2023 at 15:05
‘…it is welcomely reassuring to see all the familiar names that are still posting.’
+++++
And it’s lovely to see some of the ‘old’ (as in ‘former’) posters’ pen names again!
Whatever else about Mike Ashley I think his action against the SFA’s readiness to accept Dave King as a ‘fit and proper’ person made it clear that it was TRFC that was the member of the SFA, and not its holding company, RIFC plc.
That ‘finding’ destroyed any notion that it was some ‘holding company’ that was Liquidated while RFC of 1872 somehow remained a member of the SFA! It was RFC of 1872 that was the member of the SFA, and not any other entity owned by CW, and it was RFC of 1872 that died the death of Liquidation.
I was doing some clearing up in the attic today and was reminded of this:
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=a77617a7-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7
I think the SFA must have dreaded and hated having to make that point- they took long enough to do it.
I’d like to think that Ashley knew fine and well that being a director of RIFC plc did not mean that that King was a director of ‘Rangers’ and made the petition just to get the SFA to acknowledge in Court that TRFC was not, is not, and cannot possibly be, RFC of 1872.
[ Not of any immediate relevance, we hear today that the FCA is under pretty severe criticism in other areas of ‘finance regulation’ where its inability to act in time is costing lots of individuals thousands of pounds}
Interestingly I see from ‘X’ (the name-change of Twittter made by what I consider to be an a.sehole) that the gombeen man has his critics in the world of Rugby reporting: a plaintive cry- why have an Irish rugby enthusiast reporting for BBC Scotland on the Ireland/Scotland rugby match?
Why have any nationality of reporter in Scotland not reporting the truth about the Liquidation of RFC of 1872 would be my question?
from the Rolls of Court today:
INNER HOUSE ROLLS
FIRST DIVISION
Friday 13th October
Single Bill
“CA86/19 Reclaiming Motion (Lord Tyre) David Grier v The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland”
Got to chuckle at tonight’s news that the SFA have written to UEFA asking that they explain/clarify the disallowed goal in Seville. When was the last time a VAR decision was explained/clarified in the domestic game???
wokingcelt
13th October 2023 at 19:04
‘..Got to chuckle at tonight’s news that the SFA have written to UEFA asking that they explain/clarify the disallowed goal in Seville.’
++++++++
Mmmm, wokingcelt!, that may give BBC Scotland ‘Sportsound’ a wee problem!
Richard Gordon gave an accurate explanation of what the Rules say constitutes ‘off-side’: one of which is that the player must, as well as being ‘physically’ off-side, be interfering with play.
It’s a matter of common sense that an opposing player in a physically off-side position at a time when his hand is very near (perhaps actually touching the goalie’s chest!) must be considered to be ‘interfering’ with play!
BBC Scotland, in my opinion, abandoned the BBC’s foundational principle of reporting Truth when it came to reporting the death of Rangers of 1872 and propagating the myth that TRFC is ‘continuity’ Rangers of 1872.
They bowed, it seems clear enough to me, to the commands of the 6th Floor at Hampden and to the fraternal requests of the frequently changing folk at the top of the marble staircase.
Unlike the guys and gals in BBC London who report in as unbiased a way as possible what is happening in the Gaza strip- and are being hounded for so doing!
BBC Scotland may well bow to the SFA and ‘discipline’ Richard for telling the truth.
I think they have a track record in respect of disciplining those who do not subscribe to propagating untruth from Pacific Quay.
I had a smile to myself when I heard Kenny McIntyre today say this on ‘Sportsound’ today, referring to Mike Mulraney (present Chairman of the SFA board) who was his guest today:
“I always think he speaks very, very well.”
He may indeed speak very, very well and to McIntyre’s personal satisfaction.
Unfortunately, Mulraney has done no speaking about, let alone taken any action to end, the nonsense of the myth sedulously propagated by the SFA and BBC Radio Scotland-the myth that TRFC is RFC of 1872!
What’s the old quotation? ” “All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”
Why, I frequently ask myself, do football clubs-like Hearts, for example- bust a gut to avoid Liquidation if it doesn’t mean death as a historic football club?
Answer: because liquidation and the loss of membership of a recognised league cancels a club’s membership of the SFA and ends its existence as a football club.
The world and his wife know that.
But an exception, wholly unjustified, was made on highly questionable grounds in the case of RFC of 1872.
I personally believe that the SFA is as bent as a corkscrew in its very fundamentals in relation to the Liquidation of RFC of 1872 and will remain so for as long as they propagate the myth and in so doing continue the destruction of the very concept of sporting integrity.
Far worse, of course, is the kowtowing by BBC Scotland to the RIFC plc/TRFC boards.
The guys and gals at Pacific Quay? Trotting out the party line at license payers’ expense?
Shame on them in their betrayal of their colleagues who risk life and limb to report truth.
In which circle of Hell would Dante put them??
John Clark
14th October 2023 at 23:44
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I noticed also on Sportsound today that yet another ex-Rangers player (Colin Hendry) is now working as a pundit. It’s not as if BBC needed another one to add some balance! BBC previously told me it doesn’t matter who someone played for, they just want people who can add value. Surely if that was true then the massive imbalance we see in ex-Rangers players as pundits would not be the case? It seems quite clear there is a deliberate policy within BBC Scotland to employ them. Kenny Macintyre himself has never hidden his love for Rangers, although I’m not sure how much influence a presenter would have. All in all though licence fee payers are being cheated, given one club is massively represented over all others.
upthehoops
15th October 2023 at 00:20
‘…yet another ex-Rangers player (Colin Hendry) is now working as a pundit.’
+++++]
And as I have remarked before, the ‘pundits’ are paid a bloody good hourly rate!
Its interesting that Barry Ferguson and others lament the cutback in ticket allocation for away fans. Does Barry not recall that it was his former team that started this trend. Also has anyone done a comparison on attendance prior to the cutbacks and attendance after the cutbacks. I seem to recall that most clubs had difficulty in selling tickets prior to the cutbacks and surely if they couldn’t fill their stadiums then, how will they do it now.
Been some weird stuff going on with the database folks, but I think it is now sorted. Paradise Bhoy, I apologise for having to delete your comment along with a dozen other that appear to have been corrupted.
Let me know by email if there are any hitches ….
John
I see that Danilo wore a face mask at Ibrox today to protect a recent injury .
Similar to the one worn by Calum McGregor last season .
I wish Danilo no harm but I wonder if Kris Boyd will be encouraging opposition players “ to leave something on him “ ?
John Clark
16th October 2023 at 22:32
upthehoops
15th October 2023 at 00:20
‘…yet another ex-Rangers player (Colin Hendry) is now working as a pundit.’
+++++]
And as I have remarked before, the ‘pundits’ are paid a bloody good hourly rate!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
For the Rangers v Hibs game today on Sportsound, from the Studio Presenter, to the match commentator, to the pundits, I believe every single one of them to be a Rangers fan. I do not know any other Scottish team who the BBC so wholeheartedly gets behind.
My team (Celtic) will play at Tynecastle tomorrow at the time of writing, and it is unthinkable that BBC would supply the same level of support. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think they should as the BBC are publicly financed. Quite simply BBC Sportsound today could easily have been mistaken for Rangers TV. It’s really bad, and given that many Hibs fans will pay the licence fee, their team had zero representation on the programme. The programme could easily have been recorded in a pub favoured by Rangers fans, with a supporters club attached. It really was incredible, and don’t start me on the ‘St Mirren supporter’ Chick Young!
UTH – maybe some of these pundit a who are ex-RFC players have large tax bills to settle and undercutting the competition to get the gigs…
wokingcelt
22nd October 2023 at 22:34
‘…maybe some of these pundit a who are ex-RFC players have large tax bills to settle and undercutting the competition to get the gigs…’
++++++++
Ha,ha, wokingcelt!
If the individual pundit whose action in the Court of Session earlier this year is anything to go by is undercutting, the going rate must be more than the very handsome sum offered to him/her for ‘expertise’ and a few hours of their time!
And talking of ‘expertise’, I think Leeanne Crichton (if that’s how her name is spelled) knocks the McIntyres and Englishes and Bonners into a cocked hat! She makes them sound like that spectator in Billy Connolly’s hilarious piece shouting from row Z ‘play it wide!’
In my opinion, she is superb: but sadly, she buys into the TRFC myth and therefore is, I believe, as skewed as the BBC and the print SMSM.
Truth is indivisible.
TRFC are not, and cannot possibly be, Rangers of 1872. The passage of time does not and cannot alter that fact.
Is it just me?
When Rodgers offered his open hand to Diego Simeone at the end of tonight’s match Simeone was already on his way out with no thought of approaching the Celtic manager!
And his bare touch of fingers on a half-turn could be seen [at least by me] as being tantamount to a contemptuous spit in the eye.
Simeone was famously/infamously ‘kicked’ by Beckham.
I metaphorically would administer a harder Beckham kick to Simeone’s arse for his lack of ordinary post-match civility!
But that’s just me.
As a long time reader and small time supporter of the site I have to say that I can’t see a future for it going forward. There are no new long posts and the contributors are now very few. Were it not for JC there would be little to read on site. I can’t offer any suggestions how to remedy this if the posters from the past are unwilling, for their own reasons, to return. I for one would miss the site but I am sad to say I think it will fold. Some days there are no post at all and people like me are readers and can’t write well enough to post anything of interest. Please, please can anyone show me I’m over pessimistic.
Ballyargus
I hope you are wrong, but there’s always the possibility. All good things do come to an end, but the notion that the site is now past it’s usefulness is a a false one I believe.
As an example we have only recently been attacked by hackers – yet again. At least our enemies still think there’s something worth attacking, and I take that as a sign that the message is still getting through.
Absolutely no doubt that we have lost many respected posters – mostly imo down to battle-weariness – but as long as there’s life and entertainment in these pages I am determined that it will go on.
Think of it as a virtual pub or coffee shop. Comments don’t need to be up there with Hemmingway. It’s a chat room and accords and disagreements will come and go. The platform will continue to be provided until the last poster bids farewell – and I think that’s a way off.
Ballyargus,
As long as football is controlled by the “men in suits” then in my view a site like this serves a purpose. I’m guessing we don’t have the resources to fund lots of investigative stuff but I think there is scope to put forward a view. Some random thoughts from me:
1. Financial fair play – it’s referenced every now and again but personally I have no idea where Scotland’s sit in relation to the limits. What’s the realistic envelope for our clubs to operate within? Are some clubs too prudent? Others too bold?
2. Refereeing – how do our governance and accountability stand up compared to others?
3. TV and sponsorship – what about the fans? I am listening this evening to fan groups in England being up in arms over matches being scheduled on Christmas Eve whilst reading of Scotland’s clubs meek acceptance of Sky’s commands.
4. The politics in football – who decides?
Sometimes I think we are all too much in agreement on the issues of the day – maybe we need more divergent views being expressed (my experience of this site is that we are all grown up enough to agree to disagree respectfully).
This week’s email from the Scottish Football Supporters’ Association reminded me that those whose greedy hopes of forming a European Super League were rejected by the European Football clubs and supporters generally had the gall to challenge the legality of that rejection in an action in the Court of Justice of the European Union. The decision on the case will be announced on 21 December.
The hope has to be that UEFA’s stance will be upheld.
Greedy as UEFA itself has been, it has had the sense to see that a Super League would benefit only the members of that Super League, with no meaningful beneficial effect on any country’s non-Super clubs.
Here’s a wee bit of the legal stuff on the ‘Super league’ case
https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=268624&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3861695
WokingCelt
Couldn’t have said it any better. Of course SFM may not be as big a thorn in the side of the establishment as it once was, but its persistence and insistence of reminding folk of what happened in 2012, and that any new developments in the game introduced by the same corrupt system need to be viewed through that prism is still important.
John Clark
23rd October 2023 at 23:49
And talking of ‘expertise’, I think Leeanne Crichton (if that’s how her name is spelled) knocks the McIntyres and Englishes and Bonners into a cocked hat! She makes them sound like that spectator in Billy Connolly’s hilarious piece shouting from row Z ‘play it wide!’
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Permission to disagree John! Two particular incidents stick in my mind re Ms Crichton which in my opinion should have led to her being spoken to by her bosses, and greatly diluted her value as a pundit.
Incident one was when Darvel famously dumped Aberdeen from the Scottish Cup. Aberdeen had a perfectly good goal chalked off for offside, but there was no VAR. At the end of the game she said she was ‘glad’ VAR was not present to ‘ruin’ the game, when specifically talking about the goal. Very poor comment IMO.
Incident two was at the Celtic Women v Rangers Women Scottish Cup Final last season. Rangers scored a goal which VAR disallowed because it showed without doubt it was offside. She was pretty apoplectic about it saying it was ‘just’ offside. Offside is offside, whether by six inches or six feet, and it’s what VAR is for.
She seems beyond reproach though. I’ll leave it at that.
upthehoops
28th October 2023 at 21:53
‘…She seems beyond reproach though…’
++++++++++
Ha,ha, uth!
There is little doubt in my mind that the lady is a Rangers supporter and will perhaps have her at least unconscious prejudices and may [like most of us, myself included] be tempted to see her own team through partisan spectacles. [ VAR causes most of us problems (as much when it is NOT used as when it is!]
What I was getting at, really, is that Crichton’s technical analysis of a game and her fluent articulacy in giving that analysis is very, very good.
She is light years ahead of most of the ex-player-pundits (mind you, Neil McCann is close behind her), and I fully expect that she will be groomed by Pacific Quay to take over from McIntyre in the fullness of time.
If BBC ‘Sportsound’ [ itself a myth propagator] must employ upholders of the myth, then it should at least try to employ the most articulate and professionally knowledgeable among them.
Just my opinion, of course.
Big Pink
28th October 2023 at 10:37
‘.. but its persistence and insistence of reminding folk of what happened in 2012, ‘
+++++++++
I’m struck by the fact that while UEFA’s clubs and supporters were/are enraged at the gall of those who proposed a European Super League (a proposal which was not in itself illegal!) our wee Scotland football governance bodies were ready, in my opinion, to create the myth that a club created by them very selves in 2012 is somehow the very identical big-time cheating tax-dodging club of 1872 foundation that is in Liquidation!
Sporting Integrity in Scottish professional football?
No way, for as long as the Big Lie is propagated.
Spent some time this afternoon watching the live proceedings of the Covid Inquiry.
How I would love there to be a formal independent Inquiry into every decision taken by the SFA/SPL/SFL in relation to the Rangers that is in Liquidation and the new club which CG founded and which those bodies allowed and continue to allow to claim to be the Rangers that is in Liquidation!
The records of phone calls and urgent meetings would make interesting reading, and I’m pretty sure there are some folk who do not share my interest in the biggest piece of nonsense in the history of Scottish Football!
I’ve just read about the death of James Doleman, with whom I struck-up a court-room acquaintanceship quite early on in various of the ‘Rangers’ court cases, when he generously provided me from time to time with bits of information which helped my understanding of proceedings and processes.
He certainly knew his way about Parliament House
https://pressgazette.co.uk/news/james-doleman-dies-tributes/
Requiescat in pace.
John C
It was shameful of me to have failed to note James Doleman’s passing. I had a long association with Frank over the years. He was instrumental in getting Jim Craig signed up at Byline Times in 2014, and he was not a little overwhelmed to meet with one his big heroes. 🙂
We had more than a few laughs over coffee in Cafe Nero in Sauchiehall Street around that time. As shocked and appalled as he was at both versions of Rangers’ transgressions, he was always looking at both sides of the argument, never falling into into any particular narrative.
He did a podcast or two with us a while back. Reminds me how fastidious and professional he was
http://podcast.sfm.scot/e/twm-episode-14/
RIP Francis D.
Should also add that throughout his long illness, I never once heard him sound like a victim or feel sorry for himself. He faced it all in a matter of fact fashion, often joking, not in a gallows humour kind of way, but in a lightly self-mocking manner.
His “My first day as (insert job title here) went well” tweets, and his hospital cuisine commentaries were hilarious.
How disappointing!
I watched this morning’s Covid Inquiry proceedings and was enjoying the brilliant low-key performance of Helen McNamara, contrasting it with that Cummings. In an idle moment I looked up McNamara biography to find out a little more about her .
Couldn’t believe it when I saw that her husband was on the BBC Trust at the time when they made BBC Scotland accept the stupid untruth that it was the company that died, not the football club!
Put me right aff her!!
John
None of us can be held responsible for the behaviour or opinions of our significant other – as I’m sure Mrs C frequently reminds you!
Aurellio Zen
2nd November 2023 at 17:27
‘…None of us can be held responsible for the behaviour or opinions of our significant other – as I’m sure Mrs C frequently reminds you!’
++++++
Aurelio Zen,
Mrs C would skelp me good and hard if she knew what I really thought of Helen McNamara!
She was superb in the way she gave her evidence.
As having myself been a lowly civil servant on the fringes of what superior officers were about I have
some little idea of the difficulties that she and her Civil Service colleagues faced working under the likes of Boris and Hancock and the other jackanape Cabinet Ministers.
And her husband was not, I think, immediately involved in the stupid order to BBC Scotland to propagate the lie that TRFC is RFC of 1872.
Still!
I feel the media has drawn on feel good stories from a year in regards to the new Sevco/Rangers manager. The basics of the stories seem to be the same only the names have changed. Beale was this genius, was going to dethrone Celtic, lead Rangers to who have garnerd new heights. New manager, new name same essential theme to the stories. Clement has had three league games against teams who have claimed 42% of points available (Hearts), 33% (Hibs) and 30% (Dundee) and have surrendered a total of 44 games in those games. Does anyone have any record of magical Beales first three league games.
Talking up Rangers* is good for business Vernallen. Appeasing right wing forces is good for careers in the media also.
Which brings me to the peculiar notion that Rangers and Rangers* both appear to have a monoply of ultra-right leaning fans. In its own way that leads to an easier passage in the press.
An opinion I have held for decades, but one that I may not have voiced in public for fear of a torrent of tinfoil hats been sent in the post.
Nowadays though ….
big pink
6 November 2023
‘…Talking up Rangers* is good for business Vernallen. Appeasing right wing forces is good for careers in the media also.’
++++++
I am worldly enough, BP, to realise that the print media proprietors and commercial TV are in the business of making money.
Their publications/broadcasts will not be allowed to risk damaging loss of sales revenue by telling the truth if telling the truth upsets their revenues from print sales advertising and online subscriptions/advertising revenue.
Even the ‘Guardian'(ffs!) did not tell the truth about the death of RFC of 1872.
And Alex Thomson declined, referring to costs, to get involved in the question of the truth of the RIFC plc ‘Prospectus’ of 2012.
Now, I do not NEED to buy the DR or ‘The Scotsman’ or any other print publication and in so doing support their partisan and/or fearful approach to ‘journalism’.
[And the words of Neil McIntosh, editor of ‘the Scotsman’ in today’s edition make the claim that ” For more than two centuries, The Scotsman has continued to embody the spirit of Scottish Enlightenment: our award-winning journalists delve into the heart of the Scottish news to inform, inspire, and educate our readers, without fear or favour”
I creased myself, reading that ridiculous claim]
But I do need to pay for a TV licence!
And the BBC in Scotland was told to sell its soul and, despite knowing and originally broadcasting the truth, meekly complied and appeared ready to discipline staff who insisted on telling the truth, the truth that TRFC is not RFC of 1872!
The SFA’s readiness to create, [in a secret compact the parties to which included both the club that they themselves had chucked out of Scottish Football AND the club that they themselves admitted into Scottish Football in 2012] a huge distortion of sporting truth and sporting integrity, signaled the fundamental contempt for the very concept of sporting integrity lying[!] at the heart of Scottish Football governance.
The mere passage of time does not make an untruth go away.
No one knows that better than those who were/are party to Untruth whether for filthy lucre’s sake or from brotherly love.
And, I may add, no newspaper’s finance/business journalist has even tried to explain how RIFC got/gets away with the claim to be RFC of 1872 and to be entitled to its historic sporting achievements”
Why not? The stupid nonsense that it was the ‘company’ that died while the ‘club’ lived was shown to be just that- absolute nonsense in terms of law.
What then do the business affairs journalists have to offer as a reason for buying into the SFA lie?
Had some problems of late logging in, but now, hopefully, sorted by Admin!
Just back from a break, and noticed that BR was not happy that Celtic are ‘on the festive road’ (against Dundee) for the 7th (?) successive season. If that fact is wrong, my apologies to all.
Anyway, how about this Brendan …
I find it astonishing that, after 11 league games (over a quarter of the season!), the liquidated outfit (55 tiles my a***), had not visited Pittodrie, Tynecastle, Easter Road, Fir Park, Celtic Park or Livingston (generally accepted as the most difficult away grounds to visit – although Rugby Park is now ‘entering the frame’?). Celtic have visited all of the above. By the law of averages methinks, Sevco should have played at least one game at these grounds by now.
There is clearly no truth in the paranoid rumour that the above was intended to give Sevco an early season advantage (??!!), but …some coincidence, eh?
The situation will admittedly balance out come May, and meantime, in light of the above, I’m delighted that Celtic are ahead at this juncture in the title race.
Appeal is now ended folks. Sadly we ended up significantly short of the target, but in the financial situation everyone finds themselves at the moment, it is neither surprising nor understandable. I will of course continue to try to keep things afloat meantime. With economy in mind, I am making some changes to the hosting of the site which I hope doesn’t cause any glitches.
Let me know right away if there are any problems.
John
Watching CL this evening and very much of view that VAR and the authorities making football almost a non-contact sport is killing the game that we love. If Maeda deserved a red card then we should be watching 7v8 most weeks.
Coming up to the best time: Christmas!
Ha ha!
Didn’t take long for a more ridiculous red card to come along with Rashford’s sending off this evening, coupled with the softest of soft penalties.
Very much reached the conclusion that VAR should be used for offside and ball in/out of play only, these being binary decisions. Appreciate they could afford better tech at the World Cup but it worked well there. Leave everything else to the man in the middle and use videos of matches as tools for performance improvement of the individual refs.
Also seems that we are moving to a non-contact sport – I don’t recall the fans being asked about this!
vernallen
3 November 2023 at 21:49
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
What I have found particularly irritating, if not surprising, is the new popular phrase among the written and spoken media that Philippe Clement is a ‘proper’ football manager. It’s not a phrase they use towards any other manager in the league, and frankly I think it’s embarrassing. He was successful in Belgium, but a failure in France, and I’m not sure such reverence towards him is as yet deserved. However, many of those saying it raved about Beale being the brains behind Gerard, and going back a few seasons some of them also tipped Mark Warburton to win the top league when Rangers* entered it. Clement may well prove to be the absolute real deal, but the SMSM really need to reign it in a bit.
Just watching the TNT coverage of the Rangers v Sparta Prague game . One of the touchline pundits is Derek McInnes the “current” manager of one of Ranger’s league rivals Kilmarnock. I don’t know if this is a common occurrence- it just feels very strange .
Rangers are set to report a profit for the second successive year .
Last year the figure was £5.9 million “operating “ profit. I’m not an accountant but seemingly this is the before tax position. What the actual profit was , if any, I don’t know .
Probably not eroded too much by tax. Carried over losses are taken into account when tax liabilities are calculated I believe.
Where’s EJ when you need him😊
According to James Forrest in The Celtic Blog – The Rangers achieved a Loss last year of “just under one million” . I don’t know what they will claim this year but if they use the term “operating profit” again , questions should be asked .
It’s a bit like trying to budget your wages using the Gross amount ( remember that BP ? )
I should perhaps explain that my post of 6 Nov at 23.34 went into moderation and my posts of 7 Nov at 23.44 and at 23.46 were made as test posts.
My post of 9 Nov at 11.04 was written in the belief that the earlier posts would never appear when the glitch was sorted!
Had a very enjoyable few hours in Glasgow on Wednesday in the company of Auldheid, EasyJambo and John Clark.
The world was put to rights once more over drinks and a bite.
Always great to meet up with the guys. Look forward to doing it once more in the capital, early in the New Year.
Hope you asked EasyJambo to come back – he is greatly missed .
One of the economies I’ve had to put in place is a less sophisticated security for login. Consequently in the last few days we have been inundated with spam registrations.
Consequently, I’ve had to turn up the blunt force security stuff in place. I think it’s probably ok. but if anyone is being denied access, email me at bp@sfm.scot so I can sort it quickly….
With regard to the profit/loss at TRFC, to paraphrase Bill Clinton it depends on how you define profit. In 2022 TRFC reported an operating profit of £5.9m and a loss of £0.9m. To get from one number to the next there were three items:
1. £6.1m of non-recurring costs, which from the accounts were described as total anticipated costs from ongoing legal disputes.
2. £2m of finance charges – interest on various debts to you and me.
3. £1.3m tax credit – being tax losses to be carried forward and used to offset tax on future profits (no sniggering at the back). This is a credit so offsets the costs in 1 and 2.
So it’s not wrong to say that TRFC made a profit and a loss based on accounting convention.
My own view would be that you should really take into account finance charges when reviewing any company’s performance as this is usually a planned cost of them doing business. With regard to non-recurring costs these are more subjective and I would consider the track record of non-recurring items appearing when assessing underlying profitability…
I can understand non-recurring costs not being conventionally included when assessing operating profit, but finance charges are a cost of doing business are they not?
Not doubting your wisdom WC – just thinking how counter-intuitive much of what passes for good practice is.
BP – I’ve always understood the reason for charging finance costs after operating costs is because most businesses funded by a mixture of debt and equity (shares) so showing interest separately allows this cost of finance to be given similar prominence as dividends (being the cost of equity). That’s probably enough accountancy for a football blog…
wokingcelt
11 November 2023 at 17.46
‘…That’s probably enough accountancy for a football blog…’
+++++++++
Except perhaps to add, wokingcelt, that the accounts should always tell the SFA the truth about a club’s playing-staff wages costs, and that the SFA finance people should include people capable of questioning apparent absurdities such as a suspiciously low wages bill in respect of a number of players bought players each bought for very, very large transfer fees!
A very famous football club died the death of Liquidation on account of the SFA either not SPOTTING such an absurdity or having spotted it, CHOOSING not to challenge it.
Either way, the SFA board demonstrated then that it was either incompetent or something worse.
Successive boards have done nothing to correct the record so, in effect, the current SFA board are presiding over a sports body which harbours and propagates a huge untruth!
They remind me of Macbeth’s perverted logic ” I am in blood stepped in so far that should I wade no more returning were as tedious as go o’er”. But at least Macbeth acknowledged his guilt to himself!
[And as a wee aside, Cosgrove yesterday on ‘Off the Ball’ caused me to splutter into my coffee when he asked McIntyre [jokingly?] ” Kenny, do you believe Rangers is a new Club?” ]
“15 year-year-old Andy would have loved this machine” says Andy Smith in his latest SFSA personal blog in his email to members of the SFSA.
He’s not the only one!
When I think back to my college days and what passed for ‘football training’ for the first team I could weep!
We had no idea, beyond notions that it would be helpful if we didn’t smoke and did a few trots occasionally around the pitch and played the occasional 5-a-side ‘training’ game!
What I would have given for access to a ‘Footbonaut’
Years ago, I attended an ‘old boy’s’ re-union and was astonished when one of the guys whom I hadn’t seen for about fifty years said he remembered me as having been a terrific footballer!
What might I have become if only I had had access to a ‘Footbonaut’!
Seriously, though, I had never heard of the ‘Footbonaut’, but it’s been around for more than ten years or so!!
Re. VAR, my main thought is that it should be used as intended, for clear and obvious errors. More specifically, VAR officials should have 3 options with offside, the third being “too close to call”, in which case the game goes on and the referee’s decision stands. Where the two lines are very close, the time between them crossing from on to off or vice versa is a tiny fraction of a second. No one can judge that confidently, when precisely the ball was kicked, particularly when the ball was moving. It does not do what it purports to do. Also, never make a decision on a still image, which is what the referee was invited to do in the Maeda case.
If they can’t make a decision in seconds, the game goes on.
In Cricket the VAR (or in this case DRS) uses “Umpire’s Call” (i.e. original decision stands) if any of the 3 elements of an lbw decision (pitched, impact with batsman, projected trajectory to wicket) has a 50/50 split (too close to call). Not surprisinly it is the latter of the 3 that comes into play most especiaily as it can only ever be projected trajectory
Tykebhoy
I think there are three principles that are universal in any sport that makes use of these machines.
1. Best of breed technology
2. Competence of officials using it.
3. Unimpeachable integrity
My guess is that ScotVar passes only one of those
I don’t even think it is best of breed tech. The image shown to give Maeda offside in the lead up to the chalked off Oh goal in Dingwall was laughable. The EPL tech would have spun the image so that the lines were perpendicular to the view. But had they been able to do that it might have called into question your 2 and/or 3.
LORD BRAID – N Marchant, Clerk
Parliament House
Wednesday 15th November
Continued Preliminary Hearing
between 9.00am and 9.30am
“CA74/22 Elite Sports Group Ltd v The Rangers Football Club Ltd”
++++++++++
Elite still pursuing their £9.5 million
From the Rolls of Court today:
LORD BRAID – N Marchant, Clerk
Parliament House
Wednesday 15th November
Continued Preliminary Hearing
between 9.00am and 9.30am
“CA74/22 Elite Sports Group Ltd v The Rangers Football Club Ltd”
++++++++++
Elite still pursuing their £9.5 million!
Incidentally, I knew that John Combothekras Halsted had previously declared himself to be the beneficial owner of the Perron shares in RIFC plc
see https://www.rangers.co.uk/investor-information/3xiJwTahGEhZWGZAUcKMy1
But I see from Companies House that the (apparently) same Halsted was made a director of RIFC plc on 22 August this year (classified as being a ‘person with significant control’, i.e. having more than 25% of the issued shares.)
Did I miss a share offering? Or has Halsted hoovered up shares privately from existing shareholders?
Halsted is an American/Briton and appears to be managing Partner of Pamplona Capital Management LLP among other things.
John Combothekras Halsted also has connections with the American company Iconic Sports Acquisition Corp.
TRFC setting world records again by posting losses in their accounts for 11 years in a row. In reality enough is enough ( or in their case no enough). Still we can all sit back and just wait.
Yeah, RTC is busy Tweeting away about the accounts. No doubt there will be a rugby fan poring over them soon also😊
We have had our share of contributors with accounting expertise in the past. Be nice if one or two made a return to keep us in the loop👍
PMGB’s Rugger friend has “retired” from analysing accounts for Phil’s Blog
TRFC post an “operating” profit of £252 K – so another loss then .
I don’t know if this is allowed BP ? Direct Quotes from RTC
“ For the avoidance of doubt, RIFC/Sevco spent £11.9m more last season than they took in.
That is the only financial statement you need to know.
Then, after 01-July, they spent a further £13.1m on new players and getting rid of Beale.
£25m gone.”
More from the same source RTC
“ It’s remarkable that Sevco and their press lackeys are going to so much effort to paint their losses as profits.
Do they really have potential investors who can’t read financial statements? It’s all there in black and white.
They’re just adding insult to injury now.“
When consider that for TRFC their accounts include Bassey transfer and CL participation, the low level of financial performance should be a worry. They should have “hit the jackpot” with the circumstances but didn’t. Things can change quickly but I think for TRFC deep pockets and patience two key requisites.
On a separate matter, VAR in general seems to be doing its utmost to be disgraced. I see IFAB looking at reviewing how it’s used, whilst in Scotland I see that even Richard Foster and his show “The VARdict” appears to have been given the elbow (probably not spotted by the cameras) for even trying to continue to defend the indefensible.
whiteseatbhoy
14 November 2023 at 08:18
‘…John Combothekras Halsted also has connections with the American company Iconic Sports Acquisition Corp.
++++++++
yes, whiteseatbhoy.
And one of the sponsor companies of the ISA Corp is
“TIFOSY SPONSORCO
Tifosy SponsorCo LLC is an affiliate of Tifosy Capital and Advisory. Tifosy is a leading boutique sports advisory firm. The firm has an extensive track record of sourcing and executing transactions in sports and providing strategic financial advisory services to clients across the sports sector.
Tifosy was founded by Fausto Zanetton and Gianluca Vialli. Mr. Zanetton is a sought-after and trusted advisor in the sports industry with over 20 years of experience advising global media, sports and technology companies including as an experienced investment banker at Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Mr. Vialli is one of the most iconic and successful European professional footballers of the modern era, having played at Sampdoria, Juventus and Chelsea.
The firm employs an experienced team comprised of leading individuals from the worlds of finance and sports as well as other talented and focused individuals from across top-tier investment banking, legal and sports marketing institutions.
Tifosy represents a powerful complement to the Iconic Sports investor group given its deep sports sector relationships, industry expertise and global platform with integrated investment and advisory capabilities. Tifosy has served as an advisor to numerous leading private equity funds, high net worth individuals and professional football clubs on various mandates focusing on some of the biggest names in world football: Inter Milan, Inter Miami CF, Chelsea, Melbourne Victory, Parma Calcio 1913, Sampdoria, Glasgow Rangers, Queens Park Rangers, Pisa Sporting Club, Norwich City and Venezia.”
And, please do not smile: Tifoso Sponsor Co is registerd in ……the Cayman Islands.
https://www.iconicsportsacq.com/#sponsors
I believe the London-based Tifoso, of which Tifoso Consor CO is an affiliate, appears to facilitate the low-level private dealing in RIFC plc shares between existing shareholders.
And possibly facilitates pretty high level buying and selling between larger shareholders?
Not for the first time in my life do I wish I had even a big-handed street barra-boy’s cunningly exploitative understanding of the business and finance world!
Paradisebhoy
14 November 2023 at 18:40
‘…Do they really have potential investors who can’t read financial statements? It’s all there in black and white.’
+++++++++
Well, Paradisebhoy , we’ve got to remember that the very FCA read( or ought to have read) the black and white of the RIFC plc Prospectus issued in 2012 and failed to spot that it plainly suggested that RIFC plc would be the holding company of the famous/notorious Rangers of 1872.
A simple look at the current Rangers FC website shows that they (RIFC plc) KNOW that they are the holding company only of ‘The Rangers Football Club of 2012 creation, and not of RFC of 1872.
The folk who marched on Hampden knew what Liquidation meant. James Taylor of the DR and the whole of the Scottish print media knew what Liquidation meant; and BBC Scotland absolutely knew what Liquidation meant (and, to their credit, initially reported the truth of what it meant, before being leaned on by the BBC Trust and disappointingly caved in)
The legal advisers at any given time to RIFC plc also knew/know what Liquidation means- and that a company cannot be the holding company of a Liquidated entity as if that entity was not in Liquidation, and they made/make sure that the RIFC plc did not/does not claim legally to be the holding company RFC of 1872 (i.e. of Rangers 2012 plc in Liquidation)
But, altogether away from football entirely, is that not shocking news about the Stephen Lawrence murder case? and the allegations of corruption made against a senior police officer?
Who would believe such level of corruption?
Dear me!
JC, that will of course be Gianluca Vialli (deceased).
Paradisebhoy
14 November 2023 at 18:35
‘…getting rid of Beale..’
+++++++
For one and a half million quid, reportedly!
Nice work if you can get it! Roughly 37 grand a year for 30 years if he never works again in his life!
Happy man he should be!
[Arithmetic was never my strong point, and I might be wrong in my calculation. But still!]
John Clark
15 November 2023 at 00:16
I may be wrong but I think the figure given in the accounts is the monies paid to QPR for his services . His sacking happened after their year end for financials .
Another link to the old club gone . I hope he can recover and gets to where he wants to be .
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/steven-davis-exits-rangers-coaching-31444527
Looking at ‘Court of Sessions’ judgments page this evening I saw a reference to Sportsdirect.com retail ltd.
Anything to do with Sportsdirect is of interest, so I clicked on
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/docs/default-source/cos-general-docs/pdf-docs-for-opinions/2023csoh79.pdf?sfvrsn=c80ecd4b_1
An entertaining read, with references to non-payment of VAT as a contributary factor in the falling into Administration of ‘Goals Soccer Centres plc’
Sportsdirect.com Retail (as a significant shareholder) had asked for a change in the Administrators because they weren’t happy with the proposals made by the Administrators. [ No reflection on the integrity of the Administrators just a different point of view]
The administrators declared that they were neutral and were not objecting to being replaced.
I enjoyed reading the judge’s assessment.
[I confess that I had not heard or read that Goals Soccer etc was in Administration!]
postscipt to my post of 23.56 tonight
came across this:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49510373
The leader in this morning’s “The Scotsman”, in reference to a particular issue relating to truth- telling in the sphere of politics, has this to say:
” They, like us, must be hoping the inevitable happens sooner rather than later: that he [ a particular member of the Scottish government] recognises the principles at stake, and steps down”
What breathtaking hypocrisy from a newspaper that propagates the lie manufactured by Scottish Football governance: the lie that Rangers Football Club of 1872 is still in existence, and that a new club created in 2012 by them themselves is entitled to the sporting honours and trophies earned by the140-year old club that they themselves destroyed by withdrawing its membership of the SFA when it entered Liquidation!
Truth is indivisible.
A newspaper that itself supports untruth in the matter of Sport(!) is in no position of moral authority to preach to others who may be liars in other areas of human activity.
I wondered JC, have you written to the editor to ask him/her (I refuse to write them or some such nonsense) about the double standards you have pointed out.
From today’s Rolls of Court of Session:
“OUTER HOUSE ROLLS
Adjustment in the undernoted cases commenced on Wednesday 15th November 2023 and in the absence of any court order to the contrary the records therein will, without further publication in the rolls, close on Wednesday 10th January 2024.
1 ………
2 A249/23 Edgar Lavarello &c v Douglas Ireland Park
3….. ……
____________________
I ‘researched’ and found that Edgar Lavarello is one of the joint Administrators of the ‘Elite Insurance Company (In Administration)’ which is domiciled in Gibraltar. It offered many kinds of insurance cover, including motor cover, before entering Administration in December 2019.
Now, I imagine that the ‘Douglas Ireland Park’ mentioned could be none other than the DP of Park’s of Hamilton, and director of several other motor/bus operator businesses.
Didn’t I read some time ago-possibly more than a year or so ago- that Park had been exploring the possibility of acquiring the rights to run a public bus service in Gibraltar? Possibly even before Brexit, but eventually decided not to??
Anybody got any memory of that?
One wonders why the Administrators of an insurance company have raised an action against Douglas Ireland Park.
I hope to satisfy my curiosity by a visit to Parliament House if and when the matter comes to a hearing.
Earlier today I signed in to wikipedia with a view to being able to edit any entry, providing such evidence as I may have to support my editorial changes to the existing text.
My intention, as you might expect, is to correct the ludicrous crap that wikipedia currently provides in relation to ‘Rangers FC’.
They have swallowed what they have been given, and parrot the nonsense of ‘continuity’ Rangers, without seeing the underlying untruth of what whoever wrote the current piece imagined to be the situation. (look up ‘Rangers FC’, and have a laugh)
But it’s great fun trying to expose the lie that lies (ha!) at the heart of Scottish Football in any way I can.
Just afore I go to bed to satisfy Mrs C’s requirements I had a wee smile to myself when I read in ‘Andy’s Sting in the tail’ tonight:
“We have been told via the media that the SFA/SPFL will hold their ‘secret summit’”
By gum, don’t those guy love secrecy! Secret 5-way agreements and what not!
Honest to God, how do those liars live with themselves?
Scottish Football has been ill-served by a succession of SFA boards who lie.
Simples!
(and each and every one in Scottish Football clubs and in the SMSM knows the lie.)
From Oliver Holt in today’ Mail..
“That is the only logical and fair conclusion to draw from the league’s swingeing punishment of Everton. It would not be unreasonable now to speculate that English football might witness a scenario similar to when Rangers were relegated to the fourth tier of Scottish football in 2012.”
Blinkin’ flip.
Seriously
Is site ok? Are we just in a quiet spell?
I assume so b67. Been some connectivity issues recently for some folk. Other may find that they have to have a comment approved to continue as we moved hosts and the counters were all reset.
In light of the Everton situation, like FoF above, I’d have expected some conclusions to be drawn.
Similarly, Rangers’* accounts appear to have fallen on deaf ears.
fan of football
19 November 2023 at 07:55
‘ It would not be unreasonable now to speculate that English football might witness a scenario similar to when Rangers were relegated to the fourth tier of Scottish football in 2012.’
+++++
There are ill-motivated people in the world, fan of football.
There are also some astoundingly ignorant or partisan journalists.
Not personally knowing Oliver Holt I don’t know into which category he falls.
Whichever, he is no bloody use as any kind of fact/truth finding journalist, ignorant as he seems to be of the fact that Rangers of 1872 was not ‘relegated’, but died the death of Liquidation, lost its share in the then SFL, and in consequence had its membership of the SFA withdrawn.
Any journalist who cannot see the monstrous deceit perpetrated by a relatively high-profile Sports Governance body such as the SFA has to be seriously questioned as to his intelligence/motives.
Such an one would earn no respect from me as a communicator of journalistic truth!
For pity’s sake!
And I am still quietly pursuing efforts to find the truth about the lie (as I perceive it) in the RIFC plc Prospectus that RIFC plc would become the holding company of dear old Rangers of the four young lads of my granddads’ era!
What fun, knowing that the RIFC plc board know the truth.
[ as does every board of every SFA club, may their guilty acceptance of a lie be to their cost in terms of conscience and personal integrity!]
The Truth always eventually emerges. Always.
And lies are lies.
Is it possible that Kris Boyd got the details wrong when he alleged Aberdeen lay down to Celtic and not try hard enough. Is it possible that Rangers ( or whatever name they are using) don’t apply themselves against Aberdeen and fully expect that by showing up they get the win. Also is it not interesting how in the space of a few days and a draw in Aberdeen how poor many of their players are. This is a prime examply of jumping on and off the bandwagon, especially with Celtic dropping points on Saturday. Ranger fans immediately say this as a major chance to close the gap and somehow jump ahead in the league. Don’t count your points until they are on the board.
I see from the Daily Mail that IFAB has authorised experiments in using ‘sin-bins’ penalties for players who crowd the referee!
‘Sin-bins for tactical fouls and dissent could trialled in the FA Cup and Women’s Super League after the International FA Board [IFAB] approved experiments in the professional game at a meeting in London.’
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/sport/football/fa-cup-and-womens-super-league-lined-up-for-sin-bin-trials/ar-AA1kGNXi
Where the hell are we going with this Americanisation of our sport?
Dam’ Yanks!
They have not, in my opinion, ever understood the concept of ‘sport’.
Come to think of it, neither has the SFA, which allows a ten and bit year old club to claim to be a hunnert and forty something years old!
In the end, of course, cheats never win.
They make themselves liars and KNOW beyond a peradventure that they lie!
And they know that such supporters as they may have in journalism or broadcasting are fellow liars.
And they have to hang together in their lying or hang separately, in old Benjamin’s phrase!
Oh, what fun!
You can beat Barcelona one day and three days later, if you don’t have the right mentality, you can lose to Ross County.
Philippe Clement’s statement,according to BBC Scotland . When did this ever happen and why drag Ross County into it ?
paddy malarkey
29 November 2023 at 21:01
‘…Philippe Clement’s statement,…’
+++++++++
Well pm the 135-year-old Celtic Football and Athletic club and the now 13-year-old TRFC, and 120-year-old Aberdeen FC, all showed at their different levels this week that Scottish football is just not up there!
In the case of TRFC the Board have no money; in the case of Celtic the Board are unwilling to spend.
Many TRFC fans now have doubts about Clement’s match-managerial skills, while Rodgers’ second go shows no greater result than previously.
From the Joint Liquidators (BDO) of Rangers Football Club plc (cunningly renamed ‘RFC 2012 plc’ before it went into Liquidation in 2012)) on 22 November 2023:
“We have attended to all statutory requirements throughout the course of the liquidation to date.
The Joint Liquidators have paid the final dividend just after the period end, and subsequently will be
in a position to close the case on consignment of any unclaimed dividends. Therefore, the next report to the creditors in this matter will be the final report.”
https://www.bdo.co.uk/getmedia/51b7a312-c715-45f7-af59-13ba2a32f822/RFC-2012-Plc-annual-progress-report-to-30-October-2023.pdf
After that final report, Dissolution is the next step, and it will be “Goodnight, Rangers of 1872.”
You were ill-served by a vain-glorious wretch who killed you with debt- without he himself losing a penny. as far as I can tell. And died in ignominy and shame.
The childish pretence by the SFA/SPFL that CG’s little creation of 2012 is ‘continuity Rangers of the four young men’ does not, and cannot, change the hard facts. Frightened men lied to themselves and the rest of us at the behest of other chancers whose conduct vis-a-vis their regard for business truth leaves a lot to be desired, in my opinion ( shared by many!)
Ps: have a look at the staggering remuneration etc of the Liquidators (no disrespect to them) and the settlement with HMRC.
Where did the money come from, given that Green had bought most of the assets?
Let’s hope some finance journalist in the SMSM can give us some understanding?
As if!! Propagators of football untruth as they are!
In an idle moment I have sent this email to an ICIJ journalist
“To:
salecci@icij.org
Sat, 2 Dec at 23:41
Dear Scilla,
There is no journalist in Scotland who is a member of the ICIJ.
There is no journalist in Scotland who tells the truth about the piddling little matter of the death of a football club!
If the ICIJ is all about truth, let it be about truth as it affects the ordinary everyday person as well as about high finance and global financial crime.
The Scottish mainstream media-including the BBC- propagate the fiction that Rangers Football Club of 1872 foundation somehow did not go into Liquidation in 2012, and that a new club admitted into Scottish Football in 2012 is one and the same as the liquidated football club.
Do the needful- get in there to show that journalists who propagate untruth even in a matter of ‘Sport’ in a wee country like Scotland can be held to account by the ICIJ.
I’ll be happy to give you more details.”
—
I am by and large a cynic. Dog does not eat dog. We can no more trust a ‘journalist’ than we can trust the SFA/SPFL guys.
But we can hope that the dirty wee lie that TRFC is the Rangers of 1872 will one day be exposed as the lie that it is in law and known to be a lie by the BBC and every ‘journalist’ in the print media.
Truth and BBC Scotland?
Forget the possibility in matters to do with any version of ‘Rangers’!
In my email box this evening, from Companies House:
The following information is available from the (RIFC plc) company’s filing history.
Date Form Description
4 Dec 2023 TM02 Termination of appointment of James Blair as a secretary on 1 December 2023
and Company Results (links open in a new window)
Date(document was filed at Companies House) Description(of the document filed at Companies House) View / Download(PDF file, link opens in new window)
04 Dec 2023 Appointment of Mr James Taylor as a secretary on 1 December 2023
______
Well, I never!
That’s what we’ve got to deal with, in Scottish Football journalism!
Chick, do us all a favour and kick the arse of JT as being (in my opinion) the very antithesis of what the word ‘journalist’ means.
Honest to God, the spirits of those journalists who have died in the cause of trying to establish and report Truth will be looking at JT askance.
Me masel personally, like, might possibly use un-Parliamentary language to express my contempt for the new ‘secretary’.
That such a wretch of a human being (in my opinion) should profit from his turn-coating is maybe a sign of how rotten our Sport and the ethos of Sporting journalism has become.
On the back of the tax dodging EBT regime of the Murray era of the liquidated RFC plc! and the craven, lying dereliction of duty of the Football governance bodies.
Strewth!
John,
I wonder if you’re thinking about James Traynor. Forgive if you’re not. Rangers appointed a new Chief Finance Officer in August this year called James Taylor. I wonder if this the same guy moved to company secretary.
https://www.rangers.co.uk/Article/rangers-appoint-james-taylor-as-chief-finance-officer/3BcmlGFIMGAg19K8tLaP2p
Yes, Mordecai, I ran away with myself: the mere mention of the name ‘Jame’s’ in connection with RIFC plc conjures up the ‘journalist’! My apologies to James Taylor (whoever he may be).
I suppose we can all make mistakes.
In relation to James Blair, I remember noting in para 24 of sitting Judge Lionel Persey’s judgment in the case [2012]EWHC 1929(Comm):
“On 11 May 2018 RPC wrote to Mr Blair and advised him that SDIR considered it should have been notified of the Hummel offer and have been given the opportunity to match it pursuant to the Agreement. RPC asked for a copy of the Hummel agreement. Mr Blair responded on 14 May 2018, and asserted that Hummel had simply contracted in respect of rights previously granted to Puma. Further correspondence followed in which RPC pressed for production of the Hummel agreement and asked Rangers to confirm that Hummel had not been granted rights of distribution, marketing, advertising, promoting, offering for sale and/or selling the Official or Replica kit. On 18 May Mr Blair gave that confirmation, stating that “Hummel has not been granted any of the rights set out in your email”. This was untrue. He later acknowledged in his Seventh Witness Statement that ” …Of course, Hummel did have rights to distribute, market, advertise, promote, offer for sale and/or sell the Official Kit and/or Replica Kit …”
I seem to remember that a judge in another RIFC plc case was less than complimentary about the quality of Blair’s evidence.
Wonder whatever happened to old Jabba. Been quiet of late
BP, this is not a ‘reply’ to your post wondering about Jabba!
But I can’t see how I can post separately from the ‘reply’ word on your post!
Bu.ger Jabba, as far as I am concerned!
What I want to post is this:
“Not to bore the pants off anyone, can I just say that I was re-reading some material yesterday and again today, and what I read has given rise to this observation:
The propagation by the Scottish Football authorities, the BBC and the print MSM of the myth that TRFC was/is ‘continuity Rangers’ of 1872 foundation was powerful and unremitting.
So powerful and constant in fact , that at line 5 paragraph 18 of the judgment delivered on 28 February 2018 by the Inner House of the Court of Session( [2018]CSIH 30 P341/17) in the case of the Appeal by Dave King against a decision of the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers the following appears:
“ The reclaimer (ed: i.e. Dave King) had held shares in the old Rangers club before it went into Administration in 2012, and was in touch with Mr Letham from the summer of 2014 onwards about possible acquisition of further shares.”
It seems odd, surely, for the Judges to be thinking in terms of King buying shares in a company that already in 2014 was in its second year of Liquidation, Rangers of 1872 having gone into Liquidation in 2012: after all, the world and his wife and, one would assume, their Lordships of the Inner House, know that after a company has gone through the Liquidation process its shares are essentially worthless and that the company ceases to exist as a legal entity operating in the market-place!
There was therefore in 2018 no possibility of King (or any other person who had been a shareholder in the Liquidated club) being able in 2014 to add to his now worthless, meaningless holding of RFC of 1872 shares-there were none to buy!
It seems to me that the learned judges must subconsciously have absorbed into their minds the ‘continuity Rangers’ idea propagated perversely by the Football authorities and the SMSM; and that that perhaps had led them to think that Charles Green’s new company, SevcoScotland Ltd, had become the majority shareholder in RFC of 1872 as if it had purchased RFC of 1872 as a going concern!
That of course was not the case.
RFC-of-1872- the- football-club, the shareholder of the share in the then SPL in virtue of which they enjoyed membership of the SFA,was liquidated; and most ( but not all) of its assets were purchased by the aforementioned SevcoScotland, a new company ( company number 425159 )
incorporated on 29 May 2012 ,with Charles Green the sole shareholder of the two £1.00 shares.
SevcoScotland Ltd did not buy RFC of 1872, and therefore could not have had ,and did not have, any Rangers-of-1872 shares to sell -to King or anyone else!
Consequently RIFC plc could not be and is not the holding company of RFC of 1872 (In Liquidation).
In sporting truth and fact and in law it is the holding company of SevcoScotland Ltd ( renamed The Rangers Football Club on 31 July 2012) company number 425159 ,which was admitted -for the first time-into Scottish professional Football as a new football club in that year.
——-
Something is very rotten in the State of Scottish Football for as long as the authorities allow a company to claim to be what it is not and derive marketing advantage from claiming to be what it is not, in my opinion.
And ‘Sport’ is demeaned if a football club is allowed to claim sporting honours won decades before it even existed!
I’ve tried to find out what happened back in February in the matter of the action brought against RIFC plc by the nominee shareholders whom RIFC plc blocked from voting in AGMs.
There appears to be no report at all of the outcome of the hearing which had been scheduled on the Rolls of Court of Session for 21 February of this year.
I assume that the case is still alive? Still to go to proof?
Anyone?
My own hope is that RIFC plc (and every plc!) will win the legal right to know the identities of all their shareholders, big or small.
Joe McLaughlin
18 November 2023 at 17:23
‘…I wondered JC, have you written to the editor to ask him/her (I refuse to write them or some such nonsense) about the double standards you have pointed out.’
+++++++++
Mega-apologies, Joe, for not remembering to answer your question.
I don’t recall ever writing directly to the SMSM (relying on the assumption that sites such as SFM and other football blogs will be regularly read by the sports hacks some of whose work I comment on (with due attribution, of course)
Simple reason? Letters do not get published unless you give your real name/address to the editor.
Asseverations that your name/address will not be published are all very well.
But, sad to say, it is my view that in a situation where newspapers propagate a blatant sporting untruth to satisfy their editors/newspaper owners one would be an absolute idiot to trust them at all in any matter.
That is the damage that has been done by the 5-way Agreement.
God grant that those reporting to us on much more serious matters than football are not thirled to the lie that TRFC is continuity RFC of 1872.
After today’s latest ‘penalty’, has anyone yet put together a video comparing the type of penalty given apparently as standard to ‘Rangers’ when other very similar incidents are not awarded to other teams? There must be an opportunity to really show up/shame referees and the SFA generally if someone were to make a video with side by side comparisons. This site is about corruption in football so I believe this is a valid question for this site.
Hard to complain right now considering celtic have had most penalties in the league this season
If only all the penalties given to the new club were not similar to the ones not given to their opponents. There lies the argument, you cannot go over almost 70 odd games without conceding domestically, yet have conceded penalties to opponents in Europe for similiar ones not given domestically.
The fix is in as the new club seem to be in a bit of panic to remain financially sound and look like any new shares offered is just taking the piss out of the shareholders whose shares are virtually worth nothing in momentary terms but worth investing in a cheap poundland frame to hang on the wall. You can only dillute so much orange squash until it becomes something else.
nawlite
9 December 2023 at 20:14
‘..There must be an opportunity to really show up/shame referees and the SFA ‘
+++++++++
Ach, yer havin’ a laugh, surely, nawlite?
The SFA, with the support of the SMSM, long ago made self-contradictory a shameless liar of itself when, in spite of insisting, quite properly, that CG’s bunch of football players known as SevcoScotland/ Club 12? (honest to God!) had to apply for membership of, and be accepted into, a recognised football league before it could be granted membership of the SFA, and then proceeded to allow the brand-new club to claim to be the liquidated RFC of 1872 and enjoy the benefit of using the RFC of 1872 name in its marketing of itself!
Shamelessness isn’t in it!
The SMSM and the BBC bought into the most absurd nonsense that it was another entity that was Liquidated while the football club (the ‘what it’s all aboutness’ that that bloody eejit of a QC rabbited on about some years ago in the Court of Session) carried on as RFC of 1872!
Truth is not to be found in Scottish Football governance when untruths are not challenged by those who fear financial loss if the truth were to be sought.
Perhaps even morally worse than those who signed the 5-way Agreement are our own clubs’ owners/directors for not seeing the lie at the heart and resisting it with all their strength.
Never mind referees, when the very governance body is suspect!
The odd bent referee is as nothing compared with a cheating, lying ‘governance’ body!
It will take someone furth of Scotland, of England even, to dig into and expose the truth.
Shame on the SMSM, when in much more serious matter than sport journalists are being killed for trying to establish truth.
I spit in their eye!
Kilmarnock denied a blatant penalty during win over celtic today.
Luckily it didn’t cost them vital points in the top 6 race.
welcome for the first time, RossM. Good to have fans of all clubs on SFM. Just don’t let your bias show too much though, yeah?
nawlite
10 December 2023 at 21:18
‘..Good to have fans of all clubs on SFM…’
++++++++
nawlite, I mentioned in my post of 9 December 2023 at 00:34 my view that the SFM blog will be being read assiduously by the frightened PR people at Ibrox who know the truth about the false claim that TRFC is Rangers of 1872 and not some grubby creation of CG’s creation endorsed by a lying governance body!
A genuine Kilmarnock supporter will of course rejoice (and quite rightly so!) that Kilmarnock is the first domestic team to beat Celtic this season.
An utterly irrelevant observation about nothing to do with Kilmarnock FC suggests that RossM is more interested in another team altogether!
And perhaps eager to divert attention from the truth that RFC of 1872 ceased to exist as a football club entitled to participate in Scottish professional football when it went into Liquidation in 2012, and that there may be hard questions to ask about the implicit deceit in marketing of RIFC plc as being the holding company of RFC of 1872 in the Prospectus of 2012!
And, like a former PR officer for RIFC plc, is unable to hide the fact.
My sincere apologies to RossM if he/she is not working in the cause of RIFC plc, rather than celebrating a famous win by Kilmarnock!
From the Notes to the RIFC plc Accounts for 2023 report:
“33. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES During the year under review, a claim was raised by Elite Sports Group Limited (“Elite”) against the club in respect of previous contracts. On 24th November 2022, Elite went into administration, and appointed administrators. The administrators are now pursuing the claim and defences have been lodged by the club. Having taken independent legal and expert advice, the board is satisfied that no provision is required in the financial statements.”
and from yesterday’s Rolls of Court:
“LORD BRAID – R Hamilton, Clerk
Court 6 – Parliament House
Thursday 21st December
Procedural Hearing
between 9.30am and 10.00am
“CA74/22 Elite Sports Group Ltd (in administration) v The Rangers”
———
What is the sum the Administrators of Elite Sports are claiming in damages…£9.5 million is it?
Ha-ha: there might be no need to show that there is provision to meet such an amount if the Administrators win the case: but, my goodness, RIFC plc/TRFC Ltd will have to have the readies ready in that event.
Is there a clone of CG anywhere around when you need it?
Well, there are things that you remember from your schooldays that still make you cringe in your 80’s.
Let me mention one such thing in my own life.
Back in about 1956, in 3rd year, while reading aloud in class from one of the set books, I for the first time came across a word which I pronounced as ‘condiggin’.
A voice roared at me “Spell that word, boy!”
I duly did.
As you will have worked out, the word was ‘condign,’ and the following word was ‘punishment’.
Where am I going with this?
Well, tonight I’m in a position to use those two words in relation to that result at Celtic Park this evening!
That result can be seen as “condign punishment” for the Board of Celtic plc for having gone along with the nonsense that TRFC are RFC of 1872, instead of insisting on Truth sports governance.
The Celtic plc board are in there with the SFA and SPFL (in my opinion) as supporting the moral filth of dishonest sport.
The Turkish Football Federation have shown by their actions recently that our SFA/SPFL AND Celtic acted as cowardly compromisers of Truth for the sake of filthy lucre.
There’s a stain on the Celtic escutcheon (a bigger one on SFA/SPFL) that will NEVER be cleaned off: And a stain on such consciences as they may have of all who sold their souls for money!
[ I didn’t see tonight’s game, but from the radio commentary Naismith outsmarted Rodgers}
What a wonderful week for Scottish football in Europe.
I found it refreshing that John Hartson and Neil Lennon both agreed that shirt pulling was a blatant penalty.
Celtic getting a penalty wasn’t surprising though as our domestic game confirms.
RossM
Are you ‘reasonablechap’ or Albertz 11 of recent times perchance? Just wondering!
Congratulations to the team in blue that captured the League Cup today. I believe this is their second cup win since their inception in 2012 and has them tied with St. Johnstone at that total and still trailing Celtic in the years since 2012. One other thought, can someone define when shirt pulling, shirt holding etc is a penalty. Cantwell’s grip on an Aberdeen shirt ( still photos) certainly would have qualified as a penalty in recent weeks. How would that scenario been viewed if the gripper had been in red and the grippee in blue.
goforpar
17 December 2023 at 22:48
“…I believe this is their second cup win since their inception in 2012 …”
++++++++
And you believe correctly, goforpar, without a shadow of a doubt!
It is appalling that our sport is governed by men so collectively unprincipled, gutless and/or venal as to allow TRFC of 2012 creation to claim ownership of all the sporting trophies and honours won by the Liquated RFC of 1872.
As mentioned several times in the past, the fan-base of the old Rangers FC of 1872 knew damned fine what ‘Liquidation’ meant and took to the streets to ‘force’ the frightened governance bodies to abandon all sense of duty and right.
I say ‘force’ but in truth they were/are men so lacking in moral fibre that they capitulated without a fight and endorsed the stupidest fiction imaginable in sport.
May they be held in contempt and scorn for generations to come.
And the running-dog lackeys in the SMSM with them.
John Clark
18 December 2023 at 13:37
I seem to recall that historical trophy wins were assigned to the new club by the powers that be, with no indication that they’d won them on the pitch .
I feel I may have missed an opportunity to pass along further congratulations to the team in blue yesterday. They have now a treble to their credit, albeit it took some 10 years to collect, and, three different managers at the helm. Other teams seem to collect them more frequently and in the same year. But, nothing gets in the way of good but belated good news down Ibrox way,
paddy malarkey
18 December 2023 at 17:07
“I seem to recall that historical trophy wins were assigned to the new club by the powers that be, with no indication that they’d won them on the pitch ”
++++++++++
Well, pm, this is from the SPFL website yesterday:
“Rangers beat Aberdeen 1-0 in the Viaplay Cup final to claim the trophy for a record 28th time and get their hands on the silverware for the first time since 2010/11”
They lie, of course-knowingly!
Just to remind them of how I perceive them, I have sent the following email to the Board of the SPFL: it might be Christmas an’ all, but I hold no Christmassy feelings for sports cheats:
“Dear Board members of SPFL,
This appears on the official website of the SPFL yesterday.
“Rangers beat Aberdeen 1-0 in the Viaplay Cup final to claim the trophy for a record 28th time and get their hands on the silverware for the first time since 2010/11″
You know with crystal clarity that in 2012 the then SPL required the surrender of the share held by ‘Rangers Football Club of 1872, and that the SFA in consequence withdrew ‘Rangers’ membership of that Association, and that TRFC was required to find a place in a ‘recognised league’ before you yourselves were permitted under your own Articles of Association to admit it for the first time into Scottish football.
Why then do you persist in identifying TRFC [company number SC 425159} with RFC 2012 plc [company number SC 004276, a football club currently in Liquidation?]
In so doing you are demonstrating a cynical disregard for truth and a readiness to suborn the very concept of sporting merit.
You should be utterly, utterly ashamed of yourselves.
Yours in contempt,
(me).”
_____
According to Neil Doncaster and Rod McKenzie, a decision to confer the titles won by Rangers Football Club on Charles Green’s Newco wasn’t made by the SFA or the SP(F)L, but following a board meeting of the SFL, a board which included known Ibrox sympathisers David Longmuir and Jim Ballantyne.
“When the issue of potential title stripping was discussed, it was revealed that the decision to recognise Newco’s claim to RFC’s titles, was taken by the SFL board including David Longmuir and Jim Ballantyne, when they decided to invite Newco into the SFL 3rd Division.”
https://www.celticquicknews.co.uk/celtic-fans-meeting-with-neil-doncaster-and-rod-mckenzie/
Anybody considering reading the entire article should be warned that many of the responses provided by messrs Doncaster and McKenzie could prove injurious to your health.
from ‘The Scotsman’
‘Lowland League votes to retain B teams as former SPFL club expresses dismay
Story by Matthew Elder •
51m ago ”
‘Celtic and Hearts can continue to field B teams in pyramid structure for next two seasons’…
‘A narrow 8-7 majority of clubs voted in favour of retaining B teams for the 2024-25 and 2025-26 campaigns, with one club understood to have abstained from casting a vote’
Anyone identify the ‘abstaining club’?
Highlander 18 December at 22.06
“When the issue of potential title stripping was discussed, it was revealed that the decision to recognise Newco’s claim to RFC’s titles, was taken by the SFL board including David Longmuir and Jim Ballantyne, when they decided to invite Newco into the SFL 3rd Division.”
++++++++
Yes, Highlander, and thank you for reminding me of the part those creatures had in the whole disgusting business.
Their ridiculous nonsense was endorsed by the gutless clubs of the SFL and then later given the nod by the new SPFL and the SFA.
Worse than that, in the wider field, was the endorsement of the Big Lie by the likes of “The Scotsman” and other parts of the SMSM.
And incidentally, ‘The Scotsman’ today makes a right hypocritical liar of itself.! Its first leader is headed :”Truth and civil service impartiality matter” attacks what it alleges is the lack of impartiality of the civil servants working to the Scottish government.
The second leader is a veritable paean to ‘Rangers’- as providing a lesson on ‘leadership’ to the SNP and Conservatives.
The ‘Scotsman’ truth-seeking and impartial?
I think not!
“Craig Levein: Celtic and Rangers should move to England and pay back £50m per season to Scottish football” (from By Gavin McCafferty of ‘The Scotsman’
Published 19th Dec 2023, 18:45 GMT
Updated 19th Dec 2023, 18:46 GMT)
———
Is there any SFM reader out there who can explain to us the practical realities for either club if it chose to detach itself entirely from membership of the SPFL and, consequently, of the SFA? For example, what might be involved in relation to their ‘B’ teams and ‘academies’?
Levein is, I think, speaking tongue in cheek!
It would, I think, make more sense if the boards of every club in the SPFL re-asserted the fact that any football match requires two teams to provide the sport that people pay to see, and pushed for a return to gate-sharing on a 50-50 basis, bugger the relative disparities in match-attending fanbase!
Somebody keep me right, please!
From the Rolls of Court Tuesday 19th December
LORD BRAID – R Hamilton, Clerk
Court 6 – Parliament House
Thursday 21st December
Procedural Hearing
between 9.00am and 9.30am
CA74/22 Elite Sports Group Ltd (in administration) v The Rangers
_______
I think this is confirmation of an already notified hearing?
Good luck to Elite Sports, and I may be permitted to hope that their Administrators are a damn sight better at their job than the wretched Whitehouse and Clark of Duff and Phelps!
God help the poor millionaire souls!
Honest to God!
Really, there has to be a film made about the whole story of the Liquidation of RFC of 1872, a universal theme of something or other.
Don’t we just love it, comedy gold!
“…and within five minutes St Johnstone were down to 10 men. Having initially booked the striker for his challenge, it wasn’t long before referee Alan Muir was called to the monitors for a closer look and he upgraded the booking to an ordering-off.”
Honest to God.
—
Poetry:
Talking about poetry I can say that among my favourite poets is Dante Alighieri. I often wonder- in the abstract- into what circle of Hell he, if alive today, would put, say, sports cheats and cheating sports governance bodies.?
—-
Back to football, I heard on BBC Scotland 11 pm news this ‘…and Tavernier made sure … with a late penalty..’
Surprise, surprise! What a total surprise! one up, ten-man opposition, but just to be sure….
Comedy gold?
Nothing even remotely funny about it, in my opinion.
—
So, that’s one in the goolies for UEFA and FIFA, from the European Court of Justice!
And the road is clear for a European super league, American style?
Squeaky-bum time for the SFA/SPFL wretches.
So, that’s one in the goolies for UEFA and FIFA, from the European Court of Justice!
And the road is clear for a European super league, American style?
Squeaky-bum time for the SFA/SPFL wretches??
More on the above .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67787981
The Court of Session seems to be eager to encourage the public to view live cases on-line:
read about it on this link
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/the-courts/supreme-courts/about-the-court-of-session/guidance-note-for-livestreaming-in-the-inner-house-of-the-court-of-session
The first case scheduled to be live-streamed is case number XA27-23, an Appeal case [ before 3 judges] scheduled to be heard on16t and 17th of January 2024.
see this link
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/the-courts/supreme-courts/about-the-court-of-session/livestream-hearings/case-xa27-23
I mention this only because my eye fell on the name of the ‘second respondent’-Park’s (Ayr) Ltd.
I think Douglas Ireland Park of this parish is connected to this business, and the case is about whether the appellant (a dissatisfied car purchaser) acted in breach of a ‘contract’ or not and blah blah blah.
Douglas Park, of course, is connected to football club that claims to be a hunnert an’ fifty-wan in spite of having been created and admitted into Scottish football only in 2012!!
My sympathies are with the purchaser. I hope he wins his Appeal (I don’t know him or anything about him, of course, but I am always on the side of anyone who is in dispute with a car dealership.
”
RossM
17 December 2023 at 01:37
What a wonderful week for Scottish football in Europe.
I found it refreshing that John Hartson and Neil Lennon both agreed that shirt pulling was a blatant penalty.
Celtic getting a penalty wasn’t surprising though as our domestic game confirms.”
Glad you concur with the two former Celts who agreed shirt pulling in the box is a pen. In the LC Final Cantwell was seen clearly shirt pulling by all who viewed the game, and video posted on social media, yet, somehow, even replays by viaplay, were not enough to merit the incidents been picked up by VAR and a PK award to the Dons, you cannot have one VAR for one club.
What would be point in other clubs paying towards it when all it does is robs them of future finance by either costing them in a final, which some clubs can feed off all season and reap financial rewards commercially, further, perhaps leading them towards relegation as points is what is at stake in the survival game.
Glad you are in agreement that all shirt tugging is either a foul or PK. The game played in the VAR room has to be called out and the usual officials repremanded.
My comment of 22.24 tonight is ‘awaiting moderation’
Must be some technical thing!?
No sweary words or such like- I merely draw attention to the Court Rolls page that tells us that the Court of Session is increasingly adopting a live-streaming approach and has posted the dates of the next live streaming cases in January, one of which involves a company with which a big shareholder in RIFC plc has connections.
From a lengthy piece in ‘The Independent’
“Why it’s vital that Uefa and Fifa win the fight for football’s future
Story by Miguel Delaney’
“It is now clear, after years, that the European Union is beginning to take an interest in a legal definition of sport. Even the Super League verdict touched on that, in recognising the importance of sporting merit.”
_____
UEFA, I believe, has shown that it has no more regard for ‘sporting integrity’ than does the SPFL or SFA by not sanctioning those ‘governance’ bodies’ for allowing the farce to continue of a 13- year-old-club claiming the sporting honours and titles won by the now defunct (in Liquidation, awaiting dissolution) RFC of 1872.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/sport/football/why-it-s-vital-that-uefa-and-fifa-win-the-fight-for-football-s-future/ar-AA1lTpJx?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=62ac20366b1a4aecb045c94f4ff44452&ei=23
My post today at 18.14 refers.
I copied that post to ‘The Independent’s’ online comments page. Why? Because of the reference to ‘sporting integrity’. The more people can be pointed in the direction of EXAMINING the integrity of those who propagate the nonsense that a liquidated football club is still playing in Scottish professional football the better, I think.
Where is there a journalist worthy of that appellation to be found in Scotland’s media? You are absolutely right -nowhere!
[At school we learned of Cato, in the Roman senate. He at every opportunity insisted that Rome should recognise the danger that Carthage presented and kept harping on about it. He was right: the Carthaginians were at it, tooling up for war.]
I am no Cato, but I will continue to insist that the Big Lie has to be recognised as such if ‘sporting integrity’ means anything at all.
Let the money-men and a dodgy SMSM squirm as liars and cheats do when confronted with Truth.
That’s all I want for Christmas.
Some good news for Scottish football .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67813683
Sadly, AI has put a post of mine about Scottish Parliamentary business into ‘moderation’
Must have used some trigger words that AI is programmed to react to! [incidentally, does anyone else read “AI” as “AL”, as in short for Alan or Albert? My brain does it every time!]
I’ve just got round to reading the Scottish Football Supporters’ Association’s ‘ Andy’s sting in the tale’ see link https://scottishfsa.org/chairmans-blog-21-12-23/
It gives the record of the discussion in Parliamentary Committee of the suggestion that Scottish Football should have an independent ‘regulator’.
This is the link to that discussion:
https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/official-report/search-what-was-said-in-parliament/HSCS-19-12-2023?meeting=15626&iob=133322
I have lifted this little gem from it:
” Sandesh Gulhane [ed: MSP, committee member]
“…A massive 96.2 per cent of people felt that independent regulation would be a positive step for Scottish football. There are other figures on that that are up in the 90s. That view is overwhelming on the part of supporters because you are right that everyone concentrates on their club. Therefore, from your point of view, why should we not look at implementing independent regulation?
Ian Maxwell [ed: CEO of the SFA]: “The idea of an independent regulator down south has had a high profile. That was born out of four different incidents. One was the potential breakaway for the European super league and the fact that English Premier League clubs were being courted for that; another one was the financial failings of clubs down south that had gone into administration, with Bury, Derby County, Macclesfield Town and a number of other clubs facing issues; one was the impact of Covid on football clubs and their ability to withstand that financial pressure, given the extreme financial pressure that football was under generally; and one was the changes that club owners had made, with, for example, Hull City and Cardiff City changing club badges and colours and making decisions that they had not engaged with their supporters on. None of those elements is relevant for Scotland.”
———
So much for Maxwell. I now ask:
–Whit’s that, Mr. Maxwell? NONE of those elements is relevant for Scotland?
I believe you are quite wrong there, Mr Maxwell!
I rather imagine that the matter of Scottish Football clubs going into Administration and clubs going into Liquidation is very relevant for Scotland.
Especially when Scottish Football ‘governance’ forswears itself and continues to allow a now 13-year-old club, to claim the sporting honours and titles won over a period of 140 years year by a club that went into Liquidation in 2012 and is awaiting dissolution in a few months’ time when the Liquidators finish their job.
An Independent Regulator would, I imagine, have an interest in how the SPFL/SFA operated under the laws of the land and would have regard to how clubs related to tax laws and insolvency legislation and
I removed one word from the post that was in moderation, thinking that that word might have been the reason for the post going into moderation.
Seems not, because the amended post went into moderation as well!
Anyway (see my post of 23.47) I think I will copy it to the Scottish Parliamentary Committee looking at whether Scottish Football should have an independent Regulator!
John Clark
24 December 2023 at 00:03
Anyway (see my post of 23.47) I think I will copy it to the Scottish Parliamentary Committee looking at whether Scottish Football should have an independent Regulator!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
I always laugh at the notion of the Scottish Government appointing an ‘independent’ Regulator for football. This will be the same Government who like to take a significant amount of income tax from us, yet in 2012 were pleading with HMRC to ignore tens of millions of tax which was illegally withheld by the old Rangers.
I have zero faith they would be able to appoint a person, or persons, to regulate the game who would be truly independent. More recently their differing treatment regarding covid breaches depending on the clubs involved only reinforces my view.
Anyway John, a very merry Christmas, and a happy and prosperous 2024 to you, and all the members of this forum.
upthehoops
24 December 2023 at 17:05
‘…yet in 2012 were pleading with HMRC to ignore tens of millions of tax which was illegally withheld by the old Rangers.’
++++++++
I take your point, uth, and am mindful of the fact that it was the UK Supreme Court, not any Scottish court, that ruled in favour of HMRC.!
And it is clearly the case that significant political players and perhaps members of the BBC Trust did their damnedest to protect ‘Rangers’, aided and abetted by a ‘governance’ body supported by the SMSM, and not seriously challenged by any other club…
Or by the Court of Session which never made a distinction between TRFC and RFC of 1872, but blithely spoke of ‘Rangers’ in any case involving RIFC plc/TRFC.
Not that I am ‘murmuring the judges’… which used to be a crime!
You may be right in thinking that whoever might be appointed as ‘Regulator’ of Scottish Football might be as personally biased as the SMSM sports hacks or the kind of folk on sports governance bodies who sign secret 5-way agreements!
But at least there would be more legal accountability?
Anyway, happy Christmas to all on the SFM blog, whether they support truth or not.
To be fair John, the Court of Session at the third tribunal (if that’s what it was called) did rule in favour of HMRC, which was then appealed to the Supreme Court.
If I’m correct, its over 12 years since Rangers got a penalty at Celtic Park
Some might describe that as a pattern of assistance.
3 tickets going spare for game after seeing the officials.
RossM
Ah, so you are erstwhile poster Albertz11 or reasonablechap – or one of like minded triplets with the
same delusional WATP rhetoric.
Anyway. following your own logic and claim (purely for the purposes of accuracy ye ken), your post should at least be corrected to reflect the fact that Sevco/TRFC have NEVER had a penalty at Paradise (Rangers -born 1872. Died 2012). Otherwise, I’m confused.
Also, I’m having some fun trying to identify who the holders of the cryptically and mysteriously (at least for me) mentioned 3 spare tickets might be. If your referring to the officials, should that read 6 (Nick Walsh, Graeme Stewart, Calum Spence, Willie Collum Daniel Mc Farlane, and |kevin Clancy – the various designated officials). the festive laff on a horrible, stormy day!
RossM
27 December 2023 at 08:26
Regardless of who is officiating, at Parkhead on Saturday , why would 3 Celtic fans give up their tickets for the game ? TRFC fans are excluded , bar maybe , the aforementioned match officials .
upthehoops
25 December 2023 at 23:26
‘…To be fair John, the Court of Session at the third tribunal (if that’s what it was called) did rule in favour of HMRC,’
+++++
They did indeed, uth, and I apologise for my poorly written post!
I think my mind was recalling the various court actions brought in England and Scotland by or against RIFC/TRFC (not RFC of 1872!) SUBSEQUENT to the Liquidation; cases in which RIFC/TRFC are described by the Judge as being ‘the well-known Glasgow football team ‘Rangers…’
The Courts, whether in Scotland or England, seemed either simply to have accepted RIFC plc’s untruthful version of who and what they were/are, or decided to ignore the fact that RIFC plc/TRFC could not POSSIBLY be the well-known Rangers football club that was in Liquidation at the time, and had been in Liquidation since 2012!
And I’m reminded of the wonderful Dr Heidi Poon who ripped apart in her dissenting opinion the outrageous nonsense of the First Tier Tax Tribunal and I raise my cocoa cup in her honour!
John Clark
27 December 2023 at 23:41
And I’m reminded of the wonderful Dr Heidi Poon who ripped apart in her dissenting opinion the outrageous nonsense of the First Tier Tax Tribunal and I raise my cocoa cup in her honour!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The 2-1 verdict at the FTTT bought them time, and allowed some outrageous media spin and headlines. Then the second tribunal, presided over by a Judge the Media exposed as a Celtic fan before it was held, gave them even more opportunity to gloat and spin. How strange that it was only when we got to the real deal of the Court of Session followed by the Supreme Court, that the whole thing was exposed for what it was. A lot of crucial time had been bought in the intervening years though.
And another thing….
The link to the article posted earlier by Highlander from when Celtic fans met with the SPFL, reminded me of one of the most outrageous aspects of this entire matter. That the SPFL and SFA deem that a football club is simply an emotional attachment that can never cease to exist. They better hope THAT view is never tested in the Court of Session or the Supreme Court!
upthehoops
28 December 2023 at 15:39
‘…That the SPFL and SFA deem that a football club is simply an emotional attachment that can never cease to exist.’
++++++++++
I think, uth, they might have got that idea from an idiot of a QC who wittered on about ‘the whatness of a club… the ethereal essence… the what-it’s-all-about-ness..’
I haven’t the relevant notebook to hand in which I think I made a note to the effect that that was the essence of the point the QC was making [to some hilarity all round]- and perhaps not his ‘ipsissima Verba’.]
I must try to dig out from my attic the notebook I used at that particular hearing. For all I know that QC might now be a Judge!!
“That the SPFL and SFA deem that a football club is simply an emotional attachment that can never cease to exist”
Tell that to Third Lanark, Airdrie and Gretna fans who lost their clubs and titles.
The Sevco scenario reminds of Trump and the MAGA movement, they know they lost an election and that their man is not the President, but it does not stop the right wing media perpetuate the propaganda that Trump is the President and MAGA is the republican party, it is not but when people are afraid to speak out it becomes an obscured norm.
bigboab1916
29 December 2023 at 16:19
‘…Tell that to Third Lanark, Airdrie and Gretna fans who lost their clubs and titles.’
++++++++++
Exactly.
The supporters of those clubs did not think even for a minute of arguing that it was the owner(s) of a ‘company’ that had gone bust while the club remained alive and kicking!
No. It was the clubs that were the entities that held membership of the SFA.
And it was the clubs that lost the entitlement to such membership and ceased to participate in Scottish Football!
We are in trouble in this wee country of ours when we have a Press and BBC prepared to propagate the lie that TRFC is somehow RFC of 1872 presently in Liquidation as RFC 2012 plc!
Honest to God,
Who could trust anything they report!? On any matter, if they can’t report truth in a mere matter of Sport?
Be out of commission tomorrow due to it being my birthday ‘n’that, so let me wish you all a very happy New Year, and a 2024 imbued with sporting integrity and a more level playing field.
Best wishes to all your teams too – except when they’re playing Celtic of course 🙂
Big Pink
31 December 2023 at 16:17
Many happy returns of the day ,and best wishes to you and yours in 2024 .
Cheers Paddy😀
Big Pink
31 December 2023 at 16:17
‘…Be out of commission tomorrow due to it being my birthday ‘.’
+++++++++
Well, BP, let me join pm in wishing you a very happy birthday: how nice to have been born at the start of a new year! May the new year bring you and yours happiness and good health, and maybe some wealth as well!
PC.s Tantrums …
This is becoming quite farcical – whit a bunch of entitled whingers WATP are! If that’s how much of a rant Clement goes on after his first defeat, what would he be like when suffering a few.
When complaining about the penalty his team were ‘denied’ (what an irony that is!), there was no gracious acknowledgement that any such penalty awarded would have been overturned as Sima was offside in the first place (thank you Bobby Madden – now formerly one of their own).
Next, he wanted Bernardo to receive a second yellow card for a brutal (whit?) foul on Goldson when, in fact, said Goldson had gone over the ball catching his opponent on the knee (lucky to escape serious injury there). Booking, at least for Goldson?
When O’Riley, in considerable discomfort, was receiving treatment, Clement was gesticulating that he should be taken off.
You’ll remember also that Turnbull was (wrongly!!) called offside before being fouled in the box by Tavernier. Penalty – naw!!!
…and what about the incident when Oh, while on the ground, was hauled away (by Goldson?) which should have resulted in another red card.
Not much mention of most of the above today in our partisan press/media whilst the Sevco fan sites go bananas.
Such childish, undignified and paranoid behaviour from a self-entitled 11-year-old club!
(be careful what you ask for wrt transparency!).
So with my own rant at an end (for now!), all the best for ’24 – and Happy Birthday to BP
You would think, if you were new to Scottish Football, this was the first time in the history of the SPFL that any team had been denied what they thought was a penalty. Whereas it happens nearly every week with just a passing moan from those affected and is forgotten 2 days later. Not with our friends from Ibrox, every time a decision goes against them they complain to the SFA and the media keep it up for days. It’s time the other teams started complaining when they are denied a penalty against The Rangers.
On the theme of the MSM did anyone notice that not one reported on Balogun spitting at fans as he walked off following his red card?
A Happy New Year to all who read SFM whatever team you follow.
Not quite sure where to go with the fallout from the Glasgow Derby. I don’t know whether the lack of understanding being demonstrated of how VAR is used is genuine or confected but the blood and thunder being generated is surely bringing the game into disrepute. For the safety of our referees the mid season break could not have come at a better time.
I’m no fan of Willie Collum – always found him a bit too fussy – but the board at TRFC need to take a look at themselves (and what happened recently in Turkey) and move on.
I think Rangers are well aware of the protocols and shortcomings of var. They also know that the correct decision was reached no matter what other nuances they wish to attribute it all to. The posturing is just a dog whistle is all.
At some point though, it might be good if the refs association woke up to the fact that their lack of professionalism and various competence deficits are things that need to be addressed.
A celtic fan worrying about the safety of match officials I always find fascinating.
The reason why these games kick off at midday is due to celtic fans in May 99.
Harassing and intimidating officials is also a celtic thing.
The club hired a private detective to follow Hugh Dallas.
A referee strike in 2010 was due to celtic fans harassment of match officials.
I think you should check the facts on the origin of the 2010 SFA Referees’ strike.
RossM
Of the three claims you make, I’m pretty sure the early kick-offs preceded 1999, but I am absolutely certain that Celtic did not hire a private detective to follow any referee.
The referee strike I think evolved out of DougieGate, so I suppose the “harassment” claim is a matter of your own perspective.
RossM/Albertz11/reasonablechap (whoever!)
Thanks for sparking some cheering ‘entertainemt’ on here for me (especially good at this time of year).
Under the ‘umbrella’ of ‘people in glass houses’, it’s not to difficult to point out the ludicrous nature of your claims e.g. check the YouTube highlights for Scottish Cup replay in 2011(?) – and many more examples of haranguing/threatening refs by Oldco abound (maybe you want to start a competition of claim and counter claim – that would be fun).
Also, I think I’ve uncovered the thinking behind the Ibrox animus towards Willie Collum via his record in games v Celtic – from today’s Daily Record.
“The whistler has been in charge of ten Old Firm matches and Rangers have only won one of them – the first one he took charge of in 2010 where Rangers won 3-1. Since then, Celtic have won eight of the eight Old Firm games Collum has been the man in the middle and drawn once…” It should be noted that these stats cover both version of the Govan ‘mob’. Nuff said – in their eyes, he doesn’t seem to ‘bend to their will’!
bect67
4 January 2024 at 15:54
Is this the same Willie Collum who gave Rangers a penalty when Whittaker dived with zero contact ,and he didn’t even see it ? Mibbes he isn’t hitting performance expectations now .
Ross M 04/01 00.28
Celtic hired a behaviour psychologist to examine the actions of Hugh Dallas after the 99 title winning game.
It was the Celtic Supporters Association who had a referee (Jim McCluskey) followed by a PI.
paddy 04/01 17.14
Broadfoot not Whittaker.
bect67
I am not Ross M, reasonablechap, Lawman etc.
Allan MacDonald asked a (US based)Behavioural Psychologist to have a look at the referee in that Old Firm match. The storm over the asking very effectively masked the BP’s verdict on the failed Celtic CEO candidate, which did not show him in a good light. Forgot about the CSA PI thing🤣
Correct about the blind penalty villain tho’👍😊
Or maybe a victim of selective SEVCO amnesia Paddy.
The incessant whinging reminds me of the old Willie Nelson song:-
“Blue eyes cryin in the rain” Get over it sez me!
Hopefully, the SFA response (Sky Sports) re the meeting yesterday should put the matter to rest for all fair-minded supporters!
This entitlement narrative, and the Collum Derangement Syndrome, diz get a bit much sometimes
The statement today from the SFA stands at odds with the narrative being pushed by certain folks. Reads like a “cease and desist” from the SFA. Let’s see what happens next – my money is on nothing.
Joe McQuaid
4 January 2024 at 21:10
‘…Reads like a “cease and desist” from the SFA…]
++++++++
Joe McQuaid (welcome-haven’t read you before!), we know that the Board of RIFC plc know that the SFA is but putty in its hands, the SFA having kowtowed to them by allowing RIFC plc to pass itself off for marketing purposes to be the holding company of the now dead RFC of 1872.
The SFA was exposed in 2012/13 as a basically corrupt body, ready to sell its soul for ‘filthy lucre’s’ sake-or worse!
And the Board of RIFC plc know in its very guts that the SFA will now simply huff and puff -and do nothing!
I would suggest that it is now about time that the SFA faced up to truth, sporting truth, and brought the upstart, ungrateful (for the favours they enjoy at the hands of the forsworn SFA) RIFC plc to heel.
For the sake of Scottish Football as a ‘Sport’ the SFA should kick the 5-Way Agreement into touch in so far as it recognised ‘continuity’ Rangers of 1872 and ignored the fact that RFC of 1872 lost its membership of the SFA in 2012.
Testing
Kenny MacDonald
4 January 2024 at 18:18
Cheers, I had a picture of Broadfoot in my head but came up with the wrong name-may be time to stop relying on memory !
RIFC plc accounts to June 2023 now available on this link
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC437060/filing-history
My notification did not say the accounts were being processed and will be available in 10 days!
A wee cat among the pigeons .
https://news.stv.tv/scotland/glasgow-msp-james-dornan-submits-motion-for-sfa-transparency-amid-rangers-row
…
Paddy malarkey above …
“A wee cat amongst the pigeons”
Check Wiki etc – this seems more like a ‘rap sheet to me – for a not very nice person!
bect67
5 January 2024 at 22:35
‘…Check Wiki etc – this seems more like a ‘rap sheet to me – for a not very nice person!
+++++++
I know not the man, I have to say!
But I agree with that bit in his question where he asks our Parliament to recognise ‘the longstanding culture of secrecy that exists within the ruling hierarchy of Scottish football.’
Secrecy?
The 5-way agreement which two different ‘Rangers’ clubs signed? One dead, one newly created?
The nonsense that TRFC inherited the share in the SPL that RFC in Liquidation had to surrender?
‘Non-disclosure agreements’ of the dirty business of allowing a new club to claim to be continuity ‘Rangers’ of 1872?
I think I echo Dornan’s call for ‘transparency!’
And not just in relation to a single penalty decision but in relation to the corruption at the very heart of a sports governance body -in receipt of occasional public monies- that created/bought into the lie that a football club newly admitted by it in 2012 into the sport which they govern is one and the same as the football club which went into Liquidation in 2012!
The sheer bloody effrontery of the SFA is almost unbelievable! And, indeed, cannot possibly be sustained.
The Truth will out, and the liars will be recognised as the liars they are, whether they may be still alive or mouldering in their graves when that happens.
By way of light relief, can I say that the answer to a clue in the crossword in Thursday’s ‘Scotsman’ was ‘cran’
That rang bells in my memory. Where had I heard that word before?
Ah, eventually it came to me this evening ( Friday) as I served up dinner for Mrs C: it was the surname of a witness in the case of ‘SDI Retail Services L td’ v ‘David King, Paul Murray..blah blah’ in 2018 see [2018] EWHC 1697(Comm) para 41.
I love these little what do you call them? coincidences?
Especially when they remind me of court cases lost by folk connected with the Big Lie!
Regarding James Dornan and his calls for transparency.
Like many football fans I would welcome reform in the SFA, part of which would be them becoming a more open, transparent organisation. However, it sticks in the craw when the call comes from a man whose former boss demanded that HMRC shouldn’t be chasing the old Rangers for the tax they owed, which had brought them much success. Another of his previous bosses stood grandstanding at press briefings regarding covid breaches within football, quite brazenly latching onto public opinion regarding which clubs they preferred to see getting a kicking, and which club was bizarrely praised for how they handled players committing breaches.
So James Dornan and anyone else within Holyrood needs to look inwardly and ask if they (the Scottish Government) would be in any way whatsoever capable of appointing a truly independent Football Regulator. On previous evidence they most certainly wouldn’t. Playing to the gallery regarding football shouldn’t be part of anything, but all previous evidence suggests it’s what they thrive on.
Who would this Regulator actually be anyway? Holyrood is already full of people earning vast sums for roles they are not even remotely qualified for. Outwith Holyrood they would struggle to hold down even a junior management position.
All the above in my opinion of course.
upthehoops
6 January 2024 at 12:12
‘…Who would this Regulator actually be anyway? Holyrood is already full of people earning vast sums for roles they are not even remotely qualified for. ‘
+++++++++
England is a different country, of course, but it’s worthwhile having a read at what is proposed there in the matter of Regulation. Have a read at this
ttps://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-sustainable-future-reforming-club-football-governance/a-sustainable-future-reforming-club-football-governance#part-2-the-independent-football-regulator
from which I have lifted this:
“The government is not convinced that an industry regulator would be genuinely independent from the influence of clubs, or could be sufficiently held accountable for its actions and performance. As such, we do not believe a football body is an appropriate home for the Regulator at this stage. This need not prevent the industry from taking action to reform in the interim.
The institutional location of the Regulator will be determined based on several guiding principles, including ensuring independence and proper accountability.
The government believes regulated clubs should bear the cost of regulation, which would ultimately benefit the industry. Therefore, the Regulator would be funded by a levy on clubs proportionate to their revenue”
I take from that that the intention is to try to have ‘Regulation’ well out of interference by people actually in the industry.
But I would say that the reluctance of the FCA and the Insolvency Service and the now defunct BBC Trust to thoroughly investigate the RIFC plc Prospectus and the bogus claims by RIFC plc to be the holding company of RFC of 1872 has made me cynical to a great degree!
John Clark
6 January 2024 at 19:41
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Thanks for that update John.
I just don’t want to see any more gravy trains for under qualified people who add zero value except to their own pockets. There is enough of that in the country right now. I also think that even with the best of intentions, getting a truly independent football regulator in Scotland is well nigh impossible. Maybe I’m wrong of course, but nothing happening in society right now convinces me there is any chance of it happening. Division, ideology, and vested interest seems to come before anything. In my opinion of course.
One from this afternoon from a TRFC fan -we need foreign referees to remove actual or perceived bias from our most important game, but they can’t come from Latin countries because of their dominant domestic religious sect (to paraphrase). I’m glad I’m godless !
Trouble is Paddy, godless or not, some are hell-bent on imposing theirs on all of us.
paddy above
Help ma boab!
So, following the logic here, that would be those from the Emerald Isle (especially Irish Catholics?) ‘goosed’ then?
Honestly, you can twist anything with a bigoted narrative
… and there wiz me thinkin’I that paranoia was the domain of CFC supporters!
paddy malarkey
6 January 2024 at 20:19
‘…One from this afternoon from a TRFC fan -we need foreign referees to remove actual or perceived bias from our most important game, but they can’t come from Latin countries because of their dominant domestic religious sect (to paraphrase).’
+++++++++
I had a good laugh at that , pm, as being a spoof comment by a comedian of a TRFC fan.. eh, it was a spoof? Surely?? Or was it an observation made by any ‘intellectual’ pundit on BBC radio Scotland?
John Clark
Alas,no . Straight from the donkey’s mouth . The Pope casts a wide and heavy shadow on some .
“The Scotsman” onine, about an hour ago:
“Joanna Cherry: ‘Perception of conflict of interest’ with Lord Advocate over Alex Salmond investigation, Rangers FC and SNP finances scandal
Story by Joseph Anderson
Ms Cherry said the investigation into former first minister Alex Salmond, the malicious prosecutions at Rangers Football Club and the live police investigation of the SNP’s finances have “brought to the fore” concerns over the Lord Advocate’s dual role as both head of Scotland’s prosecution service, and the Scottish Government’s chief legal adviser.”
++++
Interesting?
@PM with regard to acceptable foreign refs for our domestic game, I was thinking we were reduced to North Korea but then wondered whether that would be deemed sufficiently neutral from (or perhaps too antagonistic towards) South Korea for some of the more paranoid amongst us… Maybe we need to go to the Indian Super League for our refs – Owen Coyle might be able to help, darn that’s probably put India offside…
From Chairman Bennet’s ‘Business Review’ in the RIFC plc Annual Report 2023 another indication of the desperate need to foster the pretence that TRFC of 2012 creation is the Rangers FC of the 4 young men of my grandfathers’ era!
” Myself, James Bisgrove, members of the Board, investors and former players were involved in the process [i.e recruitment of Beale’s successor] We were delighted to reach the unanimous decision to appoint Philippe Clement as the club’s 19th permanent manager.”
What a load of deceitful codswallop.
And the nodding heads in the SMSM let them get away with the fiction!
How many journalists have died in pursuit of Truth in Gaza/Palestine or other such places of armed conflict?
God grant that the despicable football journalists in our own wee country will be shamed into discovering the courage to report honestly and cease propagating a fantasy!
Of course John, Scottish fitba’ is a far less existential problem for the human race than Gaza, but your point remains valid. Folk there are fearlessly telling their truth despite the real threat to their lives. And here in the Scottish MSM, they cower in fear of the opprobrium of those who peddle the delusional mythology surrounding the need to keep alive a failed institutional business model.
And that is what they are. Cowards.
I was earlier today up in the loft/attic intending to do a bit of sorting out of stuff that should be ditched from stuff that I would want to keep for sentimental reasons (e.g. my Scots Guards dad’s war medals) or as some kind of record of my early life and of the milestones in the shared life of Mrs C and me since 1970.
Got waylaid when I came across the notebook I used when making notes during a hearing of the criminal proceedings of some of those charged in connection with the purchase by Craig Whyte of heavily tax-indebted Rangers of my grandfathers’ days (now in Liquidation)
I was caught by the polis trying to write some notes and told to desist and was allowed back into the Court room after I had shown my notebook, which was found to have no note whatever of what had transpired.
None of the accused were found guilty.
And the note I had made (on a wee separate bit of paper) was not about the verdict or the accused, but about the judge’s exasperation at the incompetence of the Prosecution’s ‘indictment’, and frequent changes in the terms of the indictment(s).
The judge was almost apoplectic when he addressed the Advocate-Depute about the number of changes to the Indictment. I hear him still: ‘Advocate-depute! how many changes??’
I should say that as far as I can ascertain the records of criminal trials where the accused is found ‘not guilty’ are not made public. So, I cannot refer to the transcript of Lord Bannatyne’s observations.
I can say that it was a fun experience, listening to him having a go at the perceived dithering and incompetence of the Advocate-depute.
[I need hardly add that I was appalled at the ineffectiveness and, as seemed to me, the couldn’t-care-less half-heartedness of the prosecution.
But that’s just me, maybe!
It was with a mixture of bemusement and dismay that I noted the tweet below on ‘X’ (formerly Twitter) yesterday from the Guardian Journalist Ewan Murray
Ewan Murray
@mrewanmurray
·
Jan 10
Dundee United accounts. Turnover: £8.1m. Loans to Mark Ogren: £10.1m.
.
A serious governing body would have been asking WTF before now….
.
Mr Murray has been a journalist of some standing for a while. So I have to wonder where he has been since 2012 regarding over £100m+ of cumulative losses at ‘Rangers’, and the fact that only Director’s loans kept them afloat at times. Never can I recall him asking what the governing bodies were playing at in not asking questions. All he has done is show us once again what a problem there still is regarding the ability of the Scottish Media to comment on matters involving ‘Rangers’ without fear or favour.
Back in February 2021 I wrote and posted a letter to the Head of the Insolvency Service.
The letter was acknowledged, of course.
Covid was rampant at the time, and it was suggested that as ordinary physical mail could not be attended to at the time, I should email.
I did so, emailing the full text of the physical letter.
Receipt of that email was duly acknowledged.
But no reply was forthcoming.
Today, I sent the following email:
“From: me
To: Insolvency. EnquiryLine Fri, 12 Jan at 12:33
Dear Jonathan,
Compliments of the season, 3 years on!
Can I come back to where we left off, please, in relation to my query laid out in the email chain?
Quick summary:
Rangers International Football Club plc (‘RIFC plc’) company number SC437060 is the holding company of The Rangers Football Club Ltd, company number SC425159.
However, the official website of RIFC plc seems to suggest absurdly and untruthfully that it is the holding company of the famous Rangers FC plc founded in 1872 (company number SC004276) which went into Liquidation in 2012 under the name RFC 2012 plc.
Surely this cannot possibly be allowed, and RIFC plc should be instructed to desist from trying to market itself as being something that it is not and indicate on its website that TRFC Ltd came into existence as a football club only in 2012 and that RFC 2012 plc is in Liquidation, the next report by the Liquidators expected to be the final one?
Cheers,
(me) ”
__
I can be remarkably patient, sometimes!
From my own experience as a minor cog in the sphere of the Civil Service I know that letters from the public cannot be ignored: at some point a reply has to be made, and some kind of answer has to be provided.
And the answer has to stay this side of Truth!
Even Prime Ministers and Cabinet ministers in recent years have learned that telling actual porkies is a no-no.
And any lower or middle-range Civil Servant these days would be aff his/her chump to try to ignore correspondence. or to reply with what might easily be proven to be an untruth.
[Remember the wonderful Sir Humphrey in ‘Yes, Minister’ and his wonderful skill in drafting soothing but misleading replies without actually telling a lie?]
Basically, the Insolvency Service must sooner or later say whether or not RIFC plc is the holding company of RFC of 1872 company number SC004276 and entitled to market itself as such. or the holding company of TRFC (company number SC 425159) and therefore not entitled to attempt to mislead investors by even suggesting that it is the holding company RFC 2012 plc (IL) !
Simples!
With a nod to ‘BP 10 January 2024 at 23:59’, I agree that a deceitful football governance body is not an existential challenge and the petty lies and deceit do not have the same calamitous effects as the horrendous wars in Ukraine and Gaza!
I would say only that finding the Truth in respect of the wars is perhaps much more complicated than finding the Truth that RFC of 1872 is no more, and that the Scottish Football governance body allows a monstrous myth to be passed off as Truth in dereliction of its legal and moral duty to defend the concept of sporting integrity.
A relatively wee lie is a lie, nevertheless.
I’ve just been reading the super-duper’ “Andy’s sting-in-the-tale” that came into my email box at a very early hour this morning! see it at this link:
https://scottishfsa.org/chairmans-blog-12-01-24/
From which I cite this:
“Looking back, too many of Scotland’s teams have shown financial recklessness in the quest for soon forgotten whatevers.
I lost count in my head of just how many teams have been caught out by reckless gambling.
I was therefore sad to see Edinburgh City, who I first played against when they were ‘Postal United’ back in 1978, in the dreaded ‘Edinburgh Gazette’ on 22nd of December.
‘Financial issues’ led to a winding up petition presented at Livingston Sherriff court on the 22nd on behalf of the taxmen (HMRC).”
—
I note that there appears not to be any ‘big hands’ chap ready to buy the assets of Edinburgh City FC for buttons and be allowed by the SFA to field a team as being the selfsame ‘Edinburgh City’ (IL)!
Honest to God!
The dirty shenanigans of our lying football governance bodies and of the weak, selfish, unprincipled boards of our 2012 SPL/SFL clubs came about only in relation to RFC of 1872.
Edinburgh City FC is dead
In exactly the same way as RFC of 1872 is dead. Liquidated. History.
And history only!
Just been having a look at some of the changes to the powers of Companies House that are coming into effect in March
https://changestoukcompanylaw.campaign.gov.uk/changes-at-a-glance/
I suspect that there will be a whole lot of phony companies being set up before the effective date before the need to prove identity comes into effect!
However, it seems that Companies House will still not be obliged to check the truth of what Companies file about their accounts!
Note 32 to the financial statements in the RIFC plc Annual Report has this:
” 32. Contingent Liabilities
During the year under review a claim was raised by Elite Sports Group Limited (“Elite”) against the club in respect of previous contracts. On 24th November 2022 Elite went into Administration and appointed Administrators. The Administrators are now pursuing the claim and defences have been lodged by the club. Having taken independent legal and expert advice the Board is satisfied that no provision is required in the financial statements.”
There was to have been a ‘procedural hearing’ relating to the case on 21st December 2023.
I’ve no idea whether that hearing took place. Perhaps it did, and perhaps the Administrators intimated that they were dropping the claim?
If the claim has not been dropped, it is a remarkably hubristic decision by the Board not to make some kind of financial provision in case they lose, given that Elite’s claim was for upwards of £9 million!
I’m watching Atalanta v Frosinone ,and has wee marks every 10 metres down the sidelines, like what I suggested a while back . Or was it adopted sometime ? 3-0 for Atacama after 29 minutes.
paddy malarkey
15 January 2024 at 20:14
‘..watching Atalanta v Frosinone, and has wee marks every 10 metres down the sidelines,..’
+++++++++
For the first time in my life, I find myself asking: are continental clubs’ pitch markings actually measured in full metres or in metric equivalent of yards (10 yrds = 9.144 metres?) Bit of a bugger for a grounds-man using a metric tape-measure! Never thought about that before!
But what is this??
https://www.trademarkelite.com/uk/trademark/trademark-detail/UK00002264673/OLD-FIRM
“OLD FIRM United Kingdom Trademark Information
By Celtic F.C.Limited
The OLD FIRM trademark was assigned an Application Number #UK00002264673 by the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO). Trademark Application Number is a Unique ID to identify the OLD FIRM mark in UKIPO.
The OLD FIRM mark is filed in the category of Class 039 Transport; packaging and storage of goods; travel arrangement. . The legal correspondent for OLD FIRM trademark is Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP , Edinburgh EH3 8UL, UNITED KINGDOM . The current status of the OLD FIRM filing is Registered.
Based on Celtic F.C.Limited, the OLD FIRM trademark is used in the following business: Transportation services; travel agency services; arranging of tours; booking agency services for travel; arranging of travel, travel courier and guide services; consultancy, information and advisory services relating to all of the aforesaid services. .”
I have absolutely no understanding of what that means.
It surely cannot mean that Celtic accept for marketing purposes that there is still an ‘old firm’ of which one party is the dead RFC of 1872?
God rot the soul of any Celtic Board that buys into the lie that the Rangers of the ‘old firm’ is still in existence! [ and credit to the sports journalists of the era who coined the description of the wee deal made by faithless, greedy, greedy men]
Somebody please tell me that my view of the 2012/present Celtic Board must be mistaken.
Allowing the ‘media’ to hype up football games as being between the Old Firm is to be lying and buying into the biggest sporting untruth in the history of Scottish football.
There is no ‘old firm’.
My post at 23.19 today refers.
My AI non-human bit of computer pretence of being human says this:
‘The term “Old Firm” is a trademark that is filed in the category of Class 039 Transport; packaging and storage of goods; travel arrangement1. The two clubs, Celtic and Rangers, jointly registered the ‘Old Firm’ term at the Intellectual Property Office at the turn of the 21st century, and it was confirmed that it was still being renewed as a trademark in 2021′
Barstewards!
Honest to God! The Rangers football club died the death of Liquidation in 2012.
That it should come to this! that for filthy lucre’s sake Celtic should support the lie that TRFC is Rangers of 1872!
paddy malarkey
15 January 2024 at 20:14
3-0 for Atacama after 29 minutes.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Just deserts, Paddy.
##################################
John Clark
15 January 2024 at 23:51
that for filthy lucre’s sake Celtic should support the lie that TRFC is Rangers of 1872!
///////////////////////////////////////////////////
Celtic aren’t alone. Through their silence, every senior club in Scotland was complicit and culpable, having approved the script concocted by the football authorities that Rangers somehow survived liquidation.
That self-serving acquiescence was due to the manufactured fear that all clubs would face financial armageddon in the absence of Rangers’ renowned financial prowess. How ironic that they should be asked to endorse a fiction that the sole route to a rosy economic future lay in throwing their support behind a club that had died a self-inflicted death owing mega-millions of pounds.
I will never for the life of me understand why the powers-that-be couldn’t just have told the cold harsh truth about the demise of Rangers. There would still be a form of Rangers for the fans to follow (ie a brand new club with no trophy haul, but with historical links to its defunct predecessor, just as we all know to be the reality at present anyway) and those fans had already begun to face the reality of losing their club before the suits came up with their secretive five way agreement stitch up, paving the way for the big lie.
Highlander
17 January 2024 at 11:56
Can’t take the credit-all my phone’s work ! It looks a “thing” though , with a ladder-like thing chalked the length of the sidelines . I’ll have a look at Serie A over the weekend and ready an invoice .
Highlander
17 January 2024 at 11:56
‘…I will never for the life of me understand why the powers-that-be couldn’t just have told the cold harsh truth about the demise of Rangers.’
+++++++++
Simple answer, Highlander: they were either too partisan to do their objective duty or too cowardly/mercenary to do so.
The propaganda machine went into overdrive with such effect that people were persuaded that Rangers of 1872 did not surrender its share in the SPL and therefore did not lose its entitlement to membership of the SFA, and its right to participate in Scottish professional football.
The facts of course are:
-There was NO ‘holding company’ that owned RFC of 1872.It was the very football club itself that was the shareholder in the SPL Ltd, and it was the very football club that- on Liquidation- had to surrender that share; and, no longer being a member of a recognised League, lost its entitlement to membership of the SFA and ceased to be entitled to participate in Scottish Professional football
-the SPL on 4th July 2012 not only refused to ‘transfer’ the liquidated RFC’s share to CG’s new club, but it also refused to grant any kind of share!!
-CG had to beg for membership in the then SFL for his new football club, and on the basis of being for the first time a member of a recognised league, that new football club was permitted to apply for membership of the SFA. Which was very readily granted (without I think, any regard for other applicants!)
-As for the extraordinary cheating nonsense of ‘club 12’ and ‘associate membership’ let me use colourful old-speak: Satan himself, the father of lies, would not try to pass off TRFC as being the very same club as RFC of 1872. He has left it to his minions to try that.
REASON and LAW applied to the facts make it clear that their attempt to do so is an affront to both Truth and Law- and to the intelligence of ordinary football supporters.
—
And I am disappointed that Celtic did not absolutely insist on Truth as being of far greater importance than profit. [Geez, in my lifetime a former Celtic board was ready to close Celtic down over an issue of principle that was not even immediately related to football!!]
As you remark, common sense tells us that there was no way the ‘5 million supporters worldwide’ of the defunct RFC of 1872 would have refused to follow and support the new club, TRFC! where else would they have gone for their football? What other club’s merchandise would they have bought?
—
A bad show overall by Scottish football governance and clubs. Particularly unacceptable to me is that Celtic are in there in the mire with all the rest of them.
I suspect that if Fergus McCann were still in the chair, he would have done a Bob Kelly and called the bluff and forced the SFA/SPFL clubs to follow the path of truth and integrity.
paddy malarkey
15 January 2024 at 20:14
‘..watching Atalanta v Frosinone, and has wee marks every 10 metres down the sidelines,..’
+++++++++
For the first time in my life, I find myself asking: are continental clubs’ pitch markings actually measured in full metres or in metric equivalent of yards (10 yrds = 9.144 metres?) Bit of a bugger for a grounds-man using a metric tape-measure! Never thought about that before!
====================================================
It does seem that Football (Soccer) pitches are measured in yards worldwide. Perhaps special tapes are available or groundsmen or groundspeople just get a British tape. The link below gives some explanation.
https://www.spized.com/en/magazin/football-field
Ballyargus
17 January 2024 at 23:36
‘…Perhaps special tapes are available or groundsmen or groundspeople just get a British tape. The link below…’
+++++++
Ballyargus,I enjoyed reading that link to Spized GmbH, in Coln,Germany.
I liked the wee ‘fun fact’: that it was only in 1896 that the German football authorities ruled that football pitches should be free of trees!
It will probably be of little consolation to David Grier to learn that in a current case involving a tea-planter company operating in Kenya but having its registered office in Aberdeen, the case he lost in the Court of Session is cited in support of a particular view regarding the admission of fresh evidence :
“… Alternatively, they would have to invoke the ‘res noviter veniens ad notitiam’ (newly discovered information) procedure set out in Grier v Lord Advocate 2023 SC 116 (LP (Carloway),”
(Nothing to do with football, but with a claim by over 1000 tea-plantation workers in Kenya to have their claims for compensation for injury/ sickness related to their work heard in Scotland rather than in Kenya, the Scottish Courts having jurisdiction because the registered office of the Company is located here in Scotland.)
Grier is in the law reference books for all time to come.
Another great ‘Andy’s Sting-in-the-tail’ in my inbox. This is the link
https://scottishfsa.org/chairmans-blog-19-01-24/
Within, there is a brilliant, brilliant, brilliant open letter to Ian Maxwell from Stuart Murphy, CEO of the Scottish Football Supporters Association (with Andy’s observations that put the letter in context)
It might open directly on this link
OPEN LETTER TO IAN MAXWELL OF THE SFA – Scottish Football Supporters Association – SFSA (scottishfsa.org)
I should maybe add that although I myself have perhaps(?) tended on SFM to focus on the failings of ‘Scottish Football governance’ in relation only to one particularly glaring instance of disregard for sporting integrity I am well aware of the many other areas of our national sport which our governance bodies have failed to address.
I look forward to reading the terms of a ‘ members’ motion at the Scottish Parliament shortly.’
The case for an Independent Regulator of Scottish Professional Football is very strong.
No winter break next season –
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68058989
If media reports are to be believed where is the $4.5 million coming from to complete the transfer of the player from Denmark. If that amount is correct how will it be paid and for how long. Also if that amount is spent how does that affect the “plans” to sign Shankland. I’m awaiting the Barry Ferguson interview on the potential latest signing based on you tube viewings. Who could/would be sold to fund this signing.
The transfer fee will be paid in installments like every other transfer throughout football.
How are celtic paying for their January signing?
Be great to hear John Hartson insight into this financial agreement.
goforpar
23 January 2024 at 22:54
‘…where is the $4.5 million coming from…’
+++++++
From Andrew Smith in today’s ‘The Scotsman’
” The Rangers manager would not entertain providing any intelligence on reports the club are preparing to part with the not inconsiderable sum of £4.5m to acquire Ivorean mid-fielder Mohamed Diomande….
…The Ibrox club remain a loss-making operation and have yet to post a profit since their 2012 liquidation.”
What are we to make of that absurdity, that a liquidated football club could still be in business at all, let alone make either profit or loss?
The sheer self-contradictory nonsense of that observation shines a light on the Big Lie and the support by the SMS of that Big Lie.
Andrew! Grow some cojones as a journalist and tell the truth: TRFC is not and cannot possibly be, RFC of 1872-for your own sake as any kind of journalist: and tell your editor to get to hell if he/she refuses your request to be allowed to tell the truth!
God Almighty!
Well, there was this to me on 12th January:
“Thank you for contacting the Insolvency Service Enquiry Line.
We have received your email and where a reply is required, we will respond within 5 working days.”
Well, well, and surprise, surprise!
No response, no reply to date!
I love this: “where a response is required we will respond within 5 working days”.
I bloody well required a response!
It is now 26th January, two feckin weeks since they received my email!
Bang goes their ‘target’ of aiming to respond within 5 working days!
I’m a wee auld man, very ignorant of the ways of the world of finance. But I know a lie when I see/hear one!
If the IPO Prospectus of RIFC plc is truthful, and if RFC of 1872 is not in Liquidation and if the Prospectus for RIFC plc’s launch on the market is not all smoke and mirrors, why doesn’t the FCA, or the Insolvency Service, the SFA/SPFL and the BBC /print media explain why it is not?
Well, because they cannot!
Why not? well, let them tell me why not!
Let those public authorities explain to me, to us, how it is that a liquidated RFC of 1872 is somehow TRFC of 2012 creation.
We all know (who said ‘covis’ or Boris?) that there is a dirty world out there, in respect of lying politicians.
There is the smaller even dirtier but more disgusting world of football governance.
B.stard politicos are one thing: cheating lying sports governance bodies are worse.
And a connection between the two?
Who knows?
Honest to God.
Here I am tonight.
Had a great afternoon with older son (home on holiday from Texas) watching a rubbishy football match.
And I am just getting round to reading today’s ‘The Scotsman’, and the Celtic plc’s Brian Wilson non-exec director’s piece therein.
In that piece he is on about the Covid inquiry and the SNP Government blah blah..
While he himself sits as a non-exec director on the board of a football club that buys into the lie that TRFC is RFC of 1872!
Really, you couldnae be up to those kinds of guys!
Fly the flag of Truth, Celtic, ffs!
With all these on loan signings with an option to purchase, if these deals fall through, will Rangers will entitled to a share of any future transaction involving these players. If memory serves correct did they not have a “similar” agreement in place on a loan player that allegedly netted them $1 million. Where is the main strea media when you really need them.
Sitting here with Mrs C in Seville in a very nice apartment courtesy of my son, I give you this from the ICIJ weekly newsletter in my inbox that I’ve only just got round to reading tonight:
‘It is still dangerous to be a journalist’: Daphne Caruana Galizia’s son reflects on her life and legacy.”
“Paul Caruana Galizia had just sat down for an after-lunch coffee with a friend in 2017 when his brother called with the news that their mother, journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia, had been killed by a car bomb.
The bomb was detonated remotely in a planned assassination that took place minutes after Daphne left the family’s home in Northern Malta.
A prolific investigative journalist and blogger, Daphne was already a household name, known in the small island nation and beyond for her cutting columns and exposés on organized crime and rampant corruption at the highest levels of government.
But her murder, at a time when she was investigating a kickback scheme involving then-prime minister Joseph Muscat and two of his closest aides, led to protests in the streets and caused an international outcry over threats to freedom of the press. That reporting built on Daphne’s findings as part of ICIJ’s groundbreaking Panama Papers investigation and linked the three men to offshore companies connected to the sale of Maltese passports and payments from the government of Azerbaijan”
And I wonder how our wee ‘journalists’ in the SMSM feel about themselves, cowardly men/women happy to buy into a stupid lie, for whatever murky reasons- in a matter of Sport!
What were they, what are they, so afraid of? Car bombing? Death threats?
Ach, gie’s a break!
There can scarcely have been a more disgusting episode of cowardice in the field of ‘journalism’ since the days of Adolph Hitler.
And the thing is- they KNOW the truth and that they have put themselves on the side of Untruth.
How they live with themselves I do not know.
I sent this reminder to The Insolvency Service
From:
(me)@yahoo.co.uk
To: insolvency.enquiryline@insolvency.gov.uk
Mon, 29 Jan at 00:20
Come, come, chaps/chap-esses,
More than two weeks since I wrote, and no reply yet.
It surely cannot be so difficult to provide an honest answer to a taxpayer who thinks there may be something rotten being hidden by Civil Servants under instruction from their political masters.
Just tell me in black and white how it comes about that RIFC plc is allowed to describe itself on its website as being the holding company of a club founded in 1872 which went into Liquidation in 2012 when in point of law and fact it is the holding company of a club created in 2012.
Yours in the interests of truth,
(me)’
Here is the reply I received today:
“LiveCaseTargeting
From: intelligence.services@insolvency.gov.uk
To:
(me)@yahoo.co.uk Fri, 2 Feb at 2:11 pm
Dear…[me]
Thank you for providing additional information in your below email; we have filed this with your original complaint about the company. This new information has not altered our decision to not investigate the company at this time.
Yours Sincerely
M H
Case Officer | Compliance and Targeting Team | The Insolvency Service – ”
—
Nor at any other bloody time either I should imagine.
Bit disappointing that MH couldn’t find dream up some kind of ‘explanation’ for refusing to look into the matter: he’d never have got a job under Sir Humphrey!
https://www.assetmatch.com/app/OurCompanies/CompanyProfile?companyId=2555
John Clark et al. check out the link above. It is a share trading platform which is facilitating trades in RIFC plc and in the blurb it claims the company is a scottish professional football club formed in 1872. time to sharpen your pencils
Buteo Buteo
Lots to take away from that .
*Warning! No Formal Relationship
Rangers International Football Club plc has been admitted to trading on Asset Match at the request of a number of its shareholders. Asset Match has no formal relationship with Rangers. Investors should understand the risks fully before investing.
*Auction Details
Rangers International Football Club plc was admitted to trading on Asset Match on 20 March 2023 at a price of 25 pence per share (being the equivalent to the last funding round via Tifosy).
*In the auction that closed on 31st January, 2,500 shares traded at 10 pence per share.
Buteo Buteo
4 February 2024 at 11:58
‘…John Clark et al. check out the link…’
++++++
Just back from Seville late last night, BB.
Good spot, and I’ll certainly be making sure that Asset Match knows my views.
can’t wait to read it. more power to your pen JC
Last trade at 10p per share?! That’s well down on what has been claimed in the past, is it not? Probably about right for the basket of assets, of course.
Buteo Buteo
5 February 2024 at 20:39
‘…can’t wait to read it. more power to your pen JC.’
++++++++++
Buteo Buteo,
After dinner tonight I sat down and wrote the following but waited until 5 minutes ago before posting it on Asset Match’s website ‘contact us’ page.
“Dear Asset Match,
I lifted this from your website earlier today:
“Rangers International Football Club plc is a Scottish professional football club based in Glasgow, Scotland. Formed in 1872, it is the fourth-oldest football club in Scotland and plays in the Scottish Premiership. Ranger is the most successful club in Scottish football history with a record of 55 league titles”
_
What?? Where did you get such a story?
Rangers International Football Club is NOT a football club.
It came into existence as Rangers Football plc, incorporated with company number SC437060 on 16 November 2012
It changed its name to Rangers International Football Club plc on 27November 2012, retaining the company number SC 437060.
Under this name and company number it was launched on the market in December 2012 as being the holding company of an entity called SevcoScotland Ltd which had been incorporated on 29 May 2012, with company number SC425159.
This entity had changed its name to ‘The Rangers Football Club Ltd (‘TRFC’) on 31 July 2012, retaining the company number SC425159.
In order to participate in Scottish Professional Football a club has to satisfy the governing body (the Scottish Football Association (‘SFA’)) that it is a member of a ‘recognised’ League.
TRFC tried to buy a share in the then Scottish Premier League (‘SPL’). It failed in that attempt.
It subsequently acquired membership in the then Scottish Football League (‘SFL’) which was, of course, a ‘recognised football league’ in the eyes of the SFA and TRFC was admitted as a new football club into membership of Scottish Professional Football.
In no way is Rangers International Football Club plc the holding company of the historic Rangers of 1872 foundation.
That famous club went into Liquidation in 2012 and (under a smartly changed name!) is awaiting dissolution as RFC 2012 plc, company number SC004276.
The company of which RIFC plc is the holding company is company number SC425159, the football club TRFC which has no history of participating in Scottish football prior to 2012!
I am very surprised that you appear not to know the facts about a plc you appear to be acting for and appear to be ready merely to repeat what I presume you have been told, albeit you distance your
self from your client.
I confess that your approach to business seems to me to be a wee bit casual!
I will be sharing my thoughts with others.
Yours in all truth,
JC”
—-
excellent JC. I wonder if they will respond. probably not but at least they have the true story
Well, I had a look at Asset Match on Companies House.
There was a Medwenna Vivien Rees-Mogg who ceased to be a director in September 2023.
There is a Medwenna Vivien Rees-Mogg whose brother-in-law is a Jacob Rees-Mogg.
As you were, ladies and gentlemen!!
Oh, what fun!
JC I salute you. It is important that truth prevails.
Absolutely unconnected with SDM and CW and the death of RFC of 1872, some of you might enjoy a wee read of the judgment of the Court of Session that you will find if you search
CA4/22[CA99/22]
That is the reference number of a judgment of the Court of Session [ published on 2nd February] in a fraud case.
It is an easy read, thanks to Lord Braid’s skill in keeping things as simple as possible.
A laughable case involving what seem to be semi-literate chancers in a scam where lots of money was involved. Words like ‘duped’ are used.
And whatsapp and telegram messages of congratulation to each other as the target bit the bait.
Reading them kind of reminded me of the school that my sister attended that used to be in Charlotte Street in Glasgow, down from the barras.
Do have a read at the judgment- and wonder at the brass-necked b.stards involved in the world of finance.
And, perhaps, wonder also at the effectiveness of our Regulatory bodies in dealing with rogues in that world.
“reminded me of the school that my sister attended that used to be in Charlotte Street in Glasgow, down from the barras.”
Our Lady and Saint Francis was that school, that brought back memories, the school my wife went to and the Barras ( Calton) area I was born in.
bigboab1916
8 February 2024 at 11:40
‘..Charlotte Street in Glasgow, down from the barras.”
++++++
Aye. Good school, nothing fake about its papers!
Ma (well edumaceted) mammy went tae Charlotte Street School so she did!
Anyway, with regard to the LIQUIDATION 2012 theme, I wonder if any deniers (cult followeres, MSM, UEFA, certain politicians etc ) can recognise the following delusional thinking in themselves…
“Biden claims he spoke in 2021 with the German leader Helmut Kohl who died in 2017. The gaffe is similar to the one Biden made when he claimed he spoke with a French President (Francois Mitterand), who died in 1996, at the same meeting”. (Adapted from Fox News).
If they can, I suppose there’s hope for them yet i.e. to recognise, and accept, that the club’s ‘deid’
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68006183
One of the topics
All-time Scottish top-flight table
All-time standings provided by worldfootball.net
Fans of Celtic and Aberdeen can use this one to their advantage, given both clubs have never suffered relegation, as can supporters of Motherwell, who haven’t dropped out of the top flight since 1985.
In that time, perceived bigger clubs, such as Hearts, Hibs, Dundee United and Dundee, have all suffered multiple relegations, while Rangers have also spent time in the lower leagues following all that business in 2012.
Motherwell’s current 39-year Premiership status is largely responsible for them amassing the sixth-most points in Scottish top-flight history.
That’s according to worldfootball.net, who have Celtic top, with Rangers, Hearts, Aberdeen and Hibs in the following four spots.
But fingers will be pointed at the 1999-00 and 2002-03 seasons as far as Aberdeen and Motherwell are concerned.
The Dons finished bottom of the league in 2000, as did the Fir Park club three years later, but they were spared the prospect of relegation as Falkirk’s Brockville Stadium failed to meet the SPL’s criteria on both occasions.
PM, at least “all that business in 2012” is the BBC choosing not to claim they were relegated, I guess. Better than they might have written in the past, but still sh*tebags nonetheless.
nawlite
8 February 2024 at 21:28
‘.. Better than they might have written in the past..’
++++++++
Yes, nawlite, it is evidence that some BBC staff do not buy into the lie that the damnable BBC Trust ordered them to propagate: the lie that it was some mythical company that was liquidated and not the entity that held the share in the SPL.
The great pity is that the BBC bosses were too cowardly to insist on the truth, even to the point of making it a resignation matter. What else would they be prepared to lie about at our licence-fee payers’ expense if prepared to lie about a matter of sport?
I do not post on ‘X’ but I do occasionally have a quick swatch.
I did so yesterday and was pleased to read a post from RTC, noting the guilty verdicts against ‘Joe Lewis’.
Since I got interested in ‘Rangers’ only when it went into Administration etc I had only the haziest knowledge of their financial history.
I had to turn to the pages of Companies House to see the connection between Lewis and the now dead Rangers FC plc (alias RFC 2012 plc).
I lift the following from Murray’s statement in the Accounts published on 3rd December 1997:
” …I did indicate that I would consider favourably a single investment from an entrepreneurial partner. I am pleased to say that on 22nd January 1997 an agreement was signed……..ratified by shareholders at an EGM in February approving an investment of £40 million in the Club [ note no effin mention of a mythical holding company that could go bust while the Club lived on!!] by Albany Inc on behalf of English National Investment Company, now renamed ENIC plc.
…The injection of new capital was effected by a subscription by Albany for 11,581,522 new shares in the club, representing 25.1% of the enlarged issued share capital. The consideration, in cash, was £40 million.”
___
Joe Lewis provided the £40 million.
Refresh my memory, please: when did the boastful Murray begin to buy expensive players only part of whose wages were truthfully reported to the SFA and HMRC while the bulk of their earnings was disguised as deriving from EBTs?
Lewis’ convictions are not, of course, connected with the now dead Rangers.
But I hope he goes to jail.
[I hope Lewis get a jail sentence following his conviction for unconnected crimes]
Stenhousemuir Club Statement.
@StenhousemuirFC
The board of Stenhousemuir Football Club welcomes and supports the statement issued yesterday from six Premiership clubs citing serious concerns regarding the handling of the recent Independent Governance Report.
This report was initially deemed necessary following the SPFL’s apparent botched handling and subsequent dispute between the SPFL and one of our member clubs regarding the league’s main sponsorship partner.
Our Chairman, Iain McMenemy, raised this at the SPFL general meeting in July 2023 and received verbal assurances that this review and report would get to the bottom of what happened, how much it cost clubs financially, and, that this would all be handled independently and reported back to all clubs.
It appears that these assurances have not been met.
Iain McMenemy commented, “After being assured for almost two years that the SPFL were in the right in continuing this dispute with Rangers, we were surprised to receive, without warning, a copy of a news release that seemed to be an embarrassing climbdown. The SPFL had to apologise to Rangers, pay compensation and legal costs, and admit that they got this wrong.
“Quite rightly, we wanted to know why we had gone down this now discredited route, how much this had cost the league, and in turn how much less would be paid out to clubs because of this? Knowing this was essential to ensure that we don’t make these mistakes again in the future. This was the basis and catalyst for the Independence Governance Report.
“Far from drawing a line under this issue, the entire handling of this review and report raises fresh questions and concerns regarding the judgement of those running our game.
“It’s time for complete transparency with all member clubs who are the shareholders of the SPFL. We welcome this intervention from six of our largest clubs and will support them in any endeavour to achieve transparency, clarity, and accountability as a matter of urgency.”
………………………………………………………………………………….
Only the SPFL could commision a Independent review of the overall governence of the league that subsequently raises even more question regarding their governence.
I was in Spain last Wednesday and could not watch the debate on Ben Macpherson’s ‘Football Regulator’ motion.
I watched it a little earlier on this afternoon, and I was quite pleased that the Minister for Sport, Maree Todd, indicated that she would be happy to have initial round table discussions with all interested parties to explore ideas and options and costs. The Governmment recognises the huge place the football industry has in Scottish culture etc etc.
No outright knockback.
On this link
https://www.scottishparliament.tv/meeting/members-business-s6m-11073-ben-macpherson-enhancing-scottish-football-january-31-2024
Alexander Ceferin says ( in relation to his decision not to run for Presidency of UEFA in 2027)
“Factually, it’s my decision if I want to run after 2027. Honestly speaking, I am tired of Covid, tired of two wars, nonsense projects of so-called super leagues and self-proclaimed moral authorities who are only moral until it comes to their personal interest.”
He’s very condemnatory of people who are ‘only moral until it comes to their personal interest.’
I shall be equally condemnatory of him, who as President of UEFA allowed and allows a national football association to propagate a sporting lie, namely, that a football club founded in 2012 is entitled to claim the sporting titles and honours of a club that went into Liquidation in that very year!
I emailed to Ceferin (c/o his legal firm’s email address in Slovenia) in December 2019, and getting no acknowledgment of any kind, sent a further email in March 2021. No reply.
I detest bad manners.
So, I think I will copy this post to whatever email address I can find for some minion at UEFA! (there was no contact point for Ceferin or his secretariat on the UEFA website, which is why I sent it to his (or his dad’s) law firm asking for it to be passed on to Ceferin himself)
Whatever, I’m glad he’s not going to run for office again!
Personally, I wouldn’t count on Ceferin not standing again, JC. 2027 is a long way off and it’s easy enough for him to say now that he probably won’t stand if that appeases any people who are against the proposal, perhaps for personal reasons. I believe the current limited term is a good thing – you just have to look at the Blatter situation to see what can happen in personal fiefdoms. For a Celtic supporter, the current board is another example of how stale things can become with no fresh blood/views. Because of that, I wonder why Ceferin is proposing extending the allowed term of office if he has no personal intention to continue.
On a more football matter, I was wondering what everyone thought of the possible introduction of sin bins. Without pondering too much, my first thought is that it’s a good thing, my main reason being that it allows an immediate advantage to the team which has been ‘fouled’ against. Currently the system of totting up yellow cards gives no advantage to the immediately disadvantaged team, but offers another random team the benefit of not facing that player down the line after X yellow cards. It’s similar to the retrospective red card process which again means the team ‘fouled against’ passes the benefit of the red card to another team.
I say all that despite the comments from Postecoglou/Klopp etc that there is no need to change. I am surprised that no one is commenting on the immediate benefit to the aggrieved team. Surprised, too, at Postecoglou saying that all it would do is encourage teams to sit in/waste time etc – as far as I can see in Rugby, the sin bin hands a real advantage to the aggrieved team with the sin binned team sh*tting themselves for the 10 minute duration. Perhaps Ange has quickly forgotten that teams in Scotland already sit in and waste time for 90 minutes, let alone 10!!
Just wondered if anyone had any views?
nawlite
10 February 2024 at 12:13
‘..Without pondering too much, my first thought is that it’s a good thing, ‘
+++++++
I think it was the guest presenter (Ali Defoy) on ‘Off the Ball’ a little earlier today who raised the situation that would arise where the goalie was sin-binned for the last ten mins of a match and all 3 subs had already been used so that it wasn’t possible to pull off an outfield player and put on the sub goalie!
Clever girl!
Someone mentioned that to me, JC. I honestly don’t see a problem with that. Bear in mind, the sin bin is only for either a cynical foul or for abuse of the ref. GKs are unlikely to commit a cynical foul that wouldn’t already lead to a Red card (i.e. last man tackle outside the box or deliberate handball to prevent a goal scoring opportunity) so if he’s daft enough to abuse the ref, why shouldn’t he be sin binned? If an outfield player has to go in goal for the 10 minutes, why not? As I’ve already said, in my mind the aggrieved team deserve the benefit there and then rather than another team benefitting down the line. Do you agree with that principle?
When they lie they tell biggest porkies ever. How they can face their family when they go home.
“RANGERS kept alive their hopes of completing a world-record equalling eighth domestic treble this season when they beat the Ayr United team managed by former Celtic captain Scott Brown in the Scottish Cup at Ibrox tonight.”
https://www.thenational.scot/sport/24111803.rangers-2-ayr-united-0-instant-reaction-burning-issues/
nawlite
10 February 2024 at 15:32
Someone would have to define the meaning of ‘cynical’ so that it wasn’t subjective, and also the areas of the pitch where the new card can be used. To my mind, deliberately obstructing a player so that the ball goes out of play is as cynical as it gets.
RossM
12 February 2024 at 00:00
My mate reckons it’s Zionists that aren’t appreciated. Nice stirring , though !
paddy malarkey
12 February 2024 at 02:24
‘…. Nice stirring , though !’
+++++
pm, when it comes to ‘stirring’, RossM has nothing on that pernicious ar.ehole of a ‘journalist’ based in New York, who has a piece online relating to Abada in that ars.-wipe of a ‘newspaper’ which is propagandist-in-chief of the biggest sporting lie in Scottish football’s history.
We’ll see if the BBC ‘Sportsound’ propagandists pick it up!
nawlite
10 February 2024 at 15:32
‘…If an outfield player has to go in goal for the 10 minutes, why not?’
++++++
I think ,nawlite, the point that was being made by Ali Defoy was that if at a point in the match all the permitted substitutions had been made and then the goalie was sin-binned his team would have to play an outfield player in a ‘specialist’ position for ten minutes. Playing with ten men, one of whom is not a specialist goalie but has to go in goal, is a kind of double punishment, in that it surely gives the opposing team an additional advantage for those ten minutes?
I myself would have no truck with the Americanisation of our game.The way it’s going there’ll soon be specialist kickers coming on whole teams of substitutes at a time!
I’ve just been reading a CAS judgment in the case of an athlete found to have a prohibited substance in her system.
https://www.tas-cas.org/en/jurisprudence/recent-decisions.html
The athlete gained sporting advantage in the Beijing Winter Olympics.
.
“…On these Grounds the Court of Arbitration for Sport rules that:
1…
2…
3…
4..
5…Ms Kamila Valieva is found to have committed an anti-doping rule violation…
6…A period of four (4) years ineligibility is imposed on Ms Valieva…….
7…All competitive results of Ms Valieva from 25 December 2021 are disqualified, with all the resulting consequences (including forfeiture of any titles, awards, medals, profits, prizes, and appearance money)
CLOSING REMARKS
421.It is important to understand what the Panel has and has not decided.
422. The Panel has decided that the Athlete did not discharge the burden of proving, pursuant to Clause 12.2.1 of the Russian ADR, that her ADRV was not intentional on the balance of probabilities. It is, as the Panel has said, difficult to prove a negative and so it has been the case here. It does not follow, and the Panel most certainly has not concluded, that Ms Valieva is a cheat or that she cheated when she won gold at the Beijing Olympics.”
___
She may not have cheated but loses her Gold.
RFC of 1872 in EBT times?
TRFC claiming continuity?
Oh, that the SFA had been faithful to its duty when the facts became clear that sporting advantage on a massive scale had been obtained deceitfully.
Back to my post of 9 February 2024 at 22:24 in which I say:
“So, I think I will copy this post to whatever email address I can find for some minion at UEFA!”
—
Can I say that instead of buggering about with further emails I will actually write a letter, post it snailmail to Ceferin at UEFA in Switzerland, tracked by the good old Royal Mail, enclosing printouts of the emails I sent to his and/or his dad’s law firm requesting that my emails to him be forwarded to him.
I will ask whether his [ family legal firm] staff decided not to let him know of my emails, or, if they did forward them, why he did not have the decency to at least acknowledge receipt.
There’s always a wee question to ask when folk in any kind of office seem to want to ignore questions!
I will write my letter [ maybe actually write with pen and paper? oh, what fun!!] tomorrow.
And will post it on the blog.
Since they will be discussing the governance of Scottish football , you would hope that one club at least would bring up the subject of the 5-way Agreement and it’s impact on openess and transparency .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68291255
Couldn’t correct my spelling mistake !
paddy malarkey
14 February 2024 at 16:27
‘…you would hope that one club at least would bring up the subject of the 5-way Agreement and its impact on openess and transparency.’
++++++++
Thanks for posting the link to that BBC report, pm.
One would hope in vain, I fear, since with one honourable exception they ALL sold their souls to a lie and kept their complicit mouths shut at the brazen, blatant disregard for Sporting Integrity and Truth shown by the SFA, the SPL and the SFL in dreaming up the myth of ‘continuity Rangers’ that lay behind the ‘5-Way Agreement’
So The Rangers and the rebels will be meeting with the Scottish Football to discuss the administrations shortcomings. I think before the rebels get swept up in another Rangers dispute it would be worthwhile looking at their own in house administration, and, based on the numbers below it can’t all be the fault of the SPFL. The numbers are based on the percentage of points achieved based on points available and secondly goal difference.
St. Mirren 46.6% —- 0 (almost passable)
Aberdeen 36.2% —- -10
Livingstone 17.3% —- -27
Motherwell 34.7% —- -4
St. Johnstone 32% —– -15
I’ve no sympathy for the SPFL and the number of blunders associated with them going back to 2012 but
teams have to accept their share of blame when it is due and not use the crutch of Rangers having another go at the SPFL and shouldn’t be dragging other clubs into their disputes.
goforpar
15 February 2024 at 17:16
++++++++++++++++++
I listened to a podcast the other night run by Graham Spiers, with mainstream journalists Andrew Smith and John McGarry. They were all firmly of the view that Neil Donacaster had done everything in his power in 2012 to shoe-horn the newco into the top league, and failing that the Championship. Ergo they wondered by Rangers are so much against him. Only fan threats to not buy season tickets scuppered his plan.
upthehoops
15 February 2024 at 19:27
‘..podcast the other night run by Graham Spiers, with mainstream journalists Andrew Smith and John McGarry. They were all firmly of the view that Neil Donacaster had done everything in his power in 2012 to shoe-horn the newco into the top league,..’
+++++++++++++++
uth, thank you for that.
Two observations:
First, Doncaster was a servant of the SPL, not its master.
His job was to provide the Board with information about what the Articles of Association of the SPL and of the SFA had to say about, respectively, surrender of a share in the SPL and about termination of membership of the SFA.
He clearly did his duty well and truthfully enough (maybe to his chagrin and regret?) because the SPL membership decided that they could not allow SevcoScotland/TRFC to purchase the share that RFC of 1872 had been required to surrender- that share went to the newly promoted Dundee.
and the SFA required Big Hands’ new creation to apply as a new club for membership of the SFA.
Second, and in contrast, the trio of self-styled journalists came, in my opinion, nowhere near to doing their duty as journalists.
They absolutely swallowed and continue to propagate the lie, the blatantly untruthful claim that RIFC plc is the holding company of a Liquidated football club!
I keep remembering the wonderful Daphne Anne Caruana Galizia, a real journalist murdered in her pursuit of truth.
And our guys are feart of a 12-and-a-half-year-old football club, when a single para would show that club to be telling porkies!!
Please provide evidence for your statement.
Albertz11
16 February 2024 at 12:08
‘…An application was made to the SPL for the approval of the registration of the transfer of the one share in The SPL Limited previously belonging to The Rangers Football Club Plc to SevcoScotland Limited, the new owner and operator of the business which included the Club commonly called ‘Rangers Football Club’, but that application was refused by a vote at a General Meeting of the members of The SPL Limited on 4 July 2012
+++++
Thank you, Albert11, for that post, confirming that the SPL rejected the application by SevcoScotland to register the ‘transfer’ of the liquidated Rangers Football Club plc to Charles Green’s team (which was called ‘Team 12’).
The refusal was on the basis of the Articles of Association of the SPL in force at the time, banning the transfer of a share to ‘…a person who is not the owner and operator of club.’
And, of course, Charles Green was NOT the owner and operator of a football club at the time.
Whatever the weasel words of a couple of subsequently gravely criticised Administrators, Charles Green did NOT buy a football club!! He bought a bundle of assets- cheap. Or he would have had to pay the full debts to bring the club out of Administration.
And because he and his assets were not a football club belonging to a ‘recognised football league’ the SFA under its own Articles could not grant them membership of the SFA.
So, Charlie, knocked back by the SPL, had to go begging to the SFL. There he found more willing/frightened minds and hearts, and that league accepted his application and let him in, albeit very grudgingly indeed.
On the basis of being a member of the SFL, his ‘team’ was admitted to membership of the SFA.
Up to that point, the SPL and SFL boards, and the SFA board had acted more or less properly [leaving aside the Nimmo nonsense and the ridiculous First Tier Tax Tribunal ‘judgment'[ bless Dr Poon!])
But the STUPID and insulting refusal to acknowledge the death of RFC of 1872 and allow a 12-and-half- year-old PLC to pass itself off and market itself [falsely] as being the holding company of the 140-years-old RFC plc (now RFC 2012 plc in Liquidation)which died in 2012 is a betrayal of any kind of truth and fidelity to office in governance (whatever it might also say about the FCA and the Insolvency Service and UEFA)
Those in office in football governance in Scotland know in their hearts that a dirty deed was done that has corrupted them themselves, Scottish Football, and the SMSM and BBC Scotland. They do not sleep easily in their beds.
—
I watched the Raith Rovers v Dundee Utd game this evening, remembering with respect, admiration and fondness the late Turnbull Hutton, man of integrity!
Ballyargus
16 February 2024 at 22:36
++++
RossM has gone beyond acceptable limits, in my view.
And you are right to call on him to justify his sweeping remarks.
And afore I say goodnight let me urge you to read this link https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/scottish-news/24093916.senior-judges-rule-sheriff-wrong-say-hun-protestant-slur/
Which I was pointed to a few minutes ago!
It was no surprise to see Albertz11 back on for the first time in a while because he felt he had to disprove John Clark’s comment that the new club were not using old-Rangers’ SPL share. After laughing, I almost commented immediately on his post because the Press Release/Minute he used as ‘evidence’ merely confirmed JC’s view!! I knew JC’s reply would be better, so waited for it instead.
The new club may indeed have bought the Share (along with some other assets – but never the club, of course), but it proved to be worthless as its registration was required for it to be usable. When the SPL clubs refused this, the Share was effectively null and void until the SPL members decided to register it by issuing it to Dundee who were promoted to the SPL to replace the now defunct old club. As JC says, the new club were then eventually issued a share in the SFL so they could start up in the bottom tier.
How sad that A11’s delusion has impinged on his memory so badly that he now reads history with such heavy blinkers on that allow him to misinterpret simple English in a way that makes it fit in with his worldview even when it doesn’t!!
Well done, A11 – that was the funniest thing I’ve seen in a while.
Ross M – your comment was not a funny thing in the slightest, but being a typical Rangers/TRFC fan who sees no problem in weaponising the suffering of child abuse victims, I guess you’d have no qualms at using the suffering of Israelis/Palestinians and one young Israeli in particular. That was a horrible comment and BP should kick you off for it imo.
This may not go down well in some quarters .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68325218
Paddy Malarkey 17/02 12.14
I take it the “risk” supporters are the same group that Celtic FC themselves chose to ban toward the end of last year for a number of offences, including the rushing of turnstiles and forcing opening fire exits, illegaly gaining access to Celtic Park prior to the CL game v Lazio, violent and intimidating behaviour at Easter Road. Should be nowhere near any football game let alone a womens game attended by families, young children etc.
Albertz11
17 February 2024 at 13:35
Show us your working,wee man, or is it all in your imagination ?
But A11, your post of 16 February 2024 at 12:08 was aimed SOLELY at responding to JC’s contention that the SPL share owned by the old club could not be used by the new club (even though they may indeed have bought it). Your attempt served only to reinforce that fact by confirming the refusal of the registration prior to approval of the share passing to Dundee. You really should have remembered that the SPL and the SFL were separate at that time, which was why the SPL could tell them to get tae, as could Turnbull Hutton & the rest of the SFL1, before the SFL3 (Ballantyne & all) took them in.
All your usual tactics of broadening that lost argument to the familiar old club/new club debate and posting lengthy irrelevant articles are unnecessary. Stick to the issue raised which you tried to debunk and you’ll have to admit you made an a*se of it!! Now you’re just making it funnier, lol.
Paddy Malarkey 13.39.
Wouldn’t have to be Hercule Poirot to work it out tbf.
From a Celtic blog.
“they wanted Celtic to cancel the block of tickets bought by the Green Brigade”.
So basically they were not trusted to behave at Celtic games but are now given the green light to attend a womens game at Ibrox attended by children & families.
Albertz11
17 February 2024 at 13:10
‘…I would question your expertise in the subject matter in comparison to those named above JC.?’
+++++++++
Ach, Albertz11!
Their honourable Ladyships and Lordships refer to the ‘Club’ as being among the bundle of assets purchased by Charles Green. So what? It was a club that was NOT a member of a football League ‘recognised’ by the SFA , and had therefore ceased to exist as a professional football club entitled to membership of the SFA.
How many times must it be repeated- SevcoScotland/TRFC HAD to apply for membership of the SFA as a NEW football club, not as continuity Rangers of 1872!
And it could apply only after finding acceptance in a recognised league!
Bluster and shout as much as they like, the RIFC plc Board DARE not put in print their claim that RIFC plc is the holding company of Company number SC004276.
That claim in print would bring them some trouble indeed!!
RIFC plc is the holding company of the football club ‘The Rangers Football Club’ [company number SC425159] which came into being as SevcoScotland and was admitted into membership of the SFA only in 2012.
Not even the learned Judges of the Court of Session could say otherwise, without causing havoc in the application of the Companies Act and the Insolvency Acts!
(and I am still pursuing efforts to convince the FCA that the RFC website needs looking at as possibly , in my opinion, a piece sharp work)
One lad had a dream,to fleece a football team
not even a strip or even a ball
https://thecelticstar.com/cancelled-kelty-hearts-testimonial-destroys-continuity-myth/
Albertz11
17 February 2024 at 15:17
The Green Brigade that are displaying a banner at Parkhead today ? Not trusted to behave themselves ? I heard it was a cost thing , as the home club got a fright when they found out how much policing would cost as it hadn’t been budgeted for .
Albertz11
17 February 2024 at 16:50
‘…As we all know, the vote was NOT passed and that meant we no longer were a member of the SPL and had to find our new home in the SPFL.’
+++++++
‘No longer a member of the SPL’ equals ‘no longer entitled to membership of the SFA’ because no longer belonging to a ‘recognised league’.
Rangers Football Club plc ceased to exist.
SevcoScotland could not begin to exist as a football club unless and until it joined a recognised league, and that meant having to apply for such membership in the SFL, and on the basis of that membership, become a football club permitted to participate in Scottish professional football.
All the verbiage in the world cannot change those facts.
It’s late of an evening and one finds one’s mind going on little excursions.
For example, are non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) that bind signatories to silence about some ‘arrangement’ that might be illegal, be in themselves illegal?
Say, for example, that Al Capone signs a non-disclosure agreement [NDA]with a trucking [trucking, I wrote!!] company to ship booze from A to B. Would that agreement be legally enforceable?
No way!
One then wonders whether a NDA which allows a new sports club to claim to be something that it legally is not is not worth the paper that it is written on?
Parties to such a dodgy Agreement must surely be free to disclose the truth behind the ‘secrecy’ if the secret is rooted in a lie?
And be supported by the Courts if they did so?
Oh, the possibility that any kind of Sports governance body should be in the business of using NDAs to hide the truth is a dreadful prospect!
it surely couldn’t happen?
Could it?
Decided to take the foot off the moderation pedal for a bit, but sadly it didn’t take long before the comical mixture of untruths, half truths and zoom-eyed zeal returned. Safety catch back on – for all our sanity.
Albertz11 – Got to laugh at you delusional people coming on here and elsewhere spouting your “same club” DRIVEL who are obviously clueless as to the LAWS and REGULATIONS of the Financial and Companies Regulators re BANKRUPTCY and trying to pass yourself off as being a company that has failed to pay off its debts. There was absolutely NO distinction between The Rangers Football Club PLC and company – NEVER was – and it is even telling you this in the last Liquidators Report here :
https://www.bdo.co.uk/getmedia/51b7a312-c715-45f7-af59-13ba2a32f822/RFC-2012-Plc-annual-progress-report-to-30-October-2023.pdf
Maybe you can enlighten us all why none of the other football clubs that went BANKRUPT before – and since – the original Rangers went BUST tried to come out with the separate club/company wheeze to save their club, or any other company for that matter? I can answer that and that is because it is totally against every law going because it would be FRAUD on part of the owners/shareholders being committed to try and get out of their debt and carry on as the same club/company. If it was so easy and legal then everyone would be doing this and the FACT is no one else has.
By claiming to be the same original Rangers on their website, that Asset Match site and in their accounts the crooks behind this club are committing FRAUD and DECEPTION against potential investors of their club and can be sued for any loss or damages arising from that FRAUD – same goes for the SPFL/SFA re their investors etc as well being conned by their FRAUD with regard to this matter and yes JC NDAs based on FRAUD and DECEPTION are themselves ILLEGAL.
Albertz11 – A perfect analogy of the original Rangers situation was MG Rover when they went BANKRUPT. The administrators could not find a buyer to take them over and pay off their debts so they were BANKRUPTED and then the administrators sold off the assets – the Longbridge factory and machinery, design centre etc to a Chinese company who set up a NEW company in China with a SIMILAR name because you are not allowed to use the same old name – and they have been building cars since then under that name, although they have shut down and sold off all of the assets here in the UK, and no one in this country is foolish enough to believe that this Chinese company is the same old British company that went BANKRUPT – EXACT same scenario as what happened with the original Rangers and only the gullible believers think any differently as the old original Rangers has been gone since 2012 and will NEVER return and as that annual report linked to is saying the old original Rangers will finally be put to bed and BANKRUPTED in the next and FINAL Report.
Some musings sitting here on a dreary winter’s afternoon. Rangers fans like to trumpet the fact that Celtic had an open goal for a number of trophies they won while Rangers were on the journey back. So if we take the trophies out for the years of the journey, how do the totals stack up from 2016 to 2023, and, could we show the trophies won by other clubs during that time period. Does the media not have any other adjectives to describe former or current players as either hero, or, star. Surely not every player is entitled to have that description applied to them. Will the knives be out for former Ranger manager, Michael Beale, who has been axed again, especially as he was once touted as the brains behind Steven Gerrard. Or will this be another record claimed by Rangers a former manager sacked within four months of being sacked by Rangers.
Issue 103 ( today’s issue) of the Rolls of Court has this:
“LORD BRAID – N Marchant, Clerk
Court 6 – Parliament House
Thursday 22nd February
JUDGMENT
(No appearance of counsel necessary)
P1105/23 Pet: James Easdale &c for Breach of Interdict”
+++
This is only of peripheral interest since neither James nor Sandy Easdale is on the Board of RIFC plc and the case (as far as I know) has nothing directly to do with football.
James Mulholland covered an earlier hearing in his report in the Evening Times on 7th February, in which he referred to an earlier judgment which ordered a guy to pay the Easdale’s £400,000 because he allegedly had defamed them.
Thursday’s judgment may be related to a suggestion that the other party was in contempt of Court for, allegedly, ignoring an interdict and repeating his defamatory statements.
I assume that His Lordship Judge Braid will formally come into a court 6 to pronounce judgment publicly.
I know from listening in Court to the case brought against ‘Dave frae Castlemulk’ that the Courts seem to have a helluva job trying to decide ‘contempt of court’ cases where the’ charge’ is brought by others, as opposed to when the Court itself is affronted live by some stroppy party in the dock blinding and effing the judge to his face!
In this case, the party alleged to have been in contempt seems to argue that he had no idea that what he said in England might be seen as ‘contempt of Court’ in a Scottish court.
I’m looking forward to reading the judgment and then re-reading the judgment in the King case!
All very interesting.
New Rangers mantra, one day at a time, somewhat misleading as I believe that was used extensively in the two years Ange was at Celtic. However I guess something borrowed, something blue is not out of step at Ibrox. And how desperate is the scottish media, the DR in particular, dredging at a story on Rangers being the last team to win at PSV, can this this be another world record for the 12 year old club. How have they kept Dave King away from the media, surely with them clinging to a two point lead, the media would love to have his input.
goforpar
20 February 2024 at 22:43
‘…How have they kept Dave King away from the media, surely with them clinging to a two -point lead, the media would love to have his input’
++++++
For all my contempt for yer man King, he at least knew and admitted that only by the payment of all its debts could RFC 2012 plc be brought out of Liquidation and restored to life as ‘continuity Rangers of 1872’.
Dave looks after Dave, first, last and all the time.
He is not, I think, generally regarded as anything but a self-seeking chancer with an ego who was bested by the bigger ego of SDM!
Our Dave will be quietly working the oracle, gauging the wind, hoping to get back the (£25 million was it?) that he seems to believe he was done out of during the blasted knight’s reign.
The ‘media’ don’t know which way to turn to be f.cked by the Board of the holding company of company no SC 425159!
Prostitutes all, ready to be shafted at the bidding of Untruth.
Honest to God.
How glad I am not to be the son of such ‘journalists’.
bigboab1916
20 February 2024 at 00:28
‘…One lad had a dream, to fleece a football team not even a strip or even a ball..’
https://thecelticstar.com/cancelled-kelty-hearts-testimonial-destroys-continuity-myth/
+++++++
bigboab1916, thanks for that link!
It confirms my belief that initially the Football authorities to their credit took the action that their respective Articles of Association required them to take as did the SMSM and BBC.
And then the fear and trembling and partisanship influence set in!
Not so much the influence of the crude “pitchfork and fire-brand wielding” marchers on Hampden, but of the white-collar brothers in commerce and business and journalism and radio broadcasting.
That influence, in my opinion, subverted the football authorities. Worse, it subverted the print media.
Even worse, it subverted the BBC!
Honest reporting by some at Pacific Quay was banned on the command of the BBC Trust on the most stupid basis that there had been a holding company that had gone bust while the football club remained in existence.
Such a flagrant distortion of truth by the BBC has destroyed my belief in the truth of anything the BBC in Scotland has to say about any issue of importance.
ps. Was the Kelty Hearts player given any kind of compensation for losing out on a testimonial game proceeds?
And what did the Le Havre team get in compensation?
Any bloody Scottish ‘journalist’ able and willing to ask?
[ And I am still impressed by the guys, decent guys, who paid the face-painter]
My post of 20 February at 22.13 refers.
Lord Braid has fixed a Hearing for Thursday 29 February to discuss the sentencing options open to him:
he rules out an Admonishment as not being appropriate given a contempt of such severity, and lists the three other options:
1) to obtain a criminal justice social work report from… with a view to a possible subsequent imposition of a term of imprisonment
2) to impose a financial penalty, or
3) to defer sentence for good behaviour….”
The full judgment issued today can be found at
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/docs/default-source/cos-general-docs/pdf-docs-for-opinions/2024csoh17.pdf?sfvrsn=ea0ace17_1
Well done BigBoab, that old post is worth reposting, reposting and reposting again and again. Remember, this site succeeded/incarnated from the Rangers Tax Case site and was aimed at continuing to tackle corruption or incompetence within the Scottish football authorities – this article is Evidence Item #1. As JC says, it provides evidence that those authorities DID initially do the right thing in treating the liquidated club as gone and the new club not yet a club. This should be driven at the SFA/SPFL/the SMSM and all those deluded TRFC fans who cannot face the truth.
I was glad that BP banned Albertz11 again, but it would have been interesting to see his arguments against this one! I’ve been here since TSFM’s inception having TUPE’d over from RTC, but can’t remember how he and others of his ilk responded to this prime piece of evidence of the truth. Does anyone else remember?
Governance in accordance with agreed rules is what sports governance bodies are supposed to be about.
In my inbox today is a CAS decision, which I summarise as follows:
The International Olympic Committee Executive Board (IOC EB) suspended the Russian Olympic Committee (ROC) from the International Olympic Committee on 12 October 2023 due to its decision to include as its members some regional sports organisations which are under the authority of the National Olympic Committee of Ukraine…
ROC appealed.
The CAS Panel that heard the Appeal dismissed the Appeal, finding that the IOC EB did not breach the principles of legality, equality, predictability or proportionality.
The CAS decision is final and binding except for parties’ right to file an appeal to the Swiss Federal Tribunal within 30 days on limited grounds.
you can find this at
https://www.tas-cas.org/fileadmin/user_upload/CAS_Media_Release_10093__Decision_.pdf
—
If our Scottish Football governance folk in 2012 (and perhaps even for years before) had looked properly at RFC of 1872’s financial reporting and the subtle wee casual mention of a way of paying into trusts for
players then they would have discovered the EBT arrangement and would then have had to ask further questions (if they dared!)
And the Nimmo Smith inquiry would not have been able to arrive at the ludicrous view that no advantage had accrued to the liquidated club by using EBTs.
And there would have been no stupid statements from HMRC that suggested that Rangers would continue to play at Ibrox.
(As a former Civil Servant myself, I thought that guy/gal ought to have been sacked! Stupid sod even to think of passing any such comment!)
And the Res 12 matter might have been properly dealt with by Celtic and other clubs and by UEFA.
Alas, Scottish Football is badly ‘governed’, is in thrall to a lie, and not worth a tinker’s curse!
My post of 23 February at 23.21 refers
An email today tells me this:
“Lausanne, 26 February 2024 – The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has registered the following
appeals further to the announcement made by the International Skating Union (ISU) on 30 January 2024 by which the final standings for the Team Event in figure skating at the Olympic Winter Games Beijing 2022 were adjusted following the disqualification of the skater Kamila Valieva, a member of the Russian team’
The report adds that ” Given the early stage of the proceedings, no indication can be given as to when a hearing may take place, IF ANY” (my capitals)
Oh, how I wish that in 2012 there had been a statutory Regulator of Scottish Football. He/she might have prevented the nonsense of ‘Non-disclosure Agreement’ being used by parties as a mechanism to keep schtum about a monstrous sporting untruth being forced upon Scottish Football by greedy and unprincipled sports bodies.
It is utterly unconscionable, in my view, that a football club newly created in 2012 was allowed, and is still allowed, to pass itself off as being Rangers of 1872 by the very Sports governance body that took away from the Liquidated club its entitlement to membership of the SFA when it lost its membership of a ‘recognised league’ under the Articles of Association of the then SPL.
Mind you, given that even the BBC lost its integrity perhaps such a Regulator might just as easily have forsworn himself/herself, but there would have to have been very public explanation of his/her decision, with no oaths of secrecy!
Has the football team that was missing at Ibrox on Saturday surfaced yet as I believe they have a game this week. Their manager has been quoted as they are going to challenge Celtic and Sevco (Rangers), but will have to do better 1 draw and 4 losses this season while surrendering 9 goals and getting 3. Flashing back to last week for a minute and an article involving Gary MacAllister who was pictured in his Sevco (Rangers top) with the infamous 5 stars emblazed on it. Two days later there is a picture of Phil Clemente with his top and no stars. Is this a tacit comment on the oldco/newco twist and the admission that they really are a newco.l
goforpar
26 February 2024 at 22:51′
‘.. Their manager has been quoted as they are going to challenge Celtic and Sevco (Rangers)..’
++++++++
goforpar, if [as I think you may be] you are referring to Naismith of Hearts may I say that I will not hear a bad word about him!!
“Why not?” I hear you cry.
Well, he had the sense to realise that RFC of 1872 no longer existed as a football club with an entitlement to membership of the SFA, having entered Liquidation and having had to surrender its share in the SPL and therefore no longer being a member of a ‘recognised football League’
He understood that his contract with RFC of 1872 was therefore cancelled and he was free to walk away.
And sensibly did choose to walk away from CG’s proposed new creation that CG hoped to be allowed to carry on as ‘continuity Rangers’
Naismith knew the truth: and feared that any ‘continuity Rangers’ would not in fact and law be the Rangers of 1872, no matter what the forsworn SFA might say:
and that his value as a player might be diminished if he signed a new contract with CG’s SevcoScotland/ team 12/ TRFC.
He showed a clear understanding of his legal position as an employee.
Praise and credit to him for seeing the truth of what Liquidation means.
John Clark
27 February 2024 at 00:01
I am pretty sure he recanted , JC, and is now a liquidation denier , saying he was wrongly/badly advised at the time, although that doesn’t appear to be the case from this interview .
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2012/jun/24/rangers-steven-naismith-steven-whittaker
From the Rolls of Court today:
LORD BRAID – N Marchant, Clerk
Court 6 – Parliament House
Thursday 29th February
By Order
between 9.30am and 10.00am
COS/P1105-23 Pet: James Easdale &c for Breach of Interdict
++
We will learn which sentencing of the 3 sentencing options Lord Braid will settle on after hearing what the contemnor has to say for himself.
paddy malarkey
27 February 2024 at 15:03
‘..I am pretty sure he recanted , JC, and is now a liquidation denier.,.’
+++++++
Only he, pm, will know whether he was lying then or whether, if indeed he now says something different, he’s lying now!
The legal advice he received was spot on.
His lawyers’ view that his contract with the Liquidated club was rendered null and void by the fact of that club’s Liquidation was not challenged by an Appeal, because no Court in Scotland could possibly have ruled in favour of CG’s claim that he had bought RFC of 1872!
CVA was rejected and a new co was formed with new company name with new CH number
Players contracts were now void and players could and can apply TUPE
Charles Green bought a bag of assets ( car parks etc) not the original club which was previously incorporated and liquidated
https://www.steedman.co.uk/hmrc-reject-rangers-cva-proposal/
” HMRC stated today they would vote against the Glasgow Club’s Company Voluntary Arrangement.
Creditors of Rangers are due to meet on Thursday morning to vote on whether to accept an offer from the club to pay off part of their debts.
As HMRC is a major creditor, their decision is enough to all but rule out the possibility that the CVA will be accepted; meaning a liquidation of the football club is now likely.
Prospective club owner Charles Green said: “I am hugely disappointed by the decision of HMRC not to support the CVA proposal and that disappointment will be felt acutely by Rangers fans across the world.”
HMRC are currently owed more than £21 million in unpaid taxes from Rangers.
A statement from the tax office read: “liquidation provides the best opportunity to protect taxpayers, by allowing the potential investigation and pursuit of possible claims against those responsible for the company’s financial affairs in recent years.”
Liquidation will force the club into forming a new Company, which would then have to be voted back into the Scottish Premier League by the other member clubs. A no vote could force a new Rangers entity into the lowest division of the Scottish League.”
If these Rangers fans lived in the USA they would be election deniers.
bigboab1916
28 February 2024 at 12:46
‘…If these Rangers fans lived in the USA they would be election deniers.’
+++++
The link you give, bigboab1916,
https://www.steedman.co.uk/hmrc-reject-rangers-cva-proposal/
is to an accountancy firm.
Not one that I would ever contemplate using if the para beginning ‘.Liquidation will force the club into forming a new Company’ is not part of the HMRC statement but Steedman’s opinion!
As it appears to be.
One would wonder at an accountancy firm coming out with such nonsense as that a liquidated entity can create a new company to be its owner!
And to have had that nonsense accepted and propagated by the BBC and the SMSM is utterly unacceptable.
Earlier this evening I was listening to a journalist in Gaza who was right in there in Gaza trying to report truth.
And I measure her against the sycophantic/partisan/ scared stiff /frightened sports ‘journalists’ of BBC Scotland and the print SMSM-who refuse to report truthfully in a mere matter of Sport!
Honest to God, I find in my very soul nothing but contempt for churls who do not report truth and churls who propagate untruth.
And they know who they are!
Imran quids in .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-68436872
The BBC report on the judgment issued today by the Court of Session in the damages claim by Imran Ahmad for wrongful arrest has this para:
“A judge-led inquiry into the failings of the fraud probe over the sale of Rangers is to be held once all related legal proceedings have concluded”
that report is at
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-68436872
The full Court judgment can be found on this link:
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/docs/default-source/cos-general-docs/pdf-docs-for-opinions/2024csoh23.pdf?sfvrsn=2385c04d_1
Scroll to para 122 to see details of how the amount of damages was worked out.
I very much look forward to learning how such a monumental and expensive cock-up arose that cost us taxpayers so many millions of pounds.
Has there ever, I wonder, been such a farce of a public prosecution in all of the history of prosecutions in Scotland?
Lord Braid has deferred sentence until August 29th on the guy who defamed the Easdales, warning him that as it stands he could expect a significant fine, and if he breached the order again could face imprisonment.
my post of 15.59 refers
https://www.pressreader.com/uk/greenock-telegraph/20240301/281638195153484
is a link to a press report
Blue card idea to be scrapped .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68450854
How to deal with pyros ?
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/irish-league/linfield-hit-with-stadium-ban-following-fireworks-display-at-coleraine-showgrounds/a71884843.html
paddy malarkey
1 March 2024 at 18:10
‘…Blue card idea to be scrapped.’
++++++
Thanks for that link, pm.
I hope the IFAB make it clear that they will not allow the ‘blue’ card’ idea into professional football at all, anywhere.
My opposition to the idea is rooted in the belief that the individual members of a team should understand that they owe it to their team NOT to act so unsportingly/recklessly/ cheatingly [ as in ‘professional foul’] as to merit being sent off for the remainder of the game.
The present system has worked well enough as mechanism to keep the worst behaviour under control by reason of fear of letting the team -mates down.
There will be many a hot-headed or cynical sod of a player who has been made to feel uncomfortable by his team-mates for getting himself sent off.
Well, it was good to hear Infantini so definitely dismiss the notion of ‘blue card’, by (as the BBC chap put to him) ‘showing the blue card the red card’!
It was interesting also (if I understood him correctly) that a player coming off because of fears of possible concussion from a head knock will be able to be substituted even if the normal quota of substitutes has already been used up.
I’m happy with that realisation that players’ health must take priority over ordinary rules of sport.
[ as a wee aside, I am reminded of the fact that for there to be ‘sport’ there has to be some kind of parity in the abilities of sports participants. Some sports, such as horse racing and golf, recognise that fact and deal with it by the idea of ‘handicapping’ which accepts that something has to be done to try to ‘equalise’ competitors if ‘sport’ means anything at all]
Could the idea of handicapping be introduced in football in relation to the capacities of very rich clubs as against cash-strapped clubs?
In former times, shared gate money in league matches gave ‘weaker’ clubs some possibility of competing against the stronger clubs.
And, at bottom, there can be no game unless there is another team playing, whether in a ‘home’ or ‘away’ match!
I had some difficulty in following the logic of a story in the DR regarding the team that plays at Ibrox and the loss today. The writer claims that this is the first real setback Clement has suffered since taking on the manager’s job. If this was a setback what was the loss to Celtic.
paddy malarkey
1 March 2024 at 18:41
How to deal with pyros ?
———-
Smoke detectors and massive industrial sprinkler systems installed in the roofs of stands.
What is the tie breaker in Scottish football should two teams tie for first place and have the same goal difference, and, to add another layer in their head to head meetings both won two and lost two with no difference in goals for and against. Something to keep in mind as the end of the campaign draws closer.
I saw this a wee while ago and was reminded of it today:
From Dominic Booth in ‘The Guardian Tue 20 Feb 2024 18.11 GMT
“Rochdale have launched a desperate plea for investment as the club tries to avoid possible liquidation by the end of March.
The National League club’s chairman, Simon Gauge, has said Rochdale require a cash injection of £2m. Dale have run up losses of more than £1m over the past year, during which they have been relegated from the Football League and their financial situation has deteriorated.
Gauge has called an emergency meeting of shareholders at the club’s Spotland stadium on 7 March in an effort to find investors. He said he was “looking for an investor to inject £2m to gain 90% of the club”.
—
I’m not at all well up on English football.
But surely Simon Waugh must be kind of wet behind the ears if he hasn’t learned that Liquidation doesn’t mean the death of a football club? (as has been the case, apparently, in Scotland since 2012)
Even I know that what you do is go into Administration, appoint Administrators who may fail to find an outright buyer ready to pay all your debts, but will sell to a named bidder who will buy cheaply such assets as he legally can but not all the assets, if the creditors refuse to sign up to a Creditors Voluntary Arrangement.
In the knowledge that the football authorities …….
Need I go on?
Or maybe the football authorities in England understand that Liquidation = death and that a club once dead cannot be resurrected?
[No harm to Rochdale, a fan-owned club, and I do hope they find a buyer to keep them in truthful, honest existence, history intact]
goforpar
4 March 2024 at 22:41
‘…What is the tie breaker in Scottish football should two teams tie for first place and have the same goal difference,..’
+++
I asked AI [ i.e, artificial intelligence, but the capital ‘I’ looks to me like an ‘el’ so my eye reads it as Al as in Allister]
‘If the head-to-head record is the same, the next tie breaker is goal difference. The team with the better goal difference will finish higher in the league. If the goal difference is also the same, the team with the most goals scored will finish higher. If teams are still tied, fair play points may be used as a final tie breaker’
But, of course, with the SFA /SPFL who knows? Break one rule, break them all, if convenient to do so!
It is already a criminal offence to take or try to take a pyrotechnic into football matches.
it is a fact that our big clubs are unwilling to pay for Police Scotland officers to be present at turnstiles and instead rely on their own stewards.
Let them pay for proper policing both at turnstiles and in the ground during the game as in days of yore, when polismen walked round the track round the pitch during the game and would get right in there in the crowd to tackle obstreperous fans!
Always an entertaining sight when some turd of a supporter was hustled away!
Stewards have no powers to get in there and arrest troublemakers: and pyro-fecking eejits are far more of a danger than the stupid drunk out of his mind!
Nothing will happen, of course, until a huge damages claim is brought by a spectator blinded or burnt by a pyro set off near him.
Honest to God!
macfurgly
4 March 2024 at 11:08
Collective punishment ? It isn’t the supporters’ responsibility, so why should the majority be punished because because of the inaction of those whose job it is ?
As this site exists to challenge poor performance and potential corruption within the operation of Scottish football, I hope VAR performance is allowed to be discussed even if the incident I’m about to discuss disadvantaged only Celtic. L know any club could raise similar issues of their own. I haven’t yet seen the outcome of Celtic’s appeal against Yang’s red card. I imagine the SFA will protect their own and uphold the ‘eventual’ decision else they will be seen as not supporting their own and also raising questions over John Beaton’s competence or impartiality. I hope Celtic has raised the (imo) right question within the appeal. For me, the question should not be whether the high boot was a yellow or red card. While watching, my genuine feeling was that I thought it was worthy of a yellow card (due to lack of intent and lack of any real impetus in the kick/flick). At the same time, I immediately thought “I can see that being treated as a red card offence too, due to the high boot being close to, or making contact with, Cochrane’s face). I hope I’m not being too presumptious then to suggest that most reasonable people seeing the incident would have thought similarly i.e. ‘Ooh, that could be a yellow or a red’ and which side of that decision you come down on depends to an extent what blinkers you wear day to day. Obviously, the blinkers of Celtic, Hearts (and Rangers) fans will skew their view as will your own views on player safety etc. Nonetheless, if I am indeed right that most people feel it could have been a yellow or a red, then why does John Beaton as VAR decide to become involved? I accept that his role is to review possible red card offences, so have no problem with him doing so as a matter of course, but if I am right that a reasonable person would see it as yellow or red, then Beaton would have to accept that the referee may be right to deem it a yellow card and that it is therefore NOT a clear and obvious error which would demand his intervention. The question would then have to be asked why he thought it WAS a clear and obvious error which the referee should review. Does that make him an unreasonable person and, if so, what drives him to be unreasonable in this particular case? The question of what drove him to become involved is what needs answered, NOT should the card be yellow or red. I’d be glad to hear others’ thoughts.
JC — 4 march 2024 —
Thanks for claryifying the tie breaking rules in Scotland. Due to the fluidity in applying rules maybe a copy should be sent to SFA/SFPL.
An interesting look at the squads for Benefica and Rangers as posted today. Benefica listing 8 academy graduates in their lineup versus 3 for Rangers, a rather telling story for the deelopment of Scottish footballers.
Has there been any follow up on the teams that were writing to Scottish football adminstrators listing their concerns about the administration of the game. Strange how the media were all over it at the time, but, nothing since the first flurry of stories.
How can a league continue with VAR when almost every manager in the top flight has taken exception to it in one form or another thus far. When does it become apparent that there’s something wrong and perhaps the SFA/SFPL take another look at the issue and not just gloss over it. Maybe the media could take a look at other professional sports to see what level of issues they have with VAR. I think they would be surprised.
goforpar
5 March 2024 at 22:54
‘…Has there been any follow up on the teams that were writing to Scottish football adminstrators listing their concerns about the administration of the game.’
++++++++
I think the last I saw was from
SPFL board to arrange all-club meeting over independent report
By Brian McLauchlin
BBC Scotland
Last updated on17 February 2024
see last para at this link https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68326139
“They called for league bosses to attend a meeting on 27 February. But the SPFL has now scheduled a gathering of all clubs on 19 March”.
I am not aware of any change to that.
paddy malarkey
5 March 2024 at 12:56
macfurgly
4 March 2024 at 11:08
Collective punishment ? It isn’t the supporters’ responsibility, so why should the majority be punished because because of the inaction of those whose job it is ?
—
Hang on a second while I get my tongue out of my cheek.
As an ex Trade Union Rep., and a teacher, I’m well aware of the iniquities of collective punishment. I expected folk on here to realise that it was an attempt at humour, but hey ho, there is always one.
goforpar
5 March 2024 at 22:54
‘…How can a league continue with VAR when almost every manager in the top flight has taken exception to it in one form or another thus far. When does it become apparent that there’s something wrong and perhaps the SFA/SFPL take another look at the issue and not just gloss over it.’
++++++++
As a consequence of the ‘ 5-Way Agreement’ our Football ‘Authorities’ lost any moral authority.
Until those ‘Authorities’ undo the damage done to the integrity of Scottish Football governance by the creation and propagation of the lie that RIFC plc is the holding company of RFC of 1872 no one will be too ready to believe that anything like the Truth can be expected from them in response to any challenge presented by the facts of a matter in contention.
[ Geez, 65 years or so on from struggling with ‘Macbeth’ at school and I find myself remembering this:
“I am in blood
Stepped in so far that, should I wade no more,
Returning were as tedious as go o’er”
For nearly 13 years our Football governance bodies have been ‘stepped in deceit’ pretty far.
But they can fix that quite simply by recognising the death of RFC of 1872 and stating the simple truth that TRFC, newly created by them in 2012, is not entitled to any football honours or titles won by the club that was founded in 1872 and which entered Liquidation in consequence of losing its membership of a recognised league, thereby ceasing to be entitled to membership of the SFA.
Would that they had the moral courage to do so!
They might then be able to speak with an authority that would be respected as deriving from honest pr exercise of judgment based on facts and truth.
Nawlite – I’m with you on the clear and obvious error point. Robertson didn’t miss the incident and it is one that we see no, yellow or red cards being given for. I would add a further question to yours which is what did Robertson see at the monitor that caused him to change his mind? In effect Robertson has very publicly told us all that his judgment in making his original decision was at fault. It’s often said that without the referee there is no game. Well without the fans there is no professional football and for too long we have been treated like third class citizens by the authorities. We need these authorities to be fully transparent and accountable to the life blood of the game.
nawlite
5 March 2024 at 19:57
———
Agreed on all points. In that match, the high boot was, as you describe, probably yellow, possibly red. The penalty against Iwata was a nonsense, not one Hearts player complained, and players today will claim for anything. Clear and obvious error? I don’t think so. For me , that was bias and Rodgers was right to call out Beaton.
At the same time, my main problem is with the reliability of VAR, and hence the opportunity for misuse, with the Shankland offside being a case in point, for balance if you will. There is no way that VAR can decide that he was offside when there was a fraction of a second between his arm being at his side and onside or forward and offside, as Scales moved in the opposite direction and the ball was 20 m away, partly obscured by Iwata I think sliding back.
I have lived a long life being “paranoid”, Aye right, but it seems more sinister now that these decisions are being taken by a Kafkaesque, non accountable, non identifiable, person elsewhere. I suppose it should not come as a surprise that VAR should be adopted by those with the power to use it to their advantage, but Lennon is wrong Rodgers is right, it’s time to speak openly.
….. and as I type, Rodgers has a two match ban for those remarks.
macfurgly
6 March 2024 at 22:18
‘… I expected folk on here to realise that it was an attempt at humour, but hey ho, there is always one.’
++++++++
Actually, macfurgly, I had to read it twice with furrowed eyebrows for a second or two before I twigged!
But I think pm’s post makes an important point: crime is crime and criminals should be caught and punished.
Whose job is that?
No one expects that some mad bast.rd with a weapon in a supermarket or cinema or at a rock concert should be tackled by staff, stewards or even a ‘security’ person. That’s a job for the polis. Only they have powers to touch you/apprehend you.
And pyro-carrying fans at a football match are criminals. That’s a job for polis.
And if a football club or other public entertainment business has to pay for the polis needed, so be it!
( the cost will be passed on to the punters, believe you me!)
macfurgly
6 March 2024 at 22:41
‘…. and as I type, Rodgers has a two match ban for those remarks.’
++++++
A ban by an ‘authority ‘ that propagates the biggest lie in Football? -rubberstamped in 2012 and subsequently by Rodger’s employer?
No point in Celtic trying to be huffy-puffy about things like that.
They bloody well bought into the Big Lie.
macfurgly
6 March 2024 at 22:18
Sorry, I thought it you were half kidding,hale earnest , and I was being Mr Grumpy .
paddy malarkey
7 March 2024 at 08:36
————
No worries. Humour is sometimes difficult in print where there is no tone of voice.
A couple of weeks ago there was a VAR call from a camera in line with the six yard box looking back toward the half way line at about 40 degrees to the pitch, probably because that was the only view that had both the ball being kicked and the potentially offside player. The lines were touching. I do not believe that call is possible, VAR is claiming to do something it can’t do. This is wrong,and matches are being decided by it. I find it hard to believe I’m writing this after 50 years of watching referees from Davidson and Wharton onwards, but there should be 3 VAR calls; onside, offside or too close to call, with a max. of 30 seconds to decide. If it’s too close to call, go with the onfield decision. It takes us back to where we were, but at least there is transparency. VAR was intended for “clear and obvious errors”, that’s what it can do and what it should be used for.
Imran’s no done yet!
From the Rolls of Court today:
“LORD HARROWER – G Hamilton/A McNeill, Clerk
Court 11 – Parliament House
Friday 15th March
By Order
between 9.30am and 10.00am
CA144/21 Imran Ahmad v Lord Advocate “
This evening, I idly speculate: Can there be a more unpleasant sound than that of K Mac pissing himself in his excitement at TRFC’s draw against Benfica?
It was all handshakes all round, I imagine, at Pacific Quay!
But then it was ever thus since way back when that (in my opinion) bad article Peter Thomson was doing his bit for Rangers when he was a Senior Producer at the BBC (ask Archie MacPherson!)
And BBC Scotland, by propagating the lie that TRFC is RFC of 1872, made a whore of itself in 2012 and continues today to enjoy being shafted by the board of RIFC plc!
In my opinion.
I give you this:
‘Non-league Rochdale close to being saved from serious threat of liquidation by US investor’
and this
‘Rochdale AFC can announce that all five resolutions proposed at Thursday’s Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) have been passed by shareholders.
Following an initial count, we can confirm that the threshold for all resolutions to be passed has been reached. Final figures will be shared on Friday.’
So, like Hearts they found the resources to avoid the death of Liquidation. Somebody bought the club and ALL its assets outright!
Unlike Rangers of 1872, Rochdale AFC will NOT be Liquidated and will be the same football club that was founded in 1907!
A long time ago in primary school in Auchenshuggle I and the rest of the class were exposed to the delights of one of Wullie Wordsworth’s poems the opening line of which was ” My heart leaps up when I behold a rainbow in the sky..’
That line popped into my mind not half an hour syne, as I read Section 70 of the ‘Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023’ which received Royal assent on 26 October 2023.
Section 70 reads as follows:
‘ 70. (1) The Companies Act 2006 is amended as follows.
(2) After Section 1002 insert-
1002A power to strike off company registered on false basis
(1) The registrar may strike a company’s name off the register if the registrar has reasonable cause to believe that-
(a) any information contained in the application for the registration of the company….is misleading, or
(2) any statement made to the registrar in connection with such an application is misleading, false or deceptive in a material particular…”
I’m not any kind of lawyer, of course, but I idly, on a Friday night, wonder whether, say, a prospectus which I may have written to launch my new holding company as being the holding company of a long established, very successful company with a company number that belongs to a very newly created company might possibly pose a problem for me?
Was my prospectus misleading, suggesting that potential investors would be investing in the holding company of company ‘x’ rather than the holding company of a brand-new company ‘y’?
I dare not put on my company website that my company is the holding company of company ‘x’, but that same website clearly implies that it is!
Oh, dear!
(It is good to see that Parliament is ready to try to have a go at those in business who try to cheat us. Bad b.stards all, whether green or white or mint sweetie coloured or frae the ‘mulk or whatever)
Ps. I know that, generally, new legislation is not retrospective.
But it would be a nonsense if a plc that had passed itself off as something it was not, could not be viewed suspiciously?
John Clark
8 March 2024 at 23:25
A long time ago in primary school in Auchenshuggle I and the rest of the class were exposed to the delights of one of Wullie Wordsworth’s poems the opening line of which was ” My heart leaps up when I behold a rainbow in the sky..’
That line popped into my mind not half an hour syne, as I read Section 70 of the ‘Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023’ which received Royal assent on 26 October 2023.
—–
Never mind the context, that kind of association is genius.
To pick back up on the VAR discussion, I think there are four fundamental issues with VAR as it is being deployed (some of these issues are not exclusive to Scotland).
1. Use of still images when refs called to the monitor. These are quite literally distorting the picture as they strip away any consideration of context and ignore the fact that football is a dynamic game. Refs should be allowed to view different angles of an incident, slowed down if they wish but not super slow motion.
2. Culture of mutual appreciation. Everyone on the pitch makes mistakes, but the VAR ref has no real excuse for getting it wrong. Senior referees in Scotland have their own association (union) and are a fairly small group. If the ref is called to the monitor what is the likely outcome when faced with accepting the VAR call or calling out a fellow union member for getting it wrong despite all the tech support?
3. VAR technology. This is well tested elsewhere and across different sports and should be uncontroversial – I have never seen a tennis player argue with Hawkeye which predicts where the ball landed. But the technology deployed in Scotland and how it is presented when showing offsides is second rate and is undermining the whole initiative. We need to improve what we have deployed and present better.
4. Lack of communication – rugby had its own TMO issue in the Scotland-France match, but I was taken by the clarity and professionalism of the referee and his assistants in Italy yesterday, not least with the decision on the Italian knock on late in the game. Real time, onfield decisions shared with the crowd and TV audience. Tell me why we can’t do similar in football which has significantly more funding?
And a final point for the SFA and Scottish Referees Association – where is the diversity in the referee population in Scotland? First Asian referee in the English Premier League yesterday and female assistant referees increasingly common. In Scotland? Middle aged white males from Glasgow and north Lanarkshire…
With all the discussion about what’s a handball and what’s not, I believe there is another rule/law that should be looked at. A team is awarded a penalty and the keeper makes the save but leaves a rebound that is picked up by the attacking team who then scores. Is this not being penalized twice, once for the original penalty and then having the rebound poked into your net. Pro hockey has penalty shots and if the keeper stops that’s the end of the play, no rebounds. Also Clement with a coded or decoded message on fitness of Rangers players with an alleged swipe at Beale. Was their not glowing reports over how Clement had increased fitness levels at the team since taking over. The amount of injuries suffered by clubs in Scotland is truly shocking and bears a long hard look at how training on field and off is handled, and, how the players are maintaining their own fitness.
goforpar
10 March 2024 at 21:52
‘..A team is awarded a penalty and the keeper makes the save but leaves a rebound that is picked up by the attacking team who then scores. Is this not being penalized twice,..’
+++++++++
That’s a very interesting proposition, goforpar. It certainly has its attractions!
But given that a penalty is just a free kick, the ball is in play as soon as the kick is taken, and the first man from either team to any rebound from keeper or post/crossbar can take possession and play on.
There might be a case for IFAB to revise that ‘Law’ and give a ‘penalty kick’ a different status from any other free kick??
Mind you, a quick breakaway by the defending team from a rebound can offer an advantage!
Tonight, Lundstram’s speed of reaction and his timing, I have to admit, couldn’t be faulted.
I didn’t record the match, so I don’t know how the Hibs players were positioned? Could any one of them have got to the rebound before Lundstram in time to boot the ball out of the danger area?
Wokingcelt
10 March 2024 at 12:13
‘…Real time, on field decisions shared with the crowd and TV audience.’
+++++++
That’s the ideal, Wokingcelt!
But international matches are refereed by ‘neutrals’ and (I suppose) the TMO guy/gal would also be a ‘neutral’.
I don’t know what the position is with the use of TMO in domestic rugby? Is it used at all?
Or is it simply implicitly accepted that while a referee may get things wrong, he will not get them wrong by reason of partisanship or bribery or any such horrible thing?
The climate of suspicion in Scottish football is such that nothing but complete visual and audio evidence of what was said by the on-pitch ref and the ref in Baillieston will do. (And maybe, a wee background check on the techies who film and record particular matches- or is that a bit too much? In a media world where a sporting lie of some magnitude is insistently propagated, and TV recordings of matches have in the past been known to have ‘gone missing’? One wonders.)
I think that VAR is causing more problems than it resolves in Scottish football, and the blame lies squarely with CFC,TRFC and their supporters (including in the dugouts and the match officials .) It will always be subject to whitabootery,even though incidents are rarely identical ,and their thoughts and viewpoints will be thrust down the throats of the rest of us by a compliant media The absence of professional referees(and in some cases,professionalism) doesn’t help . Wouldn’t it be nice if Rangers hadn’t died and they’d both departed to pastures new , and left the rest to organise an honest game . They don’t want to be here other than to hoover up trophies . Their greed ensured the end of gate sharing , and the 11-1 voting set up meant they could stymie any attemps to upset their applecart .
I’ve just been listening on BBC Radio 4 to Kevin Hollinrake, MP, a UK minister of state for business, discussing the new powers given to the Registrar for Companies to strike off companies that file bogus and/or misleading info about themselves, etc etc.
One commentator said that he expected that thousands of bogus companies will be struck off in due course.
It may, of course, take longer for apparently long-established companies who may have made unjustified claims about themselves when they first registered to be identified and dealt with.
Quite encouraging, though.
Its rather ironic the way the Scottish Cup semi finals came through the draw. Both Glasgow clubs drawn against teams that both sets of fans (Celtic and Rangers) accuse the opposition of laying down against the Glasgow teams. It will be interesting to see the stories attached to these semi finals over the next few weeks and of course the referee and VAR officials will only add to the hysteria surrounding the events. It could be a major boost for the Scottish game if the perceived underdogs prevailed and shut the alleged big two out of the cup final. One can only imagine the weeping and gnashing of teeth in that scenario.
goforpar
12 March 2024 at 00:43
‘…One can only imagine the weeping and gnashing of teeth in that scenario.’
+++++++++++++
As a matter of interest, does anyone know how much less revenue comes to the SFA from the sale of the broadcasting rights of a Scottish Cup Final between, say, Aberdeen v Hearts than from a Celtic v Rangers final?
The readiness of the Boards and members of the SFA/SPFL to create/rubber stamp out of fear of loss of revenue, the nonsensical untruth that RFC of 1872 did not die in spite of entering Liquidation would suggest to me that there is nothing they would stop at to maximise revenue receipts at whatever cost to the concept of ‘Sport’
John Clark
12 March 2024 00:43
It would be difficult to comprehend any sports organization having a two tiered payment system for what is described as their premium event. Again this is the SFA and one should not be surprised by any action taken by them. Have they issued any comment on the stands in regards to Martin Boyle. They probably missed that as they make plans for taking in the next couple of friendlies for Scotland and work on their travel arrangements for Germany. Never let an expense paid vacation get in the way of doing your job.
Lord Harrower in his judgment of 29 February 2024 in the matter of Imran Ahmad’s action against the Lord Advocate seems to think that ‘Rangers Football Club plc’ was bought out of administration by SevcoScotland as if Charles Green had paid all its debts, and as if SevcoScotland/The Rangers Football Club Limited was the very identical club as RFC plc in Liquidation.
(That’s my reading of his readiness to use the word ‘Rangers’ in relation to CG’s TRFC Ltd)
There appears to be no recognition that the insolvent football club had ceased to be a member of a recognised football league and had therefore- by that very fact- ceased to be a member of the SFA!
and that in fact the Rangers of the 4 young men on Glasgow Green had ceased to exist as a football club.[ and I appreciate that the case was to do with Ahmad’s claim for damages, and not about whether TRFC is Rangers of 1872/1899]
Or that TRFC Ltd had had to apply, beg for, any kind of membership of a recognised league before it could get membership of the SFA, as a new club!
Old big hands was clever enough. Other folk since have been cleverer. But they have all done pretty well out of their cleverness.
And as for the temporisers with Truth in our media?
They have just been contemptuous assholes masquerading as ‘journalists.’
They have all bought into the lie that TRFC is the Rangers of the 4 young men!
Honest to God!
What are they like in the depth of their resistance to speak truth?
Not like the truth reporting journalists who risk death in reporting truth!
And thank God for such heroic journalists!
From today’s Rolls of Court of Session,
“LORD HARROWER – G Hamilton/A McNeill, Clerk
Court 11 – Parliament House
Friday 15th March
By Order
between 9.30am and 10.00am
CA144/21 Imran Ahmad v The Lord Advocate”
——
This, I think, is ‘to discuss the terms of the interlocutor that would be appropriate to give effect to the award that I have indicated…’ [in the judgment issued by Lord Harrower on 29 February in the Ahmad v Lord Advocate damages claim]
My post of 11 March 2024 at 12:35 refers.
I idly wonder whether I might send Kevin Hollinrake copies of my email correspondence with the FCA, the Insolvency Service etc., etc.?
After all, my contention is that the Prospectus issued by a particular company in its bid to become a plc was misleading in its claim to be something that it was not!
And maybe I could ask Hollinrake to live up very practically to his expressions of hope that the new powers will tackle the problem of cheating companies by having a look at what I say in relation to the Prospectus issued by the particular company I have in mind?
I shall consider!
But given the fact that BBC Scotland was ordered not to report truth… and obeyed that order?
What hope that Hollinrake will be any more a man of principle?
I think I will ask him!
Not tonight, though!
See where some members have fallen for the fallacy that team hosting Benefica this evening has won 55 league titles and this should be a concern for the Benefica team. Perhaps someone could set them straight on the actual number of league titles that the current version of Rangers has won. Also, I see on one of their websites they have glossed up their European record since 2017 with no mention of previous games in earlier years and no mention of CL games. The love affair with the EL continues.
Well, I have to say that watching the game this evening I agreed with Ally McCoist in his consternation, frequently voiced from quite early in the match, that TRFC left their left flank exposed repeatedly to counter-attacks.
M.Clement seemed not to see that.
The ironic thing is that the Benfica goal came on TRFC’s right flank, where no TRFC player was in a position to do anything but vainly chase the Benfica goal-scorer!
I would even at this stage be ready to suggest that M. Clement’s jaiket is already on a shoogly peg: because that’s a lot of money now not available to RIFC plc for the summer transfer market.
And they are still kind of dependent on directors’ loans to be able to declare that they can continue as a ‘going concern’.
Just for fun, I have been asking my Artificial Intelligence ‘co-pilot’ a few questions, such as ‘Was the Prospectus issued by RIFC plc in 2012 ‘misleading’ in suggesting that it would be the holding company of the Rangers Football club which was founded in 1872 later incorporated with company number 004276′
This is the response from the machine:
“The Prospectus issued by Rangers International Football Club PLC (RIFC) in 2012 did indeed suggest that RIFC would be the holding company of the Rangers Football Club, which was founded in 1872 and had the company number SC004276. However, this representation turned out to be misleading.
In reality, RIFC became the holding company for the newly formed Rangers Football Club after the original club faced financial difficulties and entered liquidation. The new club, known as The Rangers Football Club Limited, was established in 2012. The shares in Sevco Scotland Ltd were transmuted into shares in this new entity, which then became the football club operating under the name Rangers.
The situation was complex due to the club’s history and the need for restructuring. While the prospectus implied continuity with the historic Rangers Football Club, the legal reality was different. The new club, under RIFC, continued to play at Ibrox Stadium and carry on the legacy, but it was a distinct legal entity from the original club that had entered liquidation.”
—-
I may follow this up with the Registrar for Companies for him/her to have a wee look at with reference to the powers available under Section 1002A?
If you are having us on, then you got me.
If not, that is startling to say the least. Who programmed the thing? RTC?
After years of carry-on with lawyers, the BBC, the print media, Companies House, the FCA, Uncle Tom Cobley and all, some peculiar electronic gadget chirps the right answer!
Jings, I have been observing AI warily in the hope I may one day understand what it is; perhaps being overwhelmed by robots may not be entirely bad.
macfurgly
15 March 2024 at 15:40
‘…If you are having us on, then you got me.’
+++++
Not having anyone on, macfurgly!
I could hardly believe my eyes, but what I posted was exactly what AI came up with in answer to my question.
There is no legal way that TRFC could be the Rangers of 1872 and entitled to be given status as and sporting entitlements of Rangers of 1872.
The SFA and the SPFL simply must realise that, and go public to confess their ‘mistake’/’misgovernance’ and sort things out honestly.
To John Clark, Bang on. Your question pumped in and reply that came up.
According to http://www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:
Answer:
Yes, the Prospectus issued by RIFC plc in 2012 was deemed misleading in suggesting that it would be the holding company of the Rangers Football Club which was founded in 1872 and later incorporated with company number 004276.
The controversy surrounding the Prospectus issued by RIFC plc in 2012 revolves around the misrepresentation of the company’s role as the holding company of Rangers Football Club. The prospectus implied that RIFC plc would be the parent company of the football club, which was founded in 1872 and incorporated with company number 004276. However, this assertion was found to be misleading and inaccurate.
The issue stemmed from the fact that RIFC plc was established as a new entity following the liquidation of The Rangers Football Club plc in 2012. While RIFC plc did acquire certain assets and business operations of the original Rangers Football Club, it was not a direct continuation or legal successor to the historic club founded in 1872.
Investors and stakeholders raised concerns about the misleading nature of the prospectus, as it created confusion regarding the true relationship between RIFC plc and Rangers Football Club. The prospectus failed to adequately disclose the complex corporate structure and legal distinctions between the old club and the newly formed company.
Subsequently, regulatory authorities and legal experts scrutinized the prospectus to assess whether it breached any disclosure or transparency requirements. The misleading information provided in the document raised questions about corporate governance practices and investor protection standards.
In conclusion, the Prospectus issued by RIFC plc in 2012 was indeed misleading in suggesting that it would be the holding company of Rangers Football Club, which was founded in 1872 and later incorporated with company number 004276. This misrepresentation contributed to confusion among investors and highlighted the importance of accurate and transparent disclosure in corporate documents.
bigboab1916
15 March 2024 at 18:06
‘…To John Clark, Bang on. Your question pumped in and reply that came up…’
+++++++++++
Yes, and a much more detailed reply! Well done!
“…Subsequently, regulatory authorities and legal experts scrutinized the prospectus to assess whether it breached any disclosure or transparency requirements. The misleading information provided in the document raised questions about corporate governance practices and investor protection standards”
When, I wonder, did the ‘regulatory authorities and legal experts’ carry out their scrutiny, and what did they do when they found that the Prospectus was misleading?
Just let it go? Make a public announcement and ask RIFC plc to make a public apology and reimburse any investor who bought shares on the basis of false information?
Obviously not: that would have been news that not even the BBC or print SMSM could keep back!!
I think I may now ask the Registrar of Companies to re-investigate with a view to using the NEW powers that Section 1002A of the Companies Act 2006 has recently given her to strike RIFC plc off the Register. Or explain why she won’t…!
It’s maybe time I got my Westminster MP involved, I think-even if just to give him a problem in election year…
—
[ I understand that much of the reasoning behind the enhancement of the powers of the Registrar of Companies is related to the need to hammer down on international ‘money laundering’ and the use of companies whether bogus altogether or genuine but bent to shift dodgy money around the world.
The international business scene of ‘Sport’, with directors/major shareholders of UK sports companies also being directors/shareholders in overseas companies, might well provide opportunities for ‘money laundering’.
Not that I for one minute would suggest that RIFC plc could ever be involved in that kind of wickedness.
Nevertheless, the facts appear to be that it was prepared to issue a misleading Prospectus claiming to be what we know it was not. And it needs its a.se kicked good and hard_ ‘pour encourager les autres’!
As would any supposed ‘governance body’ which knowingly allowed it to claim to be what it was not!
I shall ponder deeply over the next few days.
Sadly, I am too poor to think of engaging the services of a good (England-based) lawyer. No offence to Scottish lawyers, of course, but they have their businesses to consider!
And I should add that I am aware that Artificial Intelligence is not yet to be regarded as infallible! But I do believe that it can find and source recorded facts, such as, for example, that the regulatory authorities did look at the Prospectus and found it misleading.
As ever, I’m always happy to be corrected in matters of fact]
Well spotted bigboab 1916
‘Yes, the Prospectus issued by RIFC plc in 2012 was deemed misleading in suggesting that it would be the holding company of the Rangers Football Club which was founded in 1872 and later incorporated with company number 004276 etc etc.
I’m happy wi’ that finding – however no’ sae much wi this…!
‘How Rangers’ innovative use of artificial intelligence reduced injuries by 50 percent en-route to 55’
(Rangers Review)18th November 2021
Somedy needs tae educimicate that AI oan the ‘Big Lie’ methinks!
bect67
16 March 2024 at 11:18
‘…Somedy needs tae educimicate that AI oan the ‘Big Lie’ methinks!’
+++++
Ha,ha!
The guy who wrote that misleading headline will not be so happy now about AI as any collaborator in propagating a sporting untruth!
I have been drafting a letter to my Westminster MP. (Well, it’s the kind of thing to do on a Sunday night, n’est-ce pas, Hercule?)
I want to ask ‘them’ [canny say him/her these days!] to have a look at the RIFC plc ‘Prospectus’ and tell me how any potential investor would think he/she would NOT be investing in a hunnert and 40-year-old, titles-and-honours-laden football club, instead of in a new football club that had been admitted into membership of a ‘recognised league’ and of the SFA only in 2012!
I might also suggest to them that the legal advice given to the SFA, the SPL/SFL, the Administrators and CG is questionable in that it, apparently, accepted an untruth, namely that CG had bought Rangers of 1872 out of administration and was simply the new owner of RFC of 1872.
All signed up in a non -disclosure agreement!
[What is that I hear? -faint echoes in Parliament Square of ‘what it’s all about’, ‘the essence of a football club’ …]
Honest to God!
What ARE they like, those who say that RFC of 1872 did not die the death (or, rather, was murdered by an egotistic majority shareholder of a knight!)
The good thing JC is that you will notice no one, outside their little group on their board, wants to invest in this Rangers* football club/company because the people who buy shares do their due diligence before investing in any company etc and they will not be fooled by the separate club/company DRIVEL and will actually see for themselves that the original Rangers Football Club is at present being wound up in bankruptcy – they will see what you and everyone else can see on companies house and in the financial sector records re the history of their bankruptcy to date journey – soon to be finalised.
The fact that they are not on any major investing sites will waken up investors to the bad smell around this club/company as well. They might be able to con their mug supporters to their continuation LIE but they are not able to con the investors into their LIE as is being shown by their lack of success in trying to get them to invest. Their mug supporters should be asking if they are still the same “successful” club then why is no investors outside their little group of directors willing to invest in this “successful” club.
I note that Para 7 of BDO’s report to creditors issued on 22 November 2023 reads as follows:
7. Conclusions
We have attended to all statutory requirements throughout the course of the liquidation to date.
The Joint Liquidators have paid the final dividend just after the period end, and subsequently will be in a position to close the case on consignment of any unclaimed dividends. Therefore, the next report to the creditors in this matter will be the final report.”
I presume that that final 6th-monthlyreport will be due very soon( period from November to April?)
Out of interest I had a look at this
“Companies House
Guidance
Liquidation and insolvency:
7.4 The duties of the interim liquidator
Within 28 days of the appointment, the interim liquidator investigates the company’s affairs and will call meetings of creditors and contributories. Contributaries are people that are liable to contribute to the assets of a company in the event of it being wound up.
The meetings appoint the official liquidator who must notify AIB within 7 days. If no liquidator is appointed at the meetings, the court appoints a liquidator.
The liquidator must send to AIB (the Accountant in Bankruptcy), a statement of receipts and payments for the first 12 months of liquidation and thereafter every 6 months until the winding up is complete.
7.5 When the winding-up is complete
When we, together with the AIB receive notice from the liquidator of the final meeting that winding-up is complete, we will register it and publish its receipt in the Edinburgh Gazette.
Unless the Court directs otherwise, the company will be dissolved 3 months after the notice was registered with us.”
The absolute end of Rangers of the 4 young men is only weeks away, whatever the emotional shock, and whatever any lying football governance bodies may have tried to do. RFC of 1872 will simply be a footnote in the history of Scottish Football.
The wee spat this afternoon on BBC Scotland’s ‘Sportsound’ between Michael Stewart and Rory Loy (?) relating to the calling off of the Dundee v TRFC match because of the state of the pitch was full of heat but shone no light!
Stewart argued that if the two teams were happy to go ahead then they should have been allowed to.
Loy argued that the decision on what was safe for players could not be left to players OR clubs, because (if I followed him rightly) the clubs would have a natural desire to get the game played and would perhaps unconsciously influence their employees [i.e the players,]in the choice those players might make.
That left me wondering: if the authoritative final voice is that of the match referee, what would be the position of the SFA if the referee allowed a match to go ahead at the request/insistence of the clubs and a player was badly injured in an accident caused by the state of the pitch?
Could the injured player sue the SFA and/or his employing club?
Or are referees [as agents of the SFA?] told to take no chances, and play safe?
Anyone?
John Clark
I imagine that if clubs insisted, against the match officials’ advice, that a match should be played, then at worst, the SFA would require a waiver from both clubs and players (approaching 40 of those) indemnifying the SFA against any further action. I think that may be impractical since it would effectively give any one player the right of veto.
Some folk have short memories.
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/18238240.rangers-v-livingston-called-off-due-waterlogged-pitch-ibrox/
paddy malarkey
17 March 2024 at 22:27
‘…Some folk have short memories..’
+++++++
That made me smile.
I hope, though, that the match referee will always say “it’s not a committee decision: it’s my exclusive function to exercise my judgment, so butt out and don’t annoy me, the pair o’ you.”
John Clark
17 March 2024 at 23:22
The thing that gets me about the fiasco is that some of match officials pictured at the venue don’t generally hide their allegiance,but none of them saw fit to inform M Clement that there might be a problem . You would almost think the furore was orchestrated .
From the Scotsman website and on Radio Scotland it is reported that the Scottish Professional Football League says it will investigate the circumstances surrounding Sunday’s postponed Premiership match between Dundee and Rangers….Match referee Don Robertson took the decision to call the game off less than two hours before the scheduled noon kick-off after the Dens Park surface was deemed unplayable due to waterlogging.”
The SPFL Rules say this:
G77. Match Officials shall use all reasonable endeavours to be present at the appropriate
stadium at least one and a half hours prior to the advertised time of kick-off. The
Referee shall decide as to the fitness of the ground in all matches and each Club must
take every reasonable precaution to keep its ground in a playing condition and,
where necessary, shall re-mark the ground during the half-time interval. The home Club may, where weather or other conditions make it appropriate, require the Referee to visit the ground two hours or more before the scheduled time of kick-off of any League Match.
G78. The Board may require the Referee to complete a report on the condition of the
playing surface in a form specified by the Board and approved in writing by the
Scottish FA from time to time”
What’s to investigate? Robertson’s motives?
Is the referee supposed to look for a consensus view and explain why he did not?
So, the Bill to introduce an Independent Regulator of English Football has been presented in the English parliament.
How long before a similar bill is introduced into the Scottish parliament?
The most recent update on the matter was the SFSA’s statement of 17 March which indicated that “a round table discussion with representatives of parliament, SFA, SPFL and of course us, the SFSA.” would take place.”
I haven’t seen anything further about the possible/likely date of such a discussion.
[I have had fun reading the introductory paras to the English Bill, wondering whether any similar para in a Scottish Bill will have anything like this:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-sustainable-future-reforming-club-football-governance/a-sustainable-future-reforming-club-football-governance‘
Background
“.1.2. However, despite the phenomenal success of football at home and abroad since then, we have seen all too many examples of the catastrophic impact the failure of a beloved club can have on its fans and a local community. There have been over 60 instances of clubs going into administration since 1992, and we have lost historic clubs like Bury and Macclesfield Town. We have seen fans fighting back against their owners at Blackpool and Charlton Athletic and events at Derby County leaving it on the brink of liquidation in 2022.”
Would RFC of 1872 be mentioned as a ‘historic club ‘ lost to Liquidation??
How could anyone be ready to accept the functions of an independent Regulator if he/she was happy to turn a blind eye to the nonsense of the denial of the liquidation of RFC of 1872 and the perverted decision by the Scottish football governance bodies to allow the sporting nonsense of ‘continuity Rangers?”
How could he/she accept the existing fundamental dishonesty and expect to have any serious moral authority?
There simply must be recognition that TRFC is not and cannot legally be the same football club as RFC 2012 (In Liquidation) – and probably long dissolved by the time any Independent Regulator is appointed!!
Crawford Allan resigns and the big story in the smsm is a waterlogged pitch, really?
valentinesclown
19 March 2024 at 19:42
‘Crawford Allan resigns and the big story in the smsm is a waterlogged pitch, really?’
++++++++
I was really glad that Allan’s resignation is not related directly to the call-off of the Dundee v TRFC match.
It was stupid of the SFA to announce it when they did. My first thought was: is there a connection?
I immediately laughed at the idea, because it would be laughable if a referee’s decision to call off a match needed ‘probing’ and ‘investigation’ by the SPFL and occasioned the resignation of the Head of Referee operations!
The Kate Middleton conspiracy theories were more than enough to be going on with!
Maybe Crawford does not fancy the idea of Celtic and BR been lawyer-ed up for the upcoming VAR case.
https://philmacgiollabhain.ie/
bigboab1916
19 March 2024 at 23:04
‘…Maybe Crawford does not fancy the idea of Celtic and BR been lawyer-ed up for the upcoming VAR case
++++
Well, of course, facts are ‘chiels that winna ding’ as our aproned poet declaimed!
Which club suffered more disadvantage because of the ref’s decision?
Oh!
My goodness, none other than TRFC!
Who might have wished for a different decision?
I read this morning that Stuart Murphy -CEO of the Scottish Football Supporters’ Association- has given a date for the promised formal follow-up talks to the Holyrood cross-party discussions that took place earlier.
That date is May 8.
Murphy adds “…the days of football in Scotland marking its own homework are over. The debate is now about HOW -not whether-such independent scrutiny should happen.”
I would add that it is imperative that Scottish Football should first roll back from the lie that TRFC is the Rangers of 1872 and from allowing RIFC plc to market itself world-wide as the holding company of a 152-year football club laden with titles and honours that it was never in existence even to compete for!
The TRUTH is that Rangers of 1872 lost its place in a recognised football league and lost thereby its membership and did not even apply for membership of a league: it was a completely different legal entity -CG’s SevcoScotland -that the SFL admitted into membership and that the SFA admitted into Scottish Football membership as a new club.
Our football governance bodies need to accept that truth or any hope of an honest sport where ethic of sporting integrity and honour are safe-guarded – by a truly Independent Regulator is, frankly, pie-in-the-sky.
‘Alexandro Bernabei couldn’t WAIT to leave Celtic as he targets Brazilian revival to show Rodgers what he’s missing’ trumpets the Sevco propangandist Daily Record (the caps for WAIT is a dead giveaway)
The ‘Ha’penny Liar’ (as my father desrcibed this rag) strikes again – brazenly displaying it’s affiliation.
(please see reputable news outlets for accurate reporting)
They’ll likely hiv a ‘hairy canary’ if the Govan mob don’t win the league!
The pernicious Big Lie seems to have been accepted as truth in the minds of English football!
Have a read at
https://www.football365.com/news/man-city-relegated-premier-league-expulsion-rangers
Manchester City has its financial troubles. In relation to which, according to one Jason Soutar who writes for ‘Football 365’, quoting from ‘Football Insider”, reports:
” ex-Everton CEO Wyness has likened the situation to Rangers, who were demoted to the Scottish fourth tier after tax issues.”
It seems to me that neither Jason Soutar nor Wyness (whoever they are) could be described as diligent enquirers after truth!
Maybe somewhat like the scribes of the SMSM who, like Pilate, cynically ask: What is truth? -and fail to seek it and report it?
My post of 22 March 2024 at 23:39.
A little bit of research shows that the Wyness who talked about Rangers having been ‘demoted’ is the same Wyness who suggested that Aberdeen should share a ground with Rangers back in 2007?
Bampot then!
And worse bampot now, in his ignorance of the truth that RFC of 1872 ceased to exist as a football club when it lost its membership of the SPL and in consequence of that, lost its entitlement to membership of Scottish professional football.
John Clark
22 March 2024 at 23:39
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
There is even a court ruling in Scotland that ‘Rangers’ were not relegated. Despite that, the media (and some others) insist they were. Would Case Law be allowed to be ignored in any other ruling? I very much doubt it.
upthehoops
23 March 2024 at 21:29
‘…There is even a court ruling in Scotland that ‘Rangers’ were not relegated.’
++++
Yes, uth, and thank you for reminding me of that fact. Here it is the reference:
OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION
[2017] CSOH 43
CA90/16
OPINION OF LORD BANNATYNE
Lord Bannatyne judgment
And here is the really relevant part:
“[180] However, as submitted by Mr Sandison that is not what happened to Rangers. It was either unchallenged evidence or a matter of admission, that what happened to Rangers at the material time was this: the Rangers Football Club Plc sold inter alia the one share in the SPL to Sevco Scotland Limited.
That sale required the approval of at least 8 of the members of the SPL. That application was refused.
It was thus no longer eligible to play in the SPL.
It thereafter applied to the SFL and was permitted to join the lowest league of the SFL (the five part agreement).
The foregoing process cannot be described as being moved by anyone to a lower division, or being moved down or demoted. The dictionary definitions are not apt to cover what happened to Rangers.
I am satisfied that what did not happen was that the SPL moved or demoted Rangers to a lower division.’
So far,so accurate and true.
With all due respect to his Lordship, though, his next sentence is factually incorrect.
That sentence is:
” Rangers ended up in a lower division by the entry into a contract which allowed them to join the SFL in the third division”
God bless the man, he appears not to have been informed- by either Counsel in the case- that it was NOT RFC of 1872 that entered into a contract which allowed them to join the SFL in the third division, but the brand- new CG’s SevcoScotland/TRFC because CG had not bought RFC of 1872, but only some of the assets of a liquidated entity! and dirt cheap!
I think his honour Lord Bannatyne made an unnecessary mistake in adding that last sentence trying to be helpful.
Worse, in my opinion he was possibly misled into believing that “the Rangers Football Club Plc sold inter alia the one share in the SPL to Sevco Scotland Limited”.
The truth is that RFC of 1872 had to SURRENDER its share to the SPL which alone could decide what to do with it.
And what the SPL (to their credit) did NOT do with it was to give it to CG’s SevcoScotland!
ps Mr Sandison took up post as Lord Sandison on 1st March 2021
Hearts not happy,and they weren’t even playing .
https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/13101307/hearts-demand-answers-from-rangers-after-badge-defaced-in-sky-sports-cup-final
paddy malarkey
24 March 2024 at 22:52
‘….Hearts not happy, and they weren’t even playing ‘
++++++
Mmmmm!
I think I can understand Hearts’ annoyance at the cavalier disregard by ‘guests’ on their premises of the ordinary courtesy requirements on ‘guests’ at any kind of a place!
You don’t do that kind of thing at somebody else’s place, unless you’re the kind of person that nobody would want as a guest.
And, I suppose, this was something that could only have been done by those with access to the changing-room or whatever.
Poor show, when we thought women’s football was maybe rooted in the concept of ‘sport’ without baggage.
I was in conversation with a chap this morning who referenced the ‘Horizon’ post office scandal, sort of relating it to the kind of suspicions some folks have that the lie that TRFC is the RFC of 1872 is somewhat similar.
Are there parallels? In terms of lying executives?
In that a sports governance body has told and propagated an untruth in the same way that the Post office has propagated an untruth?
One wonders.
And the baddies know that they are baddies!
“When you go to Hampden, you get your own branding in each of the dressing rooms, whether it’s a semi-final or a final,” said Lennon. “Obviously the girls, or Rangers, thought it was the same thing to do at Tynecastle. For me it’s nothing, just pick it up, say ‘thanks Hearts for the venue, we’ve won the cup.’ It’s so pedantic”
So says Neil Lennon!
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/sport/football/neil-lennon-weighs-in-on-rangers-hearts-badge-row-as-ex-celtic-and-hibs-boss-calls-reaction-pedantic/ar-BB1kvS3p
What a stupid remark to have made!
Hampden Park, whatever it may have been to the old ‘amateur’ Queens Park, is now a neutral venue, the property of ‘Scottish Football’ as a whole.
Tynecastle is the private property of Hearts.
The Hearts’ statement makes it clear “that their wishes against branding in the dressing-room had been disregarded..”
It’s a pretty safe bet that Lennon/Celtic FC would have had something to say if a guest club using Celtic Park as the venue for a final with another club behaved as disrespectfully as TRFC women’s team/manager/coaches did.
The Hearts’ board was not being ‘pedantic’ in pointing out that guests behaved badly in spite of being asked not to.
[ as an aside, Mrs C wonders at Lennon’s use of ‘girls’]
Please, BBC Sportsound, gonny get Richard Gordon back, full-time??
Or get Leeanne Crichton signed up (if she intends to return to work)!
McIntyre has no real understanding of his function as presenter and co-ordinator of the programme, which is to stand back from airing his own views and CALMLY ask the ‘pundits’ intelligent and relevant questions about their assessment of performance to try to find agreement about the possible/probable causes of poor performance, and possible remedies.
In my post of 25 March 2024 at 00:37 I referred to the Post Office ‘Horizon’ scandal.
How wonderful to see tonight Alex Thomson of Channel 4 coming up with recordings that prove that the folk at the top of the Post Office organisation knew the truth and deliberately ignored the truth.
I just wish that he had seen it worth his time and Channel 4 money to get right into the ‘5-Way Agreement’:
and explore how and why a brand-new football club was (and still is!) allowed to claim in the marketplace to be what it manifestly cannot be either in law or under the Articles of Association of the SFA and the then SPL in 2012.
The readiness of a football governance body to sign up to the untruth (in my opinion) that TRFC is RFC of 1872 must surely deserve full investigation, in the same way as decisions of, for example, certain FIFA officials in the past?
I think I will drop him a note.
No, I will Definitely drop him a note incidentally reminding him that he said that he had been treated with hostility by at least one SMSM journalist for asking questions about ‘Rangers’.
And I forgot to add this into my post of 23.14
https://www.channel4.com/news/by/alex-thomson/blogs/rangers-endorsed-downfall-book
It helps to give context.
Just feel like stirring the pot today. DR and Rangers fans all agog over Jack Butland being briefly as being in contention for England at the Euros. If Joe Hart hadn’t announced his retirement would he have got some notice, 75 appearances and 43 clean sheets versus the 9 appearances for Butland and his apparent inability to stop penalties. Trusted hands versus unsure hands at the intrnational level.
goforpar
28 March 2024 at 13:58
‘…Just feel like stirring the pot today.’
++++++
I’ve just been listening to the latest BBC report on the Horizon story of deceit by high heid yins (and perhaps their lawyers) who failed to disclose in Court the De Loitte’s report.
I wonder what would happen if a plc and its NOMAD allowed that plc’s IPO ‘Prospectus’ to be issued if it contained misleading information?
I wonder what would happen to a sports governance body if it were to allow a football club newly admitted to membership of the sport to claim to be another, much older, entity laden with football honours that the new club could not conceivably have won on the field?
In reference to my post at 17.29 today, have a read at this, to be found on this link
https://3vb.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Prospectus_Litigation_lessons_learned_from_-1.pdf
“For claimants who have suffered a loss after acquiring securities offered by a prospectus, s 90 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) provides an invaluable mechanism for seeking redress.
Under s 90 an issuer will be liable to any investor who has suffered loss as a result of:
an untrue or misleading statement in the prospectus; or
the omission of any “necessary information”.
Importantly, under s 90 the investor need not show reliance on any particular statement (or omission), nor even that they read the prospectus: once the conditions of s 90 are satisfied then, subject to defences, liability is made out.”
Could have fun and games with that, if you found out that the new plc you invested in was not in fact or in law the holding company of Company ‘A’ as its Prospectus clearly implies it will be, but of company ‘B’ which is a company in Liquidation!!
I chuckle quietly to myself at such a scenario.
Just a quicky afore I go to bed.
what a brilliant piece of work by ‘ascom’ on the statistics of penalty awards!
The SFSA’s ‘Andy’s Sting in the tail’ reference to
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rM1c1KGpw-0
will get you there.
As our gun-running ‘brother’ of a poet and UK civil servant (who kept his job in spite of his gun-running attempt to French ‘revolutionaries’) said: ‘facts are chiels that winna ding’
Let’s see how the SFA views the ‘ascom’ analysis.
I would suggest ‘ with fear and trepidation.’
Or maybe not.
Liars as they are about TRFC of 2012 foundation being Rangers of 1872 they are thirled to untruth!
What miserable wretches they are!
Honest to God.
Why does the SFA need to come out with praise for John Beaton and his VAR abilities. With so much complaining about VAR, and, not just about Beaton why shine a light on a very sensitive subject. I believe this maybe the first time an official has been praised by the SFA. If they are to offer praise can they not offer criticism when warranted. Hugh Keevins may have sunk lower in the popularity polls with Aberdeen and Heart fans when he hinted in his column that Celtic and Rangers would be competing in the Scottish Cup final. Cup games can be very interesting and I don’t believe any of the final four teams have a lock on a berth in the final. With all the hoopla surrounding Tavenier’s 131 goal giving him the lead as the best scoring defender in British football. Has anyone taken the time to compare the penalty scoring records of some of the player he has surpassed. A quick look indicates he has scored 65 penalties (all competitions) since joing Rangers and has missed 17. That works out to an average of 9 penalties a year, truly an amazing record. Is any of the players he has surpassed anywhere close to that number.
I enjoyed ‘The Scotsman’s’ April Fool piece this morning. It is football related, so I have no qualms about mentioning just the first paragraph of it here (The whole piece is about 380/400, with a nice photo];
“by Flora Poil’ (a give-away!)
“Ministers have drawn up secret plans to use the long-delayed ferry Glen Sannox to ferry the Scottish football team home from Germany after the Euro.”
My post at 21.15 refers
the ‘380/400’ refers to my (very rough) estimate of the number of words in the piece!
From the horse’s a mouth:
“Speaking to talkSPORT, McCoist said: “We’ve got a hate bill by the way, a hate bill has been passed in the country. And I can guarantee you, next Sunday at Ibrox, I, along with 48,000 will be committing a breach of that hate bill in the particular Rangers vs Celtic game we are all going to. It is madness.”
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/worried-ally-mccoist-erupts-over-hate-crime-law-and-claims-rangers-diehards-are-sitting-ducks-vs-celtic/ar-BB1kVcsx?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=294fd833fe72431dde95b3dfb85326b4&ei=17
That’s the International Boxing Association lost its recognition by the International Olympic Committee:
“Lausanne, 2 April 2024 – The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has dismissed the appeal filed by
the International Boxing Association (IBA) against the decision taken by the IOC Session on 22 June
2023 withdrawing the IOC’s recognition of the IBA as the IF for the sport of boxing.
In its final award, the CAS Panel noted that, as at the date of the Appealed Decision, the IBA had not
complied with the conditions set down by the IOC for recognition, namely:
a. The IBA had not increased its financial transparency and sustainability including through diversification of revenues.
b. The IBA had not changed its process relating to referees and judges to ensure its integrity,
including a monitoring period for IBA’s own competitions ahead of the Olympic Games Paris
2024.
c. The IBA had not ensured the full and effective implementation of all the measures proposed by the “Governance Reform Group” established by the IOC, including a change of culture.
As a consequence, the Panel determined that these three elements justified the IOC Session’s decision
to withdraw recognition of the IBA ..”
Not at all relevant to Scottish Football’s ‘poor governance’, of course.
But it does remind us that sports governance bodies can be dealt with if there is any hanky-panky or deep-rooted mendacity.
The CAS is a court of law, after all!
See my post of today at 22.36
Hanky-panky?
Oh, when one thinks about it, might that term include something like allowing a football club first admitted into Scottish Football in 2012 to claim entitlement to the sporting awards and honours of a club that was founded in 1872 but which entered Liquidation in 2012?
Earlier this evening I got AI into difficulties- it gave the company number of RIFC plc as SC 425159, and not SC437060!
The contradictory information it has picked up is too much for it to handle. It has partly bought into the lie propagated by the liars but seems to be smart enough to see the inconsistencies and can’t make sense of them.
Companies House records show that RFC plc of 1872 was not a holding company of any other entity.
it was RFC plc that held the share in the SPL.
Company and football club were one and the same!
Craig Whyte bought Rangers football club of 1872 foundation.
Killed it.
The death was recognised by the SMSM, big time!
It was recognised by the SPL, bigger time!
And recognised by the SFA, biggest time!
And then, magically, some/many lying sods in Scottish Football governance, protecting themselves under an NDA, decide that a new football club should be continuity Rangers FC of 1872, the very club from which they had withdrawn entitlement to membership of the SFA!
Honest to God!
How those barstewards can live with themselves!
And how much damage they have done to Scottish Football by abjectly kow-towing to a lie that sets aside the very concept of sporting competition!
I metaphorically spit in their eye. Lying (bar)-stewards of Scottish Football integrity as they are.
Far do’s: The National World reports as follows:
“Ally McCoist has decided not to attend the Old Firm derby this Sunday following his comments on Scotland’s new hate crime law on talkSport”
JC @ 17.33
“Ally McCoist has decided not to attend the Old Firm derby this Sunday following his comments on Scotland’s new hate crime law on talkSport”
The wee fat gardener stirred it up – and ran away.
Earlier today I had a bit of free time.
I used that time to dig out D&P’s ‘Progress report to Creditors’,which was dated 24 August 2012.
Seeing again the sheer self-contradictory nonsense on which,in my opinion, TRFC was allowed to get away with claiming to be RFC of 1872 confirms me in my belief that Scotttish Football is deeply flawed in its governance.
Briefly:
Para 4.4 : here the Administrators tell us that they “must perform their functions with the purpose of achieving one of the following objectives:
Rescuing the company [That is Rangers Football Club plc /RFC 2012 plc] as a going concern
Achieving a better result for the Company’s creditors as a whole than would be likely if the Company were wound up(without first being in Administration) or
Realising property in order to make a distribution to one or more secured or preferential creditors
Para 4.5 : here they say “ The Joint Administrators initially [my italics]pursued the objective of a rescue of the Company as a going concern through the proposal of a CVA”
As we know, that did not happen because HMRC voted against a CVA.
There was therefore no possibility of CG’s SevcoScotland buying RFC of 1872/RFC 2012 plc as a ‘going concern’ under any kind of ‘voluntary liquidation’ with creditors happy to sustain losses in the hopes of better things to come.
It is to be noted that nowhere do the Administrators dare claim in so many words that RFC plc of 1872/RFC 2012 plc(company number SC 004276) was bought /brought out out of Administration!
All they can say is that SevcoScotland was, by prior agreement, obliged to ‘purchase the business, history and certain assets’ of RFC plc if there were to be no CVA.
(The clear implication, it seems to me, is that the Administrators wished to suggest that there were two entities: a ‘company’ and ‘a football club’ that they ran as their business and that while the company went bust the separate football club was bought whole and entire by a brand new company
There were NOT,of course, two entities: there was only Rangers Football Club/RFC 2012 plc , registered at Companies House as Company Number SC 4276 in 1899.There was no ‘holding company’ running a football club which lived on after Liquidation!
So, in my view para 5.2 is just a load of guff: “Following the sale of the business and assets of the Company [ i.e RFCof 1872/RFC2012 plc] the responsibility for maintaining all trading operations passed to Newco[i.e. SevcoScotland ] which continues to operate Rangers Football Club”
The footall club had ceased to be. Even D&P had to recognise that fact! In para 6.2 there is this:
“The sale of the business and certain assets included the sale of the Company’s right, title and interest in its SPL share and SFA membership”
Oh,no it did not,whatever CG might have been expecting.
As that para continues, “ Following the sale of these assets (and) the sale of Ibrox and Murray Park and the transfer of the Playing Staff [ !except some of those who realised their contracts were ‘ nullified and rendered void by the Liquidation!] to Newco, the Company (i.e. RFC of 1872/RFC2012 plc) was no longer in a position to meet the criteria for membership of any of the Football Authoritiesnd therefore no longer operates as a football club”[my italics]
There it is,plain as a pikestaff: RFC of 1872 was NOT bought out of Administration as any kind of going concern or ‘continuity Rangers of 1872.’
SevcoScotland/ TRFC to the eternalshame and disgrace of the Football Authorities needed the secret services of a 5-Way Agreement before it could become a football club.
And I believe that most SMSM editors and journalist know that to be the case but continue nevertheless to ignore the truth.
I am reminded at this juncture of the words of the customs officer/poet :
“Ah,Tam! Ah,Tam! thou’ll get thy fairin, in hell they’ll roast ye like a herrin!”
Who knows, I might be there to turn the spit!
Just furthering my education this evening, I discovered that the Government had called for discussion on the suggestion that there should be an Independent Regulator of Insolvency Practitioners, instead of there being 4 different bloody organisations, each of which regulates only individual ‘Insolvency Practitioners’ but not the firms who engage them.
Honest to God!
The latest info is that the Government has chickened out of that suggestion and is prepared to leave things as they are, with some changes, saying that
” The introduction of a single regulator has not been ruled out. Instead, the government proposes creating a power to implement a single regulator approach “should that prove necessary”.
Eh, what? I can think of one company that employed Insolvency Practitioners who might well have been investigated by an independent Regulator.
Just to let you know: I’ve just posted the text of an email I sent a few minutes ago to James Cook , news editor of BBCRadio Scotland.
My post is in moderation.
But it is just asking him to tell me the name of the company that owned Rangers of 1872, the company that went into Liquidation while the football club survived!
and referring to the response I had from Companies House and to the Register of Insolvencies maintained by the Accountant in Bankruptcy.
No sweary words!
My post of 23.59.
I used the word ‘bug..red’ Maybe the machine counts that as a ‘bad word’!?
My post of 00.03
Here is my post without the word ‘b.g..ered
This is what I wrote in my email:
From:
me@yahoo.co.uk
To:
goodmorningscotland@bbc.co.uk
Mon, 8 Apr at 23:34
Apologies- this email is addressed to Mr Cook via you, because I can’t find any email address for him!
Please pass it on or let me know whether you choose not to!
Thank you.
FAO; Mr James Cook, News Editor
Dear Mr Cook,
I refer to BBC Radio Scotland’s on-line report (on 6 October 2021) of Lord Tyre’s judgment against the Administrators of RFC 2012 PLC (formerly The Rangers Football Club plc), company number SC004276, which you will find at this link
Rangers administrators ordered to pay £3.4m over ‘duty breach’ – BBC News
The report (the writer is not bylined) has this:
“Advocate Kenny McBrearty, QC, said the pair could have made staff redundant and stopped the company that owned Rangers [my italics] from being liquidated by making it more attractive to potential buyers.”
Some wee while ago the response I got from Companies House to my question ” What was the holding company of Rangers Football Club plc, company number SC004276?”
was
“RFC plc company number SC004276”
And the register of insolvencies kept by the Accountant in Bankruptcy shows that it was ‘RFC 2012 PLC formerly ‘The Rangers Football Club plc ‘ company number SC 004276 that is in Liquidation.
I am puzzled.
Can you tell me, please, the company number of the ‘company that owned Rangers’ that went bust?
Yours in the search for Truth and researched truthful reporting.
JC
Off to bed now, somewhat puzzled at being twice ‘in moderation’
There’s an interesting photo in the DR today. It appears to show a Rangers player with his hand on the official ( John Beaton). Is there not a rule in Scottish football about laying hands on an official even if there is no intent or malice. If there is such a rule would there not be a suspension in order. I know that laying hands on an official in North America normally calls for an ejection with the potential of further action. Does anyone have any further information in regards to such a rule.
An email from the ICIJ has this (among a lot of other things about the effects of the ICIJ’s work)
“Here’s some bonus content about journalism industry happenings we thought would interest you.
Dermot Desmond’s defamation case against The Irish Times, stemming from coverage of the Panama Papers, is set to advance to trial. The Irish High Court sided with Desmond in dismissing the newspapers’ proposal to call expert witness Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate economist who contends the reporting on Desmond was in the public interest”
This is in reference to this article in the “Irish Times” on March 11
‘Mary Carolan
Mon Mar 11 2024 – 15:33
The way has been cleared for a trial date to be fixed for businessman Dermot Desmond’s High Court action against The Irish Times over alleged defamation.
Mr Justice Alexander Owens was told on Monday, following his recent determination of the only outstanding pretrial matter in the proceedings, it was ready for trial.
The proceedings may now be listed in the next High Court list to fix trial dates for such actions.”
The ICIJ mentions it because the case arises from the ‘Irish Times’ coverage in 2016 of the so-called Panama Papers, based on details within 11.5 million documents leaked from the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca that contained financial information about offshore tax entities.
If only an ICIJ journalist had queried the order given to BBC Scotland that they should not report that ‘Rangers the football club’ had been Liquidated but just some (unspecified!) company that owned and operated that football club!
I don’t think there is any journalist based in Scotland who is a member of the ICIJ.
Perhaps there isn’t a Scotland-based journalist who would keep his job if he so much as applied for membership?
Or perhaps the concept of ‘investigative journalism’ implies that being a journalist entails something more than issuing PR hand-outs and might involve some hard work and an interest in Truth?
———
I only vaguely remember seeing some mention of Desmond’s legal action against the ‘Irish Times.’
I’ve never met the man.
But I suspect that he would have been influential in persuading the Celtic Board to keep schtum about the fix that allowed TRFC to claim falsely, in my opinion, to be ‘continuity Rangers of 1872’.
I declare that were I not a man of the highest cultural refinement and ‘politesse’ I think I might be tempted to kick his fundament if I got within range!
goforpar
9 April 2024 at 15:40
‘…Is there not a rule in Scottish football about laying hands on an official even if there is no intent or malice.’
+++++++++
goforpar, my Artificially Intelligent friend tells me that:
“The Scottish Football Association (SFA) has rules in place to ensure the respect and safety of referees during matches.
These rules prohibit players from physically contacting referees, which is considered a serious offense. The SFA’s Football Governance Handbook and the Laws of the Game provide detailed information on the conduct expected from players, including the consequences of violating these rules. It’s part of the broader effort to maintain sportsmanship and discipline in football.
If you’re looking for specific sections or rules, I can help summarize the key points from the SFA’s official documents”
It adds that :
“While the specific consequences can vary depending on the context and severity of the incident, they typically include suspensions and fines.”
Any kind of aggressive laying on of hands would be utterly inadmissible.
I think, though, that any kind of pally slap on the shoulder or other ‘familiarity’ should be penalised to some extent, in that the ‘Referee’ is no one’s ‘friend’ on the field of play!
“(The) Rangers reclaimed pole position at Dens Park last night when they won their game in hand to open a two point lead with just six games remaining”. (Clairvoyant and true blue Keech Jackson of the Ha’penny Liar).
Naw they didnae son! Whit a riddy!
From the Daily Record on-line
“Dundee vs Rangers call-off sees Hibs fire in SPFL complaint over ‘sporting integrity’ with top six up for grabs
The Easter Road men join Motherwell and the Dark Blues in a three-way battle for a spot in the top six.
Bookmark
SPORT
By Alan Galindo
18:36, 10 APR 2024 UPDATED20:21, 10 APR 2024
“Hibs have held ‘robust discussions’ with the SPFL over ‘sporting integrity’ fears after Dundee’s postponed clash with Rangers.”
Well!
I ask you, who the hell today believes that there can or has been ANY ‘sporting integrity” in the SPFL/SFA since the wholesale adoption of the untruth that Rangers of 1872 was not Liquidated?
Galindo (who he??) needs to wise up!
bect67
10 April 2024 at 18:10
‘… (Clairvoyant and true blue Keech Jackson of the Ha’penny Liar).
++++++
Did that actually appear in print or on-line, bect67?
If it did then he and/or his editor deserve to lose their Press cards!
Originally on DR website I think JC.
The article, which was likely intended for Thursday morning’s publication, went live on Wednesday afternoon, ahead of Rangers’ scheduled match.
Jackson’s piece seemed to anticipate a Rangers victory, stating, “Rangers reclaimed pole position at Dens Park last night when they won their game in hand to open a two-point lead with just six games remaining.” This assertion was made before the game occurred and was postponed due to pitch conditions.
With all the jabbering about the cancellation of the Dundee/Rangers game with the weather forecast for the last two weeks anything but promising, has anyone asked why the game couldn’t be played on March 27th. Oh, I forgot Rangers were scheduled for a game on the following Sunday., surely that didn’t enter into any conversations regarding an earlier date when, if I recall, the weather was a lot better. And why must a team overnight for a game in a town that’s only an hour away . Shades of the onset of the journey back, staying at luxury hotels, fine meals, etc.
bect67
10 April 2024 at 22:18
‘…Originally on DR website I think JC.
The article, which was likely intended for Thursday morning’s publication, went live on Wednesday afternoon, ahead of Rangers’ scheduled match’
++++
Thanks for that, bect67.
Talk about counting your chickens fore they’re hatched. What a feckin eejit is yer man!
goforpar
10 April 2024 at 22:51
‘…Shades of the onset of the journey back, staying at luxury hotels, fine meals, etc.’
++++
Oh, could there be some tax advantage, perhaps? Necessary company expenses of business and that kind of thing?
Or a desperate need to pretend to be what they are not, given their dependence on directors’ loans and what not!
The very word ‘rangers’ seems somehow to chime with the word ‘tax’!
I lie abed at night wondering why that should be so?
As if!
Whether we think VAR works well or not; whether John Beaton is biased or not; whether the SFA and SFPL is incompetent/corrupt or not, the end decisions from the weekend’s TRFC-Celtic game must surely raise some questions over John Beaton’s actual ability as a referee, if nothing else.
I’m not necessarily sure that they did, but if we accept that the three main VAR interventions in the match ultimately reached the correct decision – Goldson’s elbow; Silva’s penalty and the Lawrence foul on Iwata that led to TRFC’s equaliser being disallowed – then surely the SFA/SPFL must be asking questions of Beaton’s competence. After all, he initially gave exactly the opposite decision in each case despite being well positioned to see each incident. One error is understandable to an extent, but to get three important decisions so wrong must surely bring up questions re his status as ‘one of our top referees’. I realise that VAR was introduced to correct mistakes made by referees and it could therefore be argued that VAR worked well in this match, but should a referee who got three big decisions wrong in such a vital match still be offered another big match this coming weekend, as I am sure Beaton will. Does the SFA/SPFL do anything re quality control and remedial training for referees, or does it just back them against complaints no matter what? I think I’ll email both authorities and see what they say.
Is there a reason that Tannadice can’t be used in place of Dens Park for Dundee’s game against TRFC ? Have TRFC fans adopted the hatred of Dundee United from the old club ,and refuse to go there ?
It may seem like the simple solution – but Rangers’ clash with Dundee cannot be moved just down the road to Tannadice due to SPFL rules over VAR.
PM, I heard that they can’t use Tannadice because, being a Championship ground it’s not set up for VAR. I know, don’t laugh!!
nawlite
11 April 2024 at 18:53
I would imagine that the hardware required would be brought to the ground ,and all that would be required is a communications link to the remote VAR team . Lack of big screens ?
Hello Chaps,
Haven’t been on for a bit, but I used to work on the railways, particularly B.R., and not the shoddy thing they have replaced it with.
However, and remarkably, I have to mention that London North Eastern Railway, the current operator of services on the East Coast Main Line, is claiming the history of the London and North Eastern Railway, the company which ran trains on that same line between 1923 and 1947, after which nationalisation came along.
What does that remind you of?
It was quite a remarkable railway company. It built probably the most famous steam loco in the world, ‘Fly Scotsman’, and another of its locos, ‘Mallard’, still holds the World record for the maximum speed attained by a steam locomotive: 126 mph.
However, the current operator, LNER, is an construct of the Operator of Last Resort, a Government agency installed to cover up the fact that no private operating train company can at least make ends meet on the East Coast Main Line.
There is absolutely no connection between the current LNER and the former L&NER, but tell Sevco that!
Nobody in the MSM has questioned this stance.
With all the controversy surrounding VAR and numerous questions regarding the competence of referees in Scotland, has anyone taken the time to see what referee has had the most calls overturned by VAR and what impact those calls have had on the outcome of games. Surely the SFA and SFPL must be in deep discussion over the implementation of VAR and the operation of that tool. I believe every team in the league has had lodged complaints either through the media or direct to the governing bodies. When does the light come on and realize that they have messed up in a large manner. Somebody should rain on their parade of just sitting and letting things spiral into a dark hole.
Haywire
11 April 2024 at 22:00
‘…However, the current operator, LNER, is a construct of the Operator of Last Resort, a Government agency installed to cover up the fact that no private operating train company can at least make ends meet on the East Coast Main Line…..
What does that remind you of?
++++++++
Great post, Haywire!
LNER have a bloody cheek claiming any connection with the “Flying Scotsman” of 1923.
“Retired from British Railways in 1963 after covering 2.08 million miles, Flying Scotsman earned considerable fame in preservation under the ownership of, successively, Alan Pegler, William McAlpine, Tony Marchington, and, since 2004, the National Railway Museum.’
The current LNER company number 04659712, started life as Strutton Rail Ltd on 7 February 2003, becoming GW Railway Ltd on 18 June 2013, then DFT OLR 1 Ltd on 16 July 2016, and London North Eastern Railway Ltd.”
There is, in my opinion, more than a hint of deception when a company claims to be what it is not for marketing/advertising/image reasons.
A letter-writer to ‘The Scotsman’ today observes, in connection with the ‘Dundee pitch’ matter, that “The decision to allow Dundee a third opportunity to play its match at home against ‘Rangers'(my quotation marks) is mind-blowing and a betrayal by SFA/SPFL directors of Scottish fans and all concerned with the image of Scottish football.”
I agree with that letter-writer, of course.
But those ‘governance’ bodies have already been guilty of the far more serious betrayal of Scottish Football in jettisoning the very concept of ‘sporting integrity’ by allowing TRFC to claim sporting titles and honours that they could not possibly have earned!
Scottish Football governance is in my opinion rotten at its very heart.
And needs to change by publicly recognising the truth that TRFC is not, and cannot possibly be, RFC of 1872.
Folks
Just moved the blog to a bigger, faster server. Should improve speed of delivery and response, but if anyone notices any odd behaviour – beyond what is expected of course 🙂 – please get me at sfm@sfm.scot
Other folks see the merits .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68797201
paddy malarkey
12 April 2024 at 19:08
‘…Other folks see the merits.’
++++++
I wonder whether the Turkish football experience includes the kind of nonsense we here in Scottish Football were/are presented with?
that a football club newly admitted into Scottish professional football in 2012 by the SFA (the very body that stripped RFC of 1872 of its membership of the SFA!) should be regarded as being one and the same
as the club RFC of the four young men?
My post at 23.56 finds itself in moderation.
It was making the observation that Turkish football did not have to deal with 12/13 year old football clubs being allowed to claim as their own the honours of a dead club!
There was a further discussion of the problems with VAR this afternoon on Sportsound.
At one point, reference was made to fans not being told the contents of the discussion between the VAR ref in Baillieston and the pitch referee.
I was on the mid-landing ’emulsioning’ the ceiling at the time and my radio was plugged-in down in the hall with a turn in the stairs kind of blocking the sound a bit, so I may have lost bits of the conversation.
I think I heard ex-ref Madden express some inclination to have that situation changed.
Both Kenny McIntyre and Tom English seemed to be ready to insist that the Press at least be told the reason why an on-pitch referee changes his decision i.e. told what the VAR ref tells the pitch ref what he saw on replay that the on-pitch ref seemed to have missed live.
(The Rugby system is brilliant in that respect: we all saw the pictures for ourselves and heard the detailed discussion between the VAR man and the on-pitch ref in the Scotland/Engerland match)
Anybody else who listened to the prog get that impression?
There was definitely no reference to the Turkey situation! (Actually, I wonder that UEFA/FIFA seem to have allowed that! It’s a dreadful statement on the governance of Turkish professional football as failing to ensure that there was faith and trust in the home-grown referees)
Ach, what am I saying here in my wee corner of Scotland: a football nation so badly governed by the SFA as to allow TRFC to claim to be dear old Rangers of my grandfathers’ days!
The possibility that there could be dodgy/partisan/incompetent referees is a mere trifle when one considers that the whole ‘governance’ of Scottish football was diverted down a path of objective untruth by frightened/venal governance bodies.
It is simply not true that TRFC is Rangers of 1872.
Rangers Football Club of 1872 is in Liquidation: not Craig Whyte, not Wavetower, not any other entity which ‘operated a football club’.
Rangers Football Club of 1872 was NOT brought out of Administration by a CVA, or because it had paid all its horrendous debts.
CG did NOT buy Rangers of 1872.
The Administrators did not keep ‘the company’ in existence as a ‘going concern’ under the same owners and directors.
No, RFC of 1872, the football club, went as bust as any other company that fails and is recorded in the Insolvency Register held by the Accountant in Banking.
That is not a ‘matter of opinion’ but of legal fact.
And the BBC and (I love an opportunity to use the Chinese expression) the ‘running-dog lackeys’ of the SMSM are to be seriously questioned about their readiness to support perhaps the biggest ‘sports’ lie ever to have been told in Scotland!
Some early thoughts on the five SPFL top six Post-Split Fixtures for Celtic and TRFC
Based largely on TRFC having only visited Tynecastle once in the league this season (Celtic have played there twice), together with the fact that Kilmarnock have been to Govan once), here’s what I think the above will shape up as:-
Celtic (3h, 2A)- TRFC, Hearts, and St Mirren/Dundee (Home)
Kilmarnock, St Mirren/Dundee (Away)
TRFC (2h, 3A)- Kilmarnock, St Mirren/Dundee (Home)
Celtic, Hearts, St Mirren/Dundee (Away)
Dear me!
BBC Scotland’s ‘Sportsound’ tonight made me think that the King (not the ‘glib and shameless liar’ of that ilk, frae Castlemulk!) must have died, so funereal a tone was struck!
But that’s by-the-by
In this post I refer to my post of 9 April at 22.00.
In that post I used the phrase ” …that being a journalist entails something more than issuing PR handouts and might involve some hard work and an interest in Truth”
What a joy it was to listen to Dorothy Byrne saying on BBC Radio 4 that ” the job of a journalist is to seek out the facts and tell the truth”.
I say at the outset that I had never heard of Dorothy Byrne.
[‘Google’ her, and her former job as head of Channel 4 news etc etc.]
She is famous for saying out loud that Boris is a ‘known liar’ when delivering the McTaggart Lecture.
I wonder whether I should write to her and ask whether she might be interested in a mere matter of ‘sporting truth’?
I wonder whether Alex Thomson was told by her that the expense of researching the truth about RIFC plc’s claim to be the holding company of the Rangers Football club of 1872 could not be justified?
And ask her why not?
What fun!
I find it very much to be a distateful piece of journalism when the DR publishes an article where a former Rangers players boasts about driving his car at speeds in the range of 200 km. This does not set a proper precedent for young people and then to brag about not getting a ticket because he gave the cop a pair of tickets to a game is even more shameful. It would be interesting if someone could go back and find out who the policeman was that negated the ticket and essentially took a bribe. By the tone of the article it appeared his partner was not impressed. Then again this appears to be the standard of reporting in the DR. Lets not forget the association of being tied into a member of the Glasgow underworld. That alone should raise alarms bells in the SFA/SFPL. One other point the Ranger player who hasn’t played due to a broken thumb. He could take lessons from a couple of professional hockey players. One played through the Stanley Cup playoffs last year with a broken or cracked sternum. Remember this is a contact sport played at a high rate of speed. Second example from last year another player took a cut in his face that required 65 stitches,. The only time he missed was while receiving stitches and returned to play in the same game. A broken thumb would not hld these guys back while competing for a championship.
goforpar
18 April 2024 at 01:50
‘…A broken thumb would not hld these guys back while competing for a championship.’
++++++++
I enjoyed that post, goforpar!
It somehow brought to my mind the occasion I was at Hampden for the St Mungo Cup final in 1951, with my mammy and my Auntie Sarah and their friend my honourary ‘auntie Meg’.
I was 9 years old.
This was the game where Celtic’s goalie George Hunter hit his head on the post trying to keep the ball out.
No subs in them days! Bobby Evans had to go into goal.
Hunter was off the pitch for about ten minutes or so.
Head injuries? Naw, get back on the pitch pronto!
In them days!
So this is how clubs/authorities should treat fans and clubs when items are thrown at players, officials and club officials then. Lifetime bans for individuals and a complete ban on fans, albeit temporary. Whereas here, a club doesn’t comment on any of their incidents, takes no apparent action to apprehend anyone, our authorities do nothing, our law enforcement apparently do nothing and our media sit silent. Shameful.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68851819
I note this from a piece in today’s ‘The Scotsman’ written by Deputy Editor Alan Young:
” The Scotsman and Scotland on Sunday have secured a host of nominations for the annual Scottish Press Awards….Aidan Smith in sports columnist, Alan Patullo as sports feature writer….”
I refer to my post of 17 April 2024 at 23:55 in which I write “…Dorothy Byrne saying on BBC Radio 4 that “the job of a journalist is to seek out the facts and tell the truth”.
I will be corrected, of course, if I am wrong in believing that neither of those gentlemen of ‘the Press’ have acknowledged the fact that TRFC is not, and cannot possibly be, RFC of 1872.
Or even tried to explain why they accept the propagation of a myth, a myth according to which some unidentified, unspecified ‘holding company’ that owned and ‘operated’ a football club went bust while the football club that it ‘operated’ continued in being!
In my humble opinion, ‘accepting myth’ is a far cry from ‘seeking out the facts and truth.’
And I would suggest that perhaps not Pattullo not Aidan Smith nor ‘The Scotsman’ have anything to crow about in the matter of ‘Sports reporting.’
Honest to God!
As an aside, and almost entirely unconnected with football, can I be allowed to say that Mrs C and I drove down Galashiels this afternoon to see the ‘Great Tapestry of Scotland.
The connection with football was, of course, a section of the superb needlework of a panel showing an aspect of Scottish life in modern times: Scottish football.
Needless to say we had gone there because of Mrs C’s interest in sewing.
But I found myself almost overcome by the depictions in needlework of the history of Scotland.
Can anyone explain why Hearts bother to show up for games versus Rangers. A quick look at results for the 2023/2924 seson to date indicate that they have taken 1 point from Ranger,surrendered 15 goals, and have scored 3. Its almost like the manager doesn’t want to upset his former team and ensure maximum points. It will be interesting to see what performance they provide in their game during the split.
goforpar
21 April 2024 at 22:34
Can anyone explain why Hearts bother to show up for games versus Rangers.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
As a Hearts fan, I’m slightly reluctant to answer your question, which seems more appropriate to a Kerrydale Street type Celtic forum than a forum about the (lack of) governance in Scottish football, but the best I can come up with is:
Can anyone explain why Celtic bother to show up for games versus European teams?
John Clark
19 April 2024 at 00:34
Head injuries? Naw, get back on the pitch pronto!
In them days!
…………………..
Reminds me of the well known but worth repeating anecdote re. John Lambie:
The Partick Thistle trainer brings the centre forward to the touchline with a head knock and says, “Boss, he’s got concussion. Says he doesn’t know who he is”.
Lambie: “Tell him he’s Pele and get him effing back on”.
Highlander
Yir obviously no’ that reluctant tae answer Goforpar …
‘Can anyone explain why Celtic bother to show up for games versus European teams?’
… because, in so doin’, methinks ye hiv reduced the credibility of yir ain comment tae the same fatuous level!
macfurgly
22 April 2024 at 11:34
‘…Tell him he’s Pele and get him effing back on”.
+++++++
Aye, that’s a great story, right enough. Was it correctly attributed to Lambie, do you know, or just taken to be the kind of response he might have made?
John C
Was another ex-Thistle manager, Bertie Auld, who first told me that story. Therefore I conclude it’s on the category of ‘stories you wish were true’ 🤣🤣🤣
On the subject of football governance, and following the media confusion over the stramash in the Celtic penalty box, can anyone explain why VAR decisions are not properly explained post match with reference to the rules of the game? Surely the transparency and fan education this would provide would all be for the good? It might even help some of our more challenged pundits to better understand the rules…
So, everything is hunky-dory in Scottish Football!?
(Here, please imagine that I am speaking in tones of awe) “An ‘Old Firm’ Scottish Cup final!”
Oh, joy! oh, what ‘sport’! Oh, the TV money…’
Eh, whit?
A now nearly 12-year-old club that claims falsely to be Rangers of 1872 foundation gets to play a chicken-hearted partner-in-deception!
Oh, ma auntie Sarah!
Shame and disgrace
-on Scottish football governance
-on RIFC plc
-and on the Celtic Board in office in 2012 which was unprincipled enough to buy into an untruth.
And as for the SMSM!?
Well, which of Dante’s levels of Hell’s punishment would be punishment enough for them?
What did Dorothy Byrne say, about calling out Boris as being ‘a known liar’?
Nothing more spectacular than that ‘the role of the journalist is to seek out the facts and tell the truth.’
Our guys and gals in the SMSM did not do so or were not allowed to do so.
And still don’t do so!!
Simple reminder: the whole thrust of RIFC plc’s ” Prospectus” was that RIFC plc would be the holding company of a tremendously successful 140-year-old football club.
RIFC plc is in fact and law the holding company of a football club created in 2012!
Craig Whyte bought Rangers Football Club plc whole and entire from a man whom I would cross the street to avoid meeting.
CG on the other hand bought a bundle of assets from a liquidation sale and most assuredly did not buy a ‘going concern.’ He did not bring Rangers Football Club plc out of Administration. If he had, there would have been no Liquidation!!
And that reminds me: the final report from the Liquidators will be due shortly.
And then, sadly. dissolution.
(TRFC is no more RFC of 1872 than today’s ‘Flying Scotsman’ is the real, original ‘Flying Scotsman’)
bect67
22 April 2024 at 19:32
Highlander
Yir obviously no’ that reluctant tae answer Goforpar …
‘Can anyone explain why Celtic bother to show up for games versus European teams?’
… because, in so doin’, methinks ye hiv reduced the credibility of yir ain comment tae the same fatuous level!
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The inference that a manager could persuade an entire team plus subs to throw matches in favour of the team that the manager’s allegiance truly belongs to is abject nonsense on a scale that even the most rabid and conspiratorial Celtic fan would baulk at endorsing.
Moreover, Hearts have had a plethora of different managers over the decades who’ve failed miserably against both Ibrox clubs. I would suggest that Hearts recent league wins against Celtic should prompt questions about Brendan Rodgers’ capabilities, rather than focussing on Steven Naismith’s.
I’m sure ‘goforpar’ posted his comments with a degree of tongue in cheek, and in his/her defence, this site can be eerily quiet for lengthy spells at times, so I will apologise if I came across as unnecessarily critical. At least I didn’t go as far as to call goforpar’s post fatuous, as bect 67 did.
Well well…a politician willing to tell the truth about what happened in 2012.
https://twitter.com/celticrumours/status/1782794388751405351?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1782794388751405351%7Ctwgr%5E22160bc5395598720ac2fb9d42c1868bb1051ba4%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fs9e.github.io%2Fiframe%2Ftwitter.min.html1782794388751405351
I posted a few hours ago – apparently in moderation. Any update?
upthehoops
23 April 2024 at 17:15
‘…a politician willing to tell the truth about what happened in 2012.’
+++++++++
uth, brilliant spot and brilliant post!
I’ve just had a swatch at the Hansard record on -line:
I have lifted this:
Mr Perkins:
“….Surely football club owners should be able to spend the money they have to take such a risk. However, if they are spending money from the future, as Derby County and Glasgow Rangers did, and the risk fails in the current year, they will inevitably go bust. Glasgow Rangers disappeared altogether, and Derby County almost disappeared. Football fans do not want clubs to take that risk, and surely the regulator should be preventing that.”
I shall be communicating with Mr Perkins to congratulate him for recognising the disappearance of Glasgow Rangers.
I will add that I believe that Scottish Football governance desperately needs independent scrutiny by a statutory Regulator because the very truth that he himself articulated today is denied by the SFA, the BBC, and the mainstream print Press.
I will suggest that he might find it interesting to read the ‘Summary’ pages of the ‘Prospectus’ issued by Rangers International Football Club plc in 2012 and check with Companies House the company number of the football club of which Rangers International Football Club declares itself to be the ‘holding company’: and notice that it is not the company number of the Rangers Football Club of 1872, and cannot be, because Rangers Football Club went into Liquidation in 2012.
John Clark
23 April 2024 at 22:31
I will add that I believe that Scottish Football governance desperately needs independent scrutiny by a statutory Regulator because the very truth that he himself articulated today is denied by the SFA, the BBC, and the mainstream print Press.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
However, if any future Regulator is appointed by the Scottish Government, I don’t hold any hope of the truth being outed. They are as much a part of the big lie as the SFA, the BBC, and the mainstream print press.
I also won’t be at all surprised if the MP in question ‘corrects’ himself at some point in the future. Like many others, he probably thinks telling the truth is not worth the hassle he will inevitably receive.
Has UEFA sent a “coded” message to the SFA ans SPFL in regards to no Scottish referees invited to this summer’s tournament. Have UEFA recognized the fact that these referees might not be up to the task, or, do they want to avoid potential embarrassment with a wrong call at a crucial time. Is this the first time no Scottish referees will no be involved in such a tournament. Are questions being asked of the suits at Hampden.
Trying again to submit my ‘moderated’ post!
Highlander
‘I’m sure ‘goforpar’ posted his comments with a degree of tongue in cheek, and in his/her defence, this site can be eerily quiet for lengthy spells at times, so I will apologise if I came across as unnecessarily critical. At least I didn’t go as far as to call goforpar’s post fatuous, as bect 67 did’.
A bit late to come in and ‘defend’ goforpar wi’ that dontcha think?
You have a ‘dig’ at goforpar (and Celtic), then my response tae you (ferr anuff), followed by ‘being sure’ about what he/she may have been thinking. That’s rich! I’m not sure what you’re ‘doubling down’ on or ‘walking back’.
Just out of curiosity, for my continuing education ye ken, what single word would YOU use to describe goforpar’s post.
May I give this first draft of the letter that I will be sending to Mr Toby Perkins, MP:
“Dear Mr Perkins,
I watched part of the debate on 23 April in the House of Commons on the [English!]Football Governance Bill.
As a member of the Scottish Football Supporters Association (“SFSA”) but not at all writing as being either an officeholder in, or authorised spokesman for, that organisation, I listened with great interest.
I did so because I support the principle of there being a statutory independent Regulator of Scottish Football. I therefore look forward to the English bill being passed and enacted as a spur and some help to equivalent Scottish legislation being enacted by the Parliament of Scotland.
I may say at once that I was immensely cheered to hear you speak Truth about the demise of Glasgow Rangers of 1872, in the phrase you used in reference to their Liquidation:’ Glasgow Rangers disappeared altogether’.
I think you are the first ‘public’ person to tell the truth that Rangers Football Club plc, company number SC 004276 ceased to exist as a football club when it entered Liquidation in 2012.
Did you know that BBC Radio Scotland was ordered by the now defunct BBC Trust to distinguish between ‘company’ and ‘club’ in such way as to suggest that while the ‘company’ was liquidated, the ‘football club’ still existed?……as if there had been a ‘holding company ‘ which went bust while the football club that it owned somehow continued in existence!
Companies House will confirm that RFC plc, company number SC 004276, was not a company held by any ‘holding company’ other than RFC plc.!
The legal and factual truth is that it was RFC plc of 1872 that (under its new name ‘RFC 2012 plc’) that went bust and ‘disappeared altogether.”
In my view, the BBC Scotland bought into a lie.
And the SMSM sedulously fostered and propagated and continue to foster and propagate that lie.
Essentially the lie is that Charles Green bought Rangers Football Club of 1872 foundation out of Administration.
He did not.
But the SFA were happy to buy into that lie and allow the very new club that they themselves had to admit as a new club to claim to be the Rangers of 1872, from which they themselves had withdrawn membership of the SFA because of its Liquidation!
But perhaps of wider, non-football significance is the question about the Prospectus issued by RIFC plc when it made its IPO in 2012.
I think that Prospectus was misleading.
It seems to me to suggest that investors in RIFC plc would be investing in a 140-year-old very successful football club, that is Rangers FC of 1872 foundation.
When in fact they would be investing in a brand-new football club newly admitted into Scottish professional football by the very sports governance body that had stripped RFC of 1872 of its membership in Scottish football!
May I suggest that you might have a wee look at that?
Questionable governance in a sport is one thing: failings in the world of the Financial Conduct Authority are quite another and much more important matter.’
I’ll look at again tomorrow before I send it, of course.
From the Rolls of Court today:
Court 6
Starred Motions
Wednesday 1st May
between 10.00am and 11.30am
“CA74/22 Elite Sports Group Ltd v The Rangers Football Club Ltd ”
___
The glossary of Scottish law terms says:
‘Starred motion
In Scots law, a motion in the Court of Session which will call before the court for determination. It requires appearance by or for a party to the proceedings.
Motions which do not require appearance are referred to as unstarred motions.’
I have revised my draft letter to Toby Perkins, MP.
Here is the revised version.
“Dear Mr Perkins,
I watched a large part of the debate on 23 April in the House of Commons on the ‘Football Governance Bill.’
As a member of the Scottish Football Supporters Association (“SFSA”) but not at all writing as being either an officeholder in, or authorised spokesman for, that organisation, I watched and listened with great interest.
I did so because I support the principle of there being a statutory independent Regulator of Scottish Football and I look forward to the English bill being passed and enacted so that it may serve as an encouraging support to the cross-party group of members of the Scottish Parliament and to the SFSA in their co-operative campaign for the creation of an Independent statutory Regulator of Scottish football.
I may say at once that I was immensely cheered to hear you speak Truth about the demise of Glasgow Rangers of 1872, in the phrase you used in reference to their Liquidation ’Glasgow Rangers disappeared altogether’.
I think you are the first ‘public’ person to tell the truth that Rangers Football Club plc, founded in 1872 and incorporated in 1899 ( with company number 4276) ceased to exist as a football club when it entered Liquidation in 2012.
Did you know that BBC Scotland was ordered by the now defunct BBC Trust to distinguish between ‘company’ and ‘club’ in such way as to suggest that while the ‘company’ was liquidated, the ‘football club’ still existed?……as if there had been a ‘holding company ‘which went bust while the football club that it owned somehow continued in existence?
Companies House will confirm that RFC plc, company number 4276, was not a company held by any ‘holding company’ other than RFC plc! That is, it was the football club that was the shareholder in the then Scottish Premier League. It was the football club, not some ‘holding company’ that was required to surrender its share in that League, and it was the Rangers Football Club that, no longer being a member of a ‘recognised league’ ceased to be a member of the Scottish Football Association(“SFA”)
The legal and factual truth is that it was RFC plc of 1872 (under its new name ‘RFC 2012 plc’) that went bust and ‘disappeared altogether.’
In my view, BBC Scotland bought into a lie ‘forced’ on it by the BBC Trust.
And the Scottish mainstream media(“SMSM”) after day one headlines such as ‘the end of 140 years history’ suddenly also began (and continue to) sedulously foster and propagate the lie that Charles Green’s SevcoScotland Ltd bought Rangers Football Club of 1872 foundation out of Administration.
He most certainly did not!
But the SFA were happy to buy into that lie and allow the very new club that they themselves had admitted into membership as a new club to claim to be the Rangers of 1872, the club from which they themselves had withdrawn membership of the SFA because of its Liquidation!
But perhaps of wider significance, unrelated to the mere sport of football, is the question to be asked about the Prospectus issued by RIFC plc when it made its Initial Public Offer in 2012.
That question is: was that Prospectus misleading in suggesting as I believe it does that investors in Rangers International Football Club plc would be investing in the holding company of the one- hundred- and -forty-year- old Rangers of 1872 foundation, one of the most successful and football honours-winning clubs in the world?
When in fact they would be investing in a brand-new football club newly admitted into Scottish professional football by the very sports governance body that had stripped RFC of 1872 of its membership in Scottish football!
May I suggest that you might have a wee look at the possibility that the Prospectus was misleading and that the ‘NOMAD’ (the nominated adviser for RIFC plc in its launch on the ‘market’) and the FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) and the Insolvency Service fell down in their duties in not questioning the truth and accuracy of the information provided to potential investors?
Questionable governance in a sport is one thing: failings in the regulation and governance of the world of finance and commerce would be quite another much, much more important matter.
Let me finish by thanking you for your courage in stating the truth that Rangers Football Club of 1872 foundation was liquidated.
No journalist in Scotland has been prepared to/or allowed to state that factual truth, whether out of partisanship or fear of losing their job or out of simple physical fear.
Yours sincerely,
(me)
—–
I’ll look again at my effort tomorrow before sending anything off, whether by email or snail mail.
This is what I will send to Toby Perkins, MP either by email or perhaps by Royal Mail.
“Mr Toby Perkins, MP
House of Commons,
London, SW1A OAA
Dear Mr Perkins,
I watched the recording of the debate on 23 April in the House of Commons on the ‘Football Governance Bill.’
As a member of the Scottish Football Supporters Association (“SFSA”) but not at all writing as being either an officeholder in, or authorised spokesman for, that organisation, I watched and listened with great interest.
I did so because I support the principle of there being a statutory independent Regulator of Scottish Football and I look forward to the English bill being passed and enacted so that it may serve as an encouraging support to the cross-party group of members of the Scottish Parliament and to the SFSA in their cooperative campaign for the creation of an Independent statutory Regulator of Scottish football.
I may say at once that I was immensely cheered to hear you speak Truth about the demise of Glasgow Rangers of 1872, in the phrase you used in reference to their Liquidation, ’Glasgow Rangers disappeared altogether’.
I think you are the first ‘public’ person to tell the truth that Rangers Football Club plc, founded in 1872 and incorporated in 1899 (with company number SC004276) ceased to exist as a football club when it entered Liquidation in 2012.
Did you know that BBC Scotland was ordered by the now defunct BBC Trust to distinguish between ‘company’ and ‘club’ when reporting on the Rangers liquidation saga in such a way as to suggest that while the ‘company’ was liquidated, the ‘football club’ still existed?……as if there had been a ‘holding company ‘ which went bust while the football club that it owned somehow continued in existence?
Companies House will confirm that RFC plc, company number SC004276, was not a company held by any separate ‘holding company’. It was the football club that was the shareholder in the then Scottish Premier League. It was the football club, not some ‘holding company’, that was required to surrender its share in that League, and it was the Rangers Football Club of 1872 foundation that, no longer being a member of a ‘recognised league’ had its membership of the Scottish Football Association (“SFA”) withdrawn by that body, thereby ceasing to have any place as a football club participating in Scottish Football.
The legal and factual truth is that it was the football club RFC plc of 1872, company number SC 004276 (under its new name ‘RFC 2012 plc’) that went bust and ‘disappeared altogether.’
And it is a fact that the football club of which today’s RIFC plc is the ‘holding company’, namely ‘The Rangers Football Club Ltd’ bears company number SC425159 and not company number SC 004276!!
In my view, BBC Scotland bought into the lie ‘forced’ on it by the BBC Trust.
And the Scottish mainstream media(“SMSM”) after day one headlines such as ‘the end of 140 years history’ suddenly also began to foster and propagate the view that Charles Green’s SevcoScotland Ltd bought and brought Rangers Football Club of 1872 foundation out of Administration and had become the new owner of the historic football club founded when my grandfather was 21 years old!
He most certainly did not!
[ Instead, he bought a bundle of property assets and the services of some football players and other employees whose contracts with the liquidated club were voided by the Liquidation. He then was forced to apply for membership of a ‘recognised’ football league. On being accepted into the then Scottish Football League he had to apply as a new club for membership of the SFA.
The SFA, sadly, were happy to buy into that lie (in the secret, subject to a ‘Non-disclosure Agreement’ ‘5-way Agreement’.)
They allowed ‘The Rangers Football Club Ltd’- a club that they themselves had newly admitted into membership as a new club to claim to be the Rangers of 1872, the club from which they themselves had withdrawn membership of the SFA because of its death by Liquidation!]
But perhaps of wider significance and importance unrelated to the sport of football, is the question that has to be asked about the ‘Prospectus’ issued by RIFC plc when it made its ‘Initial Public Offer in 2012’.
That question is: was that ‘Prospectus’ misleading in suggesting as I believe it strongly does that investors in Rangers International Football Club plc would be investing in the holding company of the 140-year-old Rangers of 1872 foundation, one of the most successful and football honours-winning clubs in the world?-when in fact they would be investing in a brand-new football club newly admitted into Scottish professional football by the very sports governance body that had stripped RFC of 1872 of its membership in Scottish football!
May I suggest that you might want to have a wee look at the possibility that the ‘Prospectus’ was indeed misleading and that the ‘NOMAD’ (the ‘nominated adviser’ for RIFC plc in its launch on the ‘market’) and the FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) may have fallen down in their duties in not questioning the truth and accuracy of the information provided to potential investors and the general UK taxpayer.
It is a fact that RIFC plc is not and never was the ‘holding company’ of Rangers of 1872 (company number SC 004276) but was from its launch in 2012 the holding company of ‘The Rangers Football Club Ltd’ of 2012 foundation (company number SC425159)
Now, questionable governance of a sport is one thing.
I would suggest that possible serious failings by the FCA and/or a Nomad in the matter of the regulation and governance of the world of finance and commerce would be quite another and of much, much more importance!
Let me finish by thanking you for your courage in stating the truth that Rangers Football Club of 1872 foundation was liquidated and ‘disappeared’ as a football club entitled to membership of the SFA.
Regrettably, no journalist in Scotland has been prepared to/or been allowed to state that factual truth, whether out of partisanship or fear of losing their job or from simple physical fear.
(Alex Thomson of Channel 4 News reported in his ‘Foreword’ to “Downfall: How Rangers FC Self-Destructed” by Phil Mac Giolla Bhain (published by Frontline Noir, 2012) remarks : “Astonishingly, the author-like myself- received overt physical threats from a former Glasgow-based sports journalist for having the temerity to investigate the mess at Ibrox.”
Thank you for reading thus far a letter from someone who is not in your constituency.
But, sad to say, it would be an absolute waste of time for me to write to my own MP and/or MSP.
Neither has ever publicly questioned the absurd assertion that TRFC is Rangers of 1872.
Yours sincerely,
Another view on VAR this time Sweden .
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/music/sweden-refuses-to-use-var-amid-fan-revolt/ar-AA1nHMzt?ocid=msedgntp&pc=LCTS&cvid=f29e9739550841c38cb2a3960c878431&ei=28
In the unlikely event of that being adopted in Scotland paddy, we would just go back to ‘honest mistakes’ on the field – rather than from a bunker! At least it wid be in plain sight!
Half kiddin’ – whole earnest!
Just to say that I sent my letter (to Toby Perkins MP) by email this morning, to his House of Commons email address.
I tidied it up a bit grammatically and syntactically and added a reference to ‘Downfall: How Rangers FC self-destructed” (Phil Mac Giolla Bhain’s book) quoting the comment made in the ‘Foreword’, written by Alex Thomson of Channel 4 News, referring to him being threatened by a Scottish journalist for investigating the ‘Ibrox mess’.
bect67
27 April 2024 at 19:33
The SFA could always bite the bullet and employ professional referees – probably cheaper too . The mob they use now make Bobby Madden look like Collina , and not just the napper.
I honestly don’t see why the SPFL should be compelled to use the Referees that the SFA foist upon them. Surely they should be able to go out and procure the best possible service available, and in terms of Refereeing, the SFA Referees do not come even close to that. The SFA do not even make an effort to remove potential conflicts of interest in terms of their appointments, while the developed football world does. The SFA would be squealing from the heavens if a German Referee is granted the Germany v Scotland game in the Euro’s, but think it’s absolutely fine to appoint fans of clubs to officiate in crucial games in the Scottish League which involve the team they support.
Feelin’ a bit mischievous the day, so may I crave your indulgence with the following …?
Dougie McLean’s ‘Caledonia’ has had a remix for 2024 – courtesy of the Union Bears. The chorus goes …
“So let me tell you that I love you, and I think about you all the time.
Ibrox Stadium is calling me and now I’m going home.
To think of life without the Rangers, you know that it would make me more than sad.
Glasgow Rangers is everything I’ve ever had”.
The last line indicates to me that the writers, who seem delusional/uninformed about how old the club is, are probably around 12 (the age of The Rangers!). One further point – ‘the Rangers’ should more accurately read ‘The Rangers Football Club (TRFC)’.
… and they can’t help harping back to oldco with this verse…
“We won 9-in-a-row and I’m still dreaming, of Brian Laudrup and Trevor Steven.
Marvin Andrews said ‘Keep believing’, Davie Cooper’s on the wing.
“We remember Gazza with great affection, the day the helicopter changed direction.
“Jimmy Baxter, he was pure perfection, Super Ally scores again.
… again , should the 9-in-a-row referred to above read ‘tainted 9-in-a-row’?
Anyone remember good old Sevco 5088?
Names like Green and Whyte and drunken assertions from a Green to a Whyte that ‘you are Sevco!?’
Oh, what fun and games in them days of Charlotte!
And didn’t Whitehouse and Clark have some dealings with Sevco 5088 before all of a sudden mentioning SevcoScotland?
Anyway, Sevco 5088 is insolvent (who knew it still existed?) according to its most recent Companies House statement of account.
Interestingly, its ultimate owner is Worthington Group plc, and that itself is in Liquidation at the moment.
Have a look at what Sevco 5088 says about itself on the Companies House website.
Who said fairy tales?
bect67
29 April 2024 at 19:36
‘…… again , should the 9-in-a-row referred to above read ‘tainted 9-in-a-row’?
++++++
Well, bect67, it’s important to remember that in no way has TRFC of 2012 creation been top of the SPL at any time!
TRFC are not any continuation of Rangers of 1872. They are a new creation, legally and in terms of the SFA’s rules and the Insolvency Service etc etc.
They are NOT the Rangers of 1872 that might have blotted their copybook by some kind of cheating or rule breaking.
They simply are a brand new club.
The Rangers of 1872 are in Liquidation, about to be dissolved legally.
As Dave King knows.
Test
Was wavetower not the company with which Craig Whyte bought ragers 1872
IIRC it had battled against insolvency a couple of times
Company number
07380537
I often wondered
When the lying MSM and others were insisting that it was the company that went into liquidation .what company was it they were referring to .
Certainly wasn’t wavetower
It was interesting to red the piece on VAR mishaps. The article or release could have carried more weight if the review panel had indicated how many VAR decisions have been made since its implementation; the VAR teams involved ( on field and in the booth) and what bearing said decisions had on the game. One other item what would the top scottish legue look like if Celtic and Rangers results were removed from all games against other teams in the league, and, what would the standings look like applying the results from the 10 remaining teams.
fan of football
2 May 2024 at 14:58
‘…When the lying MSM and others were insisting that it was the company that went into liquidation .what company was it they were referring to .
Certainly wasn’t wavetower”
+++++++++
It certainly wasn’t, fan of football!
As you undoubtedly know, the latest Companies House filing by The Rangers FC Group (the name Wavetower changed to on 6th May 2012) was on 22 April 2024.
Companies House entry for THE RANGERS FC GROUP LIMITED [my note, formerly “Wavetower”]
Company number 07380537, has this entry:
“22 April 2024 Accounts for a dormant company made up to 30 April 2023”
That entry has this:
“As the company is insolvent the directors have prepared these finance statements on a break-up basis as set out above under the basis of preparation”
So, Wavetower is still alive.
The entity that died was RFC plc founded in 1872 which was the entity that held the share in a ‘recognised football club’ in virtue of which it was entitled to membership of the SFA and which accordingly lost that entitlement.
And oh, what fun to read about ‘Liberty Corporate’, ‘Law Financial’, ‘Liberty Capital’ and such like.
Honest to God!
What a world!
What a football governance body!
What an SMSM!
What a monstrous beast of untruth was the BBC Trust!
Together those organs of public information betrayed the very idea of truthful journalism and made liars of themselves.
Why and for what?
“The Scotsman” blowing its own Trump-et today!
It reports triumphantly that the Independent Press Standards Organisation has thrown out The Donald’s complaint against the “Scotsman’s” report on the dirty condition of the kitchen at the Trump International Golf Links in Aberdeenshire.
The second ‘leader’ has this:
“Sorry, Donald. It wasn’t fake “news”. Too many rich and powerful people think they can bully or bore the media into submission by drowning us in paperwork. But whether it concerns the fate of democracy or where to have a meal out, we will always steadfastly defend our right to tell it like it is and the independence of the free press.”
‘Tell it like it is’ when it comes to the death by Liquidation of a powerful football club and the deceitful attribution of the legitimate sporting honours and titles earned by the 140-year-old Rangers Football club to-a 12-year-old football club??
I don’t think so.
In parroting the nonsense that TRFC is Rangers of 1872 The ‘Scotsman’ has out-Trumped Trump!
John
What’s the old saying ,.
You couldn’t give them a red nack with a blow torch .
Definitely applies to all above
John I wonder if you would be interested in
Craig Houston speaks to Paul Murray
It’s on you tube and he discuses his time at the old ragers 1872 during the Craig Whyte era
What I noticed was how Pacific he was on dates and times during the saga , it looked suspiciously scripted to me but might be worth a watch if you have an hour or so to spare
specific
Sorry
fan of football
3 May 2024 at 11:41
‘..Craig Houston speaks to Paul Murray..’
+++++++++
Yes, I’ll try to have a look at that, thanks.
Is this an indication of what’s wrong with football on a global basis. Two of Canada’s major cities are set to host six, that’s right six games each, in the upcoming world cup. The latest estimate on costs for each city are beyond staggering. Toronto is on the hook for something in the range of $350 million dollars, and, Vancouver is estimated to be in the range of $500 million. These estimates are current and there is no factor for any increases prior to 2026. Funding will come from three levels of government, which means a deep dive into ordinary taxpayers pockets somewhere along the line. Somehting is dramatically wrong with this picture.
Just had some fun with Artificial Intelligence.
I asked ” is the company with company number SC425159 ( i.e.TRFC of 2012 creation) the selfsame company as the company with company number SC004276 (i.e. the Rangers of the four young men).
Guess what it said?
You’re dead right!
It said ‘no’!
Clever it/her/him/them!
Of course, I realise that the ‘machine’ can only deal with the info that we humans feed it, (a bit like wiki!) and is unable to cope with contradictions.
We human beings know the truth.
Which is that the RFC of our grandfathers’ days died just as Gretna etc died as football clubs.
And nothing that can change that truth.
Not even any secret ‘5-way agreement’ cobbled up by the SPFL/SFA.
Craig Whyte bought Rangers Football Club of 1872.
And killed it!
And Charles Green bought (very cheaply!) a bundle of assets and was eventually allowed to have a newly created football club (club 12?) accepted into the SFL, having had the SPL tell him to get to featherstone!
Oh, how I hope that, over the next few years I may live, someone will write the truth about the whole rotten saga!
goforpar
3 May 2024 at 22:58
‘…set to host six, that’s right six games each, in the upcoming world cup. The latest estimate on costs for each city are beyond staggering…’
++++++++
What I don’t know (because I have never seen any kind of report relating to the matter. never looked for such a report, to be fair) is how much money the host countries, states, cities and the relevant national football associations and owners of the stadium/stadia used MAKE out of hosting World Cup matches.
Is it just a vanity project by a national football association/city/state/country, and bugger the expense?
Or does FIFA pump in monies enough to make hosting the games at least break-even financially for club, city, state and country?
I wonder whether any of our wee Scottish SMSM so-called ‘journalists’ are into asking that kind of question?
No. I’m not wondering.
All their mental effort is directed to propagation of the Big Lie!!
This afternoon I heard Doncaster smoothly speak of the Buckie situation, as he spoke of his deep regret and, crocodile-like, expressed sympathy for Buckie while stressing that the Rules have to be applied!
Oh, no they don’t!
Not when a football club that has had its membership of the SFA withdrawn by the SFA because it had to surrender its share in the SPL!
Normal rules were not applied when Rangers of 1872 had to surrender its share in the SPL.
Oh, no.
A dirty little secret deal was done where the Rules were conveniently forgotten.
And Doncaster as a lawyer knows that it is legally impossible that TRFC of 2012 foundation could be RFC of 1872!
Bad cess to him, as my revered granny would have said.
John Clark–May 4th –2024 — 23:38
John, expenditures are reportedly for security, stadium upgrades, FIFA housing, etc. No mention of funds going back to game development in the host country/cities. There appears to be no sense of this being a break even proposition, perhaps the big winners will be FIFA. Will watch for udates.
Not to be a boring old fart can I say that I’ve just had a wee re-read of the “Final Progress Report to Creditors” issued by the (now, God bless them) multi-millionaire Administrators of dear old ‘Rangers of the four young men.’
That report is dated 27 September 2012.
In the ‘Definitions’ (of terms used) ” Rangers/the Company/the Club” is defined as ” RFC 2012 plc/the Company/the Club”
There can be no truth in the stupid assertion that the ‘Company’ went bust while the ‘Club’ lived on!
No, the Rangers Football Club of 1872 foundation died.
And Doncaster and the SPFL and SFA are, in my opinion, betrayers of their offices as members of any kind of sports governance body.
There is a cuckoo club in Scottish football, with a false claim to be what it is not and legally cannot be!
A false claim earnestly and assiduously propagated by the BBC and the Scottish print press.
Who would have thunk it, of the BBC?
Ach, there’s history there,of course!
What was that guy’s name? Peter Thomson?
Och aye, we know.
“It’s not really respectful towards my team,” Clement responded. “I will never say things like that about an opponent.”
However, Rangers’ manager added: “I heard yesterday that they are going to have fun. We’re going to have fun also.”
The ultra-sensitive PC, who incidentally, did NOT disrespect the Ross County Manager (he was just disappointed at getting beat before ‘bolting the course’ – aye right!), is claiming that Brendan Rodgers ‘disparaged’ TRFC. Could someone please explain to me what derogatory comments BR actually made about TRFC to justify his ‘hissy fit’?
I’m further confused, because it seems, from Clement’s (clearly contradictory) statements, that they’re all gonna have fun (with apologies to Cindy Lauper) – so what’s the issue?
Is he ‘hivin a laff’ ur whit?
I think it is tomorrow (Wednesday) that Maree Todd MSP has her meeting with what, as Andy Smith of the SFSA describes it, is ‘a heavyweight group including us’.
Let’s hope that the Minister will share the feelings of incredulity and irritation at the sheer managerial deficiencies of a governance board that publicly ‘blackballs’ an organsisation that represents the CUSTOMERS of the businesses of which that governance board is the governance body!
The English Parliament has shown the way in recognising in law that the governance of English football is not at the mere whim of the FA as representing private business companies or plcs but has to take into practical account the views and opinions of the customers of those limited companies/plcs.
There are thickheads at the SFA.
I say nothing, of course, of ethical integrity in matters of things like liquidation of football clubs blah blah blah.
Except perhaps to observe that had there been in 2012 a statutory Regulator of Football, the Prospectus issued by RIFC plc might have been looked at to ensure that legally all was well.
My post of 7 May 2024 at 23:18 refers.
I should have realised that the resignation of Humza would have caused the need for cancellation by Maree Todd MSP (and Minister with responsibilities for Sport, under Neil Gray, the Cabinet Secretary) of the ‘football’ meeting scheduled for 8th May – John Swinney might conceivably have replaced both her and Gray!
Let’s hope she can arrange an early date for that meeting!
And my thanks to the person who alerted me to the current political situation!
BDO’s final report on the Liquidation of the Rangers Football Club that was founded in 1872 is due, I believe, by about 24 May?
Their job done, the Registrar of Companies will remove Company number SC 004276 from the Register.
And that will be that: extinction of a very old football club, done to death by its last two owners.
If there had been statutory regulation of Scottish football that quite possibly could not have happened!
Are the fans of TRFC supportive of the move to have an Independent Regulator to help it avoid a similar fate?
Did you know World Press Freedom Day originated in Africa?
I didn’t, until I opened an email received today from Micah Reddy, Africa coordinator for the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. (ICIJ)
Reddy goes on to say “It grew out of the Windhoek Declaration produced at a UNESCO conference in Namibia in 1991 to emphasize the importance of the free flow of information in newly independent African nations. Although its creation reaffirmed the media’s vital role in democracy, my continent still has a long way to go.
Colonial-era defamation laws, together with new draconian measures in the digital realm criminalize journalism and curtail free speech. In 2023 alone, 67 media workers were jailed across the continent, and in Cameroon, journalist and radio presenter Martinez Zogo was abducted and killed.”
Dying to tell the truth at the risk of their very lives.
While our so-called ‘journalists’ were afraid to comment on a UK MP’s matter-fact-observation in the House of Commons that ‘Glasgow Rangers disappeared altogether’ when it was Liquidated in 2012.
Why can’t at least those of them who are not motivated by partisan bias (and/or inclined to threaten Alex Thomson and PMcG) challenge the RIFC claim to be the holding company of Rangers of !872 given that they are legally no such thing??
There could be a big story there, possibly involving the FCA and the possibility of negligence on its part and a possible false implication in RIFC plc’s ‘Prospectus’ that somehow CG had bought ‘Rangers of 1872’ and that TRFC is Rangers of 1872.
Who knows, some smart cookie might be able to prove that RIFC is the holding company of Rangers of 1872, company number SC004276, to the point where RIFC plc are able legally to use that Company number as if it were the company number of TRFC!
And embarrass the hell out Companies House!
Is there no one brave enough even to do a wee bit of research?
Even 12 years or so after the Liquidation?
I think I might suggest to the School of Journalism in Manchester that students there might enjoy practicing research techniques in how to establish the facts from bull.hit propaganda!
Anent my post at 22.47 today, and just for fun I emailed the text of that post to the email address of the School of Journalism.
Maybe, just maybe, some honest kind of person might just see it and wonder ‘what the hell’? and have a wee curious look at the ‘Prospectus’.
‘The truth is out there!’ that old X-Files stuff floods the mind!
Early days yet, of course.
But Toby Perkins MP (or his ‘staff’) has not even acknowledged receipt of my email to him about his statement in the House of Commons in which he referred to Glasgow Rangers as ‘disappearing altogether’.
I wonder why?
It surely cannot be that he buys into the myth that Rangers was not liquidated, had its membership of the SFA withdrawn and ceased to be a football club eligible to participate in Scottish professional football. He clearly said the very opposite.
Has he been warned off?
Will he tell me if he has been leaned on, the way BBC Scotland was leaned on by the wretched BBC Trust?
I will ask him.
I am much in favour of the move to get a match between TRFC and Celtic described as being the ‘Glasgow Derby’.
The football club that played against Celtic today came into existence only in 2012.
It is manifestly not the original Rangers of 1872 foundation.
There is now no such thing as ‘the old firm’
And all the deceitful marketing by TV companies and football boards and associations shows to me that the sport is rotten to the core!
There are serial liars in there, with no notion of sporting integrity and truth.
And well they know it, each and every liar of them!
There cannot (in my opinion) be anyone involved in Scottish Football governance who is not lying to himself/herself in accepting that TRFC is the Rangers of the four young men!
Honest to God! What despicable people they must know themselves to be.
They know it.
The more brass necked hardened liars don’t give a sh.t about truth and honour.
But there are owners/ directors/fans of clubs whose consciences are disturbed about their acceptance of a monumental sports untruth.
And they, to their eternal shame, failed to man up and insist on Truth: CG’s Sevco/Club 12/ TRFC is not, and cannot possibly be the Rangers of 1872!
So who won ?
https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/news/willie-collum-appointed-as-new-head-of-refereeing/?rid=14258
John Clark: 11 May 2024 at 23:52
‘The football club that played against Celtic today came into existence only in 2012.
Sevco/Club 12/ TRFC is not, and cannot possibly be the Rangers of 1872!’
On the basis of that John, and tonight’s result, here’s the updated Scottish League Champions Roll of Honour:-
SCOTTISH LEAGUE WINNERS AS AT END OF 2023/24 SEASON
Celtic FC – 54
Rangers FC* (1872-2012) – 54
Aberdeen FC – 4
Heart of Midlothian FC – 4
Hibernian FC – 4
Dumbarton FC – 2
TRFC (2012 -) 1
Dundee United FC – 1
Kilmarnock FC – 1
Dundee FC – 1
Motherwell FC – 1
Third Lanark FC (1872 – 1967) – 1
* Liquidated (aka ‘deid’) – cannot add to total. Also, the figure of 54 for RFC should read at least a few less, as some of them are ‘tainted’.
Once again the SFA show a complete lack of imagination and foresight with the latest appointment of the head of referees. Why not go outside the box and bring in someone with no ties to scottish football and a much too clse attachment to the current list of referees. A new face who could perhaps upgrade the overall standards and have some input on fixing/upgrading, or, teaching how it should be used. How much was psent conducting this extensive search, how many actual interviews were held, etc. Why a referee who has garnered so much criticism in the past. I undersand that all helicopter rental deposits will now be returned to the SFA post haste.
Well!
That was a game well worth a watch in anybody’s language!
The only downside is that one team had to lose.
I’ve mentioned before that through my late sister’s husband (also deceased) I had a remote connection with Thistle, in the sense that I would be happy for John if Thistle were doing well (except in matches against my own favoured club, of course!)
But that connection has to take second place to my wish again to pay tribute to Turnbull Hutton’s integrity and his readiness, on the steps at Hampden Park, to speak Truth about the dirty deeds of Scottish Football ‘governance’, even using the word ‘corruption’.
So, I supported Raith Rovers. And I hope and hope they win through!
And I should maybe add that ‘my own favoured club’ has been since 2012 somewhat less favoured by me on account of its tergiversation and ‘de facto’ endorsement of the untruth that TRFC is RFC of 1872.
Honest to God… is not what they have been!
In my deeply held opinion.
Not want to sound like a Celtic fan but want to be somewhat unbiased based on past criticism. First, we have several TRFC forums looking for 19M to 21M to sell Butand and still going on about appearing for England this summer. He was available for free to all EPL teams last year and there was no nibbles, and, having conseded 18 goals in the last 10 games, and, at a crucial time of the year I believe that the Euros are not going to happen and a multi million poound move are highly unlikely. With the Scottish Cup final on the horizon it appears there is more interest in having a bevy or two or three, or more, prior to the game. I don’t believe this enchances much of stories related to scottish and alcohol.
goforpar
18 May 2024 at 23:01
‘…TRFC forums looking for 19M to 21M to sell Butand and still going on about appearing for England this summer. He was available for free to all EPL teams last year and there was no nibbles,.’
+++++
Well, goforpar, TRFC fans believe that TRFC is RFC of 1872 foundation!
If they can believe that, then they can and do believe anything!
Dave King knows that RFC of 1872 ceased to exist on entering Liquidation.
He acknowledged that if someone was prepared to pay the multimillions of tax due to HMRC, RFC of 1872 could have been brought out of Liquidation and honourably restored as a living, continuous entity.
None of the big talking tykes trying to weasel their way in to saving ‘Rangers’ was worth a damn!
Moneyless chancers, in my opinion.
Who never put their money where their mouths were at the critical time.
Ah, no,
Like scavengers they were, waiting to pick the bones of a dead beast-under license from a corrupt governance body!
As I see things to have been in 2012.
And were assisted in that utterly deceitful (as I see it) sporting untruth by the BBC and print media.
It’s all there.
Liars here there and everywhere- in sport, and in the SMSM.
The liars know who they are, of course.
Bad cess to them- and especially to that one of them who knows the meaning of that expression.
HMRC win Rangers’ Big EBT case
Last Updated: 31 August 2023
Update: an appeal has been lodged with the Supreme Court.
Three judges have decided in favour of HMRC in their long-running battle with the Murray group and the former Rangers football club over its Employee Benefit Trusts (EBT). Payments made to executives, players and their families via the EBT were deemed remuneration and not loans.
Murray Group executives and football players were all ‘paid’ via loans from the club’s EBT for nearly ten years from 2002 in a scheme designed to avoid PAYE and NICs.
Players were contracted by the club for comparatively low salaries but under the terms of a ‘side letter’, the club paid cash bonuses into its EBT which in turn appointed the cash into various sub trusts for the players and their family. Players contracts had to be registered with the Scottish Football Association, however the side letter was not disclosed.
Arrangements for payments to the chief executive Sir David Murray and others were more informal. Funds were just paid to the EBT which in turn appointed them to sub trusts for the players’ families.
The club argued that all the sums paid were genuine loans.
The case went to the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) in 2012. It decided that despite the existence of the side letter there was a genuine discretion in making the loans and found in favour of the club although one of its three members dissented.
In 2014 the Upper Tribunal (UT) refused HMRC leave to appeal, however they were later granted leave to appeal to the Inner Court of Session (CS) on one final point of law. As the case had been heard in Scotland, the Advocate General for Scotland, acted on behalf of HMRC.
HMRC argued that the cash payment made by the employer to EBT was in consideration of earned services by the employee. The scheme amounted to “a mere redirection of earnings which did not remove the liability of employees to income tax”.
The court agreed with HMRC, finding that the FTT and UT both erred in law.
While the FTT had focused in ‘large measure’ on the trust arrangements, the CS considered the source of the funds involved and the reason that they were provided in the first place. It considered that the bonus terms in the side letter was negotiated as part of a player’s remuneration package, observing that the ‘fundamental principle’ that emerged from previous cases was clear: ‘if income is derived from an employee’s services qua (in their capacity as) employee, it is an emolument or earnings, and is thus assessable to income tax, even if the employee requests or agrees that it be redirected to a third party’.
Delivering the opinion of the court, Lord Drummond Young said: ‘That accords with common sense. If the law were otherwise, an employee could readily avoid tax by redirecting income to members of his family to meet outgoings that he would normally pay: for example to a trust for his wife…or to trustees to pay for his children’s education or the outgoings on the family home…The funds are ultimately derived as consideration for the employee’s services, and on that basis they are properly to be considered emoluments or earnings.’
In relation to employees other than footballers, the ‘true nature’ of the individual transactions was that bonuses were paid into the trusts on the basis of the work performance of the employee in question, and the profitability of his employing company.
‘On the foregoing basis, we are of the opinion that the sums received by the trustee of the Principal Trust and in due course by the trustees of the sub-trusts amounted to a mere redirection of income and thus constituted emoluments or earnings of the employees in question,’ Lord Drummond Young said.
Background
HMRC have long argued that EBT loans were not real loans and that as payments which formed part of the employment package of the players they were taxable as earnings. It took some time to take action against the companies. At one stage Murray International Holdings, which had been a major shareholder in Rangers, had threatened both HMRC and the Tribunals Service over concerns that sensitive details about the EBT case had been released into the public domain.
HMRC put Rangers into liquidation when it was revealed that the club had clocked up some £21 million in unpaid PAYE and in addition potentially owed a further £75 million if HMRC were successful in their battle over the EBT. The current Rangers FC is not party to this case.
Rangers’ EBT was devised by Murray in 2000. By 2010 the club had transferred almost £50 million into the EBT. The EBT was administered by trustees and had over 100 sub-trusts. The plan was that the sums would never be repaid. What has turned heads in this case is that some players were given side letters which confirmed contractual entitlement to payments from the EBT. The moment that payment becomes contractual it is difficult to argue that it is not actually earnings.
Rangers also had a discounted share options scheme. Although smaller in scale than the EBT, it is estimated that the tax bill for this is in the region of £4 million. Funds were transferred into offshore companies, and share options were granted to players in those companies. After exercising their options the players ended up as the owners of cash rich offshore companies.
Case:
(1) MURRAY GROUP HOLDINGS LTD; (2) MURRAY GROUP MANAGEMENT LTD; (3) THE PREMIER PROPERTY GROUP LTD; (4) GM MINING LTD; and (5) RFC 2012 PLC (in liquidation) (formerly The Rangers Football Club PLC)
What now?
It seems fairly obvious that HMRC will use this decision as a basis for serving an Accelerated Payment Notice on any company that has yet to settle its EBT. If you would like assistance, please contact our Virtual Tax Partner service.
I thought this line was very telling
The current Rangers FC is not party to this case.
The scandal of this case is compounded even more with Sandy Brysons disgraceful interpretation of what had actually gone on .
This is without doubt the biggest scandal in Scottish football and the stripping of ALL trophies won in this time frame should have been the least to happen .
I hope in time the charlatans involved in this disgusting episode in the so called sport of football in this country, are held to account and history records their roles in this saga
The MSM has certainly gone into overdrive in regards to Celtic fans celebrating another title win. Has anyone taken the time to look back at TRFC celebrations in honour of their recent title win. It would be interesting to see the comparison in the coverage and some of the descriptive wording used. Carnge I believe is a little strong when you look at what’s happening in the Ukraine and with the Hamaz tragedy. If onlt the MSM could as much effort into digging into behind the scenes story of the original Rangers and ferret out the truthful version. Good luck on that.
fan of football
20 May 2024 at 18:11
‘…I thought this line was very telling
‘The current Rangers FC is not party to this case’
++++++++
You’re dead right, fan of football!
Because, of course, the ‘current Rangers FC’ referred to was most definitely NOT the Rangers of 1872, but a new creation (untainted at that time as far as is known) by any tax evasion charges whatever may be the case now. The multi-millionaire Administrators /HMRC at least got that right!
And you are absolutely correct in your observation that
“This is without doubt the biggest scandal in Scottish football”.
There was mischief there, where a governance body first of all properly applied its rules by withdrawing ‘Rangers’ of 1872’s’ membership of the SFA when the SPL required that club to surrender its share, stripping it of its membership of a ‘recognised football league’.
… and then made liars of itself by allowing a new club to market itself as Rangers of 1872 and claim sporting honours and titles that it could not possibly have earned!
And we let it happen!
The late Turnbull Hutton, honour to his memory, was a man of principle. The ONLY one in the sordid, soiled, dirty world of Scottish professional football which in 2012 bought into an absurd fiction. The fiction that TRFC is RFC of 1872!
And as for our sports media, especially BBC Scotland?
What pit of hell in Dante’s ‘Inferno’ should they expect to find themselves in when they shuffle off into eternity?
As they will do, sooner or later! – as venal purveyors of untruth for the sake of what, exactly?
How embarrassed must our ‘serious’ so-called journalists when they learn of the death of real journalists who die in the pursuit of truth, while they trot out the lie that TRFC is Ranger of 1872, instead of reporting truthfully that RFC of 1872 is as dead as Gretna and every other football club that went out of business.
fan of football
20 May 2024 at 18:11
‘…I thought this line was very telling
‘The current Rangers FC is not party to this case’
True, but it is 100% to this:-
‘Rangers £18.3m gross debt is by far the highest in Scotland,
I know the above figures may be a wee bit out of date (not much though Shirley?), so they’re still skint.
What, I wonder what will the ‘summer rebuild’ already being hyped by the media, look like – certainly compared to Celtic’s?
I laugh when I think of crooked David Murray’s boast that…
“For every 5 pounds they* spend, we will spend 10”
* Celtic
He could have added “with money stolen from people we will later ‘shaft’ on our way to oblivion”.
bect67
Murky sure knew how to use
OPM
The taxpayers mostly
Had a splendid afternoon (not!) at Edinburgh airport, waiting to meet some American friends! Their flight was delayed by about an hour, and that wee dump of a place where arrivals arrive is, in my opinion, an awful place; low-ceilinged, not all that clean, and the wee Costa place not terribly customer friendly!
And 4 quid for a pretendy ‘cappuccino’, nowhere near anything like a genuine, proper, cappuccino!
But that’s by-the-by. We and our friends have had a very nice evening together: they and Mrs C went to bed a wee while ago.
So, I sat down and sent this to Companies House:
“Tue, 21 May at 23:42
Dear Companies House,
Just to draw your attention to what I think may be a discrepancy between what a particular plc claimed in its IPO Prospectus -and the actual truth.
It is very clear, in my opinion, that the Prospectus issued by Rangers International Football Club plc (‘RIFC plc’) strongly claimed that it would be the holding company of the Rangers Football Club that was founded in 1872, company number SC004276.
I am therefore somewhat puzzled to find that the official website of ‘Rangers Football Club’ (which is the site on which ‘investor information’ is given about RIFC plc) declares [in very, very small print] that RIFC plc is the holding company of a quite different entity, namely The Rangers Football Club Ltd, company number SC425159 only founded in 2012!
And Company number SC004276 has been in Liquidation since 2012!
Could you let me know, please, what the explanation may be for this apparent discrepancy?
Am I missing something?
Is everything tickety-boo?
I will be ever so grateful for an explanation.
Of course, if it may not fall to you to give an explanation perhaps you could let me know to which authority I should re-address this query?
Yours sincerely,
JC”
And quite separately) I noted last week that the Companies House attempt to crack down on phony companies has so far failed! There are more of them than ever, apparently!
John Clark
It really doesn’t inspire confidence regards companies house , to invest in any companies on their records .
The word Lax springs to mind
I have received this response from Companies House:
“From:
enquiries@companieshouse.gov.uk Wed, 22 May at 10:45
To (JC,i.e. me)
Dear Customer,
Thank you for your email.
Your enquiry has been forwarded to the relevant department for a response. You should receive a further response from us within the next 10 working days.
Please note that this is for your information only and you do not need to reply to this email.
If you believe that the company may be struck off the register before this point, please call: +44(0)303 1234 500.
Yours faithfully,
Anita
Customer Advisor
Companies House Contact Centre
enquiries@companieshouse.gov.uk”
____
Note: I should perhaps point out that before the ‘Yours faithfully’ there is another paragraph headed ‘For internal use only’ addressed to the Scottish end of Companies House, asking them to prepare a response for Companies House within 10 days.
I think we may have been here before, but we’ll have some fun when we see what the response is!
fan of football
22 May 2024 at 12:37
‘…It really doesn’t inspire confidence regards companies house , to invest in any companies on their record..’
++++++++++
fan of football, I note that Companies House’s website still carries this note:
“We carry out basic checks on documents received to make sure that they have been fully completed and signed, but we do not have the statutory power or capability to verify the accuracy of the information that companies send to us. The fact that the information has been placed on the public record should not be taken to indicate that Companies House has verified or validated it in any way.”
Would you, or anybody, buy shares in any new would-be ‘plc’ based on what their ‘Prospectus’ said, without remembering that the truth of what they say about themselves is not rigorously examined and checked by the FCA? And that what they say may be a tissue of lies?
I certainly would not.
Well that explains a lot.
Chocolate fireguard springs to mind .
While listening to the Raith Rovers v Ross County match tonight (still some hope for Raith!), I was looking at the Disciplinary Notices issued by the Stock Exchange over the last number of years.
I got back to AIM disciplinary notice AD11, which was issued by the Stock Exchange on 21 December 2011.
Briefly, a ‘Nominated Adviser”(‘nomad’) was disciplined (fined £400,000) on account of its failure to advise properly the company to which it was appointed as nomad, in relation to
a) ……….
b) [its] conduct as nominated adviser to a company seeking admission to AIM in particular, in relation to the due skill and care exercised in undertaking pre-admission due diligence in relation to the applicant company and its directors…”
I suppose that means that the ‘nomad’ never bothered its ar.e to check with ‘due skill and care’ what the would-be member of AIM had said about itself, in its application, in order to check whether it would be appropriate for the company to be admitted to AIM, and
failed to give sound advice and guidance to the company in respect of its admission,
and failed to exercise due skill and care
I’m struggling to remember what that [utterly unconnected with football] disciplinary case calls to mind!
What was it, again?
Some application by a newly created plc which claimed in its Prospectus to be the holding company of a company in Liquidation but has to name on its website another entirely different company as being the company of which it is the holding company!
Something like that.
Ach, it’s coming back to me!
RIFC plc’s ‘Prospectus’!
I wonder whether the nomad might not reasonably be asked a question or two?
Did he/she/it believe that CG had actually bought Rangers of 1872 as a going concern, having supposedly brought it out of Administration by paying all its debts and saving it from Liquidation?
I may be tempted to write to AIM/the Stock exchange that perhaps RIFC plc’s ‘prospectus’ and the ‘nomad’ who advised RIFC plc might be looked at.
I incidentally watched today’s ‘Horizon’ Inquiry!
’nuff said.
Stand up, the boy who said Nimm…..
b. Seymour Pierce’s conduct as proposed nominated adviser to a
company seeking admission to AIM in particular, in relation to the due
skill and care exercised in undertaking pre-admission due diligence in
relation to the applicant company and its directors.id
https://youtube.com/watch?v=YHxst2slWU0&si=Wi-1Bza6fnbVMZZt
Funny how the media seemed to get what liquidation meant back at the time .
A lot of serious faces about then
VAR problem for the Court of Arbitration for Sport!
It seems that while VAR was employed in the semi-final of the Swiss Cup between FC Winterhurst and Servette FC, it was not used for the other semi-final between FC Sion and FC Lugano, played on 29 April!
FC Sion asked the Swiss FA not to recognise the result of that match, and to order a replay.
The Swiss FA refused to do so.
So, FC Sion lodged an appeal to CAS, asking that the result not be recognised and that the Swiss FA be ordered to take urgent measures to arrange a replay of their match v Lugano, before the date fixed for the cup final.
The response issued today by CAS states that they have drawn up a very tight schedule for the submissions from parties involved. But the conditions for taking ‘ urgent provisional measures’ have not been met.
(There does not appear to be an English version. My French is not quite what it was, but I think I have got the gist of the email)
Was VAR available for any of our current play-off matches that involved a premier league team?
“Asking [Raith Rovers] fans to get to Dingwall for a 12 noon kick off is outrageous”
So says the SFSA’s ‘Andy’s ‘Sting in the Tale’ piece today.
And I agree, hunnerpercent.!
Why did the Raith Rovers board agree to that time?
Have they no consideration for their fans?
Did they even argue the toss, or just meekly accept that their team is in effect being denied the support of their fans in an away match?
They could do with a Turnbull Hutton on their board.
Fans who actually go to games are the least considered of all, unfortunately.
If the speculation holds true and PC has to start or use injured players in the SC final, and, if its a loan player who is used and further aggravates an injury, what does that do for future loan options. Would TRFC asked the lending club if it was permissible to use the loanee or would they just charge ahead without any thought of further implications. Would there by any consequences should the injury be such that the loanee is not available for his lending club for a substanial amount of time or perhaps career ending. Its also strange how the injury list at TRFC is now a cpncern, but, was not a concern before the wheels came off and they sat atop the league.
goforpar
25 May 2024 at 01:49
‘… Would TRFC ask……the lending club if it was permissible to use the loanee or would they just charge ahead without any thought of further implications. Would there be any consequences should the injury be such that the loanee is not available for his lending club for a substantial amount of time ‘
+++++++++
Valuable assets are valuable assets!
It would surely be a poor bit of business by anyone to lend out something of potential value without some kind of insurance cover, paid for by the borrower, if the item of value were to be reduced in value or totally destroyed while on loan!
I’ve no idea of how a player loan deal is done.
Presumably, the lending club, the player, the player’s agent and the borrowing club have to try to cover themselves legally in every possible way against potential loss through injury to the player.
Apparently, the average number of pages in a footballer’s contract is 26!
If you have not already done so, have a look at https://www.reevaldo.com/story/introduction
This is a four-part look at the elements of a standard football player contract (in England), using fictional names and clubs.
It’s a good, informative read.
[God help the young lads who haven’t the savvy/or means to have their own lawyer to act for them in their dealings with their own Agent, whose personal interests may not always coincide with those of his client!
There’s a mucky world of business behind the ‘sport’]
We know already, of course, that it’s a mucky world, the wee world of Scottish football where the concept of ‘sporting integrity’ was killed by the sport’s very ‘governance body’ in its lying, mercenary creation, support for and propagation of the biggest sporting (and sports business!) lie in Scottish football history!
In my oft expressed opinion.
The Rangers Football Club of 1872 were not beaten today.
It was the football club successively named Club 12, SevcoScotland, The Rangers Football Club that was finally admitted as a new club into SFA membership in 2012, that (only just!) were beaten today.
Facts are chiels that winna ding, as customs officer and would-be gunrunner Rabbie truthfully asserted!
I was relieved to see that Ross County won the Premiership play off tie. No harm to Raith Rovers but the last thing the top league was another plastic pitch .
At one time we had 25% of our top league games played on those horrendous surfaces , Kilmarnock , Hamilton and Livingston . Only Kilmarnock left now and I believe they are switching to grass Season 25/26 . Now is the time to ban them permanently from the top flight .
Artificial surface = Artificial football = Artificial results
Clementballs (about the correctly chalked off goal) a la Colemanballs
“I also saw Celtic defenders grabbing my players and having their arms around their necks and waists at that moment.”
Is there a dafter one than that from the weekend ( given what goes on in penalty boxes these days!)?
Oh … wait a meenit:-
“Even Celtic men told me we were the better team”
If they did, I think they meant Celtic!
Any others?
As usual after a high profile match in Scotland, fans and media attention is focused on match officials and VAR . Would it not be possible to skim a percentage of CL/EL/ConL monies received from UEFA and use it to employ professional referees ? The clubs wouldn’t miss it if they know it’s the price they have to pay in order to be put forward for European competition .
paddy malarkey
27 May 2024 at 16:56
‘…use it to employ professional referees..’
+++++++++
pm, your post prompted me to have a look at how European refs are paid.
I was interested in what this link has to say:
g.com/bundesliga/revealed-how-much-pro-referees-earn-but-how-do-salaries-in-the-premier-league-compare-to-europes-other-top-leagues/
https://scontent.fgla3-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/217540637_10157825370915047_5002609944061870980_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&_nc_rgb565=1&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=b9115d&_nc_ohc=Uqe4ZSS-3eEAX_6gomG&_nc_ht=scontent.fgla3-2.fna&oh=9f2a509d32060ab523eb57c718e0f59f&oe=60F9BDEC
my post of 22.17 above refers:seem to hve made a pig’s ear of posting the link!
I think this is the one I meant to post:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13272329/Referees-salaries-Premier-League-compare-Europe-leagues.html
If it hasn’t got an April 2024 date, then it’s not the one I mean!
(and see this not being able to edit one’s post before posting? Does ma heid in!
Long time since I heard mention of Keef! The Keef who told the rest of us about the MBMM who was Craig Whyte!
Aye, the very Craig Whyte who sentenced to death [ by not paying its huge debts after he had bought it for one pound from, in my opinion, a wretch of a human being] the football club known as the Rangers Football Club that was founded in 1872- at a time when both of my grandfathers were alive and kicking.
I’ve just had a read at what said Keef has to say about the Scottish Cup final game.
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/brittle-rangers-lose-war-clement-32896052
It’s a very strange piece, I think.
There is an element of truth in his assessment of the game (I myself thought that scarcely one Celtic player was on any kind of form!)
But Keef seemed to feel obliged by oath to talk up a TRFC that was even less on form!
Monsieur Clement, I think, got his team selection very badly wrong, and I would have expected some mention of that by any DR journalist.
But what do I know?
Basically, only that a club newly created in 2012 did not win the Scottish Cup this season.
I received today from a friend in Glasgow a couple of pages from the ‘Evening Times’ of 16th May 2024 containing an article in a series about ‘Times Past’
The author is one Hamish Macpherson.
Not having read the ‘Evening Times’ since the days when the ‘paperboys’ would wander the streets of East-end Glasgow crying ” Times, News and Citizen’ I had no idea who Hamish MacPherson is.
So, I researched him.
This is what I found:
“Hamish Macpherson’s work predominantly revolves around providing expert commentary and reviews on topics related to culture & society, with a focus on Scottish history and legal policy regulation. His articles delve into historical events, treaties, and aspects of Scotland’s past.”
And, indeed, the article I refer to is one in a series of articles with titles like “How King David I transformed the landscape of Scotland” and the ‘anniversary of the death of King Alexander I’…….and such like topics.
The 16th of May article is headed “Looking back at how Rangers started…”
There was nothing in the article itself to take exception to, and honour to the 4 young men.
But I do wonder that Macpherson appears to have accepted the insertion of a sub-editor’s blurb which reads (in a central, eye-catching position and in relatively large print) as follows: ” Rangers have been a huge part of football in Glasow ever since they were founded in 1872″
As any kind of ‘historian’ MacPherson must know that that observation is misleading in its use of the words ‘have been’ instead of the word ‘were’.
The use of ‘have been’ suggests that the Rangers of 1872 is still with us, as a club entitled to participate in in Scottish Football: when in fact and law Rangers of 1872 is in Liquidation, its glory days having ended in October 2012. and that TRFC of 2012 foundation is not and cannot possibly be RFC 2012 plc
(formerly Rangers Football Club of 1872 foundation).
Now, when any kind of ‘historian’ who does not check his/her facts concerns are raised about his/her proficiency, diligence, general savvy and even, perhaps, his/her scholarly integrity.
In my opinion, Macpherson (if he had known about it before the paper went to press) should not have allowed that sub-editorial propagation of an untruth to attach to his article any more than BBC Scotland should have obeyed the wretched BBC Trust’s order to make a non-existent distinction between ‘club’ and ‘company’.
He should have withdrawn his article if his request were not granted.
In my opinion.
Foreign refs anyone ?
https://www.theguardian.com/football/article/2024/may/30/foreign-players-revolutionised-the-premier-league-should-refs-from-abroad-be-next
So the big name move from Rangers to Saudi has been completed. Bisgrove moving on and no in coming fee for his services. Is this person, with substantial in side information, leaving before something bad happens. Was he not the shining star who upgraded their sponsorship programs, etc. Who’s next.
Bit of cooking the books.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2UUQjFw82o
goforpar
30 May 2024 at 19:48
‘…Was he not the shining star who upgraded their sponsorship programs, etc. …’
+++++++++++
To be fair, goforpar, I think Bisgrove is to be credited with the development of New Edmiston House which seems to have been a success with TRFC fans on match days (if they have a ticket for the game!)
[Very politically correctly, apart from it being a great RIFC plc facility it was described as being a great general venue facility for the Govan community!
Maybe throwing that line into the planning application got them the nod? Did it also get them some City of Glasgow Council cash?]
Whatever: the Board’s statement, while the need for it came as a surprise, had to fasten on the ‘positive’ and accord Bisgrove due credit for his commercial abilities.
They might have other things to say about his judgment in matters of the core business- winning football games!
You wonder, goforpar, whether Bisgrove as a very inside insider as CEO might just be jumping ship?
Well, I think it’s generally realised that TRFC /RIFC plc have no significant ‘transfer fee’ spending money. Are things so bad as to suggest that Administration may be in prospect?
I suspect not yet.
But it might be touch and go!
bigboab1916
30 May 2024 at 20:03
‘…Bit of cooking the books.’
++++++++
Yer man Trump is in a kind of a way like the SFA/SPL/SFL in 2012 in their denial of Truth and their creation of a lying fantasy.
I myself regard our football governance bodies as I regard Trump – as being venal and untruthful.
Sadly, I have to regard the SMSM in the same light.
Further to my post of 31 May 2024 at 00:13, can I say that the deputy editor of ‘The Scotsman’ reports with glee that a number of the paper’s journalists won awards at the Scottish Press Awards ceremony.
He reports the Chair of the judging panel as saying:
” In another year of turbulence and change it’s a real tribute to the sector’s resilience that the diligence and creativity of Scottish journalism is more evident than ever.”
Certainly, the SMSM has since 2012 been diligent in fervently sustaining and fostering the ‘creative’ untruth that TRFC (company number SC004276) is RFC 2012 plc formerly known as Rangers Football Club plc (company number SC004276)!
Shame on journalists who can’t or won’t speak and write Truth.
Am I missing the boat with Bisgrove’s resignation or quitting Rangers and then TRFC claims to be looking for compensation. In the real world if someone resigns/quits his job its highly unlikey his former employer would be seeking compensation. In most cases the former employer would be pleased with someone moving on and not staying on board and being a disruption. The claim for compensation seems to be a far fetched idea, or, is it a stab at building the transfer fund budget.
The power of The Scottish Football Monitor .
Following my post of 26/05/24
https://www.irishnews.com/sport/soccer/scottish-premiership-clubs-vote-to-phase-out-artificial-pitches-within-two-years-HWB22HAOEBMPNNTWZMZLWRKWB4/
I take full credit , of course .
goforpar
31 May 2024 at 16:28
‘…The claim for compensation seems to be a farfetched idea, or, is it a stab at building the transfer fund budget.’
+++++++++
My thoughts exactly, goforpar!
Was Bisgrove in breach of contract?
If so, then he would surely be the one from whom ‘compensation’ should be sought- (in a civil court in Scotland, if need be, as a straightforward ‘breach of contract’ case.)
Was he ‘poached’ by the Saudis, without Bisgrove telling RIFC plc that he was having private discussions?
In that case, RIFC plc could quite legitimately pursue a claim against the Saudis in CAS.
RIFC plc could be on a double winner here!
But I rather think that a sensible little understanding will be reached between RIFC plc and their former CEO and/or between RIFC plc and the Saudis.
Just been re-reading https://scottishfsa.org/chairmans-blog-31-05-24/
Lots of sensible truth-telling there, and justifiable criticism of the SPFL and of the SFA.
It really is time for the creation of a statutory independent body to keep football clubs under some kind of control.
Such a body would prevent the kind of situation where a sports governance body can allow a new football club admitted into Scottish professional football in 2012 to claim to have been founded in 1872!
Honest to God!
[ I am up to date in my viewing of ‘Rebus’: dirty, mucky business by hired underlings by the respectable ‘suits’. Great fun….]
https://x.com/alba_bazW/status/1516504854037991430
Seems like they all knew what the refusal of a CVA meant for the CLUB
Back in 2012 .
This from no other than the guy who does the commentary on the official rangers TV channel .
Sevco 2012 could indeed be going for 55 but it will take a minimum of 54 years to get there
I don’t want another Scottish professional football club to die the death that RFC plc of 1872 foundation died in 2012 (as fan of football’s post 3 June 2024 at 12:57 reminds us of!).
ICT is not a plc so its Annual Report/ Accounts to Companies House are not required to be as extensive and detailed as those of a plc.
And, in any case, I am no accountant!
However, looking at ‘The Notes to the Financial Statements for year ended 31 May 2022 (the most recent one to be found on the CH website) I read this (on page 3):
“……the exciting classification of the Caledonian Stadium within the Inverness Tax Site section of the new Green Freeport……having huge potential for the development of our site”
The question that instantly comes to mind is: development as what? a football ground?
Or, being sold to developers for a good few bob, as a site for speculative development of new business entities and what-not?
Does the SFM have any ICT supporter who can let us have some info?
Or would Big Pink be able to get some guy who knows about that kind of thing to do a wee podcast, maybe, to explain the ‘Green Freeport’ concept and why the ICT Board are excited about it?
If I were an ICT supporter, I would be a wee bit worried about seeking a CVA unless I knew that the creditors would agree to accept less than full repayment, to let the club stay alive.
How difficult would it be to have the SMSM d away with the following terms:
Jetting, jetted in, etc isn’t flying suffiicient
starlet in reference to a young player, could it be prospect ( which in fact they are), newcomer,
servant — as in reference to player at a club, is it not a little demeaning to refer to someone in this day and age as a servant, you don’t see that reference used to people in the normal work day world. And they are quite well paid for a “servant”.
Going tonto — not sure hw well this would be received in countires with large indigenous populations
Coded or cryptic messages — I believe if someone is delivering a message of intent it is neither coded or cryptic. You have to take into consideration a number of the people using these terms still have difficulty in coming to terms with liquidation, starting over in a lower division, etc.
Yesterday, Lord Harrower delivered this judgment on Imran Ahmad’s damages claim:
“Disposal
[40] I shall grant decree for payment to the pursuer by the Lord Advocate of the sum
of £516,755.61, with interest to run at the judicial rate from 15 March 2024 until payment.
Except insofar as expenses have already been dealt with, and with the specific exception of
the expenses occasioned by the by order hearing of 27 March 2024, in respect of which the
court has not yet heard from parties, and which are therefore reserved, I shall find the Lord
Advocate liable to the pursuer in the expenses of process subject to a restriction of 50%.
For the avoidance of doubt, I shall refuse the Lord Advocate’s motion for expenses.”
Well, there you are!
It’s a shocking thing that the ineptitude (?) of our Lord Advocate/Crown Prosecution Service/Police Scotland investigators should have cost us taxpayers such vast amounts of money!
And when I say ‘ineptitude’ I think of the angry judge who almost apoplectically asked the Advocate-Depute ‘what indictment am I dealing with’, because the prosecution made such a fu.k of their case that he had no idea of who was being charged with what!
The innocent men that we as taxpayers have made rich by the ‘malicious’ fuc’ed up prosecutions against them have my congratulations.
Well done, the lot of you!
May you enjoy your millions or hundreds of thousands or whatever.
‘The Scotsman’ (Anthony Brown, reporter) reported this morning that ICT “have decided to remain training at Fort George for the foreseeable future” and that the Board consider that “it is also prudent to approach to approach a suitably qualified insolvency practitioner to advise on how we may proceed should our efforts to find new investment fall short”
In my post of 3 June at 22.49 I referred to “……the exciting classification of the Caledonian Stadium within the Inverness Tax Site section of the new Green Freeport……having huge potential for the development of our site.”
I did so without knowing whether the club owned their ground.
I have since learned that ICT as a company does not in fact own their ground but that it is held on long lease from the Council.
I presume that it is the company that is the leaseholder and not some individual/group of individuals who sub-lease it to the club?
Naturally, I have no idea as to the terms of the lease.
Is the lease-holder free to sub-lease the land for any commercial purpose? Free to demolish football-related buildings and structures and in their place rebuild retail units and such like for such sub-leases at greater commercial revenues than could ever be got from operating a smallish (in terms of football related revenue) football club?
Experience in recent years has taught football supporters in general, and perhaps the supporters of one particular club, that their clubs can be money-making opportunities for folk not particularly
interested in anything other than making money, and two-fingers to supporters!
England has understood the need for some kind regulation of ‘football’ as a business.
But what do I know?
And just afore I hit the hay, let me say that tomorrow, allowing for weekends and bank holidays, is the tenth working day since the email of 22 May from Companies House that assured me of a reply within ten working days of my email to them on 21 May.
Am I agog with excitement?
Not really.
I expect a ‘nothing to see here’ response.
Afterall, given that even BBC Scotland could bend the knee and capitulate to the happily now defunct BBC Trust and buy into what they KNEW to be an untruth, what hope that Companies House [which explicitly declares that it does not check the truth of what companies tell them] will actually respond with any measure of truth?
Very little hope, indeed.
But who knows?
I mean it would take a brave person to assert that the holding company of company SC425159 is the holding company of SC 004276!
John Clark
5th June 23:38
It is indeed scandalous regards the amount of taxpayers money that has been lost to the whole saga of the death of ragers 1872 .
IMO none of the real peepil responsible for the debacle have ever been held accountable for their part in it all, then again maybe that was their idea all along
I had a right good laugh this morning when I looked at the special, self-advertising front page of “The Scotsman”.
It appears that the paper is to have a new tagline under its title. The tagline is ” dare to be honest’, lifted from a letter by poet (and would-be gunrunner to the French revolutionists) Rabbie Burns in which he writes to his boss in the Excise service ” I dare to be honest…”
The paper says
” Today our journalists make a promise
we dare to be honest
In a world of deceit, hypocrisy and sensationalism it’s time to
ask yourself this question- do you want the truth?”
—-
Yes, Mr Editor: and you can begin, please, with your truthful, detailed explanation as to how exactly RIFC plc got (and gets) away with claiming to be the holding company of company number SC 004276 when in fact it is the holding company of company number SC 425159.
Then you may speak of being daring and honest and we might perhaps believe you.
Maybe they could bring Jim Spence into their sports dept .
“Today our journalists make a promise
we dare to be honest”
Would it be right to ask if these are not new journalists, what have they been doing previously if not been honest.
Do we reckon that any “marquee” signings are to be made in Scottish football this summer ? Who is big enough – Shankland ? Kellerher ? Neither excite me, probably be on the bench at Firhill .
“Don’t mention the war!”, Basil Fawlty would cry in “Fawlty Towers”.
I was reminded of that panicky shout this afternoon, listening to Sportsound’s discussion on the problems of ICT.
Someone must have shouted ‘Don’t mention Rangers of 1872!!”
It was as though everyone was mortally terrified to mention ‘Rangers’, when discussing what ‘Administration’ might mean for ICT if it goes into Administration (there was some mention that Administrators will be appointed on Wednesday of next week?) and the Administrators fail to find an outright buyer and then fail to achieve a CVA, and ICT enter Liquidation, and lose their membership of the SFA and are Liquidated.
Would someone step forward to buy ‘the business and assets’ dirt cheap, on a nod from the SPFL/SFA that any new football club set up as ‘The ICT’ will readily be admitted into a league and into membership of the SFA?
The precedent has been set by the faithless, cowardly, venal bodies who ‘govern” Scottish football in their readiness to create and propagate the biggest and perhaps legally unsound lie in Scottish Football!
Just mentioning, like.
The response promised by Companies House ‘within 10 days’ (my post of 6th June at 23.52 refers) has not materialised.
They said “Your enquiry has been forwarded to the relevant department for a response. You should receive a further response from us within the next 10 working days.”
I have not received the promised reply.
At the very least, that’s a failure to meet a departmental ‘target’
But perhaps it’s an indication that CH has a problem? At their Scottish end? [ to which they referred my question]
Given that BBC Scotland obeyed the ridiculous order by the BBC Trust to propagate the untruth that it was some owning company that was liquidated while the football club that held the share in the SPL lived on, it would not be surprising if CH [edinburgh] were inclined to be equally acquiescent and too fearful to face facts and tell the truth that RIFC plc is not the holding company of RFC of 1872/RFC 2012 plc(in liquidation)
And try to dodge the question by simply ignoring those who raise the question, knowing that there is not an MP or MSP of whatever party brave enough to challenge the assertion that TRFC is not, and could not possibly be, RFC of 1872.
I could shake hands on that.
[Aye, Rab and the Scotsman? Dare to tell the truth?
My a.se!]
Alan Hansen unwell.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cn00k4gkpz3o
Very worrying. I hope the lack of info is not a bad omen.
JC may want a word with ” the brilliant investigative reporters at Times Sport, the best in the business?”
Available free until midnight .
https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/man-city-sportswashing-premier-league-legal-football-q88wc7dbw
What’s the betting (Pun definitely intended) some Clumpany objects to the SPFL’s new sponsorship deal with William Hill (replacing Cinch) due to an exclusivity clause in the shirt sponsorship by an online betting firm.
Will certainly be interesting to see if the shambles is repeated. You’d like to think not, but it is RFC/SPL🙄
Scottish football and politics .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ceddenl8xz4o
paddy malarkey
10 June 2024 at 10:00
‘…Scottish football and politics .’
++++++++
I read just recently the remark attributed to Winston Churchill to the effect that “In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies.”
We are savvy enough to understand that guys and gals who want to be elected to Parliament on what they believe to be ‘truth’ take comfort from that remark by Churchill and may feel quite comfortable when they lie in the name of Truth (understood in their minds as being their right to be elected!)
We ought not extend the same understanding to the SFA or SPFL.
It is absolutely unacceptable that the governance bodies of a sport (a sport! not a wartime, life-and-death matter!) should act like politicians and feel free to forget their governance duties to truth and sporting truth by propagating the ridiculous untruth that TRFC is RFC of 1872!
If only those Scottish journalists who are pissing their pants/ wetting their knickers over the ‘Red Card’ referee (oops, sorry, I coughed up some phlegm there!) would see the absurdity and utter inconsistency of their approach to ‘journalism’.
A politician is investigated.
Meanwhile a lying sports governance body is bolstered in its lie!
God Almighty, who are less trustworthy?
The ‘politician’ or the ‘journalists’?
The players fight back .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cd11dvkd4veo
https://x.com/jbluvsceltic/status/1801325097330085918?s=48&t=MARmwmYID5aFYmfMaTVRKw
Looks like the liquidation of ragers 1872 is finally about to come to an end ,eleven and a half years and hundreds of unpaid creditors later .
Lest we forget
I’m looking forward to seeing how the finalisation of the liquidation is reported, fan of football. How will they avoid mentioning the club when the thing being liquidated includes the ‘Club’ in it’s name?!?!
On a similar note, having watched Inverness Caley back when they stepped up to senior level, I have no desire to see them go bust and I hope that investment or administration is as far as their current troubles go, but if liquidation of ICT were to occur, it might be ‘worth it’ just to see how the MSM and our footballing authorities differentiate that from original Rangers’ liquidation when it would presumably look exactly like what happened to original Rangers. The linguistic gymnastics would be something to behold, I imagine.
That will be very interesting indeed
Will they destroy their journalistic reputations even further or will they just ignore the story altogether .
Ah decisions decisions
nawlite
14 June 2024 at 11:44
‘…to see how the MSM and our footballing authorities differentiate that from original Rangers’ liquidation when it would presumably look exactly like what happened to original Rangers. The linguistic gymnastics would be something to behold, I imagine.’
fan of football
14 June 2024 at 12:04
‘…will they just ignore the story altogether…’
++++++
A reminder of some of the rubbish that was written in 2012
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-18418513
That passage of rubbish came out from Pacific Quay a year before the BBC Trust had ordered the BBC to distinguish between ‘Company’ and ‘ Football Club’
I am glad that BDO did such a brilliant job as Insolvency Practitioners, and did not in any way buy into any such absurd notion.
I sincerely hope that ICT can get out of Administration like Hearts and other clubs have done and thus avoid Liquidation.
I thought the double jeopardy thing applied if you made a genuine attempt to play the ball, but gave away a penalty? Was Porteous just too dangerous?
I meant to incorporate in my post at 18.10 today this link:
https://scotslawthoughts.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/rangers-fc-plc-interim-report-by-duff-phelps-10-july.pdf
Para 5.16 has this:
“5.16 In the event that a CVA was not possible, prospective purchasers wished to understand how the
Club‟s Member Share transferred from the Company to a new corporate entity. This transfer
would be required to enable any newly incorporated company to participate in the SPL league.
Prospective purchasers also wished to understand whether there were any implications with the
SFA and its registration requirements. The Joint Administrators wrote to the SPL and SFA on a
confidential basis in order to understand the processes, any limitations and the criteria which
would be applied. Following responses received from both of these parties, all prospective
purchasers were advised to contact the SPL and SFA for guidance. A number of the parties
spent some time with the Scottish football authorities, other bidders made no contact whatsoever”
They all twigged that RFC of 1872 was no more, and that what they would be buying (dirt cheap) was not Rangers of 1872, a football team with a 140 year history of tremendous success, but a stadium, a training ground, and those players and staff of the defunct RFC of 1872 who chose to sign a contract with the purchaser if a league could be found to allow the purchaser to apply successfully for membership thereof and thereafter gain admission into SFA membership.
The whole bloody nonsense that it was the company that died while the club lived on can be understood, and to a degree, with sympathy, as a fans’ clinging to straws.
But as being a lie created/endorsed by Scottish Football ‘governance’ it must be declared as such.
We simply cannot have lying governance sports bodies.
No point!
May as well authorise performance-enhancing drugs in athletics or allow heavyweights to win belts in competition with flyweights or abandon the notion of handicapping in horse-racing!
Of greater importance: we simply cannot allow the BBC (the print press is thirled to money anyway and will bow and scrape as necessary..) to continue to support and propagate the lie that TRFC is entitled to claim to be RFC of 1872 (now under the name of RFC 2012 plc (in Liquidation) awaiting dissolution in a few weeks’ time.
I am reminded of Trigger’s brush, in ‘Only Fools and Horses’- commended for using the same brush for 18 years, (with eight handle and 10 brush head changes! or some such!) Sentiment is understandable.
Buy lying is not at all acceptable.
Has Keith Jackson developed a new “bromance” with his infatuation with Billy Gilmour. Is this shades of Craig White. His constant championing for Gilmour to be in the Scottish team is a little much. Gilmour might be good but he was never going to stop the Germans yesterday. It never looked more than a training exercise for them and sets them on a good path for the balance of the tournament Scotalnd needs to take a long hard look at their development plans for young players, coaching, diet, personal training, etc. The team yesterday looked out on their feet after 10 — 15 minutes. Meanwhile the biggest story re scottish football garners nary a mention. Thankfully some bloggers have invested time and effort to reveal the final BDO report on liquidated Rangers.
Back to my post of 14 June at 18.10
Remember Mr Miller, a bidder for RFC of 1872 (in Administration’)?
I have had a re-read of what Douglas Fraser of the BBC wrote on 8 May 2012:
“Mr Pritchitt, chief executive of Club 9 Sports, which itself was previously interested in bidding said, tells us that, from Mr Miller’s point of view: “It would take a fairly large amount of money to keep it from dying”. And was it worth his children’s inheritance?” Er, no.
see the full thing on this link
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-17999964
And in NO WAY was CG’s paltry bid able to pay what was necessary to be able to come (honourably, as other clubs have done) out of Administration and stay in existence as a football club.
No, RFC of 1872 was NOT kept from dying.
Bad men in Football Governance bodies manufactured the absurd lie (with the tacit consent of any ‘independent’ board members of clubs represented on the boards of those governance bodies) that CG had bought RFC of 1872 and had therefore brought it out of Administration by paying the debts that had caused it to become insolvent!
He did not.
He bought valuable land and property dirt cheap!
And the sooner that Scottish Football acknowledges that fact, the better for the game.
(unconnectedly, can I say that while I have seen an occasional pass-back to the keeper being intercepted by the opposition, I’ve never seen a throw-in to the keeper being intercepted so wonderfully well as that of the one that let Albania score!)
Well, perhaps to compensate for the stupid nonsense of ‘Engeland’ supporters making ar.es. of themselves singing ‘ 10 German bombers’, Classic FM radio played half an hour ago Haydn’s string quartet no. 3, which has the tune of the German national anthem, which has the words “Deutschland, Deutschland uber alles.’
I love these little serendipities!
Engeland’s performance tonight was pretty poor, and in my opinion, suggests that if they meet Germany at any stage, they will be gubbed!
“Rangers fans are opposed to the newco option, believing it would rob the club of its tradition. But here’s what the club’s manager Ally McCoist had to say on it, as per the Daily Mail:
‘If it happened, we would still have the history of the club, absolutely. I have done a bit of homework on it and newcos have happened at clubs like Plymouth and Crystal Palace.
I can imagine people would try to wind up supporters about it—that’s part and parcel of the game. But, make no mistake, we wouldn’t lose our history at all. We wouldn’t allow that to happen.
If there is a team playing at Ibrox in blue shirts, it’s Rangers. I think I’m right in saying we only became a plc in 1899, which was 27 years after we were formed. Nobody really recognizes that change, but there have been changes all the way down the years.
Rangers are Rangers and that would be the opinion of the vast majority of people’
—
thus spoke Coisty, OBE.!
Long time ago.
He was, it seems, not aware of the fact that it was Rangers Football Club of 1872, name changed to Rangers Football Club plc, that was the shareholder in the SPL which had to surrender its share and thereby ceased to be a member of a ‘recognised league’ and thereby lost its membership of the SFA.
There was no ‘holding company’ that held the share!
As a football club Rangers of 1872 ceased to exist, legally.
And a lot of people suffered on that account, while those responsible- what can one say about them?
Who said a bad word? Was it ‘basterts’?
Naw.
The ‘bastert’ word has to be reserved for the SMSM who sold their souls to a lie.
Well, that was nip and tuck tonight.
What a transformation in terms of team effort and spirit! And if we had won, the win would have been deserved.
In my opinion.
It was an enjoyable watch, and well done to the lads.
Building materials delayed from Asia disrupting games to be played at Ibrox for the start of the season, really?
I will wait to here if there is more to this story as they have a poor past record on putting out the truth.
If, and this is a big if, asbestos is uncovered at Ibrox, and, if I was a lawyer I would be running ads for those who have been seated in the affected stand over the years. A nice class action lawsuit, or whatever is permitted under Scottish law, woud make things interesting. If asbestos is discovered and it hs been shown to be disturbed over the years, although a longshot in terms of compensation, it would casue squeaking bum time in the blue room, especially with the luck they have enjoyed in previous lawsuits. If they have to paly games away from Ibrox where is the rental fee coming from, would opposition teams be in their right to claim compensation for travel and lodgings, would fans be accorded the same option, or, would there have to be a reduction on season ticket purchases if the suspected asbestos issues becomes a long term problem. One last thought, what if the board of directors knew of this problme in the past and neglected to report it. Lawyers have to be to licking their chops at the potential income. Also, it could put to bed, although not in good way, the constant harping of the Ibrox loyal over the abuse at Celtic Boys Club.
valentinesclown
21 June 2024 at 11:48
“I will wait to here if there is more to this story as they have a poor past record on putting out the truth”
+++++++++
From the ‘Sun’, online yesterday afternoon:
“Outgoing chief executive James Bisgrove has timed his departure nicely, while SunSport understands the project manager has already been fired”
Is the ‘Sun’ suggesting that Bisgrove saw himself all right in getting off his mark at very short notice while the ‘project manager’ got the sack?
Whatever, all we wait for now is a pompous, belligerent RIFC plc jaw-thrust-out statement that RIFC plc will be raising an action in the Court of Session for alleged breach of contract by those suppliers ‘in Asia’ whose alleged failure to deliver has caused them a problem and potential loss of revenue.
I like going in to Parliament House to hear such cases.
I confess I’m coming new to this story, but I have read that Hampden Park is a no-no because the pitch will be being re-laid, and that Murrayfield is also not likely to be available, and that, ” surprise, surprise”
the SFA and SPFL are ready to do what needs to be done in terms of changing things so that TRFC’s early season home games will all be away matches at the grounds of their opponents.
I can see Monsieur Clement getting his excuses ready!
Surely the answer to TRFC’s problems with using Ibrox Stadium at the start of the season is for them to cede home advantage for the games that can’t be played ? Other clubs shouldn’t be inconvenienced ,
‘If, and this is a big if, asbestos is uncovered at Ibrox…’
Having followed these ‘rumours’ for years goforpar, I’m not so sure if it is a ‘big if’ – more a distinct probability…
As you’ll know, such rumours have abounded season after season about the presence of asbestos, and when pro Sevco PR machines (including the Scottish mainstream media) feed the consumer tripe like ‘improvements to the Copeland Road Stand’, you know something more serious is amiss.
Jist ma apinyin ye ken.
I think you’re spot on with your speculation that the board of directors might have known of this problem in the past and neglected to report it’. I’d also love to know what materials are on their way from Asia!
bect67
22 June 2024 at 20:47
‘… I’d also love to know what materials are on their way from Asia!’
++++++++++
I’ve seen one report that
‘A delayed shipment of steel for a new cantilever section being built as part of an overhaul of the club’s facilities for disabled fans is to blame.’
Anyone out there able to say whether a planning application for such work was
a) required to be made
b) and was granted
c) and say where exactly in the stadium the new cantilever section is situated relative to the existing structures that may/may not have an asbestos problem.
(Despite earning my first, treasured, wage as a casual labourer on a sewage building site near Kirkintilloch away back when, I have no idea what a ‘cantilever section’ means!)
Seriously, though, it would be unthinkable that even RIFC plc would get away with trying to hide the fact that there could be a danger of asbestos inhalation by workers on any improvement scheme they undertook!
Buggering about in matters of sporting truth is one thing.
Buggering about in matters of life-threatening significance is quite another.
But who is going to ask questions?
Not the SMSM, for sure!
Anent my post of 22 June at 23.59, I have since been referred to this link to the Glasgow Council planning department and the application by Rangers Football Club made on 17 April 2024
https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/files/E7EE6A1545900F0B3A53B9B4592B5107/pdf/24_01095_PLU-COVERING_LETTER-6096215.pdf
Apparently, it was agreed between the Council and the Agent for the ‘applicant'[ ‘Rangers Football Club’] that the work involved was such as NOT to require Planning consent, merely a Certificate of Lawfulness.
It is the creation of up to 30 wheelchair spaces under cover while making up for the otherwise loss of the seats that will be lost in existing rows where the cantilevered platform will be built.
All seemingly above board.
But have I missed something?
I seem to remember big talk about increasing total capacity in order to close the gap between Ibrox and Celtic Park, with newspaper talk of increasing capacity to 55,000.
A few more wheelchair spaces is hardly likely to do that (although, of course, it is a commendable thing to do) and is unlikely to require expenditure of ‘multi-millions’.
That suggests to me that the cantilever arrangement might be extensive enough to increase capacity almost to the extent of an additional floor capable of bearing a considerable number of additional seats.
But what do I know?
Have a read at the planning bumph.
Genuinely it’s all very educational.
In an idle moment, I went to AI with a question: the machine came back with this
“Yes, Company number SC425159 corresponds to the same football club as Company number SC004276. Both are associated with Rangers Football Club, but they represent different periods in the club’s history:
SC004276 (RFC 2012 P.L.C.): This company was previously known as “The Rangers Football Club P.L.C.” and has a rich history dating back to 1899. It is currently in liquidation and was active until July 2012.
SC425159 (The Rangers Football Club Limited): This company, previously known as “Sevco Scotland Limited,” was incorporated in 2012 and remains active. Its registered office is at Ibrox Stadium in Glasgow34.
In summary, both company numbers are associated with Rangers Football Club, but they represent different eras and legal entities. 🏴⚽
—
Indeed, they do!
And every lying SMSM /BBC Scotland ‘journalist’ knows that to be the case.
But fearfully persist in propagating the lie that Rangers of 1872 is not as dead and defunct as my grandfathers.
That we should have such lying journalists is regrettable.
In a matter of sport!
God knows what they would be like in reporting dangerous political matters!
How I despise them!
More than I despise the Boards of the then SPL and SFL.
What miserable wretches they were, bereft of any notion of sporting principle, in allowing a monumental untruth to be accepted, for filthy lucre’s sake.
If I may, let me refer to my post of 22 May 2024 at 00:02.
Companies House has not yet responded with ANY kind of answer to my query about whether everything is quite tickety-boo about RIFC plc’s IPO Prospectus, given that RIFC plc is the holding company of Company Number SC 425159 and NOT of company number SC 004276 ( the company number of Rangers football Club of 1872).
Companies House ( Cardiff) referred my query to the Scotland end of the Registrar of Companies set-up. Far be it from me to draw any conclusions about the efficiency of the Scottish end of Companies House in answering my query
or to raise any question about their reluctance to reply to a straightforward question from a member of the public.
Honest to God!
We have seen very recently political chancers apparently using inside information from government about the date of the general election to make a good few bob from the bookies.!
And we have seen the ‘Press’ get right into that.
But in the matter of the lie that TRFC is RFC of 1872?
What we get is lying propagation of an untruth!
And no response at all from Companies House (Edinburgh branch)!
Tells its own story, I reckon, about Scottish ‘journalism’ and ‘journalists’.
Basically, jobsworths, and a far cry from the heroic Watergate guys and the Malta journalist.
How they live with themselves is a mystery.
In my opinion.
[and how good it was to see Georgia win tonight! I enjoyed the game.]
So (as apparently you begin discourse nowadays}, do we think that the (re)signing of Liam Kelly by TRFC might be the last bit of linkage to the dead club ?
bect67
22 June 2024 at 20:47
‘…If, and this is a big if, asbestos is uncovered at Ibrox…’.’
+++++++++++++
Mmm!
I am suddenly prompted to ask:
Is it, could it possibly be, the case that Whitehouse and Clark in the role of Administrators would have had to have had comprehensive access to information about the stadium, information that they would have been obliged to share with prospective buyers, and which might explain the otherwise ridiculously low price they sold it for to CG?
The RFC of 1872 accounts say, innocently enough, in Murray’s time that the club’s ‘tangible assets’ (stadium, Murray Park, Edmiston House and what-not) were valued at over £100 million?
But, of course, if there was an asbestos problem that had, or might have had to be dealt with at great expense, those tangible assets would not be worth anything like that sum.
Mind you, neither Whitehouse nor Clark used ‘asbestos’ as an excuse for undervaluing the tangible assets.
Maybe they knew nothing of the rumours..
Only those multi-millionaires can tell us!
I, of course, hope that no one employed at Ibrox is, or has been, working in any kind of danger from asbestos dust inhalation and that the rumours are just rumours with no basis in fact.
[At one time my official duties involved some degree of involvement with those involved in helping asbestosis sufferers]
paddy malarkey
27 June 2024 at 23:12
‘..So (as apparently you begin discourse nowadays}..)
++++++++
Aye, paddy.
Every feckin ‘expert’ has to be begin his/her/their response with a conclusive ‘So’!
It annoys the bloody hell out of me, the pretentious academic speaking as if he/she/they was/were Solomon/Solomona/It.
Honest to God, what are they like!
Abusers of language is what!
I smile .
John Clark. 28June at 00.01
‘…If, and this is a big if, asbestos is uncovered at Ibrox…’
John, I was responding to goforpar, who stated the above (my comments are below his), so the quote, in the interests of accuracy should be attributed to him.
My own intuition (based on the fact that these rumours have been around for years), is that there is (literally) something rotten in the state of Govania – in all likelihood asbestos – and that the club’s Board/SMSM are trying to avoid the ‘inconvenient truth’ for as long as they can.
.. AND they had the cheek to complain about the state of Dundee’s pitch!
This is much more than an upgrade to the Copland Road Stand. Whit a shambles!
Keith Wyness has given an interesting, and enlightening, take on ‘Asbestosgate’ (Football Insider – You Tube), which is well worth a watch.
Finally, when will shipment of materials arrive from Asia I wonder, and how long will the delay be in getting matches played again at Ebrokes?
.
bect67
28 June 2024 at 10:54
‘…John, I was responding to goforpar, who stated the above (my comments are below his), so the quote, in the interests of accuracy should be attributed to him.’
+++++++++
bect67, thanks for the correction, and my apologies to goforpar!
And I notice that the DR on-line has picked up Wyness’ observations!
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/rangers-skewered-over-ibrox-fiasco-33127280
Not for the first time I will say that the PR folk at Ibrox are really useless at preventing the Board from making a.ses of themselves in their attempts to hide unpleasant truths that will sooner or later emerge one way or another into the light of day.
I do sincerely hope that there is no danger to the health and well-being of any employee at Ibrox stadium especially those who work indoors daily. I hope they are mindful of their own health and are making note of any reassuring messages they are being given by the Board.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cj7dk73p441o
Re the above article from the BBC, I’m a little confused about some of the reported transactions. Obviously FSR is a good thing and it’s interesting to see clubs being forced to reduce/offset their debts by selling players to generate income. The part I don’t get is where the article seems to suggest there’s something underhand about some of the deals, which look like swaps to all intents and purpose. How can it help a club’s FSR position if a deal simply means they effectively spend and receive the same amount resulting in a net zero transaction. Can anyone clarify/explain at all?
I was thinking how ironic it would be if the delayed Ibrox-bound steel had been ordered from Murray International Metals, considering the principal role Sir David Murray played in the death of the original Rangers.
I’ve since read though that the international steel arm of the Murray family’s metal business, latterly run by Sir David’s sons, was sold in December 2023 to the company’s management, with the Murrays concentrating on the UK steel market, making any link between the delayed Asian steel and the Murrays less likely, if not impossible.
There would have been some kind of poetic justice if my initial hopes had been realised, but I fear I’ve not got a leg to stand on.
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/23649254.murray-family-sells-international-steel-business/
Highlander
28 June 2024 at 20:54
‘…making any link between the delayed Asian steel and the Murrays less likely, if not impossible.’
++++++++++
Well, I wouldn’t be too sure about that, Highlander.
Although the planning application for the ‘cantilevered’ wheelchair-area’ was made in April, the decision to make that improvement would have been taken some time before then, and possibly at a time before the Board knew that Teresa Chong would be the new owner of the Asian bit, as the Murrays baled out.
But seriously, I can’t believe that the problem at Ibrox is related to a few seat-arrangement alterations to increase wheelchair access!
However, there does not appear to have been any other planning application for more significant, bigger- scale construction work that is being held up by delay in delivery of Asian steel?
I mean, it’s easy enough to shut down a section of a stand while leaving the greater part of it open to spectators.
Why would the whole stadium have to be closed down?
Is anyone in the SMSM asking serious questions?
Are they listening to the dribbling nonsense of Doncaster and patting him on the back for his warm reminiscences and his ready understanding of TRFC’s predicament?
Of course they are.
They have supported the most ridiculous untruth in sporting history.
They’re not going to change now!
The fact there is basically silence from the Rangers Board, and from the media, is very telling in my view. Disregarding all rumours (because that’s all they are right now), of asbestos or subsidence, Rangers are still going to take quite a financial hit over this fiasco. It is not the responsibility of the SPFL, the SFA, or any other club to minimise the hit for them. In my opinion they should simply be told that the fixtures have been issued, so find somewhere to play. However, intimidation and fear will play a part, both from the SPFL, and other clubs. The media will swing into action on their behalf whenever instructed.
Just to say that having been referred to this link
https://www.ibroxnews.com/2023/12/05/chris-jack-issues-rangers-financial-stance-amid-ibrox-renovation-news/
which relates to info provided last December to TRFC fans I now have a clearer understanding of the seriousness of the failure of delivery of Asian steel!
I have since read further stuff from the newspapers I don’t normally read, about the major plans for refurbishment and enhancement, including the (pious aspiration?) that capacity might be increased to 70,000!
I felt in my waters that there was more to it than a mere increase in wheelchair places!
This link is also of some interest:
https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/13024490/rangers-stadium-ibrox-work-unique-drone-footage/
No wonder Bisgrove got off his mark! As CEO he should have been sitting right on top of such an ambitious project! And very clearly, he seems not to have done so.
Honest to God!
The loyal support of TRFC (founded in 2012) is being as royally shafted by the incompetence of the board of RIFC plc (incorporated in 2012) as the fans of dear old Rangers of 1872 were shafted by, first, David Murray and then by CW in 2012 the actions/inactions of both of whom caused the death by Liquidation of that Rangers Football Club of my grandfathers’ days.
I note that the final report by BDO, the Liquidators of Rangers football Club plc (company number SC 004276) issued on 7 June 2024 has this little paragraph:
“We have attended to all statutory requirements throughout the course of the liquidation to date.
The Joint Liquidators have paid all dividends due to creditors and completed the consignment of any
unclaimed dividends.
As the affairs of the Company are fully wound up, a Notice of Final Account has been posted to the
creditor portal web site with this report in accordance with terms of Rule 5.33(2) of the Rules.
Following 28 days from the delivery of this report, the Joint Liquidators will lodge a copy of this
report together with a notice under section 146(4)(b) of the Act with the Accountant in Bankruptcy,
the Registrar of Companies, the Court and the Accountant of Court. The Joint Liquidators will vacate
office on the filing of the section 146(4)(b) notice.
If no creditors have objected to the Joint Liquidators’ release within the 28 day period from delivery
of this report, the Joint Liquidators obtains their release in terms of Section 174(4)(d)(ii) on the day
they vacate office. If any creditors object to the Joint Liquidators release an application will be
made to the Accountant of Court for to seek the Joint Liquidators release under Rule 5.32”
Assuming the 28-day period means 28 working days the 17th of August or thenabouts will be the effective date of the complete death of the Rangers Football Club of the four young men.
Just to say I posted at 23.35, and my post is in ‘moderation.’
I’ve carefully read it again, can’t see any cause, except perhaps the word ‘foxer’?
I am intrigued!
John
Think it was something to do with the links.
Often unpredictable but now sorted
J
upthehoops
29 June 2024 at 22:48
‘… Rangers are still going to take quite a financial hit over this fiasco. It is not the responsibility of the SPFL, the SFA, or any other club to minimise the hit for them.’
++++++++++
I agree.
But, of course, the track record of our football governance bodies shows clearly enough that a ‘Rangers’ is a protected species!
As a matter of course, every bloody effort will be made to help TRFC ( remember the previously unheard of ‘conditional membership’ of ‘Club 12’?
I smile to myself.
Rotten to the core.
Caveat here that this all educated guesswork based on my limited knowledge of construction management gained in first year of a Civil Engineering degree forty years ago (I specialised in water engineering thereafter). So if my knowledge is either out of date or half or mis-remembered, and if consequently my inferences are wildly out of step, I am happy to be corrected.
In construction projects, a time-line is usually put together with logistics such as availability of labour and materials, access to the site etc (storage of materials would be one) factored in.
A “just in time” approach may have been adopted to have preparatory work done just in time for bulky materials to arrive as they were required, avoiding storage difficulties (and costs).
That much is fair, but the risk factors associated with any deviation from that time-line would have to added to the equation, and it is clear that those risk factors (the major one in this case that the football season HAS to start at a predetermined time) have either not been dealt with correctly (for which project manager would rightly be accountable), or there were risk factors that only became apparent when the initial preparatory work was being carried out.
Now of course we venture into guesswork. Did they discover or disturb asbestos or serious structural failure whilst carrying out that preparatory work? This may have made it impossible to undo that work so that at least part of the stadium could still be used.
Whatever the reason for the stadium closure, the closing of the whole thing implies that there is a health and safety issue of some kind that would affect spectators beyond the area that is currently being worked on. Perhaps asbestos, perhaps some major structural integrity breach (or maybe something else I haven’t thought of). Also worth saying that in this instance, had the TRFC board known about issues (some folk are talking about class actions), they’d never have opened up that can of worms for the sake of a few extra disabled section seats. Safe I think to say that they were unaware of how things would pan out.
On the face of it, with such a small project (not even requiring planning permission) you’d think they would just patch it back up to the original state and defer and reschedule the works commencement until the goods had arrived. The fact that the simple solution is not available suggests that there are more serious problems facing them. If so, and if the problems are as catastrophic as some are suggesting, one can hardly blame them for trying to manage the flow of information (from a PR perspective).
Whatever the case, this may be a serious crisis not just for TRFC, but for other clubs as financial consequentials feed through the system.
“The Sound of Silence” (Paul Simon)
Says it all for me – all they have to do is come out and state publicly, and categorically, that the scheduled work is NOT asbestos related.
In the absence of such a pronouncement …
Administrator
30 June 2024 at 11:17
‘…John
Think it was something to do with the links.
Often unpredictable but now sorted
++++++++
Thank you, Administrator: I’m glad it was just a technical glitch, and not something I wrote!
It may just be me!
I finally received on 29 June a reply from Companies House to my email to them on 21 May ( you can read what I said in that email in my post on 22 May at 00.02)
I have no idea how this reply even begins to relate to my query!
“From:
enquiries@companieshouse.gov.uk
To:
me Fri, 28 Jun at 13:43
Dear customer
Thank you for your email, received 21 May 2024. I apologise for the lengthy delay in replying to you.
I must advise that a company’s articles of association and directors’ duties, such as those requiring that they must act in accordance with the company’s constitution, are enforced as an action in private law by the company and/or its members. The Registrar has no power to intervene or to refer the matter to the Secretary of State for consideration.
You may therefore wish to seek independent, professional legal advice to try to find a solution.
I hope this is satisfactory for you and, again, I apologise for the length of time it has taken for us to respond to your query.
Kind regards
M C
Operational Case Manager ”
Am I missing something (other than a suspicion that CH is giving me the bum’s rush?)!!
I wonder who my new MP will be?
‘Kenny Miller reckons Rangers knew their stadium shambles was on the cards MONTHS ago – and asked the club why they’re only acting now….
“Just let the fans know. It doesn’t need to be statements every single day, but it directly affects them. It was looking like it was going to be Murrayfield for a while – I actually thought they’d arranged the Manchester United friendly with that in mind, because it was a strange thing.
“They already knew Ibrox wasn’t going to be available for that. They’ve had a fair idea for a while this might happen. So why has it not been organised until now? I can’t help but shake the feeling that this game was planned with this in mind.”
—-
Thus spoke not Zarathrusta but Kenny Miller, according to the ‘DR online’ report by Robbie Copeland as updated at 20.18 tonight.
It is brave of Kenny and he is to be commended for speaking out.
I’m sure there are many, many supporters of TRFC of 2012 who are wondering what the hell the Board of RIFC plc (of 2012 creation) are about!
Given that the DR actually reports what Miller has said, I suspect that even the DR is sensing that they might have to distance themselves from too readily endorsing the Board’s reference to ‘delays in delivery of steel from Asia’ as a reason for suspension of work on a relatively small-scale wheelchair-access improvement!
That there is a bigger problem than ‘late delivery of material’ might well be the case!
And if that problem is the discovery that there is/might be a danger of disturbed, broken, asbestos material any journalist/newspaper ought properly to be right in there looking for truth.
The supporters of Rangers Football Club of 1872 were ill-served by David Murray, and by Craig Whyte who caused the liquidation of that club.
It would seem that the supporters of TRFC of 2012 have been and are being as ill-served by the Board of RIFC plc (of 2012 incorporation).
Let’s hope that there is no damaged asbestos at Ibrox , and no cover up if there is.
And that no long-term employee at Ibrox has died from or is currently exposed to the risk of contracting mesothelioma or other asbestosis-related condition!
John Clark 04/07 00.21
I actually thought they’d arranged the Manchester United friendly with that in mind, because it was a strange thing.
“They already knew Ibrox wasn’t going to be available for that. They’ve had a fair idea for a while this might happen. So why has it not been organised until now? I can’t help but shake the feeling that this game was planned with this in mind.”
……………………………………………………………………………………………..
Kenny talking c*** as usual. Game was organised by Manchester United who are the “home club” John. They played Lyon at Murrayfield last year if memory serves me correct.
John Clark 4 July 2024 at 00:21
‘Let’s hope that there is no damaged asbestos at Ibrox , and no cover up if there is.
And that no long-term employee at Ibrox has died from or is currently exposed to the risk of contracting mesothelioma or other asbestosis-related condition!’
John, I’m sure you express the sentiments of all interested in the speculation. I certainly hope that’s the case (but with a degree of scepticism about its presence).
On a (hopefully) lighter, and certainly ironic note, with reference to the previous occupants if what has become known in some quarters as The Crumbling Dome, I remember back in the day, when supporters of the previous Govan entity (Rangers. 1872-2012) would regularly, and disparagingly, chant “Parkheids a Piggery” – in reference to the condition of Celtic Park compared to Ibrox (based, I think, on the fact that there had been one there – with not the most pleasant odour emanating from it!).
From Follow Follow:-
“When I was growing up it was always ‘Parkheid’ then I only remember the Piggery coming in when at the games we would chant “Parkheid’s a Piggery….”’
Sung in jest I’m sure – but a bit of karma noo wi’ regard tae the relative conditions of the stadiums!
20 March 2024
Rangers have announced they will play Manchester United in a pre-season friendly at Murrayfield this summer.
The match will take place on Saturday, 20 July in Edinburgh, and Rangers say it “may be the only opportunity to watch Rangers live in Scotland this pre-season”, due to planned works at Ibrox.
Gerry
4 July 2024 at 12:25
‘… 20 March 2024
Rangers have announced they will play Manchester United in a pre-season friendly at Murrayfield this summer.
and Rangers say it “may be the only opportunity to watch Rangers live in Scotland this pre-season”, due to planned works at Ibrox.’
+++++++
Looking again at the planning application for the work on the Copland Road stand, I am staggered at the fact that the application was received by Glasgow City Council only on 18 April and approved only on 25 June!
“Application Received Thu 18 Apr 2024
Application Validated Thu 25 Apr 2024
Address Ibrox Stadium 150 Edmiston Drive Glasgow G51 2XD
Proposal Re-configuration of seating within Copland Road stand at Ibrox Stadium.
Status Decided – The Use is Lawful
Decision The Use is Lawful
Decision Issued Date Tue 25 Jun 2024 ”
To me that shows either an appalling lack of managerial ‘nous’ or an unwarrantedly cavalier attitude to such mundane matters as getting planning permission!
Or did work start before the decision was issued?
I (almost!) feel vexed at that level of incompetence. If the Board was advising punters in March that the ground might not be available for the close season, why were they so late in getting their application in?
Albertz, I don’t know if you’re ‘in-the-know’ on ManU deciding on where they would play Rangers and are stating this as a fact, but for me – as a ‘not-in-the-know person – it seems a little odd if that were the case. I assume you won’t trust anything he writes, but ever since TRFC breached their agreed contract for the Australia tour to play second fiddle in what CFC fans referred to as Ange’s homecoming tour, Phil MacG has been adamant that TRFC agreed to play 3 future friendlies for no fee so as to pay them for that breach of contract because they could not afford a one-off payment. Perhaps it is the organising company who arranged for it to be played at Murrayfield?
Sad to hear of the passing of Rosemary Burns, the wife of the late Tommy Burns. Never met her but spent a little time talking with Tommy at Auchenhowie when he was working with Celtics youth teams. Lovely man who took time to come over for a chat despite knowing we were from the “other side”.
I will always remember the sadness, but also great respect shown by the Rangers officials when returning from the UEFA Cup Final in 2008, as they stopped at Celtic Park to lay a wreath and show their respects to a great rival.
RIP.
Albertz11
4 July 2024 at 17:12
‘…Sad to hear of the passing of Rosemary Burns,..’
+++++++++++
The unexpected, sudden death of Rosemary Burns reminds us all (and particularly really auld geezers like me!) that there are much more important things in all of our lives than sport in general and football in particular!)
The final whistle will blow for us all- and there will be no ‘VAR’ to appeal to for a review!
(It’s being so cheery that keeps me going!)
Decent of you to sympathetically acknowledge Rosemary’s death on this blog.
John Clark 04/07 22.06
Thank you John.
I still remember one of the many tributes from Rangers fans outside Celtic Park in 2008. It simply said “We lost a game, You lost much more, There’s more that unites us than divides us”.
There is much weeping and gnashing of teeth as the rumour mill churns out story (or non-story) about the construction project at Ibrox. A lot of the issues relates to the “poor” Ranger fan who might be affected by travel to games at Murrayfield. What about the other teams and fans who have to plan their trips to watch their club on the road. If either Murrayfield or Hampden emerge as the temporary home of TRFC how many seats will be allocated to the visiting fans. Is it possible UEFA may be voicing concern over the location and lack of information about the site for games in what is one of their premier competitions. Will the SFA ever sit down with the TRFC and impose a deadline so planning can move forward in regards to VAR, policing, etc. Will the temporary home site be looking for a sizeable deposit to apply to any damages to the stadium.
What would be the overall impact of refunding 8000 season tickets if only for a few games. Only if Mike Ashley had retained control when they were so close to breaking even many years ago. What are the total losses posted in the years since.
goforpar
4 July 2024 at 22:58
‘…What about the other teams and fans who have to plan their trips to watch their club on the road’
+++++++++++
That’s quite a good point, goforpar, in that it points up the fact that problems for TRFC take precedence over any other question.!
When the governance body of Scottish Football creates/endorses the absolute untruth that TRFC is Rangers of 1872 then what can we expect other than that other clubs are treated with disdain as being of no real significance.
Honest to God!
In what other ‘industry’ is there such a protected species?
I had a wee smile to myself at seeing this in the ‘rolls of court’ today on the Court of Session
‘Walling List’
“Petition: McGill’s Bus Service Limited for Judicial review of the lawfulness of the consultation by the Strathclyde Partnership for Transport in relation to the proposed “Strathclyde Regional Bus Strategy”
I was amused, but also curious.
I tried to read up about it and, briefly, found this ” It goes against every sense of natural justice and we would take this to every court in the land and beyond.”
Belligerent language used by the CEO of McGill’s buses.
And I was doubly amused.
That lovely wee litigious gene is in there in the McGill Buses board as it is in the RIFC plc board!
Oh, what fun!
[in the interests of truth, as far as I can make out, the Strathclyde Partnership for Transport is not a statutory body or even a company bound by ‘articles of association ‘ to act on the instructions of its shareholders, but a purely voluntary association of folk (including local government] interested in the business of provision of bus services.
I think McGill’s buses do have a case.
But that’s neither here nor there as far as the SFM blog is concerned]
—
Another penalty shoot-out, to separate two really, really good teams. Great game to watch.
And ‘Vive la France’! especially if they have to face Engeland!
There was mention of the Ibrox stadium problem on this afternoon’s ‘Sportsound’-slot programme ‘chaired’ by Liam MacLeod, with Tom English and Brian McLauchlin and I think one other.
They all commented on the lack of hard information from the RIFC plc Board, observing that it is a big story, and reflecting on the buggeration effect on other clubs, and remarking that it is interesting that Bisgrove got off his mark to Saudi Arabia given the (my words) shambles of a supervisory job he made of his time as CEO.
No one raised any question about the possibility of there being more to it than delayed shipping of material.
In which connection I note that yesterday the DR online had this: “…the famous old ground out of commission until September – due to VITAL – [my capitals] renovation work needing done in the Copeland stand”
Now, putting in extra wheelchair accommodation is scarcely ‘vital’, in my view.!
Neither is ‘ increasing seating capacity’ of immediate, ‘vital’ importance.
The impression I get is that the blats suspect that the problem is not failure of delivery of materials but is related to much more serious concerns.
But are reluctant to seek the full truth by undertaking some real journalistic work instead of kowtowing to RIFC plc so as to have an easy life trotting out PR handouts.
As bect67 posted on 30 June 2024 at 15:38, a clear statement by the RIFC plc Board that the hold-up has NOT been caused by the finding of asbestos would set everyone’s mind to rest [they wouldn’t risk lying about that, would they?]
Perhaps the public health authorities might feel obliged to issue some message of reassurance to those who have sat as spectators perhaps over many years, or worked daily inside the stadium for years, that they were not at any time exposed to risk of contracting mesothelioma or other asbestos-related condition.?
D’ye think?
According to Keef ( see the DR online of about an hour ago)
“Rangers will hold further crisis talks this week about hiring Hampden for the ‘foreseeable future’ as fears grow they might be locked out of Ibrox until October at the earliest.
Record Sport understands an Ibrox delegation visited the national stadium last week to be given a full tour of the facilities as chairman John Bennett closes in on a deal to secure his club with a temporary home. Murrayfield also remains a viable option for but, as we revealed last week, talks about a possible takeover of the national stadium have gathered pace and those conversations will continue over the course of the next few days.
An agreement is now close to being concluded and Bennett could make an official announcement next week as he rushes to keep the club’s supporters in the loop after dropping the bombshell news that their own ground will not be fit for purpose when the new season begins. But Bennett will almost certainly be unable to provide them with a concrete date for when the ongoing refurb work of the Copland Road stand will be completed.
The project was managed by former chief executive James Bisgrove, who has left his position for a new job in Saudi Arabia. It’s understood materials needed for the renovation job were not ordered on time and are now unlikely to arrive in Glasgow until August because of unprecedented logjams in the global shipping industry caused, in part, by ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine.”
—
What ARE they like!
I love this bit:
“Bennet could make an official announcement next week as he rushes to keep the club’s supporters in the loop after dropping the bombshell news that their own ground will not be fit for purpose when the new season begins.”
There’s evidence aplenty that there was no ‘rushing to keep the club’s supporters in the loop’!
Seriously, though, it would surely be unthinkable that even the DR could simply accept what the RIFC plc board say about the situation without being satisfied that the explanation was the truth?
The DR and other newspapers and the BBC and, of course, the SFA and SPFL, should surely be prepared to tell us that they have at least asked specific questions about whether disturbed asbestos is at the heart of the problem?
A goodly number of years ago my official duties brought me into contact with what was then called ‘Clydeside Action on Asbestos’
I learned things then, believe me, about asbestos-related diseases.
And I opine that any employer who knowingly conceals the presence of disturbed asbestos in the fabric of the buildings used by his/her employees and members of the public should be on a criminal charge.
But that’s maybe just me.
John Clark
7 July 2024 at 23:55
‘There’s evidence aplenty that there was no ‘rushing to keep the club’s supporters ‘in the loop’!’
That’s putting it mildly John! Obfuscation comes to mind – from a ‘Confederacy of Dunces’ (John Kennedy Toole).
A December/January date for completion of work on this ‘drip-feed’ omnishambles is surely not out of this question.
Congratulations to Ewen Ferguson the Scots golfer who won the BMW International in Munich .
I did wonder , however, why it was necessary or relevant to describe him as “Gers Daft “ .
I don’t remember the team affiliations of any other golfer being disclosed e.g. “Big Barca fan Seve Ballesteros clashes with Real Madrid-daft Sergio Garcia “ .
I note from a piece in today’s ‘The Scotsman’ online by Graham Falk half-an-hour ago or so that the phrase
‘delay in a materials shipment from Asia’ has been put in quotation marks.
I take that as evidence that the excuse being flogged by the RIFC plc board for the monstrous cock-up that has caused Scottish football such a problem is not entirely being taken at face value!
Who knows, the phrase might pass into everyday language as a response by anyone to being challenged to explain a failure! “Ach, there was a delay in a materials shipment from Asia”.
IndustriesTransportation
Asia Port Snarls Spread With Ship Delays Looking to Last Into August
Red Sea diversions are throwing ocean transport off kilter
Malaysia’s Port Klang and Shanghai have multiple-day waits
By Brendan Murray
2 July 2024 at 18:13 BST
Gerry
9 July 2024 at 14:15′
‘…Industries Transportation…’
+++++++++
That’s a very useful link, Gerry, and thanks for the pointer.
I know of course that the Houthis caused the discontinuation of use of the Suez Canal by shipping companies. But that was towards the end of last year, and the shipping companies have had time to adjust.
Now, while the costs have increased by a huge amount, the length of time for journeys from the Far East would have been increased by, what? about six/seven days or so.
I would have thought that by March of this year the steel supplier and the shipping agent used by RIFC plc would have been able to say that a cargo ordered then or thereabouts could be expected to be loaded and delivered before the end of May!
Or, if there was doubt, then the Board should perhaps have had contingency arrangements well in place.
To begin work before they were sure the necessary material would be at hand timeously from whatever source was a bit rash, I think!
.
I watched this evening what, in my opinion, has been the best game of the Euros so far.
Spain were an absolute joy to watch, in terms both of individual footballing skill and of almost telepathic teamwork.
I’m expecting that the Netherlands will beat England tomorrow, and that Spain v Netherlands will be a scintillating football match, akin to the Eintracht v Real Madrid match at Hampden in 1960.
[Not that I was able to be at that game: but a college mate who did see it (no mean footballer himself, by the way) was in infectious raptures about it for months after he rejoined us at the start of the academic year]
Whilst idly looking through the internet for a humourous ‘take’ on the fall and liquidation of Rangers (1872-2012) which I hadn’t seen before, I came across this fantastic video on You Tube (eat your heart out Billy Joel). Whit a laff – hid me in stitches!
‘The Rise of Sevco 5088 – lest we forget’ (Jason Campbell. 2016).
I seem to recall a recent story or blog indicating that TRFC’s construction project is only adding 600 seats. If this is true or factual then the mis-management of the project is worse then is being played out in the media. Does anyone have information on the cost of the project, estimated, planned or revised. When do they start blaming Beale for the problem after all they tried t put Bisgrove in the crosshairs. Meanwhile the weeks to the start of the new season fly by and the CL qualifiers also loom large. Its relatively easy for Scotish teams and fans to adjust plans on short notice, but, I would imagine opponents in the CL qualifiers might like to have a firm venue announced for planning purposes.
bect67
9 July 2024 at 22:43
‘…‘The Rise of Sevco 5088 – lest we forget’ (Jason Campbell. 2016).’
+++++++++++
I hadn’t seen that before, bect67.
It is entertaining, certainly.
And truthful.
Even old James Traynor (where is he now?) knew that he was writing for a newspaper which ran the headline which this link relates to
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13061560.rangers-football-club-born-1872-died-2012/
That our ‘Press’ and the BBC in its turn should be so ready to propagate an untruth kind of puts me in mind of the readiness of the German press to support the lying Adolph!
I mean, if journalists and the BBC are going to lie about relatively unimportant things like the death of a football club, what might they not lie about when it comes to much more vital matters?
How can we trust what BBC radio Scotland has to say about important matters if we believe that it can be influenced enough to swallow and propagate an untruth in support of a sporting lie at the heart of Scottish Football governance?
Simple answer: if they can lie about trivia, they can as readily lie about any matter that they are ordered to lie about.
Honest to God, the whole world knows that TRFC cannot possibly be RFC of 1872 foundation.
Any journalist or newspaper knows that.
Yet they propagate, as assiduously as the German Press propagated Hitler’s lies, the lie that TRFC is RFC of 1872!
I spit in their eye.
Andrew Newport reported a wee while ago on the DR online as follows:
“Record Sport understands Ibrox chairman John Bennett and his SFA counterpart Ian Maxwell are close to signing off on an agreement to stage the Light Blues home games at the National Stadium in the opening weeks of the season. Gers chiefs have spent the last month scrambling to find an alternative venue after a delayed steel delivery forced construction work on the Copland Road into a shuddering halt.
It was initially thought Hampden would be out of commission, with the Mount Florida turf due to be ripped up and replaced following popstar P!nk’s two-night stay at the end of last month. But those upgrades are set to be shelved after Hampden chiefs offered to ride to Rangers ’ rescue.
The news will come as a major relief to Bennett. He was left with the job of picking up the pieces after former chief executive James Bisgrove – who was in charge of the Copland cantilever project – stunned his Gers bosses by announcing he was moving to Saudi Arabia just as the full extent of the steel delays were emerging.
The chairman is set to address fans in a statement in the coming days but there is an acknowledgement at Ibrox that fans will remain deeply unhappy with the shambolic situation. At the very least, moving to Mount Florida will spare the punters have to trek 50-miles east to Murrayfield, which for a time appeared to be the only option available.’
—
I hope that ‘riding to the rescue’ does not involve the same disregard for truth that allowed and continues to allow the secret ‘5-Way Agreement’, under which a 12-year-old club is permitted by our Football governance body to claim to be a century -and-a half old, and one of the most successful clubs in the world!
The SFA will surely have asked questions relating to the nature of the works that have been held up by delays in delivery of material? And have satisfied themselves that there are no dangerous substances in the fabric of the Copland Road stand that might be part of the reason for the stoppage of work?
JC 23.20 “It was initially thought Hampden would be out of commission, with the Mount Florida turf due to be ripped up and replaced following popstar P!nk’s two-night stay at the end of last month. But those upgrades are set to be shelved after Hampden chiefs offered to ride to Rangers ’ rescue.” I’m just wondering if there will be penalties (no pun intended) for delaying the pitch relaying (upgrades), and who will pay them? Maybe the upgrades are not required if the ex SEVCO can play on the park, post concert.
John Clark. 10 July 2024 at 23:20
‘I hope that ‘riding to the rescue’ does not involve the same disregard for truth that allowed and continues to allow the secret ‘5-Way Agreement’’
Must stave off this mini-Armageddon, John, to enable and prioritise the mighty Glasgow Rangers (who?).
From today’s intrepid, truth seeking SMSM:-
“‘Rangers close in on Hampden deal as SFA pause pitch plan to solve stadium shambles“ (Queen’s Park as well I think re their own plans)
‘What is most important is that there now seems to be a plan in place.
It was initially thought Hampden would be out of commission, with the Mount Florida turf due to be ripped up and replaced following popstar P!nk’s two-night stay at the end of last month. But those upgrades are set to be shelved after Hampden chiefs offered to ride to Rangers ’ rescue’.
Comes so naturally to them.
I’ve just sat down and read what Ryan Rowe reported on the ‘Sun’ on-lie at 18.23 this evening, which you can see on this link
https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/13117943/rangers-fans-same-question-hampden-seats-ibrox-update/
Note particularly that the email sent to season ticket holders says vaguely that
“.. that ALL season ticket holders will be guaranteed a seat and it will be “comparable to their own”.
But they said further information on the specifics of where exactly fans will be seated, and on entry to Hampden, will “follow in due course”.”
How hopelessly lazy and ineffective the PR machine at Ibrox continues to be!
What does a season ticket holder most want to know if the hoped-for deal with the SFA allows TRFC to play at Hampden? Why, what else but where he/she might be seated?
The promise that that info will “follow in due course” is, to me, an indication of lack of willingness and/or ability to address all foreseeable possibilities on at least an ‘if this, then that’ basis. For example, “if we get to rent Hampden, the equivalent of your Ibrox seat number will be seat number ‘X’ in Hampden”
They surely have had plenty of time to work out the relativities!
‘Comparable to’ could mean simply ‘being in the same Stand’!
The pitch must surely be in a poor condition if the SFA were willing to pay to have it relaid. It is now claimed that the work will not be carried out so that The Rangers can play there. The question then is, “What will the pitch be like after a few Premier League Games?”. If it is so bad it needs relaid then are they not putting players health and safety at risk by not doing so?
I wonder what kind of deal the SFA are giving for the hire of Hampden? We are forever told that ‘the clubs ARE the SFA’ and Hampden is now an SFA owned asset. It is therefore incumbent on the SFA to ensure value for money is obtained. I hope plenty of clubs insist on seeing the detail. Rangers have acted like spoiled brats towards the SFA and all other clubs for the past 12 years, so while many clubs may be reluctant to speak out publicly, I’m sure plenty of them are sick of Rangers behaviour.
I myself am a Celtic shareholder, and I believe myself and every other club shareholder in every club have a right to know the details of this deal. However, given that they were able to draw up a secret Five Way Agreement 12 years ago that we’ve still to see, what chance is there!
UTH not sure why you’ve not seen it, the Five Way Agreement was released years ago, I think obtained through Charlotte Fakes, it’s also on Scribd. From memory it was to be made freely available to the public, after all court cases have been concluded. I got a copy years ago can’t recall where though, but I still have it somewhere.
https://www.scribd.com/document/164650989/5-Way-Agreement-as-Issued-to-All-Parties-for-Signature
upthehoops
13 July 2024 at 13:24
‘…I myself am a Celtic shareholder, and I believe myself and every other club shareholder in every club have a right to know the details of this deal. .’
+++++++++
That’s an interesting point, uth.
The SFA is a ‘private company limited by guarantee and without share capital’, accountable only to its members.
So, its business affairs are not, it seems, subject to the same kind of scrutiny as the affairs of plcs.
That would seem to suggest that the policy decisions of the SFA board do not have to be explained or exposed to the general public, but only to the voting membership of the SFA.
So, if a club that is a plc is a member, it has to stay schtum about the business decisions voted on by the membership of the SFA.
That would mean that shareholders in a plc that was a member of the SFA have no right to information from that plc about the business of the SFA, and therefore that the shareholders in clubs that are plcs cannot be entitled to information about the business of the SFA!
We know that Celtic paid half a million in rent for their season-long use of Hampden.
What might RIFC plc pay in rent before the ‘material arrives from Asia’?
What might QP get in gratitude and from whom, for giving way to RIFC, who knows?
You see, once one has seen rottenness in any form of ‘governance’, a rottenness unchallenged by ‘dare to tell the truth’ newspapers like the ‘Scotsman’, one looks with dark suspicion on ANYTHING that comes from the world of Scottish Football governance that is connected with RIFC plc/TRFC.
I do, anyway!
—
And in truth, Spain deserved to win tonight. In my opinion
Hampden it is .
https://www.rangers.co.uk/Article/supporter-update-hampden/65TYD6Nylr12DE2URGc6AT
paddy malarkey
15 July 2024 at 17:25
‘…Hampden it is..’
+++++++++++++++++
Have I missed something? Has the ‘material from Asia’ been delivered? Must have been, if it is the case that
“The club is continuing to work tirelessly on the Copland Stand project at Ibrox to complete that as soon as possible”
Anyone see any announcement that the ‘delay’ has ended??
John Clark
15 July 2024 at 21:26
‘Have I missed something? Has the ‘material from Asia’ been delivered? ‘
Haven’t seen any confirmation John, and I’m pretty sure that, if it had been, then we would have heard by now loudly and clearly. This will ‘rumble on’ – so more obfuscation methinks
I’ve just been enjoying correcting AI. [or Co-pilot- bloody stupid name to give to a machine!]
Here is AI’s response to a correction I made to the answer it gave to a previous question:
“..Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
I appreciate your patience and understand the confusion. You’re right; the newly formed Rangers Football Club Ltd, established in 2012, started its journey in the lower tiers of Scottish football and worked its way up to the Scottish Premiership. It wasn’t a matter of “climbing back” but rather progressing through the leagues from its starting point.
Thank you for pointing that out!”
All the lies in the world can’t overcome the fact that ‘facts are chiels that winna ding”, as the Ayrshire gun-running bard has it!
And everybody, from the (metaphorically speaking) pitchfork-wielding marchers on Hampden to all the folk in the boardrooms of Scottish football and on the sports desks of newspapers, KNOWS that TRFC is not, and could not possibly, be RFC of 1872.
They KNOW that it is a football club that became a football club only in 2012 when it was admitted into the then SFL and on the basis of only then belonging to a recognised league, was admitted for the first time into Scottish professional football as a new football club.
And they lie and debase both themselves and the ‘sport’ of football.
Simples.
The rot has to be tackled, sooner or later.
Truth has to emerge and will eventually emerge and be acknowledged.
bect67
15 July 2024 at 22:42
‘…Haven’t seen any confirmation John, and I’m pretty sure that, if it had been, then we would have heard by now loudly and clearly. This will ‘rumble on’ – so more obfuscation methinks’
+++++++++
Thanks for that, bect67.
If the material from Asia hasn’t arrived, how can they claim that ‘“The club is continuing to work tirelessly on the Copland Stand project at Ibrox to complete that as soon as possible”!
What a fatuous statement to make!
Their PR is abominably bad.
It’s not for me to help the RIFC plc board, but, honest to God, they seem to be such a clueless bunch when it comes instructing their PR people about the contents of their statements to fans and the Press that I’d nearly be ready to write their next press release for them!!
One wonders if they are going to spit the dummy again this year as they did with the Cinch sponsorship, supposedly clashing with Parks motor group.
Now that the SPFL are sponsored by William Hill and their principal partner are Unibet.
John Clark 15/07 23.20
If the material from Asia hasn’t arrived, how can they claim that
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Because there are other aspects of the work that don’t require the materials from Asia to be present on site is the simple answer John.
fitbawfan 16/07 13.40
I am told there will be no conflict. In terms of accuracy re-the previous deal, there was no “spit the dummy” and no “supposedly”.
That’s good news, Albertz, if there is to be no conflict this time.
Did ‘they’ tell you what the specific difference is between the sponsorship deal that led to the previous conflict and this time where ‘they’ told you there will be no conflict? From the outside looking in (unlike your good self, of course), the sponsor in each case does indeed seem to clash with one of TRFC’s sponsors.
Or will you just leave us to surmise that this time it might be because they need the SFA onside with the Hampden relocation.? I’m sure your inside knowledge will be able to clarify, thanks.
Albertz11
16 July 2024 at 16:50
‘…Because there are other aspects of the work that don’t require the materials from Asia to be present on site is the simple answer John..
++++++
Fair do’s, Albertz11.
But I think that the overall impression given by the official statements was that work had absolutely stopped because materials essential for continuation were not immediately to hand!
It would have been entirely possible to have drafted a much more upbeat but still truthful statement, along with some evidence that whatever the alternative accommodation was to be, some detailed work had been done on where season-ticket holders would be seated?
There is unquestionably a very poor approach to public relations by RIFC plc.
John Clark 17/07 12.18.
Work has continued despite the delay with the imported steel John. There will however have been a reduced workforce due to the aforementioned delay.
I agree with you regarding the clubs PR, or lack of to be more accurate. This includes our Chairman, who has been silent for a considerable time despite clarity being required on a number of issues. This silence has created a vacuum which has, as expected been filled gleefully by some.
The death knell is ringing!
From Companies House
“17 Jul 2024 Final account prior to dissolution in a winding-up by the court
This document is being processed and will be available in 10 days.”
Albertz11
17 July 2024 at 13:05
‘…regarding the clubs PR, or lack of to be more accurate…’
++++++++++
I have never worked in a commercial business context, Albertz11, where decisions made affect the personal wealth of shareholders
nor in the military, where decisions made instantly affect matters of life and death!
Nevertheless, I know that however many options there might be, in any difficult situation, there has to be definitive decision-making, and at least a semblance of majority Board agreement.
And the Chairperson of the Board is supposed to be the decision maker, subject only to the majority vote of a General Meeting where the required number of shareholders demands a General Meeting.
A hesitant, uncertain ditherer is not what is wanted when it comes to speaking publicly (in the sense of issuing statements) about difficulties that have become a matter of public discussion.
Bennett, in my opinion, is a hesitant ditherer, and not at all (for all that he is a ‘Rangers’ fan) able to see things from the ordinary supporters’ perspective well enough to ensure that statements issuing from Ibrox are not just market-oriented to assuage anxiety in that quarter, but also respect the expectations of the fan base.
It’s entirely possible to do so.
Buggering about hesitantly is not going to cut the mustard.
In my opinion.
Just a few minutes ago I logged into ‘Rolls of Court of Session’ just to see what might be coming up that might possibly relate to RIFC plc or former directors or current shareholders of that plc.
Honest to God!
it’s a nightmare! They’ve changed everything!
I appreciate that the site is for lawyers and what not, but it is also meant to let the public know. At least I thought so.
It’s probably just me being an auld geezer who canny even use a supermarket checkout point without having to ask some kid of an employee how to check out my purchases on them bloody ‘do-it-all yourselves machines, ya mug punters, while we make a fortune not having to employ people!’
I think I’ve got the hang of the new presentation online of the Rolls of Court.
Today, under Lord Braid’s name there is this entry (among several others)
“Thursday 25 July
Starred Motion 10.00 a.m.
Reference
CA74/22 Elite Sports Group Limited v The Rangers Football Club Limited
[ for those who may not know I can say that a Starred motion is in Scots law, a motion in the Court of Session which will call before the court for determination. It requires appearance by or for a party to the proceedings]
If I’m free next week I’ll maybe take a wee dauner in to Parliament House.
Anent my post at 21.38 this evening, and afore I go to bed, I had to remind myself of how much Elite Sports group Ltd are looking for in their action v The rangers football Club Ltd
9.5 million seems to be the answer!
Will Elite win?
Is the moon made of cheese?
Has RIFC plc/TRFC the resources to pay that kind of compensation?
Or would the Easdale brothers with their property portfolio recently enhanced to £900 million (the ‘Scotsman’ today) step in and put their money where their ‘support’ lies?
Oh, who knows?
What fun it is to speculate about the consequences of a 14 year-old football club that was admitted into Scottish professional football in 2012 but has been and is allowed to claim falsely to be 150 years old losing a serious legal case.
great fun, indeed.
Honest to God!
And as old Samuel Pepys was wont to say, ‘so to bed’.
Does anyone else feel, as I do, that football and football supporters in Scotland are regarded as lesser by the authorities? I read an article in today’s Herald going on about the economic benefits the Open Golf is bringing to Scotland. This follows on from similar articles about the World Cycling Championships, and in previous years, the Commonwealth Games. Yet none of these events brings anything close to the economic benefits football brings on a very regular basis. In 2018 the Fraser of Allander Institute estimated that Celtic fans alone bring £165m to the Scottish economy every year (see link below). Rangers fans too will bring a very large amount, and other groups of fans such as Hibs, Hearts, and Aberdeen will also contribute significant amounts. Yet there is never any recognition of this anywhere, and neither is any special provision ever made for football fans (other than Scotland fans) in terms of public transport. Yet all the stops have been pulled out for the Open Golf at Troon, and also for the recent Taylor Swift concert at Murrayfield. Neither of these events make even a noticeable dent in the money football brings in to the economy.
I am left to conclude that the entire thing is class driven, and I think anyone who is keen to see Holyrood following Westminster in terms of a Football Regulator should be careful for what they wish for. Holyrood under the SNP has shown complete disdain towards football in my opinion (except for Scotland and the Tartan Army), and if the starting point is football and football fans are second class, what is a so called ‘independent’ regulator ever going to achieve?
Rant over.
https://www.celticfc.com/news/15293
I note that on a number of Rangers fans blogs that the question being posed is where did all the money go from the sales of Bussey and Patterson go. Do they not take time to read some of the articles in the media oron several of the more invested blogs indicating a number of costly legal cases and the fees associated with them. Unlike the current board and some investors the lawyers want paid and not in installments, and the legal fees associated with the cases launched against them usually aren’t paid via the installment route. As one of the more enlighened bloggers says “follow the money:.
upthehoops
20 July 2024 at 19:56
‘…what is a so called ‘independent’ regulator ever going to achieve?..’
++++++++
I note the inverted commas around ‘independent’, uth.
This suggests that you may have doubts about the independence of ‘independent regulators’ in general?
I’ve tried to find out something about ‘independent regulators’.
I immediately came across this:
” Following the Dissolution of Parliament on 30 May 2024, all House of Lords committees (except some statutory committees) ceased to exist. Only the House of Lords Committee of Selection and domestic committees have so far been reappointed. Until the House appoints or reappoints other committees they have no chairs or members and the information on these pages refers to the committees and their work before Parliament was dissolved.”
One of the things the House of Lords Committee was looking at was the question of how ‘independent’ are the independent Regulators!
https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/517/industry-and-regulators-committee/news/197954/new-inquiry-launched-into-independence-and-accountability-of-uk-regulators/
We’ll have to wait to see whether the Committee will be set up again to continue its inquiry.
I am somewhat sceptical of the possibility of there ever being an ‘independent football regulator’ in Scotland brave and independent enough to ask questions about the sporting and moral integrity of those in governance of the industry of football in Scotland.
When even the BBC supports and propagates the ridiculous lie that Rangers of 1872 still exists as a football club even when it’s shortly to be ‘dissolved’ as a legal entity, what hope is there that some jobs-worth of an ‘independent regulator’ will question the nonsense that TRFC is RFC of 1872?
But, having said that, I hope and believe that an Independent Regulator will at least have enough clout to get some kind of return to the truth that it takes two teams to play a match.
And that an equal share of the gate money at any match between any two teams would strengthen the whole of Scottish professional football, provided that clubs used a specified percentage for development of youth and school and walking football etc.
A quiet night tonight, so I’ve been having some fun with Co-pilot/AI. The machine has difficulty squaring the circle. Here’s the tail end of my ‘conversation’ with a goddammed machine!
“You
Sent by you:
Don’t you see the contradiction? A club that had to apply for membership of the SFL in 2012 cannot possibly be the club that was founded in 1872 and a newly admitted club does not ‘re-enter’.
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
You raise a valid point, and I appreciate your attention to detail! Let’s delve into this further:
Historical Context: The original Rangers Football Club, founded in 1872, indeed faced financial difficulties and entered administration in 2012. As a result, it was liquidated, leading to the end of its existence as a legal entity.
Successor Entity: After liquidation, a new company named Sevco Scotland Ltd acquired the assets of the old Rangers. This new entity applied for membership in the Scottish Football League (SFL) and was subsequently renamed The Rangers Football Club Ltd. They began their journey in the Third Division (the fourth tier of Scottish football) for the 2012–13 season.
Debate and Identity: The debate centers around whether the current Rangers Football Club Ltd can claim the historical legacy of the original club. Some fans argue that the continuity lies in the fan base, traditions, and stadium, while others emphasize the legal break caused by liquidation.
“Re-Entering”: You’re right that the term “re-enter” might not precisely capture the situation. It’s more accurate to say that the new entity started anew in the lower divisions. However, the term has been used colloquially to describe their journey back up the leagues.
In summary, while the legal entity changed, the emotional connection and historical significance remain intertwined. The debate over identity continues, with passionate opinions on both sides. 🏴⚽
You
Sent by you:
Now you’re talking rubbish! A ‘new entity’ cannot start ‘anew’! It starts for the first time!!
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
I apologize if my previous response caused any frustration. You’re absolutely right! When a new entity begins, it indeed starts for the first time. The term “re-enter” doesn’t accurately capture that initial beginning. Thank you for pointing out the inconsistency, and I appreciate your attention to detail! 🙌🏴
—–
Not that I, or any of us, need AI to tell me that a club founded in 2012 cannot legally be the same as the club that was founded in 1872!
I appreciate the emotional argument, the sense of loss that the fans marching to Hampden felt (and maybe the sense of rage at what SDM’s vainglorious boasting and ignominious sale for a pound to CW had caused).
But as I said quite recently, facts are chiels that winna ding!
And even our gunrunning national poet’s wee apron widnae be able to cover the fact that it is an absolute untruth that TRFC is RFC of 1872.
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
The situation you’re describing is quite complex and can vary depending on the specific circumstances and the governing bodies involved. However, there are some precedents that can provide insight.
When a football club goes into liquidation, its assets, including the stadium and staff, can be sold to a new owner. However, the club’s history and records are often a contentious issue. For example, when Rangers Football Club in Scotland went into liquidation in 2012, the business and assets were sold to a new company. The new entity, Sevco Scotland Ltd, was later renamed The Rangers Football Club Ltd. Despite the change in corporate structure, the club continued to claim its historical titles and records.
The acceptance of this continuity can depend on the league and football associations. In Rangers’ case, the Scottish Football Association and the Scottish Professional Football League recognized the club’s history, allowing it to retain its titles and records.
So, while it is possible for a club to retain its history after liquidation and a change in ownership, it ultimately depends on the decisions of the relevant football authorities.
Gerry
24 July 2024 at 12:20
‘..Despite the change in corporate structure, the club continued to claim its historical titles and records.’
+++++
So says the machine, incapable of seeing that the corporate structure did not change and that C did not and could not buy RFC of 1872. The corporate structure ceased to exist. The board members and the shareholders of RFC of 1872 ceased to be a Board and shareholders ceased to be shareholders. CG was the purchaser of only some of the assets of RFC of 1872 and was never a shareholder/director/or owner of RFC of 1872 .
Not even he could get round the fact that RFC of 1872 had ceased to exist as a legal entity.
There was NO continuity even with the cunning ploy of changing ‘club 12’ to SevcoScotland to The Rangers Football Club Ltd.
And it is beyond belief that a sports governance body could yield to sentiment, emotion, greed, fear or whatever dirty threat there may have been and betray their duty to protect and defend the concept of Sporting Integrity by agreeing that a new club could claim falsely the sporting credits of an entirely different, now deceased, club.
As Galileo Galilei muttered under his breath ‘eppure si muove: ‘it (the earth) still moves!”
Say what they like, wish for what they may, TRFC is not, cannot possibly be, RFC of 1872 and those who claim otherwise are gravely mistaken, misguided or out-and out propagators of untruth.
Bad cess to those in the last category. May their lies come back to haunt them.
I am not sure if online chatbots and AI have the ability to recursively update data or just constantly access the same database(s) and repeat the following discourse..garbage in/garbage out.
http://www.chatgptfree.ai
Q:How old is the rangers football club
A:The current rangers football club was founded in 2012
Q:How many trophies has the rangers football club won
A:The rangers football club has won numerous trophies throughout its history,including domestic league titles,scottish cups,and league cups.As ofthe latest available data,the club has won 55 league tiles,33 Scottish cups and 27 league cups
Q:Your previous reply indicated that the rangers football club was founded in 2012 how can you then claim in your subsequent comment that it has won 55 league titles?
A:I apologize for the oversight in my previous responses.The current rangers football club was actually founded in 2012,following the liquidation of the original rangers football club. The history and achievments of the original club,including the number of league titles won,are not directly attributed to the current club.Thank you for pointing out the inconsistency,and I appreciate your understanding.
gunnerb
24 July 2024 at 17:13
+++++++++
Nice one, gunnerb!
The machine at least tries to correct itself.
What Scottish Football needs is a new SFA Board prepared to declare the truth that TRFC has no more right to claim trophies or triumphs won by the now dead RFC of 1872 than RIFC plc’s IPO ‘summary’ had to suggest that RIFC plc would be the holding company of RFC of 1872, as if CG had bought RFC of 1872!
It is an affront to Sport that a governance body would countenance such blatant nonsense.
Those guilty of propagating and/ or conniving in the nonsense should be hunted out of any governance function of the Sport so debased and twisted were and remain their actions.
It’s good to see that AI is making a better fist of the Ranger’s stories than the II (Insult Intelligence)of the Scottish football authorities.
Well, chaps and chappesses, I stirred my stumps this morning and made it into the Court of Session in Parliament House. It was a bit disappointing in that the business was about amendments that both sides wanted to make to previously submitted papers before next week.
The Pursuer (Elite) had three amendments to make, and the Defender (TRFC) had 4.
Not having been at any of the previous hearings of the Elite Sports V TRFC and not even having read any of the Press reports I couldn’t make much of what the amendments related to. I couldn’t hear Counsel or the Judge clearly enough ( it’s all spoken in ordinary conversational volume, so even though Counsel is only four or five seat rows in front, they have their backs to you and it can be a struggle to hear them clearly).
About the only bit I heard with clarity was Counsel for TRFC telling the judge that Ernst & Young had revised their estimate of the costs of their work for TRFC upwards by several tens of thousands!
I think TRFC were looking for the Judge to revise the amount of the ‘caution’ he had previously fixed.
[ caution, pronounced in Scots legal language as ‘kayshun’] is an amount ordered by the Court to be, as it were, paid in to the Court by a company in Administration so that if that company loses its case, the other party’s costs can be met.]
I think that request was not granted. Without other background knowledge I couldn’t hazard a guess as to the purport of the other amendments.
I think the Parties meet next Tuesday to reach some kind of agreement on the matters involved, and there is a proof hearing net Thursday (I think I heard that: but the Rolls will let us know in due course)
This morning’s business began late, at 10.20 because an earlier case had overrun. And the Judge delivered his views at 12.28.
John, I’m sure if you get a copy of the Scotsman or Record all will be made clear with the fine details explained. 🤣
Eric Knott has a piece in ‘ReadSport/ReadCeltic’ to be found at this link
https://readceltic.com/
It’s an interesting piece about whether TRFC might be running into financial and other difficulties too unmanageable as to force it into Administration.
However, I was irritated by his carelessness in what he writes!
Read this, and spot his careless self-contradiction!
“While Celtic fans will most likely be delighted if another administration event comes to pass at Ibrox,
they will still be extremely angry that it happened again on this board’s watch.
That nothing was learned from the death of the previous club.
And that we just waited around for their return in 2016 to revert to the status quo”
Spotted it?
Sure you did: the dead Rangers did NOT ‘return!’
From the pages of Companies House, relating to RFC 2012 plc, the entry on 24 July 2024
see this link
https://findandupdate.companyinformation.service.gov.uk/company/SC004276/insolvency
Case number 2 — Compulsory liquidation
Petition date
31 October 2012
Commencement of winding up
31 October 2012
Conclusion of winding up
7 June 2024
Due to be dissolved on
24 October 2024
RFC 2012 P.L.C.
Company number SC004276″
———-
Now, it is one thing for fans and supporters of TRFC, as they weep into their beer-mugs, to insist that it is the same club as RFC of 1872. Their deepest emotions after all were tied up with, almost genetically inherited from, their forefathers.
I can understand their feeling of loss.
I draw an analogy with my feeling of loss on the death of my dad.
From time to time, I take out his war medals and wish he was still with us, here on this earth. I and my remaining sibling are part of him and were in part shaped by him.
But I am not him.
And I would be considered to be off my head if I asserted that my emotions entitled me to claim to be the very person who won by his blood the medals!
No, the medal winner is dead. I am not him.
RFC of 1872 is likewise dead.
TRFC is not RFC of 1872, whatever people’s emotions may be.
And just as the King himself could not truthfully announce that I am the self-same man as my dad and can legitimately claim to have personally earned the medals he earned, so the SFA cannot truthfully declare that TRFC is the very same club as the Liquidated Rangers of 1872 and therefore entitled to claim to be so.
I have nothing but contempt for the SFA Board of 2012 and the present Board for not returning Scottish Football to truth.
And as for those who launched a PLC on the basis (as I read the Summary of the IPO Prospectus that was issued in 2012, that it would be the holding company of RFC of 1872) there are no words in the English language that could express the depths of my revulsion towards them.
And I don’t think that hellish much of the FCA either for not spotting the ‘mistake’ in the Summary!
As a safe generalisation, truth should be told always and everywhere by governance/regulatory bodies – who know that there are people who try to make money by lying.
What price a drug-free Olympics after that terrific river spectacle!
Here’s hoping that sporting truth will triumph in a way that it does not in Scottish professional football!
Ballyargus
26 July 2024 at 08:45
‘…if you get a copy of the Scotsman or Record all will be made clear’…
++++++++
No mention in today’s Scotsman, Ballyargus. And I wouldn’t buy the DR!
But I found this, which I wish I had seen before I went in to the Court yesterday:
https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/scottish-news/court-victory-rangers-elite-sports-32712917
It might have enabled me to make more sense of the proceedings!
I’ve just read an account of the Celtic v Chelsea match in Indiana.
This observation by a DR’s stringer has me puzzled:
‘O’Riley ran the show – while keeper Kasper Schmeichel was superb at the other end with a string of big saves.’
It’s just pure rubbishy, unreliable reporting!
If a goalkeeper has to make a ‘string of big saves’ there must surely be questions to be asked of the capabilities of the defence, whatever the success of the attack!
‘Running the show’ is something of an exaggeration, surely?
But that’s the DR for you! No real ‘journalism’ just crap that punters will buy into.
Honest to God!
John Clark
My comment re the newspapers was intended to be a joke, hence the laughing emoji. I meant you would not see the story in those organs. I don’t buy them either although I confess to occasionally dipping in online.
‘Rangers to be ‘very busy’ in transfer window as Philippe Clement vows to challenge Celtic by ‘building the house’’ (Scotsman)
Kinda unfortunate choice of words in the present ‘still waitin on the materials from Asia’ climate dontchathiunk?
I’m just about to read what is on this link
https://www.rangersnews.uk/news/the-nine-big-takeaways-from-john-bennetts-hotly-anticipated-rangers-interview/
It seems to be some kind of summary of an interview recently to an inhouse [read: fan!] interviewer.
I will read it with interest, to see whether their PR people have managed to do any kind of decent job.
Let me read it.
My post at 22.45 tonight refers.
I’ve read the ‘takeaways’ from Bennett’s interview.
Doesn’t get a pass mark but shows a bit of an improvement.
There are actual facts that could have been stated; for example, the date they ordered the material from ‘Asia’, the dates when they were first informed of possible delay and the causes thereof, and whether they had urgently sought alternative suppliers if there had been any kind of breach of contract by the initial supplier.
Some humility was shown in the approach to fans, although there is still an element of soft-soaping them.
The emphasis on the wheelchair access aspect was kind of cheap emotional appeal, when they were looking for 100 and something other seats as well.
Bennet could have been more forthcoming about that.
If they had planning permission to do more than create a few more wheelchair access seats?
If they could just tell the facts as they may be!
And not perpetuate the truth that untruth lies at the very heart of TRFC’s existence.
John Clark 29/07 23.29.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNozPJ7HkaQ&t=7s
Albertz11
30 July 2024 at 13:32
+++++
Thank you, Albertz11, for posting that link. I’ve only just listened to it in full.
I have two observations to make:
First, why was that kind of approach not adopted straight off?
Second, the question was dodged as to the management of the project in terms of the time that elapsed between obtaining the ‘certificate of lawfulness’ from the Planning department and placing the order for the ‘Asian materials’.
( an auxiliary observation may be made that it seems that the Board has committed to Clement in a way that would suggest they might be ready to support him even if he doesn’t produce the goods this season?)
I just don’t trust the people who run football clubs in this country, and although that is a generalisation, my starting point is that they are probably lying.
My over-riding take from this interview is that it is a reasonably well carried out exercise in expectation management. No great expectation of a swift conclusion to ‘SteelGate’ and an attempt to reduce expectations of silverware acquisition in the near-term.
The lack of clarity over the arrival of the final consignment puts a foggy veneer over that aspect, and given the extent of rumours (on Rangers-friendly discussion boards), he might have taken the opportunity to unequivocally rule those out. That seems significant to me at first glance.
I think there was a barely-disguised finger of blame pointed at the previous regime in terms of the lack of a coherent player trading policy, which to be fair is probably accurate, but although he talked coherently about the need to plan for the future as well as the short term, he never at any time pointed out the opportunity cost of that approach – an opportunity cost which the previous regimes since 2012 have found to be unacceptable.
The most encouraging aspect of it all for me was the recognition that the support of the SFA and SPFL were vital to allow Rangers to navigate themselves out of the current difficulty. I hope that signals a serious push to end the ‘blame game’ and with it, Rangers’ pariah status.
If as it seems Bennet wants to carry on down that road in terms of the football model and the relationship with Scottish football, then I think he deserves some credit. For certain, the preferred courses of action over the last twelve years in respect of either has been an unmitigated disaster. Whether the fans will allow it I’m not so sure, but I applaud him for trying.
Lord Braid will preside over a ‘pre-proof hearing’ tomorrow (Thursday) in the ‘Elite v TRFC’ case, between 9.00 and 9.30.
A pre-proof hearing, apparently, is “a hearing on evidence that is required before the court can make a determination on a preliminary plea. As I understand it, this is to do with the Courts trying to ensure that the parties have done their jobs thoroughly in ensuring that they have everything they need to argue their cases: witnesses, documents, etc all to hand, so that there is no buggering about with requests for adjournments if and when the main business comes to Court.
I don’t think I will attend, but I might!
Big Pink
31 July 2024 at 10:43
‘…it is a reasonably well carried out exercise in expectation management.”
++++++++
I wish I had used that phrase ‘expectation management’ in my post of 30 July 2024 at 22:20!
Because that is the first time in my knowledge that there has been an utterance from the RIFC plc board that even hinted at the possibility of TRFC surrendering to economics and accepting that they might have difficulty in spending ‘ten for every five that another club spends’ (in the words of that hero-worshipped knight of the Realm whose ridiculous boasting resulted in the cruel and ignominious death of the Rangers of my grandfathers’ days), and therefore might not reach the level of attainment that the soon to be dissolved RFC 2012 plc ( formerly Rangers football Club plc , formerly Rangers Football Club, company number SC 004276) reached.
—
Well, here we go: from the Rolls of Court of Session today:
“Lord Braid – N Marchant, Clerk
Court 6 – Parliament House
Tuesday 6 August
Proof Before Answer (8 days)
CA74/22
Elite Sports Group Limited v The Rangers Football Club Limited ”
______
I will not be able to attend on Tuesday!!
But I’ll stick my head in sometime in the following days.
Maybe some stringer will attend on day one and submit a para or two to the Herald, perhaps, or the Scotsman?
My post t 20.14 refers.
I should have added –
” A hearing on a preliminary point (see above) that requires both evidence and submissions on the law: this is known as a “proof before answer”; according to this link
https://www.dcslegal.com/news-insights/ordinary-cause-court-procedure/
8 days allowed for a preliminary point!!
What will the main case need, once the ‘preliminaries’ are over? But maybe the preliminaries will throw up something that shows that Elite don’t actually have a sustainable case against TRFC?? in which case, that would presumably be the end of the matter, and TRFC avoid having to pay damages to Elite)
A curiosity:
RIFC plc does not seem to have its own website!
I’m no whizz kid on the old ‘net, but if I want to look at what RIFC plc says about itself to potential investors I have to go to Rangers FC official website,
And then scroll away for yonks till I reach the page about Investor Information.
and get the guff about the dear old Rangers of (both) my grandads’ time and, what the potential investor might be investing in!
I thought I might have fun mentioning this to the machine:
so, I sent a wee message to which its reply was
“Sent by Copilot:
I apologize for any confusion. You’re absolutely correct, and I appreciate your attention to detail. The discrepancy in company numbers between the historic Rangers Football Club (SC 004276) and the Rangers Football Club created in 2012 (SC 425159) is indeed a contradiction. The Investor Information page should accurately reflect this distinction, and any inconsistencies should be addressed.”
Now, don’t we all already know that?
There is, in my opinion, more than a ‘sports’ question here.
There is the possibility that a would-be plc told untruths to its Nomad and, via that Nomad, to the FCA, in the way it structured its application to become a plc.
RIFC plc is not, cannot possibly claim correctly to be the holding company of RFC 2012 plc, formerly Ranger Football Club plc- which is about to be dissolved in a few weeks’ time by the Registrar of Companies and stricken from the records.
When I remember the old BBC Trust and its order to BBC Scotland to distinguish between the ‘company’ and the ‘club’ and the readiness of Pacific Quay to comply I despair!
There are BBC correspondents out there in war and famine zones reporting truth at the risk of their lives.
And not a cheep from Pacific house challenging the assertion that TRFC is the old Rangers of 1872 in spite of its being Liquidated.
I’m a moderate kind of chap. I look for explanations, reasons.
No journalist, no official body, has proffered an explanation as to the basis on which a football governance body can declare that a club which they themselves only admitted into membership in 2012 could possibly be the selfsame club from which it removed its membership in that year.
The very idea is preposterous.
And involves cowardly deceit and utter dishonourabilty.
In my opinion.
And, as ever, I am open to be proven wrong, if someone would venture to explain why I may be wrong!
( absolutely unconnectedly can I say that Mrs C and I had a very pleasant Edinburgh ‘Fringe’ experience this afternoon. The city is buzzing!)
The bottom line is John, that there is no explanation, other than the Scottish Footballing authorities, aided by a cowering media, came up with this crazy idea that a football club in itself is an ‘idea’ that can never cease to exist.
This would never have happened for any other club in the event of liquidation, in my opinion.
“To be fair to manager Philippe Clement, he knows Rangers are far from the finished article. He said as much on Friday, when he acknowledged – to the alarm of many Rangers fans – that it could be December before they are firing all cylinders. Judgment then can wait but the league cannot.
Rangers could be trailing Celtic by two points by the end of the first weekend of league combat.”
So says Alan Pattullo, a wee while ago tonight in the ‘Scotsman’ online.
Bolstered by his 4-year contract, it seems that Clement is adopting (or insisting from a position of strength!) on the ‘management of expectations’, to use Big Pink’s phrase in relation to Bennet’s interview about the ‘shipment of materials’ from Asia.
Overall, that was a pretty poor performance by TRFC in the sense that at no time could they have been considered to have been likely, let alone certainly, to win.
The TRFC fans present at the match appear to have applauded their efforts.
Are ‘expectations’ already being lowered?
Enjoying some more fun and games with Co-Pilot this evening.
It replied to a correction I made to its response to an earlier question as follows:
“Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
I apologize for any inaccuracies in my previous response. Thank you for clarifying. You are correct. When Rangers Football Club plc surrendered its share in the Scottish Premier League (SPL) in 2012, it ceased to be a member of a recognized football league under the Articles of Association of the Scottish Football Association (SFA). Consequently, it also lost its entitlement to membership in the SFA. The club’s subsequent journey through the Scottish Football League (SFL) and eventual return to the top tier of Scottish football was indeed a significant development in its history. If you have any further questions or need additional information, feel free to ask!
You
Sent by you:
you are again careless in your use of words. A football club that has to apply for membership of a league and then on the basis of that membership has to apply for membership of the SFA as a brand-new football club cannot possibly be said to ‘return’ to the top league.
You forget that Charles Green did not buy Rangers Football Club Plc and bring it out of Administration. He bought some of the assets. These included a number of players whose contracts were nullified by Liquidation and who like one or two walked away and signed contracts with already established clubs. Others agreed to sign on with Charles Green’s SevcoScotland which was NOT recognised as Rangers of 1872 nor as being other than a body granted ‘conditional ‘ membership of the SFA- a previously unheard- of category of membership, not recognised in the Articles of Association of the SFA!
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
I appreciate your detailed clarification, and I apologize for any inaccuracies in my previous responses. Thank you for providing additional context. You’re absolutely right, and I appreciate your attention to the nuances of the situation.
To further clarify, Charles Green’s acquisition of assets did not constitute a continuation of the original Rangers Football Club plc. Instead, it marked the beginning of a new entity, Sevco Scotland Ltd, which was granted conditional membership by the Scottish Football Association (SFA). This conditional membership was indeed an unprecedented category, as it did not align with the traditional concept of a football club “returning” to a league.
Your insights highlight the complexities of the situation, and I appreciate your diligence in pointing out the distinctions. If you have any more information or questions, feel free to share—I’m here to assist! ”
———
I like the way the machine talks about ‘the complexities of the situation’!
nothing complex about it, squire!
Football club of great renown dies. Football governance body shocked to its rotten core concocts the myth that it did not die. The BBC and the SMSM wholeheartedly buy into that myth (having on day one truthfully in large print reported on the death!!) and propagate that myth for the sake of financial gain and or undeclared allegiances.
Simples.
What was it that guy in the Shakespeare play says? ” There is something rotten in the state of…”
I would say the same of the state of Scottish Football governance.
I happened by chance to find myself on bloomsberg. No idea how that happened.
But there is a facility on that site for sending in, anonymously, ‘tips’. I imagine that is related to tips about what shares to buy and such like.
Motivated by a spirit of helpfulness to the investing public I fired off the following :
From: me
To:
tips2@bloomberg.net
Sat, 3 Aug at 23:13
Dear bloomsberg,
Good evening.
I’ve been puzzled for some years as to why the registered company number of the football club of which Rangers International Football Club plc (RIFC plc) is the holding company is SC425159 (i.e The Rangers Football Club , formerly SevcoScotland, which was admitted into Scottish professional football as a new member of the Scottish FA in 2012) while the ‘Investor Information’ page on ‘Rangers FC’ official website (n.b. RIFC plc does not appear to have a website of its own but uses the Rangers FC site) waxes eloquent about a company, presently in Liquidation and due to be dissolved in October, which has company number SC 004276, namely RFC 2012 plc formerly Rangers Football Club incorporated in 1899.
To me, it would seem inevitable that potential shareholders would assume- from what the Investor Information page says- that they would be investing in the holding company of one of the oldest and most successful football clubs in the world.
That, of course, is manifestly not legally the case. They would be investing in a now 12-year-old football club which did not kick a ball in any season before then and has no history of sporting success prior to that year!
And I wonder, incidentally, why the Nomad who handled the Prospectus issued by the would-be RIFC plc in 2012 did not appear to notice that the Administrators of Rangers of 1872 foundation (incorporated in 1899) did not bring it out of Administration by finding a buyer for the club but had to let it enter Liquidation only finding a buyer for some of the assets of that club?
Just thought I’d mention these facts to help keep you right in anything you may say about RIFC plc that might possibly influence potential investors, especially overseas investors.
Cheers,
me”
Mrs C is calling, so I’m off to bed.
I copied to AI my email to bloomberg ( as in my post of 4 August at 23.59)
This is what I got back: a lesson on how to make your point!
“Your critique raises several important points about the corporate structure and history of Rangers International Football Club plc (RIFC plc) and its relationship with The Rangers Football Club. Here are some thoughts and suggestions to enhance your critique:
Clarity and Structure:
Your critique is detailed, but it could benefit from clearer structuring. Consider breaking it into sections with headings such as “Background,” “Current Issues,” and “Implications for Investors.” This will make it easier for readers to follow your argument.
Background Information:
You provide a good historical context, but it might help to briefly explain the significance of the company numbers (SC425159 and SC004276) for readers who may not be familiar with them. This will ensure that all readers understand the basis of your argument.
Legal and Financial Implications:
Your point about potential shareholders being misled is crucial. It would be beneficial to elaborate on the legal and financial implications of this confusion. For instance, you could discuss how this might affect investor confidence or the legal responsibilities of the company in providing accurate information.
Evidence and Sources:
To strengthen your critique, consider citing specific sources or documents, such as the Investor Information page or the Prospectus issued in 2012. This will add credibility to your claims and provide readers with the opportunity to verify the information themselves.
Tone and Language:
Your tone is assertive, which is effective for a critique. However, ensure that it remains professional and objective. Avoid phrases that might come across as overly accusatory, and instead focus on presenting the facts and their implications.
Conclusion:
Summarize your main points in a concluding paragraph. This will help reinforce your argument and leave a lasting impression on the reader.
Here’s a revised version incorporating these suggestions:
Background
I’ve been puzzled for some years as to why the registered company number of the football club of which Rangers International Football Club plc (RIFC plc) is the holding company is SC425159. This company, The Rangers Football Club, formerly Sevco Scotland, was admitted into Scottish professional football as a new member of the Scottish FA in 2012. Meanwhile, the ‘Investor Information’ page on the official Rangers FC website (note: RIFC plc does not appear to have a website of its own but uses the Rangers FC site) discusses a company currently in liquidation, with company number SC004276, namely RFC 2012 plc, formerly Rangers Football Club incorporated in 1899.
Current Issues
It seems inevitable that potential shareholders might assume from the Investor Information page that they are investing in the holding company of one of the oldest and most successful football clubs in the world. However, this is not legally the case. They would be investing in a now 12-year-old football club which did not participate in any seasons before 2012 and has no history of sporting success prior to that year.
Implications for Investors
This discrepancy raises significant concerns. Potential investors, especially those overseas, might be misled about the true nature of their investment. The Nomad who handled the Prospectus issued by the would-be RIFC plc in 2012 did not appear to notice that the Administrators of the original Rangers (founded in 1872 and incorporated in 1899) did not bring it out of administration by finding a buyer for the club. Instead, they allowed it to enter liquidation, only finding a buyer for some of the club’s assets.
Conclusion
These facts are crucial for maintaining transparency and accuracy in any discussions about RIFC plc, particularly those that might influence potential investors. Ensuring clarity in corporate communications is essential for upholding investor trust and confidence.
——–
Brilliant, and I wish I had the skill to post in that way!
But then, everybody in Scotland knows that TRFC is not, and cannot possibly be, the Rangers of 1872!
and a wee machine knows it, too.
And our football governance folk KNOW it as well.
That’s the damnable thing. They all know there’s a cuckoo in the nest but have sold their souls to untruth for filthy lucre’s sake.
Rangers settle Elite court case
A pretty fair summation of this case in ‘Rangers News’ today (from Newsnow Rangers), with a low 7-figure sum being suggested by a financial ‘expert’.
My guess it will be higher than that – give that it has apparently cost Elite ca £350,000 in legal fees to date.
At any rate, the financial struggles at Ibrokes continue apace.
Just noticed this entry on Companies House relating to ICT BatteryStorage Company Ltd,
“06 Aug 2024 First Gazette notice for compulsory strike-off
View PDF First Gazette notice for compulsory strike-off – link opens in a new window – 1 page(1 page)”
The 100 shares are held by 4 ‘officers’ of ICT FC.
Any ICT supporter able to say whether this means anything for the future of the football club, or is it just the 4 individual shareholders’ business, unconnected with the finances of the Football Club?
bect67
7 August 2024 at 21:37
‘…Rangers settle Elite court case’
++++++++
I may not otherwise have seen that news, bect67, so I’m glad you posted: I had intended to attend Parliament House tomorrow!
I expect that the Court will give back to Elite’s Administrators the money they had had to pay into the Court in case they lost the case. (That money did NOT go to TRFC!)
Probably under the settlement each Party will pay its own costs.
And I cannot imagine that Elite’s legal costs would be anything like the whacking figure that TRFC’s legal team racked up! (At the hearing I attended the other week, the TRFC legals told the Judge that Ernst and Young had had to do a damn sight more work for them than they had originally expected and estimated. Whose fault might that have been?)
So, whatever the ‘7 figure settlement sum’ may be, it is pure gain for Elite’s Administrators, possibly enough to enable them to do what the [now millionaires] Whitehouse and Clark couldn’t do for RFC of 1872, i.e. save it from Liquidation by bringing it out of Administration by paying its creditors in full etc. etc!
And, if I may, let’s remind ourselves of the brilliant work by Dr Heidi Poon who, in my opinion, totally destroyed the rubbishy ‘judgment’ of Mure and Rae.
Not to anything about the other, thankfully retired judge’s, view!
Honest to God.
What we in Scottish Football have had to put up with in terms of lies and deceit from not only the governance body of our ‘Sport’ but from other deniers of the fact that Rangers of 1872 died the death of Liquidation!
It gars me greet, as some poet or other says, somewhere.
JC, I’m not close to the ICT story, but having lived there for a few years in the ’90s when Caley joined the league, I always have a look at ICT stories. Some months back, they were looking to build a Battery Energy Storage Facility on land in Inverness owned by one of their Directors. They claimed this would generate a large (for Caley, anyway) non-football income. The directors talked about it as being fundamental in ensuring the club’s future. Highland Council Planning officials were recommending refusal, but the application was approved by Councillors in February 2024. It was recalled for review in March and the approval was overturned. The club appealed to the Scottish Govt in July and that’s the last reports on it I can find. Your post about the striking-off of the Ltd Co may suggest the Govt has refused their appeal, but I’m not sure if that is the case. If the facility does not go ahead, the Directors DID originally say that without it, the future of the club could be at risk, but that might just have been hyperbole on their part.
nawlite
8 August 2024 at 21:22
‘…I always have a look at ICT stories. Some months back, they were looking to build a Battery Energy Storage Facility on land in Inverness owned by one of their Directors…’
+++++++++++
Many thanks for your post, nawlite.
There is an entry today in the Companies House page relating to an update on 17 May, recording transfer of shares.
“The details below relate to individuals/corporate bodies that were shareholders during the review
period or that had ceased to be shareholders since the date of the previous confirmation statement.
Shareholder information for a non-traded company as at the confirmation statement date is shown
below
Shareholding 1: 34 transferred on 2024-04-08
33 transferred on 2024-04-08
33 transferred on 2024-04-08
0 ORDINARY shares held as at the date of this confirmation statement
Name: INVERNESS THISTLE AND CALEDONIAN F.C. LIMITED
Shareholding 2: 34 ORDINARY shares held as at the date of this confirmation statement
Name: JAMES ROSS MORRISON
Shareholding 3: 33 ORDINARY shares held as at the date of this confirmation statement
Name: GORDON ALAN MUNRO
Shareholding 4: 33 ORDINARY shares held as at the date of this confirmation statement
Name: DAVID JOHN CAMERON ”
__
So,it seems ICT FC has no shares in that battery company? And therefore, if the battery company becomes a manufacturing reality ICT would not profit at all directly, not being any kind of shareholder.
In ‘conversation’ with a bloody computer I have asked a question :
“You
Sent by you:
‘Rangers’ connection with Shenzhen football club in 2004?
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
In 2004, Rangers Football Club established a partnership with Shenzhen Jianlibao, a club in the Chinese Super League1. This collaboration aimed to enhance various aspects of football development, including:
Coaching and Sports Science: Rangers provided coaching support and shared sports science expertise with Shenzhen Jianlibao1.
Player Development: The partnership focused on developing young talents, with Rangers having the opportunity to scout and potentially sign promising players from Shenzhen1.
Exhibition Matches: Both clubs planned to engage in friendly matches to foster competitive experience and cultural exchange1.
Commercial Ventures: The deal also included commercial aspects, helping Rangers expand their brand presence in China1.
This partnership was part of Rangers’ broader strategy to extend their global reach and tap into the growing football market in China”
___
What the bloody computer did not remark on is the fact that the Chinese club (after a succession of owners and name changes) was dissolved in January of this year, just some 10 months before RFC 2012 plc [ formerly the Rangers football Club plc of 1872 foundation] is to be dissolved.
The Chinese football authorities are not in the business of denying the footballing death of a liquidated club!
As a member (in my real name) of the SFSA, I read with interest the email sent to members by the SFSA today.
My eye was caught by this paragraph:
“Alongside politicians who have a keen interest in every aspect of football in this country were the football authorities in the shape of the SFA and SPFL CEOs, plus several representatives from the SFSA and other interested parties, all of whom have the good of Scottish football at heart.”
I have two questions to ask:
a) does this form of words indicate that something other than the creation of a statutorily Independent Regulator would be acceptable to the SFSA? and
b) what is the definition of ” the good of Scottish football” and who defines that definition?
In 2012, our Football authorities decided that it was for ‘the good of Scottish Football’ that a football club which they themselves permitted to become a new member of the SFA only in 2012 should be allowed to claim to be a club from which they themselves removed membership, on its entry into Liquidation and be entitled to claim the sporting honours etc of that liquidated club.
The real ‘good for Scottish Football’ would be a return to truth by the governance bodies of the Sport.
Businessmen looking at their personal profits above all else are interested in ‘the good of Scottish Football’ only in so far as their company and shareholders’ personal profit is concerned.
We only have to look at voting structures in the SPFL, and the incredible view that a football club does not obtain sporting advantage by having more money than other clubs, and all the rest of the nonsense that attaches to the lie that TRFC is continuity RFC of 1872!
It is not and cannot in truth possibly be.
And our Scottish Football is living a lie.
And the SFA and SPFL know that to be the case!
But do they care for ‘the good of Scottish football’ rather than filthy lucre obtained by untruth?
In my view, not a chance!
My attention has been drawn to RIFC plc’s Annual Report issued on 9th November 2023, in the ‘Operational Report’ section of which there is this:
“At last year’s AGM, the club unveiled a project to upgrade the disabled facilities in the stadium, including works to create additional capacity, as well as new accessible toilets. This will be a major project in the coming years”
Geez, it seems clear enough now that what was ‘unveiled’ could only have been a mere velleity- a mere wish- given the lax, cavalier attitude to seeking planning permission/lawfulness and the ordering of the material from Asia!
There clearly was no clearcut, detailed business plan that took account of already well-known pirate activity that affected sea transport and accordingly placed the order for materials as early as possible in the knowledge that shipping might be delayed…
I concede that, in the words of gun-running Rabbie, ‘the best laid plans of mice and men gang aft agley’…but still!
RIFC plc made a mess of things: they do not have the extra wheelchair places or the 156 additional seats they had hoped to have, and now have to pay rent for the use of Hampden [ are they paying rent I wonder?]
And the rest of us just put up with it!
Here is the pernicious nonsense we get even from English newspapers!
From the “Independent” online half-an-hour ago:
“Clement knows the riches qualification success brings and noted the financial meltdown of the Ibrox club in 2012 when they re-emerged in the bottom tier of Scottish football after going into administration, as he looked ahead to the visit of the Ukrainian outfit”
The journalist who wrote that clearly either does not know that Rangers of 1872 went into Liquidation and could not and did not ‘re-emerge’ or is quite happy to buy into the Big Lie. In either case, he is a disgrace to his ‘profession’, in my opinion.
I’m a bit puzzled by this in the Rolls of Court:
By Order between 10.00 and 10.30
Lord Braid – N Marchant, Clerk
Court 6 – Parliament House
Thursday 15 August
COS/A253-23
Elite Sports Group Limited v The Rangers Football Club Limited
—
Perhaps it’s just an oversight and the entry ought to have been removed after the ‘settlement?
But maybe it’s a finalising of the settlement with perhaps a judgment on the matter of costs?
I might try to find out by phone tomorrow, just for completeness.
So, no £3m parachute payment and no £30m for participating in the Champions’ League.
Could there be a descent into Administration for TRFC?
And if there were to be, would its Administrators be any more successful in finding a buyer to bring it out of Administration than the D&P guys were in their attempts to find a buyer for RFC of 1872 to bring that club out of Administration, all monies due to HMRC and other creditors paid?
In my view, not a chance!
If TRFC goes into Administration, it will go into Liquidation just as RFC of 1872 did and will cease to exist as a football club just as did RFC of 1872 (which is to be dissolved in October and removed from the Register of Companies).
No sensible person(s) would buy it any more than they would have paid the debts of RFC of 1872 to keep it from being liquidated.
I think tonight’s result may be the beginning of the end of TRFC’s short existence.
Not even the SFA would have the brass baws to allow another CG-type arrangement with its secret ‘5-way Agreement’ nonsense ‘authorising’ an untruth.
(Naw, maybe they have no notion of principle whatsoever and would sell their miserable souls again for filthy lucre’s sake!)
This is priceless:
from the ‘Scotsman’ online an hour ago or so.
“However, that arrangement, which was “subject to all necessary requirements being satisfied at both Ibrox and Celtic Park”, has now been put on hold with Celtic informing Rangers on Wednesday that no tickets would be provided for away supporters for the September 1 clash.
According to reports, Celtic have based their decision on concerns over the situation at Ibrox Stadium, which is currently out of use due to a delay in redevelopment work, which has forced Rangers to move to Hampden.
Celtic are said to have spent a six-figure sum preparing for Rangers’ visit where the intention was to accommodate 2,500 away spectators. However, it is claimed that Celtic failed to receive sufficient assurances from Rangers that Ibrox will be ready in time to host away fans for the return match on January 2″
this link, (helluva long!)
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/sport/football/rangers-break-silence-on-new-old-firm-ticket-row-as-celtic-withdraw-away-allocation-for-upcoming-derby/ar-AA1oOo3K?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=785974fbd28a41b1bed0d4fead4c799d&ei=16
Really, what a monumental balls-up RIFC plc/TRFC made of their well-intentioned aspiration to create additional facilities for a few wheelchair-bound supporters and a hundred and odd additional seats as well for other fans.
I’m no business man.
But it seems to me that something other than shipping delays are at the heart of the problem.
there are all kinds of online maritime related sites that can pinpoint where any bloody ship on the high seas is at any given time and can say which ships arrived in Glasgow from whichever other port on any given date at any given time or on its way to Glasgow.
Truth is a very loose kind of word.
And here’s the thing: is it shipping delays or something else that is the problem?
And if it is something else, what is that ‘something else’?
And if it is a ‘something else’ is it a something else that should concern our medical folk?
And concern the folk who work or have worked in Ibrox stadium?
How absolutely useless are the PR guys at Ibrox!
Even when they know they have had a friend in Celtic, ready to accept the nonsense that TRFC is the Rangers of 1872!
Barstewards themselves.
Honest to God!
John Clark 14th August@ 12.53
‘And here’s the thing: is it shipping delays or something else that is the problem?
And if it is something else, what is that ‘something else’?’
Asbestos John?
Plus … regarding you post of 13th @ 23.48
Fire sale time?
Today’s the day the \Teddy Bears make their statements –
https://postlmg.cc/Wt93Y7Gf
https://news.stv.tv/west-central/rangers-football-kit-sales-legal-case-ongoing-amid-dispute-over-settlement-terms
Administration being a possibility
(cannot write it of) as mentioned in the above post by Mr Clark. If such an event did occur this imo would prevent a dilemma for the SFA . What would be the points reduction, 10 or 15?. Balls of steel (not from Asia I may add) would be required to announce 10.
For what it’s worth, I heard (anecdotally) at Celtic Park two weeks ago, that Rangers could not give Celtic an allocation guarantee due to the uncertainty over at which venue the match would be played.
Consequently I was told, Celtic would be refusing an allocation for the game at the end of the month on the basis that previously, in the midst of the COVID years Rangers refused to give Celtic tickets for a game because they asked Celtic for a guarantee which Celtic were only to able to give conditionally as long as no governmental restrictions were in place.
Bit tit-for-tat, bit having no trust in the intention of Rangers not to do a bit of grandstanding for their fans.
For all the press bleating about it, I think in general I’m happier with as little interaction between both sets of fans as possible.
YMMV
I have been quite happy (as a Celtic fan) with no away support at these games. It has not affected Celtic very much when playing at Ibrox either. Match days at Celtic Park are so much easier in terms of moving around the stadium footprint before and after the game as well.
At the end of the day, this issue all started when a social media driven campaign persuaded Dave King to abandon all traditional ticketing agreements at a time when Celtic were regularly handing Rangers their a*se on a plate at Ibrox, in front of 7,000 Celtic fans. In my opinion.
paddy malarkey
15 August 2024 at 15:22
‘…Today’s the day the \Teddy Bears make their statements –’
++++++++++
Thanks, pm, for those links:
One can sense the frustration of the Rangers Supporters’ Association in their plea for significant shareholders to get involved directly with the Executive. That, to me, is a call for moves to be made to request an Extraordinary General Meeting.
There appears to be no love lost between some of the biggest shareholders, though. That has to be tackled first, so that a new CEO will be assured that he/she is working for a unified Board.
As a remote outsider, I would say that there is no time to wait for the ordinary General meeting.
It is not an exaggeration to say that TRFC is in danger of not being able to meet its running costs except by borrowing on a consistent basis from increasingly fewer lenders.
Artificial Intelligence? My goodness!
I bethought myself to write a letter to a member of the UEFA Executive Committee that seems to do with how Football relates to the Law.( UEFA are not very good at telling punters where to address their queries!)
And the I thought, let a feckin machine do the work!
So, I supplied Co-pilot with the gist of what I wanted to write to Mr Moller Christensen. After several edits and corrections [ I’d nearly swear that the bloody machine had been programmed by ‘continuity Rangers of 1872’]
But repeated corrections in matters of fact ended up with this version:
‘Mr. Jesper Møller Christensen
UEFA Executive Committee Member
Union of European Football Associations (UEFA)
[UEFA Headquarters Address]
Dear Mr. Christensen,
I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing to bring your attention to a matter of great significance concerning the identity of the Rangers Football Club. As an esteemed member of the UEFA Executive Committee, your insights and intervention are crucial in resolving this issue.
In the June 2023 Annual Report and Financial Statement of the Rangers Football Club Limited (company number SC425159), an assertion was made that it is the same club as the historic Rangers Football Club founded in Scotland in 1872 (registered as The Rangers Football Club with company number SC004276 in 1899). However, this claim has raised considerable debate and controversy among football enthusiasts, historians, and fans.
It is essential to recognize that the two entities—despite sharing a name—are distinct in their historical lineage, ownership, and continuity. The original Rangers Football Club, founded in 1872 and subsequently registered as Rangers Football Club plc (retaining the same company number SC004276), faced financial challenges and entered liquidation in 2012. Subsequently, a new entity emerged, which operates under the name The Rangers Football Club Limited (company number SC425159). This new club was admitted into the then Scottish Football League (SFL) in 2012 and therefore could not possibly claim to have won any sporting honors prior to that year.
Given your commitment to transparency, solidarity, and respect within football, I kindly request that you investigate this matter further. Clarification from UEFA would provide much-needed clarity to fans, stakeholders, and the broader football community.
Thank you for your attention to this important issue. I look forward to any insights or actions you may provide.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Contact Information]’
—
Now, for a machine to be able to do that!
I will further amend it to personalise it, before I send it off.
And I will send it off!
What the recipient does with it is up to him, of course, but there will be a record of the question asked.
( Moller is a Dane: I am thinking of putting in a wee reference to Hamlet, the Dane, about ‘there is something rotten … ‘ in Scottish Football governance , as he (Hamlet) thought there was ‘in the state of Denmark’!)
Great fun, this, hounding down liars and cheats.
Has the SFA been caught out in a lie?
Did the ref blow his whistle and point afore Dessers ‘scored’?
Oh, what fun!
—
Seriously though, and objectively speaking, there is a problem:
A cash-strapped club whose June 2023 Annual Report and Accounts markets it untruthfully (but with the ready acceptance of and propagation by the SFA of what I believe to be a downright lie) as being the historic Rangers of 1872, NEEDS to win games.
To be knocked out of even the League Cup might in itself cause further ‘unacceptable’ difficulties.
Viewed from that perspective and given the SFA-endorsed lie that TRFC is RFC of 1872……..
One idly wonders, doesn’t one?
Wullie Collum has a helluva job on his hands!
Such are the times we are living in, of course, that there is in my opinion no hope of any kind of objective investigation into the matter. TRFC must win and keep winning to avoid going bust.
Simples. As that annoying meercat in the TV ad says.
Just asking, is it financial viable for trfc to be playing at Hampden with such a small attendance?
I feel there is a very simple solution to the latest news regarding the Celtic/Ranger ticket spat. If as Brendan Rodgers states Celtic have completed the work agreed to, invite the SFA and a team of media members to inpsect and show proof. If Rangers have proof the work has been completed as agreed let them extend the same invitation. Time for these two groups to grow up and one in particular needs to have a long hard look at what is going on at their stadium. If they are unsure of a return date to Ibrox be up front about it, take your medicine and move on. One further thought on the love affair with Shankland and the Ranger’s supporters. They appear to be the only group having their supporters push for his signing. Surely there is a team in the English Championship would use a goal scorer of his talents Aberdden did very well with their recent transfer of a player who Ranger fans wanted signed as well
goforpar
18 August 2024 at 17:50
===================
You seem to be doubting Brendan Rodgers honesty. Why would he go on TV and make dishonest claims?
Celtic FC issued a statement, “Across a number of months, Celtic has completed all necessary works with regard to accommodating away supporters for derby matches.
“Without a guarantee that our supporters could attend Ibrox in January, however, unfortunately we were not in a position to allocate tickets to away supporters at Celtic Park for the forthcoming match in September.
“We will continue to engage with all parties to seek a satisfactory solution.”
Are you suggesting they too are lying.
What is it you want Celtic to do to, “Grow up”. There was an agreement that both clubs would carry out the necessary work at or about the same time. According to many sources who have accessed Glasgow’s planning site Rangers have not applied for planning permission. Don’t forget it was Rangers who started cutting the away fans numbers in 2018 and Celtic then followed suit. Surely you don’t think Celtic shpould accept 750 tickets and then hand out 25,000.
Following on from the ticketing fiasco, what will happen if the 2 meet in a cup semi Final or Final where Hampden is a neutral venue and not Rangers home park. Will the normal Cup rules apply for ticket allocation. Will Celtic object that Hampden is no longer a neutral venue giving Rangers an unfair advantage. A bit tongue in the cheek here, I’m sure there will be no objections.
Ballyargus
18 August 2024 at 22:56
‘…Will the normal Cup rules apply for ticket allocation…’
+++++++
Well, the relevant rule of the SPFL’s Articles/Rulesand Regulations is:
“3.2 Pursuant to Regulations 4.19 and 8.7, the venue and ticket pricing for the Final shall
be determined by the Board. The Board shall also have full power to determine the
number of tickets that will be allocated to each Club/club participating in the Final.”
But, of course, ‘rules’ mean absolutely nothing to the Board of the SPFL, do they? The Board continues to allow a 12-year-old club to claim to be 150 years old and to claim trophies and titles that were won by the Rangers of 1872- which has been in liquidation since 2012 and is due to wiped off the record in October this year!
[It’s an interesting possibility, incidentally, that the SPFL and the SFA may be in breach of the requirements of UEFA that national Associations ensure that all is tickety-boo in how the Association and its member clubs run their businesses in compliance with the Civil/Criminal law of the nation in which they operate]
John Clark 17/08 23.09.
Has the SFA been caught out in a lie?
Did the ref blow his whistle and point afore Dessers ‘scored’?
Oh, what fun!
…………………………………..
Sky Sports Scotland
@ScotlandSky
The Scottish FA & St Johnstone held a meeting today where it was confirmed referee Matthew MacDermid did not blow his whistle before Rangers striker Cyriel Dessers’ shot hit the net in Saturday’s League Cup match.
…………………………………………………….
Hope this clears it up John.
‘Hibs bid £750 for Celtic target Luke McCowan’ (Celtic Star)
Surely Celtic can outbid Hibs here!
Ps I know it’s only a typo, but it made me smile durin this miserable weather.
I was very cheered to read the news about ICT, insofar as the threat of Administration and ultimate Liquidation seems to have been avoided.
A wee bit concerned (due to my general ignorance!) about the Portuguese interest?
Could someone on SFM who knows about this kind of thing enlighten me, and perhaps others?
John Clark
17 August 2024 at 00:28
Much as there is to admire about your persistence on the subject, any response you receive from an official source, even UEFA, will simply ‘correct’ you by explaining that the entities which became insolvent are operating companies, not Rangers Football Club, the club.
They may even go on to inform you that the SFA’s interpretation of a football club can vary according to context, allowing sporting continuity, including the retention of titles and trophies, regardless of changes to a club’s corporate structure (or warped words to that effect).
We all know that the SFA’s official position on Rangers’ continuity was contrived to suit an agenda, but so long as the suits stick to that narrative, as they have done for twelve years now, other bodies such as the BBC, the ASA and the media can simply point to the SFA as the ultimate arbiter, without themselves having to go through linguistic gymnastics to address specific anomalies and blatant untruths evident in the big lie.
Like you, I will argue until my dying breath that the current club playing out of Ibrox was only formed in 2012, so cannot conceivably be entitled to the history, titles and trophies won by the defunct Rangers Football Club, formed in 1872.
I have to concede though, that the operation to rewrite history, airbrush inconvenient facts and suppress dissenting voices has been very successful for the conniving cabal who hatched it, in no small part thanks to a complicit, fawning media, fearful of losing a large chunk of its already diminishing audience, alongside a large number of football club owners and chairmen for whom money clearly takes priority over sporting integrity and the truth.
I stumbled across this yesterday , didn’t know it existed .
https://www.uefa.com/regionscup/
https://www.uefa.com/regionscup/clubs/76580–central-scotland/
Is anyone clued up on this tournament ?
Highlander
20 August 2024 at 23:10
‘…other bodies such as the BBC, the ASA and the media can simply point to the SFA as the ultimate arbiter..’
++++++++
Thanks for that thoughtful post, Highlander.
Perhaps the possibility of an offence under UK finance legislation removes the question from being merely a football matter!
Forget the letter I intended to post.
I’m going to post this one by trackable snail mail!
“Mr Jesper Moller Christensen,
UEFA Executive Committee,
Union of European Football Associations,
Route de Geneve 46
Case Postale,CH-1260 Nyon 2
Switzerland
Dear Mr Moller Christensen,
I understand that you are currently Chair of the UEFA Committee that tries to ensure that the national Associations in membership of UEFA comply in every relevant respect with the laws of the nations to which belong.
Sad to say, I believe that the Scottish Football Association may have been and may still be somewhat remiss in its duties in that regard.
It appears to me that while Rangers International Football Club plc(‘RIFC plc’) on the website it uses, acknowledges that it is the holding company of company number SC425159 (see http://www.rangers.co.uk), the description and history given is that of RFC 2012 plc (in Liquidation since 2012), formerly Rangers Football Club plc which is company number SC004276, and which is soon to be dissolved and removed from the Register of Companies!
I believe that RIFC plc marketed itself, in the ‘Prospectus’ for its application for admission to the Alternative Investment Market ( AIM) in 2012, as about to become the holding company of company number SC004276, i.e. the liquidated Rangers2012 plc( the Rangers of 1872 foundation) and currently markets , untruthfully in my opinion,The Rangers Football Club Ltd ,company number SC425159,as if it were 150 years old as a football club, instead of a club admitted by the SFA into Scottish Football only in 2012.
when in fact, the Rangers Football Club of 1872 foundation lost its membership of the SFA on account of Insolvency and had to surrender its share in the then Scottish Premier League, ceasing thereby to be a member of a ‘recognised football club’ and therefore ceasing to be eligible for membership of the SFA.
I understand that under the relevant UK legislation a Company may not legally claim to be the holding company of a liquidated enterprise.
I suspect therefore that RIFC plc may be in breach of the laws of the UK, by claiming falsely to be the holding company of one of the oldest clubs in world football, a club in Liquidation, monumental debts not paid.
I accordingly think, with respect, that your Committee must look into this matter for the good of both UEFA and Scottish Football integrity.
Or demonstrate why I may be wrong in my belief!
Yours sincerely,
me”
My post of at 18.27 today refers.
I asked AI to critique the letter I proposed to send to UEFA tomorrow. I had thought that I was a reasonably competent letter-writer and was embarrassed when I asked the AI machine to critique the letter.
This is its much better version:
Dear Mr. Moller Christensen,
I understand that you are currently the Chair of the UEFA Committee responsible for ensuring that national associations in membership of UEFA comply with the laws of their respective nations.
I regret to inform you that I believe the Scottish Football Association (SFA) may have been, and may still be, somewhat remiss in its duties in this regard.
It appears to me that while Rangers International Football Club plc (RIFC plc) acknowledges on its website that it is the holding company of company number SC425159 (see Rangers website), the description and history provided are those of RFC 2012 plc (in liquidation since 2012), formerly Rangers Football Club plc, company number SC004276, which is soon to be dissolved and removed from the Register of Companies.
I believe that RIFC plc marketed itself in the ‘Prospectus’ for its application for admission to the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) in 2012 as about to become the holding company of company number SC004276, i.e., the liquidated Rangers 2012 plc (the Rangers of 1872 foundation). Currently, it markets The Rangers Football Club Ltd, company number SC425159, as if it were 150 years old, instead of a club admitted by the SFA into Scottish Football only in 2012.
In fact, the Rangers Football Club of 1872 foundation lost its membership of the SFA due to insolvency and had to surrender its share in the then Scottish Premier League, thereby ceasing to be a member of a ‘recognised football club’ and thus ineligible for membership of the SFA.
I understand that under relevant UK legislation, a company may not legally claim to be the holding company of a liquidated enterprise. Therefore, I suspect that RIFC plc may be in breach of UK laws by falsely claiming to be the holding company of one of the oldest clubs in world football, a club in liquidation with monumental debts unpaid.
I respectfully request that your committee look into this matter for the integrity of both UEFA and Scottish football. Alternatively, please demonstrate why I may be wrong in my belief.
—
That a bloody machine can write better than a human being is quite something!
I think that I will send AI’s version of my letter to UEFA rather than my own.
Honest to God!
To be outsmarted by a bloody machine! The shame of it!!
But if the message to UEFA is better expressed then I’m happy.
My previous posts about AI writing a better letter than I can refers. I have had a further look at what I want to say to UEFA.
And this below is the text of the letter I will send tomorrow. Definitely!
“Jesper Moller Christensen,
UEFA Executive Committee,
Union of European Football Associations,
Route de Geneve 46
Case Postale,CH-1260 Nyon 2
Switzerland
Dear Mr Moller Christensen,
I understand that you are currently Chair of the UEFA Committee that is charged with the duty of ensuring that the national Associations in membership of UEFA comply in every relevant respect with the laws of the nations to which they belong.
Sad to say, I believe that the Scottish Football Association (‘SFA’) may have been and may still be somewhat remiss in its duties in that regard.
It appears to me that while Rangers International Football Club plc(‘RIFC plc’) acknowledges on the website it uses (see http://www.rangers.co.uk) that it is the ‘holding company’ of company number SC425159 the description and history given of company number SC425159 is that of RFC 2012 plc (in Liquidation since 2012), formerly Rangers Football Club plc which is company number SC004276, and which is soon to be dissolved and removed from the Register of Companies!
I believe that RIFC plc marketed itself, in the ‘Prospectus’ for its application for admission to the Alternative Investment Market ( AIM) in 2012, as being about to ‘become the holding company’ of company number SC004276, i.e. the liquidated Rangers2012 plc( the Rangers of 1872 foundation) and that it currently markets The Rangers Football Club Ltd ,company number SC425159,as if it were the Rangers Football Club plc , company number SC004276, and not a new club admitted by the SFA into Scottish Football only in 2012.
The basic legal facts are that the Rangers Football Club of 1872 foundation lost its membership of the SFA on account of Insolvency having had to surrender its share in the then Scottish Premier League, ceasing thereby to be a member of a ‘recognised football club’ and therefore ceasing to be eligible for membership of the SFA.
I understand that under the relevant UK legislation a Company may not legally claim to be the holding company of a liquidated enterprise.
I suspect therefore that RIFC plc may be in breach of the laws of the UK, by claiming falsely to be the holding company of one of the oldest clubs in world football.
I accordingly think, with respect, that your Committee should look into this matter for the good of both UEFA and Scottish Football integrity.
Or, perhaps, explain why I may be wrong in my belief!
No one in the SFA or in the BBC or the print media has attempted to do so except by claiming that it was the ‘company’ that died, while the football club lived on!
Balderdash! It was not some ‘company’ that lost its membership of the SFA-it was the very football club itself!
Yours sincerely
‘me’
—
as an aside, why do clubs in financial distress not do the ‘Rangers’ thing? Go into Administration, get professional advice from Administrators who sell some assets but don’t bring the club out of Administration, liquidate the club, and then free of debt carry on as being the selfsame football club?
What a wizard wheeze!
Why did Hearts and ICT not do the same?
Why did Hearts and ICT not do the same?
————————————
Perhaps the people in charge have some integrity.
…or perhaps they knew the Scottish Football authorities would have treated them as what they would have been, which is a new club?
Ballyargus
23 August 2024 at 12:07
‘…Perhaps the people in charge have some integrity.’
++++++++
Good answer, Ballyargus!
I refer to my post of 00.19 in which I say “And this below is the text of the letter I will send tomorrow. Definitely!”
Well, I did post my letter to UEFA from the Post Office (in Penicuik!). Not quite the same version as the one in that 00.19 post. I had to tweak it a bit here and there to improve its ‘readability,’ but it is substantially the same.
I am having it tracked so that I’ll know if it gets delivered.
Whether it generates a reply remains to be seen.
I am hoping, of course, that Moller Christensen’s committee are honest people who will see that the point I am making is that RIFC plc may have been, and may still be, in breach of civil Law in the UK whatever the SFA as a governance body might have to say about the exercise of its powers in matters of its governance of football under its own Articles , Rules and Regulations and UEFA’s constitution and rules etc.
The law of the land, I imagine, trumps the rules and ordinances of any sport or business.
It’s not too late for the SFA to RETURN to doing their duty, as they had faithfully started to do when they withdrew RFC of 1872’s membership of the SFA, after the SPL refused to ‘transfer’ the ‘Rangers’ share to Club 12/SevcoScotland/TRFC, and required CG’s ‘team 12’ to apply for membership of the SFA once what’s his name (Longmuir?) persuaded the SFL to let them in to a ‘recognised (by the SFA) football league’.
Status of Covid repayments.
https://forthefans.substack.com/p/six-clubs-on-track-with-covid-loan
A bit of fun and games tonight with AI:
“You
Sent by you:
Can you name me any instance in UK football that parallels the ‘Rangers’ situation?
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
The situation with Rangers is quite unique, but there are a few instances in UK football where clubs have faced financial difficulties, restructured, and continued to claim their historical identity:
AFC Wimbledon
AFC Wimbledon: After Wimbledon FC was relocated to Milton Keynes and became MK Dons in 2004, the original Wimbledon fans formed AFC Wimbledon. Although AFC Wimbledon is considered a continuation of the original club by its supporters, it started from the lower leagues and worked its way up1.
Leeds United: Leeds United faced severe financial difficulties in the early 2000s, leading to administration in 2007. The club was bought out of administration and continued to claim its history and achievements despite the financial restructuring2.
Portsmouth F.C.
Portsmouth F.C.
Portsmouth FC: Portsmouth entered administration twice, in 2010 and 2012, and faced significant financial challenges. The club was eventually bought by its supporters and continued to claim its historical achievements3.
These examples show that while the specifics of each situation differ, the concept of maintaining a club’s historical identity despite financial restructuring is not entirely unique to Rangers.
If you have more questions or need further details, feel free to ask!
You
Sent by you:
As I understand it, the clubs you mention were brought out of Administration and did not enter Liquidation.
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
You’re correct. The clubs I mentioned, such as AFC Wimbledon, Leeds United, and Portsmouth FC, were indeed brought out of administration rather than liquidation. The situation with Rangers is indeed more complex and unique in that the original entity went into liquidation, and a new company was formed to acquire its assets and continue its football operations.
In UK football, there aren’t many direct parallels to the Rangers situation. However, the closest example might be Middlesbrough FC. In 1986, Middlesbrough faced severe financial difficulties and was liquidated. A consortium led by Steve Gibson formed a new company, Middlesbrough Football and Athletic Company (1986) Ltd, which acquired the club’s assets and continued its operations. Despite the liquidation, the new entity is generally considered a continuation of the original club1.
The Rangers case remains distinctive due to the scale of the club’s history and achievements, and the ongoing debate.
Tell me more about Middlesbrough FC’s situation.
How did the new entity handle historical continuity?
Are there other examples of liquidation in UK football?
Chats
Plug-ins
Recents
UEFA Executive Committee Member
11:55 pm
Dropbox Sign-Up Prompts
9:26 pm
Selling “British Essayists, Vol. 26: Connoisseur”
Yesterday
copilot
4 days ago
Playing DVDs on Windows 10
5 days ago
Opening Device Manager in Windows 10
5 days ago
Response stopped
New topic
Ask me anything…
Aye, see me and see feckin technology!
I apologise for the fact that, in copying in my post of 26 August 2024 at 00:07 my ‘discussion’ with AI, I did not notice that I had not successfully deleted earlier stuff between me and AI (the stuff after the question I had asked, ‘Are there other examples of liquidation in UK football?’
—
It is clear that the machine can’t get its head around the problem of trying to legitimise the assertion by RIFC plc and the feckin SFA and the even more feckin SPFL that TRFC is continuity Rangers of 1872!
Not being human, the machine cannot lie! It knows that Rangers Football Club plc (RFC 2012 plc) is in Liquidation. It knows that TRFC was created only in 2012. It therefore knows that TRFC cannot possibly be Rangers Football Club plc (RFC 2012 plc).
Ah, but! It can pick up that the ‘Memory’ of RFC of 1872 is alive and, possibly, the fact that the venal minds of a sport’s governance body desperately felt the need to propagate the lie that the ‘memory’ is the legal fact: for whatever reasons best known to their own rotten consciences as human beings.
And the cowardly BBC and SMSM assisted and continue to ‘assist’ them in propagating a lie, while true journalists are prepared to risk death in order to report truth in much more important and dangerous areas of truth-seeking.
The sheer feckin nonsense of it all!
Honest to God.
So, we’re off on another attempt by disaffected shareholders of RIFC plc to try to boost the chance of their getting some half-decent price for the shares they so desperately want to sell?
CityA.M (who the hell are they apart from being company number 15016484?) has come out with a story which the ‘Scottish Sun’ and ‘The Scotsman’ and the DR have also run with, namely, that some unspecified American consortium have valued RIFC plc at £150 million and are looking to buy a significant percentage of shares.
And auld Dave frae the ‘ ‘mulk’ ‘ is right in there denying that there has been any such move by anyone.
Could we be in for some fun and games as we watch the actions of would-be deserters from what appears to be a ship in insurmountable difficulties in the economic seas?
Remember ‘The Power Game’ TV series, in which ‘boardroom machinations’ were at the heart of things (1965-1969]?
Naw, I suspect that most of the readership of SFM wasn’t even born as early as 1965!
Basically, it was about how the directors of /significant shareholders in a business saw to their own personal interests first when it came to company policy: no question of teamwork if the results of ‘teamwork’ decisions worked against them personally.
There is no doubting the fact that RIFC plc is barely washing its face, and in my layman’s view may indeed be in danger of folding.
Perhaps some help in the form of an unexpected win in the near future might help rally the troops.
Those troops, I believe, have had help before from what one might consider an unexpected source.
‘Who has won the most Old Firm games, Celtic v Rangers head-to-head record.
Bizarrely, both clubs have a total 169 wins each in their head-to-head encounters, meaning whoever wins this Sunday can claim to have ‘the best’ Old Firm record, officially. (The Scotsman – Graeme Falk)’
For Falk’s sake – whit planet are these loons on!?
Embarrassing journalism.
It’s scraping the bottom of the barrel that these writers rely on pretending that a club that died 12 years ago is still around.
bect67
28 August 2024 at 14:52
‘…whit planet are these loons on!?’
++++++++
One where the concepts of sport, truth and journalism are not at all properly understood, I would venture to suggest?
My post of 23 August at 22 .13 or so refers.
Royal Mail tracking tells me a few minutes ago that my letter to Uefa has reached its sorting office in England.
How bloody marvellous, I don’t think!
Pedantry alert, second half of Hearts game tonight, held up because of ‘a hole in the net’. A broken string results in fewer holes in a net. A bodged repair results in many more. Is there a UEFA standard? I’m sure VAR could establish whether a goal should stand, even if the ball passes through a non-standard matrix.
EKloon
30 August 2024 at 00:18
‘…I’m sure VAR could establish whether a goal should stand…’
+++++++
Enjoyed that, EKloon!
Made me reflect on the in-swinger corner-kicks I took (in the days when I played college football) which swung just a little too far and landed on the roof of the non-existent net. If there had been a net at all, and if it had a hole big enough for the ball to get through, I might have been credited for scoring direct from a corner! (Many times!)
Seriously, though, with so much at stake for football clubs it is imperative that things nobody bothered their ars.s about in days gone by are absolutely in conformity with the Rules of the game, so I have some sympathy for whatever official required the mending of the net!
carried by the Irish News is this : Story by PA Sport Staff • 3h ago:
“Rangers boss Phillipe Clement is “thrilled” to have signed Neraysho Kasanwirjo from Feyenoord.
The 22-year-old Dutch defender will join the club on loan, with an option to make it a permanent move next summer”
I note the ‘on loan’ theme.
It is clearly an indication that RIFC plc has no, or very little, outright purchasing ability.
Cash-strapped borrowers, living hand-to-mouth.
I suspect that their financial situation is really grim, and that the auditors of their accounts might have some difficulty in accepting any statement from the Board that RIFC plc can be considered as a ‘going concern’.
But that’s just me, perhaps.
John Clark 30/08 23.49.
Firstly John, loan signings are not free and come with a fee attached. Your own club i believe has just paid out £1.3 million on a loan fee.
Secondly, we have just spent/commited to spend, the best part of £16 million whilst receiving just over £5 million. This is before agents fees & loan fees are included.
Cash-strapped?
Albertz11
31 August 2024 at 07.22
‘…loan signings are not free and come with a fee attached.’
++++++++
Yes, Albertz11, I’m aware that nothing comes ‘free’ in football, [although I think there have been instances of a lending club paying part of the wages of the player that they’re lending].
The main question is: how much of ‘the best part of £16 million’ has been paid in cash, as opposed to ‘committed’? Could RIFC plc come up with the readies to meet such amount as might suddenly be called in by the lending clubs? Or find a bank ready to lend them enough cash to do so?
You may know the answer to those questions and are happy.
But a business which is reliant on loans of any kind to keep afloat over an extended period of time certainly cannot be anything other than teetering on the brink of crisis, especially when its product is not meeting the demands of its customers.
(Incidentally and by-the-by I don’t think Dave King’s recent denial of any approach from ‘America’ has been at all helpful)
John Clark 31/08 11.16.
£4.2 million committed to, with the remainder paid in installments as is the norm with most transfer fees John.
On the subject of Rangers spending, and what they can and can’t afford. They will have to satisfy UEFA’s Financial Sustainability Regulations. No ifs no buts no maybes.
The days of a Scottish owned bank allowing them a level of borrowing there was no business case for are long gone. As is the opportunity to use taxpayer’s money to bring in players they could not otherwise afford. It must also be said that the previously mentioned Scottish owned bank at the same time did its best to put Celtic out of business.
Karma, eh!
Come now, uth!
I think it was SDM’s Rangers of 1872 foundation that was propped up by a ‘supportive’ bank before that bank was taken over by real bankers who put the gun to SDM’s head.
TRFC is not the ‘them’ of the wretched, hubristic, vainglorious SDM.
I go with Cantwell: it’s a different club!
But you’re right in so far as UEFA ought to ensure that any club complies with its rules.
Sadly, though, UEFA bought into the lie that CG had bought/brought RFC of 1872 out of Administration and that TRFC was RFC of 1872 foundation.
The same stench of falsehood attaches to UEFA as attaches to the SFA in its acceptance that a football club newly admitted by the SFA into membership in 2012 could be regarded as being a club entitled to the honours achieved by a now defunct club!
The untruth is so glaring.
test
Albertz11
31 August 2024 at 11:42
‘…£4.2 million committed to, with the remainder paid in installments as is the norm with most transfer fees John.’
+++++++++
Thank you, Albertz11, but just to be clear, Albertz11, are you saying that £4.2 million was paid in cash, and the rest of the global loan-player payments due (£11.8 mill) is being paid by instalments?
I acknowledge that there’s nothing intrinsically wrong in that.
But if there is a difficulty in keeping the biscuit tin up to scratch when there’s a cash-flow problem as RIFC plc may well be experiencing now it might have been wiser for RIFC plc to ca’ canny in their disbursement of cash.
John Clark 02/09 18.24.
No John.
The £4.2 million is the amount agreed with RC Lens for the permanent transfer of Oscar Cortes next summer. It is a similar deal to that of Mohamed Diomande who joined in January 2024 on a loan with a obligation to buy this summer.
As i said previously the vast majority of transfer fees are paid in instalments.
Robbie Copeland [‘journalist’] felt entitled to write this in the DR online nine hours ago:
“Philippe Clement has been keen to bring the average age down and move on some of the lingering deadwood that once brought home the title under Steven Gerrard.”
‘Lingering deadwood’?
What an insulting way to describe any footballer/sportsperson who may no longer be able to perform at his former level!
Would anyone describe Andy Murray as ‘deadwood’?
God grant that Copeland himself be spared the indignity of being described later in HIS ‘journalistic career’ as being ”deadwood”.
As a (presumed) buyer into the untruth that TRFC is Rangers of 1872 his jaiket is already on a shoogly nail in so far as journalistic integrity is concerned, in my opinion.
Commonsense tells us that football players no longer being as good as they were do not deserve to be described as lingering deadwood.
“Journalists” who buy into fantasies and fail to report facts? They can be deservedly called a whole lot of worse things, in my opinion.
Honest to God!
It seems there is a new editor of ‘The Scotsman’.
Could we hope that some truth may be found in the matter of sports reporting?
Not at all!
‘The Scotsman’ is, in my opinion, so thirled to untruth in the matter of Scottish Football that it would require a miracle to get it to acknowledge the truth that TRFC is not, and cannot legally be, RFC of 1872!
A new editor is not likely to be any more ready to report truth, in my opinion. He would not have got the job if he was off message!
The new editor of ‘The Scotsman’ says this in today’s (Tuesday) print edition:
” You can be assured, will uphold the same principles and dedication to quality insightful and challenging journalism for which The Scotsman has become renowned”
Of course he will: he’s been the deputy editor for three years!!
And as such has clearly bought into and propagated what in my opinion is the sporting lie of lies, namely that TRFC is RFC of 1872.
Which makes a mockery of his assertion that the ‘The Scotsman’ is into ‘challenging journalism’.
May ‘The Scotsman’ die the death it deserves as a propagandist of an untruth.
By the by, did you know that ‘The Scotsman’ newspaper describes itself as ‘compact’ rather than ‘tabloid’?
Such bloody ‘Edinburgh’ pretentiousness!
The auld ‘fur coat and nae knickers’ syndrome!
Journalism-wise the ‘Scotsman’ is on the DR level as far as objective investigation and truth-telling ‘ is concerned.
In the matter of Sport!
Not life and death issues such as real journalists risk their lives reporting on.
Honest to God!
I spit in their eye!
Dave King has spoken, according to Ross Pilcher’s second-hand report (from the ‘Rangers News’) in his piece in the DR online version at 19.07 today.
“..And he’s assured fans that under-fire chairman John Bennett is feeling it just as much as they are as he tries to turn the ship around. “It is incredibly disappointing to hear that a small minority of supporters are letting their anger temporarily overcome them to the point of directing personal abuse at our players,” King told the ‘Rangers Review’.
Is there something afoot, I wonder? Is King a supporter of Bennett as interim CEO? Would I be wildly wrong in imagining that there’s a very divided Board and some very worried significant shareholders who might be thinking of baling out rather than accept the fact that without adequate funds, being made available (at risk) it may be a long way back to making it worthwhile to be a significant investor in TRFC?
It would be helpful if we had some kind of real investigative journalists with the cochones to dig deep for themselves.
Reflecting on the news that the Copland Road stand at Ibrox is out of bounds I find that I’m totally ignorant of how that affects season-ticket holders of seats in that stand.
I mean, how many of the 5000 or so seats are held by season ticket holders? How are they recompensed? How much does that cost/will cost RIFC plc?
On top of the rent they (may?) have had to pay for the use of Hampden?
And for how many games?
Once you get into asking questions for yourself, you realise how feckin useless are our SMSM! -both on their ‘business’ pages and on their ‘sports pages!
Especially when one remembers how they gleefully got into what was happening to another club some years ago which despite its financial difficulties (and the unsympathetic Bank) managed to avoid both ‘Administration’ and Liquidation.
And did NOT die, and did not need a fiction/lie to be created by the very GOVERNANCE body of Scottish football in order to ‘continue in existence’ after the death of Liquidation!
What a wretchedly wretched body of men they were, and are, if still alive, that bought into a palpable untruth.
In my spit-in-their-eye opinion they failed in their bounden duty to sporting truth for dirty, mucky, financial reasons.
And each of them knows it in his heart, whatever kind of front he presents.
Honest to God!
What have we got?
Why, nothing other than a dishonest, and therefore meaningless, ‘sport’ and a feckin useless/cowardly/partisan journalism.
In my deeply held opinion.
I heard this morning on the radio some toss-pot of a ‘runner’ describe how he makes money for other utterly loathsome (amateur)? ‘runners’ by entering races in their names, so that they can claim credit and boast to their ‘friends’. He said he charges 3 cents a kilometre (foot races) 16 cents (cycle races), not much, but he does it for several people at a time, and each lends them their phone so he can message their friends or colleagues at work pretending to be them!
He concluded his remarks with “I’ll do anything for money”
There are others in the world of ”sport”, I’m sure, who have proved themselves to have no more interest in ‘sport as sport’ than those who claim sports success that they have not themselves honestly earned, and those others who confer sports honours on persons/ sporting entities that did not exist even to have tried to win those honours!
Honest to God!
My post at 14.37 today:
amendment:
line two: for ‘for’ read ‘from’!
Careless regrettable keyboard effort from ten-thumbed octogenarian!
It’s the guy who actually runs that makes money, of course, while those who pay him are lying about their ‘sporting’ achievements.
Is Barry Ferguson doing a Michael Beale by advising PC who should be in the line up this weekend. Is Barry a close and good friend of Dave King who appears to be setting the cat among the pigeons with his latest run of statements., and does BF hope his helpful advise? might lead to a return to management at his boyhood club. Interesting days to come.
goforpar
10 September 2024 at 22:50
‘..Is Barry Ferguson doing a Michael Beale by advising PC…’
+++++++++
I’m not quite up to the minute, goforpar, having 5 granweans from Oz to run after, this wee while!
What’s the story?
No offence to the boy Barry, but one would not readily imagine that he is in any kind of position to ‘advise’ Phillipe!
That there are problems at Ibrox [apart from the botch-up over the late delivery of stuff from Asia] seems to be clear.
Is Barry boy a stooge for King? or just a For King stooge?
John Clark 10/09 23.28
Total non story John.
BF is of the opinion that Nedim Bajrami should start this weekends game. Thats it.
No different to Hartson, Sutton, Wilson etc discussing their former club.
Albertz
What is your opinion of Gillespie knocking back Gers?
How bad must the situation be for a self confessed fan to reject gers to stay with St Mirren?
MCSTAY MAGIC 11/09 13.47
Don’t know enough re- JG situation to comment is the honest answer. I do know he was inside Ibrox on a number of occassions recently.
I did allude to `issues` that needed clarification from JB In my post of 17/07 of which the CEO position was just one among many.
I’m also led to believe that the club is a shambles behind the scenes at present, so the apparent rejection by JG wouldn’t come as a major surprise.
The reasons behind the HOA leaving and a 60% reduction in the Recruitment department sent alarm bells ringing.
Thanks for replying Albertz
A step in the right direction imo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnZ2a7rmglE&t=1244s
It would also be beneficial if all members of the media actually spent some time learning the laws of the game before voicing an opinion.
Was surprised this wasn’t already posted .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c93yp0644yno
Paddy malarkey 14 september 202r at 1919
Here I am in Italy able again to post after locking myself out by basically not knowing my fundament from my elbow!
The blog Administrator got my mistakes sorted.Praise be to them!
So Bennet has gone and Gillligan is kind of ‘in charge’ of TRFC.
Question: will he and other board members be ready to fund a fairly expensive re-build and promise jam tomorrow?
Where is Dave frae ‘ the ‘ .mulk’ in this? Pulling the strings?
What fun to watch on as the , in my opinion, false pretendy Rangers of 1872 destroys itself in bitter personal in-fighting
And doing so, of course, without any of the hostile,gleeful, biased reporting about the financial problems of another football club some years ago that was so evident at the time!
Not to say a word about a Scottish bank that was only too ready to kill another football club!
But, hey, I had a wee swim in the Adriatic on the beach at Viareggio this afternoon with the granweans.
Nothing can compare in value.
There are grandfathers out there in the world of Scottish professional football governance who would have to lie to their granweans if they asked them whether they honestly discharged their sworn duty or sold their souls to Untruth.
I’m jealous, JC – I love Viareggio! Was last there in May, my regular annual holiday.
I see Dave’s rattling his chains again . And there doesn’t seem to be much of a queue to front up at the AGM .There’s always the upcoming financials to calm nerves .
Maybe not these ones , though .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cp8llrvedeno
Craig Levein
https://twitter.com/BBCSportScot/status/1836049617705693365
Couldnae resist this:-
“Celtic fans might get to see their team play in Europe after Christmas… it’s not happened for a while…” (Kris Boyd)
Sums this knowledgeable genius up tae a tee!
bect67 18/09 11.37
Winning a European knock out tie post Christmas would have been a more accurate take.
Around 20 years i believe.
Albertz11
18 September 2024 at 12:00
As usual, you APPEAR at first glance, to have missed the point ma china though, in fairness, you probably haven’t. However, just in case, please re-read my post as:-
“Celtic fans might get to see their team play in Europe after Christmas… (Kris Boyd).
If you wish to play any other daft/bitchy games – just post. Ah ferr enjoy them – especially any relating to a liquidated Govan outfit.
nawlite
16 September 2024 at 23:08
‘…I’m jealous, JC – I love Viareggio!.. ‘
+++++++
nawlite, I locked myself out of the blog a few days ago using my mobile having forgotten to take my pc with me in the haste to get into the taxi!
And my bloody mobile did not have my JC email address!
So, my attempts to use the ‘request new password’ were unsuccessful, because I couldn’t get the email that tells you the link you need to put in a new password. Or something like that!
The mobile now has my JC email address.!
As a student in Rome in 1961 I went to Viareggio on a day trip with some other guys. We had an absolutely great day on the beach. The beach is the same, the swimming is the same, but my goodness, I couldn’t remember the name or location of the trattoria where we had lunch, one of those unhurried, leisurely meals over a good few draps of the local vino and a sensible wee digestive break before another wee swim and suntan episode.
There seems to have been fairly significant industrial development and housing development along the coastline since then?
Anyway, back home early evening today. And back on the blog.
Is Dave King taking a page from Donald Trump’s playbook. Numerous statements, ( threats), an EGM where only fans vote, mysterious investors, the lines flow with no substace behind them. Should the fans and the media not take a long hard look at the position they were in with Ashley’s group in control, and, following the takeover how things went. How many legal cases, how many losses, how much turmoil in the boardroom, all for the sake of a covid title which has left them in their current position. Never mind Sevco, lets re name them Team Turmoil.
goforpar
19 September 2024 at 23:00
He has terminal selective amnesia, and is attempting to GASL(!)ight us all!
Fortunately, post like yours will keep the facts , and truth (which he’s unsuccessfully attempting to distort), to the forefront of reality.
I also wonder what Gerrard’s views on his own departure from the parlous state of Govania might be.
goforpar 19/09 23.00
Should the fans and the media not take a long hard look at the position they were in with Ashley’s group in control.
…………………………………………………….
There seems to be the misconception than under MA’s control we were a financially well run operation. The facts however prove this not to be the case. I personally witnessed the ways in which the very fabric of the club was being neglected which resulted in a toxic atmosphere.
From a purely financial perspective however the figures are interesting. The first two are under MA followed by the DK regime
2013/14 Rev- £25.230, Ex £33.837 Loss- £8.085.
2014/15 Rev- £16.470 Ex £26.804 Loss-£7.535.
2015/16 Rev- £ 22.228 Ex £24.936 Loss- £3.303
2016/17 Rev- £29.232 Ex £32.928 Loss- £6.663.
There are of course extenuating circumstances that played a part in the figure above but speaking as a Rangers supporter i hope never to see the club under the likes of MA’s control again.
I see another reference to a `covid title` which amuses me tbh. Notwithstanding it’s importance at the time, i do wonder if another clubs SC victory is referred to in a similar manner?
bect67, “GASLight”. Haha, that is simply outstanding!! A fantastically clever play on words. Great job.
bect67
20 September 2024 at 10:07
‘…GASL(!)ight..’
+++++++
Sublime and brilliantly apposite link to South Africa judge’s remark!!
I’m no company lawyer, but surely King is talking nonsense even assuming that when uses the word ‘fans’ he means only such fans as are shareholders.
As far as I can see there is no provision in the Companies Act 2006 or in the Articles of Association of RIFC plc that would allow a general meeting [ I note incidentally that the term ‘extraordinary general meeting’ is not used in the Companies Act 2006!] without at least one of the current Board being in charge exercising the Board’s authority.
Decisions made in the absence of current Board representation would be illegal ‘mob-rule’ stuff, no??
King knows he can’t force the board to do anything within Company Law, JC. That’s why he’s using his usual rabble rousing techniques through the media and his supportive fan media to get the fans angry and have them attack the board. He’ll be hoping the members of the board are weak enough to bow to fan pressure and allow him an in. I’m not sure what he’s trying to gain with all this, though. I still think he just wants some of his money back from his £20m he gave to the old club after being ‘duped’ by Murray – could he be hoping to force through a share sale (including his) to these rumoured American investors?
I hope that either that comes to pass (‘cos American investors ain’t going to be in for the good of TRFC!) or King does manage to force his way back into control – things were never so funny as when he was there last time when losing ridiculous court cases was a weekly recurring event, haha.
I do love how TRFC fans don’t see through such a seemingly obvious con man – no detail AT ALL in his plan (?!) yet they respond like Pavlov’s dogs to the buzzwords of ‘domination’, ‘investment’ and ‘most successful club in the world’.
‘goforpar
19 September 2024 at 23:00
‘.. Never mind Sevco, lets re name them Team Turmoil.’
++++++++++++++
Well, that word has been used previously!
Back in 2020, Christopher Jack had a piece in ‘The Herald’ on Stuart Gibson’s purchase of shares in RIFC plc.
In the piece he quotes Gibson (now a 9.84 % shareholder) as saying:
“The board has been through its turmoil in the last ten years, but the board that we have in place now, there is nobody that is thinking now or will contemplate in the future selling. And that is very much the way that I feel as well. The board would have to have a meeting and decide they were going to have a new share issue and, depending on what they needed and when they needed it, then, yes, I would definitely consider it”
I suspect that Gibson would consider RIFC plc to be in worse turmoil now than even then.
It is a bit of a puzzle why obviously smart businessmen like Gibson and the other major shareholders have held on to their shares without working concertedly to protect their investments by pumping some more realistic money in?
The extent of the disagreement and discord in the Board must have potential buyers licking their lips in anticipation of a cheap purchase in the near-ish future!
https://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/18815534.rangers-q-stuart-gibson-5million-share-purchase-future-ibrox-investment-becoming-director-gers-finances/
I was looking for info on the American/British John Combethekras Halstead, director of RIFC plc and came across this:
https://www.companydatashop.com/company/report/SC437060-rangers-international-football-club-plc
Reading this I find this:
“SUMMARY
This company is 11.9 years old and is currently active. It is controlled by multiple entities. The company has positive equity (net assets) of GBP 37.1 million which has decreased from the previous year’s figure of GBP 50.3 million. The latest reported revenue figure is GBP 59 million which is up 10% on previous year’s figure of GBP 53.2 million. Retained earnings is negative (GBP -31.6 million), which means the company has aggregate losses since it’s inception or it has paid more dividends than it can afford; given the company’s age, this is a sign of serious financial problems. The company has 6 active officers (directors or partners) who are or were officers of 22 other companies. The company has no public disputes filed on the Business Disputes Register. There are no court cases involving the company that we are aware of.”
—
‘ a sign of serious financial problems.’
Me, masel, personally? I think they’ve had it.
I have no doubt that one or two of the previous would-be bidders for the old, original RFC in Administration as well as American potential bidders will be keeping an eye of the possibility of ‘Administration’ for RIFC plc/TRFC of 2012 and the chance of picking up some of the physical assets cheaply (though not perhaps as cheaply as CG bought some of the assets of RFC 2012 plc alias the Rangers of 1872 from heavily criticised D&P)
Further to my post at 22.18 today, I’ve just fired off a message to the ‘contact us’ address of the site which gave me the stuff I posted in that post.
What my message was is “I am puzzled as to why the description of the company of which RIFC plc is the holding company is a description of company number SC 004276(in Liquidation) while the Rangers FC website (which is what RIFC plc uses) says that it the holding company of SC 425159.”
The untruth is in there, unquestionably, in my view. The attempt to assert that TRFC is RFC of 1872 is wrong.
And the SFA and SPL were and are wrong to have bought into it, for filthy lucre’s sake, abandoning any notion of ‘sporting integrity’ and making horses’ ar.es and deceivers of themselves.
Bad cess to them all.
[I love that ‘fire off’! it took me ages to type the message.]
And I have had no reply of any kind to my letter to what’s-his-name at UEFA.
I will ‘fire off’ a reminder to them that questions don’t go away because you ignore them.
And sooner or later have to be answered truthfully even after those who have lied are long dead and are rotting and rotten in their graves.
The truth about the 5-way agreement will emerge eventually just as the truth about the Harrod’s rapist is currently emerging.
In my anything but my humble opinion.
Naismith sacked .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cdjeygg03meo
Interesting semi final draws for the League Cup semis. What are the odds that Celtic/Rangers avoid each other in the semi finals. Have they ever faced each other in a LC or SC semi final. Odds should be out of sight on this happening. Perhaps if a computer did the draw things would be different.
goforpar
22 September 2024 at 18:31
‘… Have they ever faced each other in a LC or SC semi final.’
+++++++
I don’t know about the days before RFC of 1872 ceased to exist as a football club.
The club known as The Rangers Football Club which was admitted into membership of the then SFL in 2011/12 and wrongfully (in my opinion) is allowed by our football governance bodies to advertise itself as being one of the best and oldest clubs in the world has met Celtic in the League Cup semi-finals twice, on 1st Feb 2015 and on 23 Oct 2016.
(According to my AI co-pilot!)
I’ve just for the first time viewed the video stuff about KMI and VAR.
Honest to God, the sheer brass neck of a dishonest Football Governance body in pretending that it is interested in ‘truth’ in sport, when it itself fabricated a wholly ridiculous lie that a dead football club is somehow alive and allows it to attempt to claim to be a club that they themselves dealt the death blow by withdrawing its membership!
A legally dodgy deal does not have to be adhered to by the successors of those who made the deal. The SFA board today could rip up the 5-way Agreement as being an unconscionably illegal agreement.
Why don’t they, if they are so interested in sporting truth as to buy into VAR and KMI?
A fish rots from the head.
goforpar 22/09 18.31
Have they ever faced each other in a LC or SC semi final.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Not sure if you’re being serious or not.
In the last decade alone they have been drawn together on 7 occassions. 6 in the SC and 1 in the LC.
Re- SF draws above .
Figures should have read 5 in the SC & 2 in the LC.
Albertz11
23 september 2024 8:19 and 8:11
I was referring to the draws for semi finals only, if I’m mistaken my bad. Just seem to think the avoidance of each other in semi finals stuck in my head.
goforpar 23/09 14.16
My reply is for SFs only.
They were also drawn together in April 2021 in a SC Fourth Round tie.
More fun interrogating my Copilot: I questioned its earlier assertion (which Wikipedia also carries) as to which company it was that was liquidated while the club carried on. This is what the machine (which cannot lie) finally said after a number of questions:
You
Sent by you:
“Why then the myth that it was the holding company of SC004276 that was liquidated and not company number sc004276 itself?
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
The confusion likely stems from the complex nature of the financial and legal proceedings surrounding the liquidation of Rangers Football Club. Here are a few reasons why this myth might have persisted:
Complex Ownership Structure: The ownership and control of Rangers Football Club involved multiple entities, including The Rangers Football Club plc (later RFC 2012 plc), Murray International Holdings Limited, and The Rangers FC Group Ltd. This complexity can make it difficult to pinpoint which entity was directly affected by the liquidation.
Media Reporting: Media coverage at the time might have contributed to the confusion. Reports often focused on the broader implications for the club and its fans, sometimes oversimplifying the legal distinctions between the different companies involved.
Public Perception: For many fans and the general public, the distinction between the holding company and the football club itself might not have been clear. The focus was on the impact on the football club, leading to a conflation of the entities involved.
Legal and Financial Jargon: The terminology used in legal and financial contexts can be confusing. Terms like “holding company,” “administration,” and “liquidation” might not be fully understood by everyone, leading to misconceptions.
These factors combined to create a narrative that the holding company was liquidated, when in fact, it was the company with number SC004276 (RFC 2012 plc) that went into liquidation.
If you have any more questions or need further details, feel free to ask!”
The machine had previously agreed that Murray International Holdings was not wound up until a couple of years after RFC of 1872 so that was not the holding company, and that the Rangers FC Group was not liquidated.
Unquestionably a blatant untruth was cobbled up by Scottish Football ‘governance’ aided and abetted by the SMSM and the BBC.
Disgraceful.
I think Gilligan’s ‘statement’ is an indication of just how dire things are at RIFC plc. A Board so divided as to be reduced to airing its divisions publicly with no attempt to show any sense of corporate responsibility. Instead of plaintively saying (to DK) ‘…give us a plan.. we would read that plan’ he should surely be positively asserting that his board is already working on a plan.
The fact that he did not say something as positive as that is a sign that there is no coherent , detailed plan or even a rough sketch of a plan.
RIFC plc is heading for disaster.
Albertz11
23 September 2024 at 08:19
Re- SF draws above .
Figures should have read 5 in the SC & 2 in the LC.
Seldom right an’ wrang again (as ma Da wid say). In fairness though.
Mibbe yer jist no good at arithmetic.
Just as a wee aside, Royal Mail tracking service tells me that my letter to M. Jesper Christensen of the UEFA executive committee was delivered to the address on 3rd September.
Not having received a reply to date, I will be posting off a reminder to him tomorrow, using the Royal Mail tracking service (another £7.00! – I put my money where my mouth is!) enclosing a copy of my original letter.
Big (or even small) organisations that do not at least acknowledge receipt of correspondence are suspect.
As far as I can ascertain UEFA and its various Committees have no email address for ordinary punters to make contact with, no sort of ‘complaints’ department or ‘customer service’ point for suckers like us plebs.
Oh, for some Bernstein or Woodward in the SMSM.
No chance of that when even BBC Scotland buys into untruth on orders from above.
Anent my post of 23.03 I wonder to myself whether Archie Macpherson with whom I shared the refereeing of a schools’ football match back in 1963/64 ever bought into the Big Lie that TRFC is RFC of 1872.
I’d be disappointed if he did.
It looks like the bromance between Jackson and Whyte has come to an abrupt end. Gone are the ringing endorsement for the billionaire with untold wealth to the hatchet piece in today’s DR. Does Jackson injure himself jumping from bandwagon to bandwagon. Instead of piling on to someone who was definitely out of his league, that being Whyte, why not take a long hard look at the current circumstances at Ibrox. What about the latest report stating PC could be in line for another job in Belgum.. Does this have legs or is it idle speculation. Could he look into the cock up over the infamous steel order, did Bisgrove really mess that up himself. Where was the rest of the board during this, maybe planning European trips in the CL.
goforpar
24 September 2024 at 20:17
‘…It looks like the bromance between Jackson and Whyte…’
++++++++++++++
I’ve just read the piece by Jackson in the online DR today.
First comment: wasn’t Jackson the first to mention that Whyte was a ‘Motherwell-born multi-millionaire’?
Second comment:
This bit of Jackson’s ‘report’ might be of interest to the legal firm of Duff and Phelps:
“He does go against his own grain by going on to admit that he effectively ‘handed Rangers on a plate’ to Charles Green as part of a duplicitous deal with administrators Duff and Phelps.”
It seems to me that Messrs Whitehouse and Clark of D&P might very well have grounds for complaint at the careless way that sentence was written! They could, I think, easily take it as suggesting that they were part of a ‘duplicitous deal’ with Whyte!
I do try to be fair and relate to known facts in whatever posts I make and give checkable references to sources.
I recognised the good intent of the project to create additional and better-sited seating for wheelchair-bound TRFC fans.
In ‘The Scotsman’ print edition today Gilligan is reported as acknowledging that ‘unfortunately the timing was wrong, we got that part of it wrong..’
That’s a far more honest approach than the original attempt to blame shipping in Asia!
I give him credit for that.
But, of course, there will be no loss of total seating capacity. Indeed, as I read the planning stuff, there will be a gain of something like 356 square metres of seating space overall to compensate. That’s 18.8 x18.8 metres. You could get a lot of football seats in that kind of space.
Isn’t there someone on the blog who can check out whether I was/am right in thinking that TRFC has increased its overall seating capacity while increasing its wheel-chair fan capacity?
JC, I can’t be sure of the truth of it, but I read a while back on one of the TRFC fan sites that there was a very small increase in capacity as result of the work on the disabled section. 118 seats comes to mind, but I haven’t re-checked my memory!
John Clark 24/09 23.12.
Isn’t there someone on the blog who can check out whether I was/am right in thinking that TRFC has increased its overall seating capacity while increasing its wheel-chair fan capacity?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Hope this helps John.
https://www.rangers.co.uk/article/disabled-facilities-at-ibrox-update/40KPnwpicc7vsitthxytuk
nawlite
25 September 2024 at 11:41
‘…118 seats comes to mind, but I haven’t re-checked my memory!’
++++++++++
I gather that the proposals include the removal of 4 rows of seating in the lower tier to be replaced by viewing platforms providing up to 30 new wheelchair spaces, and that to compensate for the loss of seats there will be 6 new rows at the front of the upper tier
https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/files/E7EE6A1545900F0B3A53B9B4592B5107/pdf/24_01095_PLU-COVERING_LETTER-6096215.pdf
I have no idea of how many seats there are in any ‘ row’ in the Copland Road stand! But if the 6 new rows are the same of the same number of seats as the ones being removed then there would be a net increase of seats overall.
So, not an entirely generous spend on behalf of wheel-chair users, but a nice wee revenue raiser!
I see another Ranger player has fallen victim to the mysterious injury bug that has beset the team. Wasn’t PC going to get to the bottom of this and have sorted for this season. Perhaps he may have better luck consulting with Dr, Phil of American television who appears to have a cure for every thing.
goforpar
25 September 2024 at 20:31
‘…Wasn’t PC going to get to the bottom of this and have sorted for this season…’
+++++++++
Clement says:
” We all know we need time for that. We need a few transfer windows”.
It seems clear to me that he felt authorised by the interim CEO to use those words, reflecting a sense of realism, a biting of the bullet, by Gilligan.
But also reflecting the fact that RIFC plc had no really meaningful dosh to spend in the most recent transfer windows.
In a nutshell, no equivalent of St Fergus McCann has appeared (honour and praise to him for ever).
(Surely there must be someone in the world of football who can explain why there has not been the equivalent of Fergus among the significant shareholders in RFC plc? Oh, I’ve got it: they realise that throwing good money (except on loan terms) into supporting a sporting lie is maybe not good business!)
In sum, RIFC plc are only just a step away from insolvency, in my opinion. And the guys that loaned them money to keep the auditors happy know it!
One does not get to be a millionaire by indulging in sentiment!
Just want to paraphrase Rangers fans comment after Celtic’s win the CL, that team is the weakest in their grouping, could something similar not be applied to Malmo whose recent record in Eurpean games is less than stellar. Also the comedy continues with a passport foul up for a Ranger’s player. It would be understandable if he was just in the door, but, he’s been in Glasgow for a while now Will the former CEO be blamed for that as well.
It’s a sobering thought that if DK is even half-correct in his estimate that RIFC plc needs a minimum of £50 million, winning every game including the final of the Europa league will still leave them strapped for cash to the tune of, what? £30 M or more?
Given that it’s extremely improbable that TRFC will win more than perhaps another game or two, they will probably be toiling right to season’s end and dependent again on loan funding.
That is, if Gilligan is sincere in his assertion that there is world-wide investor interest in RIFC plc, the Board might have to accept some American/ Middle Eastern/Oriental bid for a significant number of shares in spite of their wish not to risk ‘single’ ownership by any one shareholder.
Discuss.
Sloppy, inaccurate reporting in full view:-
‘Rodgers gave Valle his debut in the Scottish League Cup last weekend, where Celtic defeated Falkirk 5-2.
Valle scored a goal on his debut for Celtic and his performance in the game turned some heads’. (Shub Banerjee – Inside Futbal).
Eh …you’ve sure turned mine Shub – cos he dindnae!
bect67
27 September 2024 at 15:23
Oops – gave masel’ a spellin’ ‘riddy’ there, eh!? Should read:-
‘cos he didnae’
A wee reminder:
The famous/notorious Rangers Football Club of the 4 young men is due to be dissolved and struck from the Register of Companies on 24 October 2024.
All the lies in the world cannot change that truth.
Scottish Football will remain tarnished and dishonest as a sport until that fact is recognised and acted upon by Football Governance.
Now that’s what you call destructive testing of a system . I can’t believe that Celtic thought they had the wherewithal to go toe to toe with Dortmund in Germany .
paddy malarkey
1 October 2024 at 23:38
‘…Now that’s what you call destructive testing of a system …’
++++++++++++
Certainly self-destructive, pm! How many of the Dortmund goals were directly the result of a poor pass /clearance by a Celtic player? And the big hole in the Celtic defence was ignored, it seemed!
A partially self-inflicted massacre.
But Dortmund would have won, I think, even without the benefit of gifted goals.
Some hard revisionism and study of fact is required now rather than reliance on present levels of skill and talent as measured against the SPFL level of attainment.
Pious hopes and dreams are no match for hard reality nor is belief in one’s own propaganda!
A salutary lesson was learned by Rodgers last night…I hope.
” Administration didn’t help Rangers, and that company disappeared”, so said a BBC chap (I wouldn’t call him a ‘reporter’ so much as a buyer-into a footballing untruth) on Radio Scotland a few minutes ago when asked whether Administration might help ICT.
Honest to God: if only the new Head of BBC Scotland Haley Valentine would restore journalistic truth to the ‘reporting’ of the sport of football in Scotland.
Is she likely to, d’ye think??
Robbie Copeland of the DR online updated at 20.57 tonight says that
“Adidas are reportedly ready to extend their agreement with Celtic after a profitable first four years”
So perhaps the Dortmund game may not be too damaging financially!
The new CL format, I think, means that there is no return match with Dortmund?
That’s rather a pity, I feel, because the chances of Celtic being so bad against them again, at home, would surely be much reduced?
That wee shock to the system yesterday would surely make another drubbing unlikely.
The now dead Rangers of 1872 never allowed a repeat of their 7-1 drubbing by Celtic on 19 October 1957!
But that’s by the by.
—
I am distressed at the situation that ICT finds itself in.
We will see how sympathetic our football governance bodies will be in the event that ICT goes into Administration and some preferred lone shareholder in a brand-new company makes a deal to buy the assets cheap if the Administrators fail to bring the club out of Administration and goes into Liquidation and then seeks a secret ‘5-way Agreement’ that will create a myth that his newly admitted club is the very ICT that was liquidated!
Would they be sympathetic?
Would they hell!
I had a wee laugh when I heard Steven Thomson(?) pundit on BBC Scotland radio say a wee while ago ‘ It could have been 5 or 6’… delicately chickening out of saying 7!
TRFC were as comprehensively beaten as Celtic were.
It seems to me that while our football governance bodies are very capable of creating and propagating a stupid lie, they are absolute rubbish when it comes to managing the whole business of football as a national sport.
There we are again internationally embarrassed and humiliated.
Hell mend those who have perverted truth in Scottish Football as a sport.
Royal Mail tracking tells me that my snail mail reminder letter to UEFA has been delivered.
Will I get a reply? or even an acknowledgement?
Probably not.
Because UEFA bought into the lie that RIFC plc is the holding company of the Rangers football club of 1872 and not of TRFC of 2012 creation.
As did the BBC and the SMSM.
Oh, that Haley Valentine will have the guts to tell BBC Scotland to tell the truth that it originally told until the then BBC Trust told them not to!
I mentioned Haley Valentine in my post of 3 October at 23.43.
Since then, I’ve discovered that she has already worked for BBC Scotland… and before that for DC Thomson papers.
’nuff said? Hopes dashed?
“She said: “I am thrilled to have been asked to lead BBC Scotland. There is a wealth of first-class creative talent in Scotland within the BBC and across the wider sector.” [as quoted in the ‘Herald’]
Creative talent in what?
Propagating and perpetuating the ludicrous untruth that Rangers of 1872 did not die as a football club when the then SPL required it to surrender its share in that company and the SFA perforce had to withdraw its membership of the SFA and require CG’s ‘SevcoScotland to apply as a new football club for membership.
Now, what football people do in relation to Truth is one thing.
What the BBC does is something of far greater importance.
And BBC Scotland has a sin to answer for in meekly having accepted the order from the then BBC Trust (trust?) to support the lie that it was some ‘company’ that was liquidated while the football club that it was that company’s business somehow lived on!
It was Rangers Football Club of 1872 that held the share in the then SPL!
While other football clubs do their utmost to avoid going into Administration and if they do, they do their utmost to get out of Administration, rather than be Liquidated.
The SFA acknowledged that RFC of 1872 ceased to exist.
But then prostituted itself for filthy lucre’s sake by creating the lie that RFC of 1872 was still alive!
I spit in contempt of the SFA and SPFL- and of each of those individual members of those bodies.
Those who lie in matters of importance are as likely to lie in everyday ordinary matters.
Not the kind of people I would want to associate with.
And maybe Hayley Valentine might be numbered among them?
Who knows?
I just had a look at the Liam Scales handball incident. Would someone in the media ask PC if he could take a look and provide another stand up routine on why it might not have been a penalty do to arm positioning, balance, etc as he so willingly provided a week or so ago with a very enjoyable show of positioning etc.
I give you part of my latest ‘chat’ with copilot AI: I had asked it a number of questions: the last question was about (guess what!) This is the response:
Sent by Copilot:
Yes, there has been a notable case involving Rangers Football Club PLC. In 2012, Rangers entered administration due to severe financial difficulties and subsequently went into liquidation i 2012. The club’s assets, including its membership in the Scottish Premier League (SPL), were sold to a new company, Sevco Scotland Ltd. However, the SPL clubs voted against allowing the new entity to take over Rangers’ league membership1.
As a result, the new company had to apply for membership in the Scottish Football League (SFL) and started in the Third Division, the fourth tier of Scottish football. This case illustrates how financial issues can lead to a club losing its league membership and having to reapply for recognition under a new structure.
If you have any more questions or need further details, feel free to ask!
You
Sent by you:
I think you may be mistaken. Rangers were required to surrender their share in the then SPL. It was not theirs to sell!
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
You’re right, and I appreciate the correction. When Rangers Football Club PLC went into liquidation in 2012, they were indeed required to surrender their share in the Scottish Premier League (SPL). This share was not something they could sell. Instead, the new entity, Sevco Scotland Ltd, had to apply for membership in the Scottish Football League (SFL) and started in the Third Division.
This situation underscores how financial difficulties can lead to significant changes in a club’s status and league participation. If you have any more questions or need further details, feel free to ask
You
Sent by you:
Thank you.
! 😊
We’re getting there!
Next steps will be to look at section 1002A of the (amended) Companies Act 2006, the wee amendment that mentions things like false information given by companies in their Prospectuses ( or should that be ‘Prospecti’ ?)
Oh, what fun and games one can have when truth is on one’s side. When one knows that desperate people are trying to make money by deceit and that third rate ‘journalists’ aid them by themselves denying truth!
Listening to the real journalists reporting from Lebanon etc our SMSM guys and gals must feel absolutely worthless and ashamed. To propagate a sporting untruth on behalf of a Football Governance body!
Geez, you cannot get much lower than that!
Shame on them.. and they know it!
TRFC was created in 2012.It is not the Rangers of both my grandfathers’ days.
Just tell the truth!
And set the records straight and truthful for future generations..
You’re welcome!
Thank you!
Give me today’s top news
Chats
Plug-ins
Recents
Registering a Business in the UK
10:32 pm
Selected Text: “`text Other Information “`
9:03 pm
Interest in Bags
3 days ago
Exploring Edinburgh
4 days ago
Flight Tracking with Real-Time Maps
4 days ago
Glasgow Airport Information
5 days ago
Dissolution of Third Lanark
30 Sept 2024
See all recent chats
Response stopped
New topic
Ask me anything…
Feedback
goforpar
6 October 2024 at 17:55
‘…Would someone in the media ask PC if he could take a look and provide another stand up routine on why it might not have been a penalty……’
+++++++++
Short answer, goforpar, is ‘of course not!’
It is a fact of footballing life that ‘managers’ have to play to the gallery, keep the fans onside, show commitment etc.
But, in my opinion, he has had to buy into the fact that the Board has no real money and is trying to get the fans to accept that fact without alienating them, for at least a season or two. The cry will be ‘no surrender’, except for maybe a season or two.
Seriously, though, I’m sure the Ibrox board is so uncertain, so disunited, so split among themselves that the man frae the ‘mulk’ will have to be listened to.
DK wants his money back- and, odd as it seems, I think he’s right.
Murray was the ultimate cause of the ‘downfall..
But has walked away, personally untouched.
If there are baddies, I’ll side with lesser baddie!
From a completely couldn’t give a damn point of view, of course.
It’s the baddies in the SMSM and BBC (if any such there be) that I am interested in.
And as a wee aside afore I go to my pit, there’s a lovely kind of something or other in the fact that BBC Scotland’s new Controller is Ms Valentine!
It was on Valentine’s Day 2012 that Rangers Football Club of 1872 and 1899 incorporation went into Administration.
Possibly the last day that the SMSM reported football truth?
(although, to be fair, BBC Scotland reported truthfully initially until the wretched BBC Trust ordered them not to)
And, sadly, they obeyed.
I have no great hopes that Ms Valentine will view matters differently, having been working in BBC Scotland at the time.
I shall be writing to her, of course, after she has taken up office.
I reckon it’s tomorrow that the latest CEBD decisions are announced bu UEFA , and they might be of interest to TRFC fans after their prominent displays in Malmo and at Ibrox . Could be expensive .
According to Andrew Newport in the DR online updated at 21.02 this evening
“Rangers are facing yet another high-profile departure with football operations director Creag Robertson set to quit the club.
The Ibrox outfit are already operating without a chief executive, head of academy and a permanent chairman. Now interim board boss John Gilligan faces having another role to fill after being informed Robertson is also stepping down. Record Sport understands he has resigned to pursue “new opportunities” elsewhere and will be clearing his desk before Christmas.
It gives one the impression that people are deserting a sinking ship!
My post of 21.59 tonight needs a correction: the last sentence ‘it gives one the impression…a sinking ship’ is my comment, not part of Newport’s report!
An ICT fans’ spokesperson was on BBC Radio Scotland at 11.45 this morning, strongly reminding us that Motherwell, Hearts, Livingston and Dundee all burst a gut to get out of Administration to avoid being liquidated. They succeeded in so doing and continue to exist as being the same clubs.
He hopes that if ICT do enter Administration, they too will come out of it and avoid entering Liquidation and thus RETAIN THEIR MEMBERSHIP of the SFA and continue as the same club, even if only as part-time club.
He knows as well as the whole of Scottish Football knows that Rangers of 1872 died as a football club in 2012 because it was NOT bought out of Administration by an incompetent Insolvency Practitioner but was liquidated, its assets being sold off cheap, and is to be dissolved and removed from the Register of Companies in two weeks’ time.
There are squeaky bums at Hampden as our football mis-governance bodies potentially face up to the consequences of the untruth they introduced into our sport in 2012, the untruth that TRFC is somehow RFC of 1872.
The Scottish Media have the SFA’s back. If ICT end up being liquidated the media will simply reprint whatever the SFA send to them. If it’s the polar opposite of what happened to ‘Rangers’ they will present whatever argument the SFA tells them to in order to justify it.
According to Scott Burns in the Daily Record online at 21.13 tonight
“Hearts are closing in on the appointment of their new manager – with just two candidates now in the running.
The initial shortlist has been cut and the final decision is now in the hands of the Tynecastle hierarchy. Record Sport understand it is between an English boss and an overseas coach. Both impressed in initial interviews and have been put in front of the Hearts board as part of the final process. It is likely that Tynecastle chiefs will make a decision on Steven Naismith’s successor over the next 24 to 48 hours if terms and an agreement can be reached”
Anyone got any of who the two remaining candidates are?
John Clark 10/10 21.47
Hogmo & Critchley are the names I have heard mentioned.
JC
Heart of Midlothian want to make 64-year-old Norwegian Per Mathias Hogmo, who led Rosenborg and Sweden’s Hacken to league titles and was most recently with Urawa Red Diamonds, their new head coach after he and former Blackpool manager Neil Critchley made it down to the final two on the shortlist. (Daily Record)
paddy malarkey
11 October 2024 at 12:59
‘…Heart of Midlothian want to make 64-year-old Norwegian Per Mathias Hogmo..’
++++++
Thanks for that ,pm.
I see that the Norwegian chap seems to have walked away because terms couldn’t be agreed.
Does that mean that the Hearts Board have to start all over again or will they offer the job to the Critchley guy….and would he take it!
The point there, I think, is that while it is a good thing that the Hearts board like to keep their fan/shareholders ,and fans generally, informed there has to be some sensible use of discretion. Names of short-listed job applicants ought not to be made publicly known, in my opinion.
If I was in Critchley’s position I think I would walk away as well.
I hope Hearts get it sorted, and quickly.
And I wonder what exactly ‘ data analytics’ really means , if it doesn’t include some kind of assessment of the remuneration and other benefits that the potential applicants for the job might insist on?
I think Hearts have made a bad mistake albeit with the best of intentions.
Well, are we downhearted this evening? Not a bit of it! Disappointed, certainly. But we were not run ragged and we certainly made Croatia work hard for a narrow victory.
Bring on Portugal!
And players must be told that a team is at its weakest in the minutes after scoring! Relief, celebration, joy and happiness cause lack of focus and here-and-now concentration!
Is there a sports psychologist involved in the ‘training’ of the national team?
Mmmnn.
Have a look at this link
https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/images/WG1adWZ4SExOOXRNV2h5Mm0vTjNtRzdVdjEzc2dEZEM4cWQ0K1hJZkJhK1NKd1Y5Qm9JUjA3dE1GdGxGemZRT2t2akJJcU43OUJOSWE3bjIrazVhd3M4U3ppZjJDejdycGNTNmlXaUtWNnF2MW9rZXAyMTFMc2kzNWtmYXg3bGtaK2Q4SnNPMHNaK2Ivb3k0YVVJZnZoTHB6T05SNHBFRmJXY25CZlREaHZrdGJPMk02NTJo
Dear me. Is it a hoax link?
Or a summary of the lack of Board control due to division/uncertainty/seismic difference in expectations?
Bisgrove chucking the CEO-ship with very short notice might well have been the harbinger of serious trouble ahead.
Of the Administration kind. The kind of trouble that no one will put up shekels enough to buy you out of, perhaps?
And a second ‘secret 5-way Agreement’ would surely not be attempted by the governance bodies of Scottish football?
It is truly right and just that a plc falsely claiming to be that which it is not should be in financial trouble with major shareholders bitching with each other and with the Board, while important people abandon ship.
In my oft-expressed opinion.
I think you’ll have to copy and paste that info , JC .
paddy malarkey
14 October 2024 at 11:17
‘…I think you’ll have to copy and paste that info , JC .’
+++++++++
It was apiece in the DR online, pm.
This might be an easier link
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/inner-rangers-sanctum-filled-stench-33877945
Well, I watched the match on the youtube channel. And if ever a team deserved a draw for sheer effort in defending, it was that Scotland team tonight. Well done to them. It cannot be said that Portugal were not trying to win; they clearly were and were getting frustrated enough almost to allow us to score on a couple of breakaways.
Clarke deserves some solid backing.
Match: Borussia Dortmund vs. Celtic FC (7:1), 01.10.2024, UEFA Champions League 2024/2025
Charges against Celtic FC:
Lighting of fireworks, Art. 16(2)(c) DR
Decision:
The CEDB has decided:
To fine Celtic FC €20,000 and to ban Celtic FC from selling tickets to its away supporters for a total of one (1) UEFA club competition match, for lighting of fireworks. Said ban from selling tickets to its away supporters is suspended for a probationary period of two (2) years, starting from the date of the present decision.
paddy malarkey
16 October 2024 at 23:37
‘…To fine Celtic FC €20,000..’
+++++
Me masel personally I would kick every stupid supposedly ” Celtic supporter” who brings fireworks into the ground very hard in the balls.
Daft, stupid, feckin eejits whose stupidity costs their club both money and respectability.
Get them to hell out of the game!
mind you, the acceptance by their club of the lie that TRFC is RFC of 1872 makes me wonder why the hell I should bother my ar.e about Celtic’s ‘good name’.
The Celtic board really need to get back onto the path of truth and insist that the SFA do not perpetuate the untruth that TRFC is the very Rangers of 1872 foundation!
‘Daft, stupid, feckin eejits…’
Too right John – unfortunately, these ‘nutters’ are all over the ‘football globe’, and it seems they’re competing for some feckin eejiticity (!?) world title.
Serious question though …
Could UEFA be more proactive in working with clubs to try and prevent such idiotic actions?
Maybe UEFA and the national associations could wean themselves off the use of pyros and set a proper example to fans . All major finals used to be adorned with pyros to enhance the viewing spectacle ,so it’s little wonder to me that fan groups picked up the baton when the authorities realised how hypocritical they were being .
paddy malarkey
17 October 2024 at 13:47
Yep …
“Don’t do as I do – do as I say”
paddy malarkey
17 October 2024 at 13:47
bect67
17 October 2024 at 14:40
++++++++
Well, pm and bect67, what if our ‘richer’ clubs and the SFA and SPFL were to demand that their stewards be given by Parliament the police powers of ‘stop and search’ of a fan after that fan went through the turnstile?
Given that the yobs are generally centred in a particular area accessed by a limited number of turnstiles relatively few stewards would need to have the powers. And season ticket holders for seats/standing room in those areas would hold their season tickets on condition that they would be/might be subject to search by an authorised steward and ejected if he/she refuses …. and so on with all aspects thoroughly explored etc etc.
It’s been a while since I went clubbing, but I imagine that clubbers today still are prepared to be searched by bouncers for drink/weapons/ drugs?
The general run of football fans are not eejits or troublemakers, and I imagine that not many of us would take umbrage at being asked to be patted down.
Or perhaps sniffed at by a dug trained to detect ‘gunpowder’?
If the Polis cannot police games the way they used to do (remember the steady walk by dozens of officers around the perimeter at what, twenty-yards distance? from each other, ready to dive into the terracing and ‘lift’ drunken, fighting yobs), then some other arrangement has to be made.
As a matter of law, the football clubs are not responsible for the crimes of their individual customers who throw fireworks any more than they would be responsible for any crime of assault committed by one fan against another or for some nutcase carrying a knife on his person or for the crimes of a pickpocket!
UEFA/FIFA should not , in my opinion, be fining clubs but helping them to get their governments to think laterally and empower clubs meaningfully.
What do you think?
”UEFA/FIFA should not , in my opinion, be fining clubs but helping them to get their governments to think laterally and empower clubs meaningfully.
What do you think?”
Can’t think that any ‘commonly sensible citizen’ would disagree with that John, but, as someone (Voltaire?) once said:-
“Common sense is not so common”
Especially in the UEFA/FIFA corridors of power methinks.
So according to the DR Rangers could be due a “mega” profit if one of their former academy players signs new conrtract with Aston Villa. The likelyhood of that happening appears to be a far fetched idea. How much would this prospect ( note not a starlet) have to be sold for to generate a “mega” profit. Please people at the DR just a little more substance in reporting even though catering to the fans of the team at Ibrox. Take a look in the dictionary for the definition of mega. And, while they are at take a look at the word starlet. Young footballers are not starlets, they are prospets or assets, with assets being the better term. These youngsters are signed in the hopes of developing into a player who an be sold on for profit.
I loved Frank McAvennie’s little question on ‘Off the Ball’ this afternoon while discussion touched on the parlous situation of ICT … if they fold, he remarked, ” will they come back as ‘THE’ Inverness Caley Thistle?” Chuckle, chuckle.
McAvennie and every footballer in Scotland, and every newspaper editor and ‘journalist’ in print or TV media, knows the truths
1) that TRFC is not Rangers of 1872 and that RIFC plc, itself created in 2012 is the holding company of The Rangers Football Club which, under various names (club 12/ Sevco5088/SevcoScotland/ The Rangers Football Club Ltd) was admitted into Scottish Football only in 2012, by the very governance body that took away Rangers of 1872’s membership of the SFA, and
2) the share in the then SPL that Rangers of 1872 had had was NOT transferred to TRFC.
It is by no means a trivial matter when the BBC and print media are prepared to lie brazenly day after day, year after year.
Lie about a matter of sport, what might they not lie about in far more serious matters?
I myself would not trust a word of what any journalist in Scotland who has sat silently accepting the untruth that TRFC is Rangers of 1872 might have to say about any of the major world issues.
Would you?
If ICT decide to appoint Administrators I hope they have enough savvy to employ reasonably competent ones who won’t make an absolute farce of things!
I do hope that some buyer will save the club, though. As far as I can see, mega-millions aren’t needed to pay their debts and a realistic down-sizing should be possible?
I’ve just checked my emails. Fans of Celtic are being invited to bid for a shirt worn at today’s match v Aberdeen!
Geez! In my opinion giving away a two-goal lead to your most serious challenger is hardly worth commemorating by owning the shirt worn by whichever Celtic player who played in that game!
Honest to God, bloody cheek to think there was anything particularly good to celebrate after that draw.
And I’m only half-kidding!
“The first-tier tribunal (FTT) has once again had to consider the thorny topic of “carelessness”. In the case of Janet Bray Ltd vs HMRC TC09277 (JB), the context was PAYE and penalties relating to yet another employee benefit trust (EBT) scheme which fell foul of the supreme court’s judgment in Rangers.”
I love these little references to the cheating-of-taxman tendencies exhibited by people in football!
Och aye, good old Rangers of 1872 under a knight of the realm are in there in cases of legal precedent- to be cited for generations to come as possibly having been at the madam in the eyes of HMRC.
Interesting to see the banner referring to ‘mismanagement’ at RIFCpl/TRFC !
I don’t think that’s so much a comment on Clement’s football managerial skills as on the general management of a plc riven by faction and division within and between large stakeholders /Board members.
Gilligan’s words of reassurance are not cutting the mustard with even moderate fans because, I suspect, they do not include positive assurances that maintaining a title challenge this season is the top priority.
Gilligan’s Board does not have the bottle openly to say that monies cannot be found this season to buy the number of top-class players Clement needs to win the League. Not this season, and perhaps not next season.
One could even imagine RIFC plc dropping into a perilous financial situation of not being able to procure financial loans enough to keep the books balanced.
What is one to make of this ambivalent/ cowardly piece of ‘journalism’ in The Herald online today?
” Will Super Caley, like Queens Park, Morton, Dundee, Motherwell, Livingston, Dunfermline and Hearts in the past, survive and go ballistic once more?
Or are they doomed to suffer the same sorry fate as Clydebank, Airdrie, Gretna and Rangers or be forced to start over again?”
It’s clear that whoever wrote that is ignorant of the fact that Rangers of 1872 is within a few days of being struck off the Register of Companies having been Liquidated in 2012.
Rangers of 1872 did not ‘start over again!
The Rangers Football Cub Ltd was admitted as a new club for the first time when it was granted a place in a league recognised by the SFA in 2012 and was in virtue of that membership was granted membership of the SFA.
By no stretch of truth can TRFC be the selfsame RFC of 1872, whatever warped journalism might wish to be the case.
The sooner that decent men and women realise how stupid the SFA and SPFL were and continue to be in defending the utterly indefensible uth that TRFC is a one hunner an’fifty year old club laden with sporting titles and ‘honours’ the sooner we got back to serious management and governance of Scottish professional football.
Drug-taking athletes who ‘win’ medals are rightly stripped of their medals when the truth is known!
Honest to God!
[ This is an amended version of a post I posted earlier this morning but which somehow ended up as having been posted in 2023! See me and my tech ability?.. hopeless!]
It’s with sadness that I note that ICT has gone into Administration.
I have read what the vastly experienced Blair Nimmo had to say about the importance of ICT being seen in its realistic position as a ‘smaller’ club and the need for it to find its appropriate level where it can compete professionally while remaining at least at break-even point financially.
I believe that that is also the view of influential people in the SFSA which, as I understand it, aims generally at getting a deeper, wider, realisation in Government and in football governance that it is absolutely true that football is too important to Scottish cultural life to be left to mere money-making company Boards.
I hope that the Administrators will be able to find a buyer for the club via a CVA ( which D&P failed so dismally to do for Rangers of 1872), and thus save it from the death of Liquidation. And kick on then with perhaps a more realistic understanding of what might be possible.
One thing is for sure: if ICT do not come out of Administration and are Liquidated there is not a chance that any JCnewco 2024 / THE ICT FC 2024 ltd which may buy the goalposts or the SFA registrations of a handful of players will be allowed by the SFA to claim to be the ICT of that wonderful headline ‘supercaley go ballistic celtic are atrocious’
To die the death of Liquidation and yet be alive was allowed by the SFA only once, and for filthy lucre’s sake and to one club, which lives today on the untruth that it is something that it is not, in my opinion and in the eyes of the Registrar of Companies.
I do wish ICT well, and hope that the Administrators are more than competent in doing what is right by the creditors while saving the club from Liquidation. And do not too quickly choose a ‘preferred’ conditional buyer of some only of the assets!
Long live ICT.
From Companies House 17 October 2024
” FINAL GAZETTE NOTICE
SC004276 RFC 2012 PLC
Dissolution date of the Company 16.10.24″
___________
And there you have it: the football club founded in 1872 that was a member of the SFA in virtue of being a shareholder in a football league ,the then SPL, recognised by the SFA but which was required by the SPL to surrender that share on entering Liquidation and IN CONSEQUENCE lost its entitlement to membership of the SFA is gone for good.
The new club formed in 2012 is not and could not possibly be the Rangers football Club of 1872.
The fiction that it is has to be challenged at every possible turn for the ultimate good of Scottish Football
——
And isn’t it interesting that ICT have had the sense to appoint as their Administrators the Insolvency Practitioners who acted as Liquidators of RFC of 1872 as Administrators of ICT?
In my opinion, Messrs Stephen and Cohen of BDO will do a far better job for ICT than the incompetent Administrators of Rangers of 1872 and will probably save ICT from Liquidation.
I do hope so.
I idly wonder what the Financial Conduct Authority might have to say about a plc falsely (as I see it) marketing itself as being the holding company of the company whose number was SC004276 and which has just been dissolved and removed from the Register of Companies, when in fact it and law it is the holding company of company ‘y’, company number SC 425159!
In my opinion claiming to be what you are not is lying.
A business enterprise in doing so must therefore be in some kind of breach of company law, stock market rules, FCA governance policies and regulations, wouldn’t you say?
I mean, isn’t it nonsense that a now nearly 12-year-old football club can be allowed to claim to have won the sporting honours and titles in competitions that took place a hundred years and more before it existed!
The SFA board and the hypocritical, cowardly boards of most of the clubs in Scottish professional football
should be ashamed in their very guts for creating and/or buying into a monstrous lie!
And the SMSM guys can be dismissed out of hand as being of the same ilk as propagandist ‘journalists’ of non-democratic states.
The shame they must feel when real journalists are fearlessly risking DEATH to report truthfully!
Ach, who thinks that sports writers are real journalists?
With the likes of XY and yxz on BBC Radio Scotland and ABC and FUC on the Scotsman and The Herald and twy etc on BBC Scotland TV?
No one!
May they personally not have peace of mind when they think of their professional association with untruth.
I metaphorically spit in their eye as being cowardly, dishonourable and unprincipled betrayers of Truth.
And they have no answer to that charge!
Not to me, but to the very concept of ‘Sport’.
Honest to God!
It gars me greet, as our gun-running poet of an excise man might have said-not!
I made use of an idle moment this afternoon to send a wee question to the Financial Conduct Authority.
It was on their website contact page, and I didn’t know how to copy on screen the text of what I wrote.
But, as I suspect you will have guessed, it was about what I believe was the failure of the nomad who nodded through what I believe was the misleading Prospectus of RIFC plc in 2012.
I was prompted to do so after reading a piece by Anthony Harrison in today’s print edition of ‘The Scotsman’.
Harrison used to work in the FCA, and his piece is a helpful reminder to firms that they have to be careful in their dealings with other possibly crooked international, money-laundering outfits or face sanctions!
The wee question I delicately asked the FCA itself was whether it was careful when it came to testing what would-be plcs had to say about themselves and about ‘nomads’ acting for such.
My message was acknowledged.
Will there be a reply? An explanation of how the nomad believed the untruth that RFC of 1872 had simply changed hands as if bought by a new owner and brought out of Administration?
Will there hell! when we know that even the BBC bought into and continues to buy into a fiction!
And there’s a special place in hell for liars and dissemblers! Certainly, Dante in his ‘Inferno’ hurled them into ‘ the eighth circle of hell, along with other falsifiers.’
May the liars in Scottish Football governance and BBC radio Scotland (they of course individually know who they are) burn as brightly and strongly as any of Dante’s liars!
During the Celtic game today the commentator remarked to Chris Sutton Celtic would be looking this year to equal rangers 55 titles. Sutton never commented on this, the reporter further commented to Sutton that Luke McCowan’s hero at Celtic growing up was Chris Sutton, to which Sutton replied are making this up, the reply was do I ever make things up. Bit of a no brainer if you think a club which started in 2012 can achieve 55 titles.
bigboab1916
27 October 2024 at 22:55
Ahv nae time fur this eejit, who hiz took the ‘king’s shillin’ (fae his Ibrokes sympathising MSM employers) jist tae stey in a joab oan that wan Boab. He widnae say it at a Celtic event that’s fur sure.
Nae credibility fur me when he ignores an undeniable legal truth that Rangers FC 1872-201 was finally liquidated last week.
Dear Chris,
Fact Check – TRFC has won ONE Scottish top league title.
Me
Sorry – Rangers FC 1872-2012
Telling it like it is .
https://youtu.be/AGJMH0s9_EE
Here is an email I received yesterday which has me wondering what the hell Companies House and the FCA thought I have been on about!
They seem to have missed the basic point I have been trying to make for years, namely, that in my opinion a new plc looking for admission into the market misled potential investors by claiming that they would be investing in the holding company of a very old, famous and very successful football club when instead they would be investing in a BRAND NEW plc which would be the holding company of a BRAND NEW club newly admitted into Scottish football!
They ‘appear’ to have absolutely no idea that RIFC plc (company number SC437060) which is the holding company of TRFC (company number SC 425159) claims to be the holding company of company number SC004276, as a look at the website of SC425159 will show.
Or maybe they, like BBC Scotland, know damned fine exactly what the truth is and have not the moral courage to tell the truth.
It’s such an absolute matter of fact and law that Rangers of 1872 is as dead as any other football club that was liquidated that one has to probe deeply into the minds and attitudes of those in football governance positions to try to get to grips with why they betrayed their offices of trust.
But of greater concern is the question as to why the SMSM ( ‘dare to tell the truth’ in particular) copped out of truthful reporting.
“Dear (me)
Thanks for contacting the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regarding Rangers International Football Club Plc.
I understand that Rangers International Football Club Plc the holding company of The Rangers Football Club. You’ve explained that their Prospectus may mislead investors into believing they are investing in a well-established club when, legally, they would be investing in a new entity. Additionally, you previously contacted us about The Rangers Football Club Ltd without receiving a response. I’m sorry to hear this and I can appreciate this is important to you. I’ve provided some information below which may be useful.
Rangers International Football Club Plc / The Rangers Football Club Ltd
I’ve conducted a search on the Financial Services Register (the register) which is a public database of the firms we authorise and regulate and it also shows warning pages for unauthorised firms.
I’ve been unable to locate a firm called Rangers International Football Club Plc which means they are not authorised by us.
I’ve located an entry for The Rangers Football Club Limited who have the status Introducer Appointed Representative (IAR) An IAR is a firm that can only introduce customers to another firm (its principal) or members of the firm’s group, and/or give out certain kinds of marketing material. The Rangers Football Club principal firm is V12 Retail Finance Limited. To ensure you are dealing with the genuine firm and not a clone we strongly recommend contacting the firms using the contact details provided on the links to their Register pages I’ve provided above.
What I have done with information provided
I have shared the information you have provided with the appropriate teams for their consideration. Further information about our primary market oversight and reporting suspected market abuse can be found here.
Just to set expectations, we wouldn’t be able to provide you with an update to what we do with the information you’ve provided us. I can appreciate this may be frustrating, but rest assured the information will be reviewed carefully.
Further support
If you have not already done so , you may also want to contact the Scottish Football Association about your concerns.
Thanks again for taking the time to contact us and I wish you all the best moving forward.
Yours sincerely”
++
I love the suggestion that I might want to contact the SFA!!
As if!!
Fcuk sending this game to the shops.
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC437060
Does anyone not find it ironic that Rangers published their latest financials results on the anniversary of the crash of the New York Stock Exchange in 1929. Could this be a harbinger of things to come.
Surely that must be a record for Aberdeen last night – 5 fouls , 5 yellow cards . Their opponents 19 fouls,4 yellow cards .(The Guardian). BBC has it as 6 and 20 fouls respectively .
goforpar
31 October 2024 at 00:33
‘…Could this be a harbinger of things to come.’
+++++
I am very ready to accept that it might very well be.
RIFC plc have, it seems to me, very relaxed Auditors who are happy to accept that company’s assertion that they will continue as a going concern.
Maybe I missed any reference to an assurance that big shareholders will be ready to lend monies enough to enable TRFC to escape Administration?
basically, RIFC plc is in financial trouble and hasn’t the resources to get itself out of that trouble- and the DKs of the world and the Easydales etc are not willing, in my opinion, to spend some few quid to save it!
But it is, I note, already ‘tomorrow’.
And time for bed, as Mrs C is kind of suggesting!
Got to be a positive .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cn5w2rqke2vo
Now no giggling at the back but surely with ICT the latest club to be (publicly declared) as in financial trouble, out football authorities need to follow the lead of UEFA and most other countries and establish financial sustainability rules and then apply and police them with consequences?
The days of clubs surviving on soft loans from directors must surely be brought to an end and clubs required to cut their cloth according to their profitability and operating cash flows. It might not be popular with all member clubs in the short term but will be to their’s and Scottish football’s benefit in the longer term.
No ‘giggling’ matter at all, Wokingcelt. It is ridiculous that with yet another sizeable loss from TRFC shortly after ICT’s fall into administration, the football authorities continue to sit on their hands and fail to deliver leadership that supports good governance for clubs and for the game in general.
Remember, it was only recently that Ian Maxwell, SFA CEO, was slated by the Scottish parliament for claiming that there was no need for a Scottish regulator because governance here was so good! “Anyone who witnessed the chief executive of the SFA giving evidence to this parliament just last month would have seen an organisation seemingly in denial,” was the quote. “Ian Maxwell claimed that the Scottish game does not have the same financial failings as the game in England. Well, I’m bound to ask, what about Gretna in 2008?
“What about Glasgow Rangers in 2012 and what about Dunfermline Athletic in 2013?” Any decent executive would surely be embarrassed at that claim given what has happened to ICT since.
Wokingcelt
1 November 2024 at 16:47
nawlite
1 November 2024 at 20:44
++++++++
Gentlemen both, on the general theme of regulation and checking and financial oversight in Scottish football, let me amuse you by saying that I have ‘fired off’ the following email suggesting that there may be other lapses of proper checking by other bodies:
For the attention of Mr McCreadie, CEO, V12 Retail Finance Limited
——————————————
“Dear Mr McCreadie,
I note that V12 Retail Finance Limited authorised The Rangers Football Club Ltd (‘TRFC’) company number SC425159 as an ‘Introducer Appointed Representative’ (IAR) as from 29 April 2024.
I imagine that the appropriate steps were taken to check the fitness and propriety of TRFC becoming an IAR.
But in my view, there is something that really needs to be cleared up.
I refer to the fact that TRFC is a subsidiary of Rangers International Football Club plc (‘RIFC plc’), company number SC 437060, which incidentally is not on the Financial Services Register.
On the ‘Investor Information’ pages of the website used by RIFC plc the company number of TRFC is properly stated- albeit in the smallest of print-as SC425159. [The website used by RIFC plc is http://www.rangers.co.uk ]
However, the description given of TRFC, the club of which they are the holding company, reads as follows:
“Rangers Football Club formed in 1872 is one of the world’s most successful clubs, having won 55 League titles,33 Scottish Cups, 27 League Cups and the European Cup Winners’ Cup in 1972….The history, facilities and ambition of the club are such that the club remains a desirable destination for foreign and domestic players alike…’
That is manifestly NOT a description of the now 12- year-old- club that was first admitted as a new club into membership of the Scottish Football Association only in 2012!
It is instead a description of RFC 2012 plc, company number SC004276, formerly Rangers Football Club plc (same company number) which entered Administration in 2012, and which was dissolved on 16 October 2024 and removed from the Register of Companies.
In my opinion, RIFC plc is claiming falsely to be what it is not, and potential investors even now could be misled: RIFC plc is the holding company of a football club that clearly is not, and could not legally be, the company that bore the number SC004276.
The fact that RIFC plc dare not suggest that the company number of TRFC is SC004276 indicates to me that something is not quite right.
No plc can be the holding company of a company that was dissolved and ceased thereby to exist.
On the face of things, TRFC should, I think, have declared this matter to its ‘principal’ firm, V12 Retail Finance Limited.
Perhaps V12’s independent checking was perhaps not quite what it should have been?
A simple mind like mine wonders why, as it seems, they did not spot the fudge?
I look forward to your reply.
Yours sincerely and happy hallow e’en!
me..”
I noticed this afternoon that there was an error or two in my email to V12 Retail Finance Ltd yesterday. I had made a mistake in typing in their email address and I see now happily that that email wasn’t delivered!
I’ve corrected the errors (I had put the company numbers against the wrong clubs!) and have sent an amended email today (without the ‘hallow I e’en’ good wishes!)
That email has gone and receipt of it acknowledged.
———
I don’t suppose I’m the only reader of the sfm.scot blog who is not familiar with the world of finance and business. I’m educating myself by trying to read up what is available online.
I give you this link
https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/appointed-representatives-principals
as a kind of starting point that might make my earlier posts about ‘IARs and ”principals’ easier to grasp.
Essentially, I have asked V12 Retail Finance Ltd whether their checks on TRFC were thorough enough, given that it appears that TRFC seems happy to accept being thought to be mendaciously described by RIFC plc as being RFC of 1872!
TRFC knows that its company number is not the company number of RFC of 1872, but of a new entity created in 2012.
In my view, V12 Retail Finance Ltd ought to have considered whether TRFC was an honest applicant for IAR status.
Have fun pretending that you are on the Board of RIFC plc or the board (such as it is) of TRFC and wondering whether you can tell the FCA that ‘there’s nothing to see here, squire’
In my view, baddies KNOW that they are baddies!
And folk who find that they may be associating with baddies will, unless they are baddies themselves, will try to distance themselves from the baddies.
I await V12’s reply with interest.
I have to say that, leaving aside every other consideration, that football match atween Celtic and Leipzig was a cracker of a spectacle. Some beautiful stuff by both teams. Sports psychologists can have a field day analysing it.
I just enjoyed it.
And perhaps I enjoyed more because today I received this email from V12 Retail Finance,
“Thank you for contacting us, I am sorry you have had reason to complain.
Your complaint has now been passed to one of my colleagues who will investigate the concerns you have
Should you wish to provide information in reference to your complaint, we can be emailed at raised.complaints@v12finance.com.
Please be aware our working hours are Monday to Friday 9am-5pm.
Kind regards,
xxx,
Customer Resolutions Executive”
I will of course reply and give them the facts, including reference to the ‘secret’ 5-Way Agreement, and the ‘Club 12’ “conditional” membership of the SFA and the rest of the stupid, stupid and insulting fiction that TRFC is historic Rangers of the four young men!
That there is a question to be answered is beyond doubt.
And a company like V12 simply has to keep itself free from any hint that it might have failed to do the checking of its IAR that the FCA requires it to do.
They will for their own business’s sake have to look seriously into why RIFC plc appears to claim to be the holding company of RFC of 1872 when in fact it is the holding company of TRFC of 2012!
Mind you, if the rotten old BBC Trust was able to lean on Pacific Quay (which once reported truthfully!) to make it propagate the myth that TRFC is RFC of 1872….where are we?
Honest to God!
But I go to bed happy.
I have received another email from V12 to say that they will investigate and asking me for any further info that I might have.
I will, of course, reply.
And I will stress the point that, in my opinion, V12’s vetting process seemed not to pick up the fact that TRFC appears to accept the untruth that is propagated by its holding company (RIFC plc) that it (TRFC) is the very Rangers of 1899 registration and 1872 foundation!…and not a brand-new club corruptly, in my opinion, that is permitted by the VERY GOVERNANCE BODY that killed Rangers of 1872 to claim falsely to be the very Rangers of 1872 and 1899 incorporation!
And which required CG’s team 12/ SevcoScotland to apply as a new entity for membership of a League and membership of the SFA!
[As an aside, the Donald has nothing on our football governance bodies in terms of skill in lying and prostitution of truth!
In my opinion.]
Companies House Crest
Companies House
RANGERS INTERNATIONAL FOOTBALL CLUB PLC
You have been sent this email because you are following RANGERS INTERNATIONAL FOOTBALL CLUB PLC (SC437060)
The following information is available from the company’s filing history.
Date Form Description
8 Nov 2024 TM02 Termination of appointment of James Taylor as a secretary on 8 November 2024
RANGERS INTERNATIONAL FOOTBALL CLUB PLC
You have been sent this email because you are following RANGERS INTERNATIONAL FOOTBALL CLUB PLC (SC437060)
The following information is available from the company’s filing history.
Date Form Description
8 Nov 2024 AP03 Appointment of Mr Graham Horsman as a secretary on 8 November 2024
paddy malarkey
8 November 2024 at 12:42
+++++++
pm, Horsman was also appointed Secretary of TRFC on 8 November.
Some other changes also at TRFC, co no SC425159
Termination of Creag Robertson as a Director of TRFC was terminated on 8th November 2024
Termination of James Taylor as a Director of TRFC also terminated , 8 November.
++++++
It may not be rodents and sinking ships, but the overall impression is one of loss of focus and difficulties in establishing proper, effective control of an agreed forward policy.
No way to run a business.
And Philippe Clement is piggy-in-the-middle, expected to do wonders that he is not being resourced to do. (Mind you, I have my doubts as to whether even with significantly greater resources he would be the magic football manager that could rescue the season, as I judge the comments made by a number of pundits on radio and TV?)
I’ve just noticed on the DR online that Gavin Berry posted at 19.45 tonight that December 5th is the date for RIFC plc’s AGM.
I take it for granted that oor Dave frae the ‘mulk’ will be attending. I wonder whether he is in a position to have proposed a motion calling for the present Board to stand down on account of their shambolic governance and that new directors be appointed?
If anyone can get hold of the Agenda from a TRFC shareholder?
I daresay that those of the SMSM who are share-holders will not divulge any info they read any more than they would desist from propagating the nonsense that TRFC is RFC of 1872!!
Integrity of the Press, integrity of Scottish Football governance……marks out of 10?
‘Rangers’ AGM’s have been an utter farce as long as I can remember, all due to the reticence of the Scottish Media to tell the truth, and challenge the utter nonsense espoused at these events.
This of course is the same media who give Celtic a hard time about their AGM every year, no matter how successful the club is, no matter how well managed it is, and no matter how much money it has earned through honest means.
It remains to be seen, but given the absolute mess ‘Rangers’ are in at many levels right now, if the Scottish Media can polish this particular turd then even I might congratulate them!
Whatever about AI, I must say it’s great fun!
I’ve just had a wee Q and A session. Following some earlier questions and responses to them by AI this was my last exchange a few minutes ago:
Q. If the holding company of an IAR were falsely to market its subsidiary as being an entirely different legal entity would they be in breach of FCA rules?
A. Yes, if a holding company falsely marketed its subsidiary as being an entirely different legal entity, it would likely be in breach of Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) rules. The FCA requires that all financial promotions and advertisements be clear, fair, and not misleading. Misrepresenting the legal status of a subsidiary could be considered misleading and could result in regulatory action, including fines, warnings, or other penalties1.
Would you like to know more about specific FCA rules or how to ensure compliance?”
I luuuvvv that objective response to a straightforward, no names named, question.
I do seriously believe that RIFC plc may be in serious trouble for the contents of the Rangers FC website which appears to me to describe TRFC as being RFC of 1872; or that TRFC may be in trouble for allowing itself to be described as if it were the Rangers of 1872.
Let the truth be acknowledged.
There will still be full houses at Ibrox to watch the 12-year-old Rangers; the finances of Scottish Football will be not in the least affected, and honour and sporting truth will be restored.
Simples!
My post of 9 November 2024 at 22:41 refers
The newly appointed Secretary of RIFC plc is, of course, a lawyer.
One wonders!
upthehoops
9 November 2024 at 21:45
‘…it remains to be seen, but given the absolute mess ‘Rangers’ are in at many levels right now, if the Scottish Media can polish this particular turd then even I might congratulate them!’
++++++
Even the SMSM can’t begin to pretend that all is hunky-dory at Ibrox: the stark financial facts are stark financial facts!
As were the financial facts in the biscuit tin days of Celtic when the SMSM were in there like scavenging hyenas ready to rejoice at the potential death of Celtic.
Happily, Fergus McCann put his money where his heart and financial savvy lay.
No such saviour has appeared for TRFC, to cut down the strife and bitchiness among themselves of the major shareholders in RIFC plc.
And the SMSM is in a reporting quandary!
Do they gleefully go after a failing RIFC plc/TRFC?
Naw, they bought into a lie about TRFC being continuity Rangers of 1872.
What do they do now?
Can someone supply the writers of the online summary of football games with a dictionary. Celtic/Kilmarnok as an example, plaer fainted the goalie, id he actually pass out in front of the keeper. I believe the word that he was searching for is feint. Very amateurish. Also one other point subbing players for the amount of running they have done during a game and the amount of games played. I think the term that should be applied is distance travelled unless they have a way of tracking running versus walking as games I have viewed it looks like some running , light jogging and walking. As for the complaint about playing 60 games or so. Take a look at the NHL with a regular season of 82 games with extended travel, 2 or 3 games a week and a playof schedule that could extend to another 28 games again with extended travel depending on teams involved. This is a league that has games played all over North America and quite often on back to back nights and in different time zones. No rolling around on the ice with suggested injuries. Get stitched up and back in the game.
goforpar
10 November 2024 at 22:40
‘…Can someone supply the writers of the online summary of football games with a dictionary’
+++++++++
That gives me a chance to say how bloody irritating I find a particular ‘pundit’s use of ‘he should of’ and ‘could of’ as contractions of ‘should have’ and ‘could have’.
Does ma heid in!!
I want to comment on the on going stories year after year regarding PoppY Day, or, as referred to in Canada as Remembrance Day. Each year in Canada it is observed on the 11th day, of the 11th month, at the 11th hour no matter what day it falls on. There is no hijacking of services by those who do not believe or follow the tradition. Diginified serices are hold in cities and towns across the country with the focus on veterans, of few remain, of WW1 and WW2 along with vets from more recent wars. In most provinces it is a holiday with stores closed, government office shut down, schools closed children can attend and learn more of the
history of the day. Instead of giving the minority the opportunity to disrupt the services of the people who truly recognize the history of the services, why not actually hold the services on the day it was intended to be held and not give the small minority to abuse the memoris of those who have been lost. If you would like to take time perhaps go to google and look at the services held in many Canadian cities and towns and see the respect shown to the living veterans and those who have passed. No point scoring by anyone involved.
Not to wander too far off-topic, I was pleased to read the Court ruling “that commissions paid between banks and brokers on car deals may be unlawful as they were not clearly flagged to customers.”
I’ve been trying to educate myself about the murky, murky world of finance and credit brokers and the slippery cheats and fraudsters out there in the provision of credit, in the context of football and season tickets and such.
It has been an education.
And I look back to 1963 when I bought my first (second hand) car, a Ford Consul, from a dealer near the ‘Barrowland Ballroom’ in the town of my birth.
Honest to God, ‘Del boy’ had nothing in it!
I will not say that I hope he is burning in hell as I write, but if it were possible I would kick his fundament with all the force that my leg could manage!
And then kick him again!
And then kick myself for being so innocent and naive!
Honest to God!
And to come back on topic, what must the guys involved in the nonsense of the ‘secret’ 5-way Agreement that put a lie at the heart of Scottish Football think of themselves?
what else as other than being cowardly unprincipled self-serving wretches whose readiness to betray their duty as a ‘governance’ body has corrupted the very soul and essence of Scottish Football as an honest ‘sport’?
Let any of them try to exempt himself from that charge!
I’d love to hear them exculpate themselves.
New blog up